(VOR News) – Investors and business experts were shocked when Tesla unveiled the robotaxi to the public because they had expected it to be a swift, sporty coupe with two seats. Compared to a regular cab, which can hold several people and their stuff, this is very different.

On Thursday night, Elon Musk unveiled Tesla’s sleek Cybercab prototype.

The occasion was eagerly awaited. He said that the cost of them would be less than thirty thousand dollars at some point in 2026.

In typical Musk fashion, he remained silent when asked if he thought these would only appeal to a particular kind of customer or how a two-seater robotaxi would meet the needs of families heading to the restaurant or the airport.

Tesla’s shares fell nine percent on Wall Street on Friday as a result of investors making fun of the company’s design and its lack of financial disclosures.

Jonathan Elfalan, head of automotive testing at Edmunds.com, said, “When you think of a taxi, you immediately envision a vehicle that can carry more than two passengers.” “Making this a two-seater automobile is odd.”

Tesla failed to respond to an email request for information.

Experts projected that a robot taxi with a towering design, lots of space, and sliding doors would resemble a typical taxi the most. This was considered to be the most plausible look. Musk did demonstrate a futuristic robovan that could accommodate up to twenty people, but he did not say when the public will be able to purchase one.

Two-door robot axis, in the opinion of Sandeep Rao, a senior researcher at Leverage Shares, an investment management company with about $1 billion in assets, including Tesla shares, would not find much of a market.

According to data from the analytics firm J.D. Power, just 2% of cars sold in the US are two-door variants, with the exception of pickup trucks and sport utility vehicles (SUVs).

According to Musk, operating a robotaxis will be less expensive than operating public transportation. He also claimed that the Cybercab will eventually run for twenty cents per mile.

He did not, however, provide any information about when Tesla will be able to take on Alphabet-owned Waymo, which runs robotaxis in a few locations around the country, or about when it will be able to secure regulatory approvals or begin mass-producing Cybercabs.

About 700 Waymo-owned Jaguar Land Rovers have the capacity to seat four people, which is the same number of seats seen in Amazon’s Zoox robotaxis.

As per the comments made by the former CEO of Waymo, John Krafcik, the design of Tesla seems “more playful than serious,” and the car’s two-door layout poses challenges for elderly or disabled passengers.

“MORE FUN THAN THOUGHTFUL”

What will be crucial for Tesla will be the delivery of the robotaxi and the building of a foothold in a highly regulated, yet developing industry.

Due to the lack of market demand for electric cars (EVs), Musk made the decision to give up on his plans to create a more affordable and compact car this year. Rather, he concentrated on raising Tesla’s objectives for autonomy. He believes that Tesla’s value may eventually reach $5 trillion if the robot-axi company is successful in growing from its current $700 billion valuation.

Two-seater cars have been recommended as practical choices for commuters for quite some time. Vice president of AutoForecast Solutions’ research, Sam Fiorani, has stated that “they just haven’t gained traction.” He said that the corporation will eventually need Tesla to build bigger robots.

Blake Anderson, a Tesla investor and senior financial analyst at Carson Group, claims that the two-seat Cybercab model is illogical if the model’s objective is to draw in a larger customer base by offering a more affordable price.

According to him, “It’s probably a way that they can introduce something quick to the market.”

SOURCE: USN

SEE ALSO:

Boeing To Lay Off Roughly 10% Of Its Workforce

AT&T Is Offering a $10,000 Reward For Information Regarding Copper Wire Theft.

Uber And Lyft Stock Prices Surge After Telsa’s “Toothless” Robotaxi Revelation.

Boeing’s CEO informed employees late Friday that the business planned to eliminate 10% of its total workforce “over the coming months.”

“Our business is in a difficult position, and it is hard to overstate the challenges we face together,” said Kelly Ortberg, who took over as CEO of the ailing aircraft manufacturer two months ago and has spent half of his time dealing with a strike by 33,000 hourly workers.

The revelation is only the latest blow to the beleaguered planemaker, which has suffered losses of more than $33 billion over the last five years, as well as a number of serious, often fatal, safety violations and greater scrutiny from regulators and law enforcement.

Boeing To Lay Off Roughly 10% Of Its Workforce

“Beyond navigating our current environment, restoring our company requires tough decisions and we will have to make structural changes to ensure we can stay competitive and deliver for our customers over the long term,” Ortberg wrote in a Friday message to employees regarding “positioning for the future.”

Ortberg’s notification did not specify how many jobs would be slashed, despite the fact that Boeing had 171,000 employees globally at the start of the year, 147,000 of whom were in the United States.

Years of challenges and losses.
Boeing has faced significant challenges for more than five years, beginning with two tragic crashes of its best-selling airliner, the 737 Max, in 2018 and 2019, which resulted in the jet’s global suspension for 20 months. It also incurred enormous losses in 2020, when the epidemic almost halted air traffic and drove airlines to reduce their purchases of new planes.

One of its more recent concerns was a door plug on an Alaska Airlines 737 Max that blew off minutes into a January 5 flight, leaving a gaping hole in the plane’s side.

While the plane landed safely with no significant injuries to passengers or crew, it spurred a new round of federal inquiries into the safety and quality of Boeing aircraft. The National Transportation Safety Board’s preliminary findings revealed that the plane left a Boeing facility two months earlier without the four bolts required to secure the door plug.

Boeing’s space and defense businesses are also losing money. The Starliner spacecraft’s first crewed trip left the two astronauts it carried trapped on the International Space Station for months, rather than the planned short visit.

Ortberg stated on Friday that the corporation should prioritize focusing resources over distributing them over multiple initiatives, which can lead to underperformance or underinvestment.

Boeing has already declared that it will implement rolling unpaid furloughs for a substantial number of its nonunion employees in order to save money during the International Association of Machinists (IAM) strike. The furloughs required the impacted employees to take one week off every four. Friday marked the conclusion of the fourth week of the strike.

The layoff decision means that the next furlough cycle will not occur, Ortberg wrote on Friday. Employees will be told about the future of their respective portions of the organization beginning next week.

“We know these decisions will cause difficulty for you, your families and our team, and I sincerely wish we could avoid taking them,” he texted. “However, the state of our business and our future recovery require tough actions.”

Losses increase during the strike.
Boeing’s debt has skyrocketed during the last five years, and the main credit rating agencies say it is in danger of being downgraded to junk bond status for the first time in its history.

Standard & Poor’s reported last week that the strike, which has halted the majority of the company’s commercial plane manufacturing, is costing them approximately $1 billion per month. Boeing makes the majority of its money when it sells a jet and delivers it.

Despite the poor financial situation, Boeing had offered IAM members a 25% raise during the four-year term of the proposed contract. However, rank-and-file union members nearly unanimously rejected the offer and opted to go on strike beginning September 13.

Boeing then increased their offer to increase salaries by 30%, but the union leadership said it was still insufficient. The union claims that the corporation can afford its salary demands despite its losses, pointing out that wages for its members account for only a small portion of an airplane’s total costs. It blames the company’s years-long losses on poor management.

Federally mediated talks between the two groups ended earlier this week. Boeing claimed late Thursday that it filed a complaint with the National Labor Relations Board ahead of the layoff announcement, alleging that the union is not bargaining in good faith, which the union refuted after the job cutbacks were disclosed.

Boeing To Lay Off Roughly 10% Of Its Workforce

“Bargaining is hard work, and Boeing keeps walking away from the table,” said Jon Holden, IAM president of District 751, which includes the majority of the strikers. “Their complaints about our plans demonstrate their desperation and serve as proof to our members that we are working for them. Our people will become more rebellious and unified as they witness Boeing repeatedly walk away and quit.”

However, wages are not the only concern. Union members are still upset that Boeing forced them to give up their traditional pension plans ten years ago when the firm was doing well financially.

The rank-and-file union members at the time narrowly agreed to the loss of pensions because Boeing threatened to relocate workers from unionized operations in Washington state to other ones it might establish abroad. Boeing canceled the threat in exchange for the loss of the pension schemes.

Boeing is unlikely to go out of business, despite its numerous issues. Airbus is the company’s only competitor in the full-size passenger plane market. However, Airbus does not have enough capacity to handle Boeing’s orders. This is due to the fact that both Boeing and Airbus have long-term order books for their aircraft. If airlines cancel their orders with Boeing, they will have to wait five years for a comparable Airbus jet.

Among the programs being eliminated is the 767 jet, which is now solely constructed as a freighter. Boeing will terminate that plane after the current orders are completed and delivered to clients in 2027. That plane was manufactured by some of the union members who are currently on strike.

The union published a statement stating the announcement regarding the 767’s discontinuation “is very troubling, particularly given the current state of negotiations.” It stated that any decision about the 767 years in the future would have nothing to do with the current strike.

“Boeing is trying to bargain in the press. “It will not work and is detrimental to the bargaining process,” Holden stated. “They are seeking to deal directly with the membership, sowing seeds of mistrust and division within our union. They seek to create a schism inside our union. There is no prospect of that happening. We are stronger than ever and united at every picket line.”

Ortberg also announced that Boeing’s newest widebody passenger airliner, the 777X, will be delayed even longer. The corporation had previously reported that it had been forced to cease test flights due to technical issues. “We have notified customers that we now expect first delivery in 2026,” he stated in an email.

SOURCE | AP

Fisher-Price is recalling more than 2 million newborn Snuga Swings due to a suffocation risk discovered following complaints that five children died while sleeping in the gadget.

According to the US Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), the $160 device “should never be used for sleep and bedding materials should never be added to it” since the seat cap’s headrest and body support insert “can increase the risk of suffocation.”

Fisher-Price Recalling 2 Million Infant Swings Following Five Deaths

Between 2012 and 2022, five deaths were reported, all of them were infants aged one to three months who were sleeping in swings. The agency stated that in “most” of the occurrences, the youngsters were unrestrained, and bedding materials were placed on the swing.

The American Academy of Pediatrics suggests keeping loose blankets, pillows, plush toys, bumpers, and other soft things away from the sleeping area.

Snuga Swings comes in 21 different models, all of which are subject to the big recall. The CPSC website provides a complete list of models and product numbers.

The gadget has been available in the United States, Canada, and Mexico since 2010. Amazon, Toys R Us, Target, Walmart, and Sam’s Club are among the retail giants.

People who maintain the Snug Swing should “immediately remove” the headrest and body support inserts from the seat pad. Fisher-Price is offering a $25 refund to owners who remove those parts, which can be accessed via Mattel’s website.

Despite that fix, CPSC commissioner Richard Trumka Jr. chastised Fisher-Price for not recalling the entire product and urged customers to be completely refunded.

Fisher-Price Recalling 2 Million Infant Swings Following Five Deaths

“I believe that the flawed recall that Fisher-Price is announcing today is doomed to fail and will keep many babies in harm’s way,” according to a statement he issued. “My advice: get your $25 refund and then throw this product away; do not keep it in your homes because even after the so-called ‘repair’ this product will still be unsafe for infant sleep.”

Mattel did not immediately reply to CNN’s request for comment on Trumka’s statements.

Fisher-Price has already recalled numerous infant swings, including its problematic Rock ‘n Play Sleepers. That gadget was involved in two recalls, including last year when eight infants died following its introduction.

SOURCE | CNN