Connect with us

News

Brazilian Supreme Court Blocks Elon Musk’s X Over Legal Dispute

Published

on

Brazilian Supreme Court Blocks Elon Musk's X Over Legal Dispute

Elon Musk’s social media platform X has been suspended in Brazil due to his refusal to establish a legal agent, according to a copy of the decision obtained by The Associated Press.

The move intensifies the ongoing conflict between the two men over free speech, far-right accounts, and misinformation.

On Wednesday night, Justice Alexandre de Moraes warned Elon Musk that X may be barred in Brazil if he did not comply with his order to select a representative, setting a 24-hour deadline. The corporation has not had a representation in the country since early this month.

In his judgement, de Moraes allowed internet service providers and app stores five days to prohibit access to X and stated that the platform would stay barred until they complied with his demands.

He also stated that individuals or businesses who use virtual private networks, or VPNs, to access X will face a daily fine of 50,000 reais ($8,900).

Elon Musk’s Conflict with Brazilian Authorities

Elon Musk showed his total disrespect for Brazilian sovereignty and, in particular, for the judiciary, setting himself up as a true supranational entity and immune to the laws of each country,” according to de Moraes.

Brazil is a crucial market for X, which has experienced a decline in advertising since Elon Musk’s acquisition of Twitter in 2022. According to market research firm Emarketer, almost one-fifth of the Brazilian population, or 40 million people, use X at least once a month.

X had tweeted on its official Global Government Affairs page late Thursday that it expected de Moraes to shut it down, “simply because we would not comply with his illegal orders to censor his political opponents.”

“When we tried to defend ourselves in court, Judge de Moraes threatened our Brazilian lawyer with incarceration. Even after she resigned, he froze all of her financial accounts,” the business stated.

VOR News

“Our challenges to his clearly illegal activities were either disregarded or ignored. Judge de Moraes’ colleagues on the Supreme Court are either reluctant or unable to challenge him.

X has fought with de Moraes over its refusal to comply with instructions to restrict users.

Accounts that have previously been shut down on Brazilian demands include MPs from former President Jair Bolsonaro’s right-wing party and activists accused of harming Brazilian democracy.

Elon Musk, a self-proclaimed “free speech absolutist,” has frequently argued that the justice’s actions constitute censorship, and his case has been supported by Brazil’s political right. He has frequently criticised de Moraes on his platform, describing him as a dictator and tyrant.

De Moraes’ supporters argue that his actions against X were legal, supported by the majority of the court’s complete bench, and served to protect democracy at a time when it was under threat.

His decree on Friday is based on Brazilian law, which requires international corporations to establish presence in the country so that they can be alerted of legal cases against them.

Given that operators are aware of the widely publicised standoff and their obligation to comply with de Moraes’ order, as well as the ease with which they can do so, X could be offline as soon as 12 hours after receiving their instructions, according to Luca Belli, coordinator of the Technology and Society Centre at the Getulio Vargas Foundation, a university in Rio de Janeiro.

The stoppage is not unusual in Brazil.

Lone Brazilian judges shut down Meta’s WhatsApp, the country’s most popular messaging service, three times in 2015 and 2016, citing the company’s failure to comply with police requests for user data.

In 2022, de Moraes threatened the messaging app Telegram with a statewide closure, claiming it had consistently refused requests from Brazilian authorities to deactivate profiles and give information. He ordered Telegram to appoint a local agent; the firm eventually obliged and remained online.

X and its prior incarnation, Twitter, have been banned in a number of countries, the majority of which are authoritarian regimes, including Russia, China, Iran, Myanmar, North Korea, Venezuela, and Turkmenistan.

Other countries, including Pakistan, Turkey, and Egypt, have temporarily stopped X to address discontent and instability. Twitter was banned in Egypt following the Arab Spring uprisings, dubbed the “Twitter revolution,” but has since been reinstated.

A search on X on Friday revealed hundreds of Brazilian users looking for VPNs that could allow them to continue using the site by making it appear as if they were logged in from outside the country.

It was not immediately obvious how Brazilian authorities would control this conduct and impose the fines mentioned by de Moraes.

Mariana de Souza Alves Lima, well known as MariMoon, informed her 1.4 million X followers that she would be heading to rival social network BlueSky, tweeting a screenshot and writing, “That is where I’m going.”

X stated that it intends to disclose what it calls de Moraes’ “illegal demands” and accompanying court documents “in the interest of transparency.”

Also on Thursday evening, Starlink, Elon Musk’s satellite internet service provider, announced on X that de Moraes blocked its finances this week, preventing it from conducting any transactions in the country, where it has over 250,000 users.

“This order is based on an invalid finding that Starlink should be held liable for the unconstitutional fines issued against X. It was given in secret, without providing Starlink with the due process mandated by the Brazilian Constitution. Starlink stated that it intends to take legal action in the case.

Elon Musk responded to users who shared tales of the freeze, adding insults to de Moraes. “This guy @Alexandre is an outright criminal of the worst kind, masquerading as a judge,” she tweeted.

Elon Musk later said on X that SpaceX, which operates Starlink, will provide free internet service in Brazil “until the matter is resolved” because “we cannot receive payment, but don’t want to cut anyone off.”

In his ruling, de Moraes stated that he ordered the freezing of Starlink’s assets because X did not have enough funds in its accounts to satisfy escalating fines, and that the two companies belong to the same economic group.

Continue Reading

News

RCMP Arrest Somali Man For Smuggling Eight Africans into Canada

Published

on

Eight Africa migrants detained for entering Canada Illegally - Getty Images
Eight Africa migrants arrested for entering Canada Illegally - Getty Images

In Manitoba, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) have apprehended eight African migrants and charged a Somali man with human smuggling near the Canada-U.S. border.

According to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), officers and their U.S. counterparts became aware of a border incursion west of the port of entry in Gretna, Manitoba.

The migrants were allegedly discovered walking north from the US -Canada border, where they were subsequently picked up by a man operating a rental vehicle.

According to the police, the vehicle was stopped, and the eight individuals, who were between the ages of 19 and 48, were apprehended under the Customs Act and transported to the RCMP detachment in Emerson, Manitoba.

Two males were from Sudan, one woman was from Guinea, and four men and one woman were from Chad.

A 35-year-old Somali national residing in Winnipeg has been charged under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act and is scheduled to appear in court in October.

canada us border

According to Sgt. Lance Goldau, the director of the RCMP’s Integrated Border Enforcement Team, the police were able to interview all eight migrants with the assistance of officers who are fluent in French and Arabic.

The Canada Border Services Agency has received them, he stated.

Canada has been experiencing an increase in the number of individuals crossing the Canada-United States border between ports of entry (“irregular border crossings,” as per Statscan).

The Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada (IRB), the country’s largest independent administrative tribunal, is crucial to the immigration system of Canada.

The Liberal government of Justin Trudeau intends to maintain a consistent increase in immigration levels, with the objective of integrating five hundred thousand new permanent residents into the country annually by 2025.  Subsequently, Ottawa will endeavour to establish immigration targets that are stable.

Nevertheless, the Canadian public has maintained a favourable perspective on immigration for decades; however, in recent years, their sentiment has deteriorated as migration levels have increased, which has exacerbated affordability and housing concerns.

In the past 48 months, there has been a quadrupling of concerns regarding immigration, according to a recent Angus Reid poll.

One-fifth of the respondents, or 21%, identified immigration or refugees as one of the most pressing concerns confronting the nation, alongside climate change. Nevertheless, those concerns are significantly less severe than the high cost of living (57%), health care (45%), and housing affordability (32%).

Additionally, the poll indicates that 19% of 18- to 34-year-olds consider the lack of employment to be the most pressing issue confronting the nation, while 40% of the same age group are concerned about the affordability of housing.

If the election were to take place today, over half of the electorate, or 43%, would vote for the Conservatives. The remaining one-fifth would support the Liberals (21%), the NDP (19%), or neither.

The poll also indicated that the CPC has experienced a minimum of eight-point increases in support among women aged 18 to 34 (+8) and those aged 54 and older (+8), as well as males aged 35 to 54 (+10).

Related News:

Trudeau in More Trouble as Canada’s Unemployment Rate Hits 7-Year High

Trudeau in More Trouble as Canada’s Unemployment Rate Hits 7-Year High

Continue Reading

News

NASA Astronauts Stuck in Space After Troubled Capsule Returns to Earth Empty

Published

on

NASA

Friday night marked the end of Boeing’s first human mission, with an empty capsule landing and two NASA test pilots remaining in orbit until next year because NASA deemed their return to be too dangerous.

Starliner descended automatically through the darkness of the desert six hours after leaving the International Space Station and parachuted into the White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico.

It was a quiet conclusion to a story that had started with Boeing’s long-awaited crew debut launch in June and then spiraled out of control due to thruster problems and helium leaks. Engineers were unable to comprehend the capsule’s issues for months, which cast doubt on Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams’ return.

NASA disagreed and scheduled a mission with SpaceX, despite Boeing’s insistence following thorough testing that it was safe to transport the two home on Starliner. They will be up there until February, more than eight months after taking off on what should have been a brief journey, since their SpaceX flight won’t launch until the end of this month.

By mid-June, a week after launching in it, Wilmore and Williams ought to have flown Starliner back to Earth. However, a series of engine issues and helium leaks hampered their journey to the space station, and NASA finally determined it was too dangerous to send them back on Starliner.

Thus, equipped with new software, the fully automated capsule departed, taking with it some outdated station gear as well as its empty seats and blue spacesuits.

As the white and blue-trimmed capsule undocked from the space station 260 miles (420 km) over China and vanished into the dark void, Williams radioed, “She’s on her way home.”

Williams remained up long to watch the outcome of everything. “Very impressive, a solid landing,” stated Boeing’s Mission Control.

Cheers were raised when the capsule was seen landing as a white streak by cameras on the space station and two NASA aircraft.

Though there were a few problems during reentry, including as further rocket problems, Starliner accomplished a “bull’s-eye landing,” according to Steve Stich, NASA’s commercial crew program manager.

“I think we made the right decision not to have Butch and Suni on board,” Stich stated at an early Saturday press conference, notwithstanding the safe return. We’re all pleased with the successful landing. However, a part of each of us wishes that everything had gone according to our original plans.

Boeing refrained from attending the news briefing in Houston. However, Ted Colbert and Kay Sears, two of the company’s top space and defence officials, informed staff members in a note that they supported NASA’s decision.

The executives stated, “We support NASA’s decision for Starliner and are proud of how our team and spacecraft performed, even though this may not have been how we originally envisioned the test flight concluding.”

NASA Calls SpaceX

After several delays and mishaps, Starliner’s crew demo came to an end. NASA contracted with Boeing and SpaceX to provide orbital taxi service after the space shuttles were retired more than ten years ago. In 2019, Boeing faced so many issues with its maiden solo test flight that it had to do it again. A $1 billion repair charge accompanied the even more problems discovered during the 2022 doover.

This month’s crew ferry flight by SpaceX will mark the company’s tenth flight for NASA since 2020. Wilmore and Williams have two seats allocated for the return part of the half-year trip, thus only two astronauts will embark aboard the Dragon capsule.

Wilmore and Williams, two former Navy captains and seasoned astronauts, expected challenges during the test mission. They have remained occupied in space, contributing to experiments and repairs. Along with the other seven people on board, the two are now full-time members of the station crew.

Starliner’s propulsion system began leaking helium even before the two took off from Cape Canaveral, Florida, on June 5. Upon liftoff, four more leaks appeared, despite the first one being tiny and deemed isolated. Five thrusters then failed. Despite finding four of the thrusters, NASA was concerned that more faults may prevent the capsule from descending from orbit.

After conducting a number of thruster tests during the summer, both in space and on Earth, Boeing was certain that its spacecraft could return the crew safely. However, NASA chose SpaceX since it could not settle with the thruster problem.

Assessment on Starliner

After undocking, flight controllers fired the capsule’s thrusters one more time for testing; one of them did not ignite. Engineers believe that as the thrusters fire more frequently, their temperature rises and protective seals expand, blocking the propellant’s flow. None of the pieces will be available for inspection because the thruster portion was removed right before reentry.

In a few weeks, Starliner will be returned to NASA’s Kennedy Space Centre, where the assessments will take place.

NASA representatives emphasised that the space agency is still dedicated to having two rival American enterprises transport humans. Until the space station is abandoned in 2030, just before its destructive reentry, SpaceX and Boeing plan to alternately send people, one every year. NASA reports that although Boeing doesn’t have much time to catch up, the corporation plans to move forward with Starliner.

Following the landing, Stich stated that it is premature to determine the date of the next Starliner astronaut flight.

“Determining the next course of action will require some time,” he told AP.

NASA Sets Coverage for Starliner News Conference and Return to Earth

NASA Sets Coverage for Starliner News Conference and Return to Earth

Continue Reading

News

Disgraced Fashion Mogul Peter Nygard Sentenced to 11 Years For Sexual Assault

Published

on

Peter Nygard Sentenced to 11 Years
Former fashion mogul Peter Nygard has been sentenced to 11 years in prison

Peter Nygard, a former Canadian fashion magnate who was convicted last November of four charges of sexual assault after being accused of attacking five women in his downtown Toronto office, has been sentenced to 11 years in jail.

Justice Robert Goldstein handed down the sentence on Monday, nearly ten months after Peter Nygard was convicted of four charges of sexual assault in November 2023 but acquitted of a fifth count and one count of forcible imprisonment.

He will also face a 10-year weapons prohibition, a DBA order, and a 20-year sex offender registration listing.

After completing pre-sentence imprisonment, Nygard has 6.7 years to complete his sentence. Justice Goldstein stated that Nygard will be eligible for day parole in 21 months and full parole in 27 months from now.

Nygard was a fashion tycoon who previously led a profitable women’s fashion firm. He was accused of sexually assaulting many women at his Toronto headquarters between the 1980s and the mid-2000s.

The 83-year-old was wheeled into the courtroom in a wheelchair, wearing a black hoodie pulled over his head. He has a lengthy beard and wears a paper visor under his sweatshirt to protect his eyes from the light.

“Mr. Peter Nygard is a sexual predator,” Justice Goldstein stated at the sentence.

Goldstein discussed how some of the women testified that they informed family or friends about the sexual assaults but did not report it to police because they were told it would be “her word against his” and they would not be believed. “He was a rich and powerful man,” Justice Goldstein stated.

Because of a publication ban, the complainants’ identities are protected and cannot be disclosed.

Five women testified that they were invited to Peter Nygard’s headquarters at 1 Niagara St. in Toronto under a variety of pretexts, including tours and job interviews, with all encounters culminating in a top-floor private bedroom suite where four of them were sexually abused.

Multiple complainants informed the jury that they met Peter Nygard on an aircraft, on the tarmac of an airport, or at a nightclub and later received invitations to the headquarters. All five women stated that their encounters or conversations with Peter Nygard resulted in sexual conduct they did not consent to.

He is still facing sexual assault accusations in Manitoba and Quebec. Peter Nygard has disputed all allegations against him, and none of the criminal charges he faces in Quebec, Manitoba, or the United States have been tried in court.

Related News:

Fashion Mogul Peter Nygard Convicted on 4 Counts of Sexual Assault

Fashion Mogul Peter Nygard Convicted on 4 Counts of Sexual Assault

Continue Reading

Download Our App

vornews app

Advertise Here

Volunteering at Soi Dog

Soi Dog

Trending