Connect with us

Business

Elon Musk Says Continuing with Fossil Fuels Will Cost $14 Trillion

Published

on

elon musk tesla

Elon Musk says converting the globe to fully sustainable energy will need $10 trillion in investment, but continuing to rely on fossil fuels will cost around $14 trillion.

The CEO of Tesla Inc. said in their Master Plan Part 3 published Thursday that a massive build-out of solar-panel factories and metal refineries is required over the next 20 years to deliver renewable power generation and electricity-storage capacity to power the global economy entirely with carbon-free energy.

The white paper expands on Musk’s vision for a world without fossil fuels, which he initially laid out during last month’s investor day. “Earth will transition to a sustainable energy economy,” Elon Musk declared at the Austin event. “And it will occur during your lifetime.”

Tesla envisions improved grids powered by wind and solar, worldwide arrays of battery farms and underground hydrogen caverns to store energy, a retooling of heavy sectors such as steel and cement production, and homes and businesses heated or cooled by heat pumps.

The alternative, continuing to generate oil, coal, and natural gas, Tesla claims, is more expensive, with charges totaling $14 trillion over the next two decades by 2022.

elon musk tesla

Tesla claims that an electrified energy industry necessitates less investment and material extraction than the current economy.

Musk’s proposed global energy system necessitates 30,000 gigatonnes of renewable energy generation and 240,000 gigatonne-hours of storage batteries. According to Bloomberg, renewable capacity will be 3,214 gigatonnes in 2021, with the stationary energy storage industry expected to have 1,432 gigatonnes of capacity by the end of 2030. That would be a big boon for cleantech companies like Tesla.

While a cleaner world’s $10 trillion investment cost is large, Musk claims it is only a fraction of the global economy’s $100 trillion and is fully possible over two decades.

“It would be 0.5% of the global economy over 20 years,” he told investors last month. “This is not a large number.”

Under Musk’s scenario, the global metals sector would experience a significant increase in demand. According to Tesla, a total of $502 billion in mining capital expenditure and $662 billion in refining expenditure would be required to generate the nickel, lithium, copper, and other materials used in batteries and clean-energy equipment.

The automaker claims that $10 trillion in investments will enable the world’s energy grid to transition away from fossil fuels. Totals include the initial investment and 20 years of 5% sustaining capital expenditure.

At peak levels, the world would need to dig up 3.3 gigatonnes (3.3 billion metric tons) of earth annually to extract the metals required to transition to greener energy sources. Tesla stated that by substituting aluminum for copper, total mass might be lowered because the former has far greater ore grades than the latter. In any event, it’s still significantly less than the 15.5 gigatonnes currently taken annually for fossil fuels, according to the report.

There is also a minimal chance that the planet would run out of critical metals, as just a portion of present resources are required, and increased demand will motivate explorers to hunt for new reserves.

As expired batteries, solar panels, and wind turbines are recovered for reuse, recycling will begin to meaningfully replace new metals supplied by 2040. Other elements will be phased out or reduced, including using copper instead of silver in solar panels, artificial graphite in batteries, and removing rare earth from wind turbines.

Tesla stated in the document, “The electrified and sustainable future is technically feasible and requires less investment and material extraction than continuing today’s unsustainable energy economy.”

Elon Musk Seeks End to $258 Billion Dogecoin Lawsuit

Elon Musk Seeks End to $258 Billion Dogecoin Lawsuit

Continue Reading

Business

Travellers Pissed at Air Canada Over New Baggage Fees

Published

on

Air Canada, Baggage Fees
Travellers angery over Air Canada imposing new surcharges on low-cost flights

Air Canada’s decision to charge new fees on budget fares has angered travellers and industry experts, who argue the airline unfairly burdens passengers with additional costs.

Travellers, industry insiders, and the federal government have criticized Air Canada for imposing new surcharges on low-cost flights, claiming the airline is unjustly burdening consumers with extra expenses.

Beginning January 3, 2025, the first carry-on bag for passengers using Air Canada’s basic-economy fare within North America will cost $35, and each additional bag will cost $50. Purses, laptop bags, and any small belongings that fit beneath the seat are free.

Additionally, by the end of February, checked baggage taxes on domestic and some international flights will rise to $35 to $42 for the first bag and $50 to $60 for the second.

“That is awful. An airline passenger, Nico Arellano, told CTV News, “The prices are getting pretty intense, and the service isn’t getting any better.” “I have two children — a baby and a toddler — and we have to bring all their essentials and pay extra for that; for families, it’s unacceptable.”

Air Canada checked baggage fee

While premium enhancements like seats with more legroom will still be more expensive, the new policy also adds fees for seat selection and modifications for low-cost passengers.

“At this time, I don’t choose seats. Kinsenge Mbaga, travelling from Ottawa to Fredericton, states, “I would like to travel as economically as possible.” “Baggage, particularly carry-on, is perhaps the fee that irritates me the most.

It is pleasant when they’re not included with the ticket, which should be standard. It should be possible to bring one or two bags, but this isn’t always the case, and occasionally, being at the gate will cost you more.”

The airline’s new restrictions have drawn criticism from Transport Minister Anita Anand, who described them as a “cash grab” that harms Canadians who already face increased travel expenses.

Air Canada, meanwhile, defended its choice, claiming that the levies are required to offset growing labour and operating expenses.

While travellers buying higher-tier fares would continue to enjoy free baggage allowances, the airline noted that comparable tariffs are already in effect with several international carriers.

Critics contend that the surcharges unfairly affect visitors on a tight budget and could result in higher overall prices when compared to slightly higher-tier fares. The changes have angered travellers, especially those who depend on lower-cost fare options.

“Carriers are free to charge whatever they like. It costs $35 now, $60 next week, and $100 next week.

Sign of the Times

Airlines expert John Gradek said, “Nobody is keeping an eye on these things; it’s based on what the market can bear.” “These fees are not yet complete. They can take additional actions to further nickel-and-dime passengers travelling on domestic routes.

As part of its continuous efforts to strengthen air passenger rights in Canada, the federal government has committed to examining how these changes would affect consumers. Travellers are advised to study the tariff information carefully to prevent unforeseen fees.

“It’s a shame that Air Canada has decided to join the likes of Porter and WestJet in charging people for carry-on bags for the lowest fare type and it’s a sign of the times that Air Canada is afraid of losing market shares and wants to basically maximise its revenue by having these cheap airfares with a whole bunch of additional revenues coming in,” Gradek says.

“It’s not a stretch to think that the government, within its regulation, can start to provide oversight and management of the way in which these airlines are putting these fees into the marketplace.”

Meanwhile, on April 2, 2025, Air Canada will begin nonstop flights between Vancouver and Manila. The direct service will operate using a Boeing 787 Dreamliner four times a week.

In a statement, executive vice president for revenue and network planning Mark Galardo stated, “The Philippines is an important market reflecting long-standing family ties between our two countries with growing business connections and tourism opportunities.”

He noted that Air Canada is making travel between North America and the Philippines even more convenient for business and leisure travellers with its vast domestic and trans-border network in Vancouver, built to easily link to the airline’s international flights.

Related News:

Air Canada Works With Thailand to Promote Long-Stay Airfares

 

Continue Reading

Business

Unemployment in Canada Hits 6.8% to an 8 Year High

Published

on

Canada Unemployment
Canada's unemployment rate increased to 6.8% in November, a near eight year high.

The Canadian dollar fell Friday due to a sharp increase in Canada’s unemployment rate, but the greenback recovered overall, putting USD/CAD above 1.4150. The USD/CAD pair has reached its highest daily close in years.

The drop in the number of loonies follows Statistics Canada’s announcement that, under Justin Trudeau’s leadership, the unemployment rate has increased to its highest level since January 2017.

Canada’s economic stagnation and ongoing issues with homelessness and poverty are the main causes of the country’s high unemployment rate. As the wealth gap between the United States and Canada grows, the nation is also experiencing a flight of investment capital across some industries.

Federal Conservatives claimed, “Justin Trudeau has devastated Canada’s economy,” in a news statement on Friday. “Canada’s labour force grew by 137,800, which is more than double the gains in jobs,”

Since April 2023, Canada’s unemployment rate has risen by 1.7%.

“Worse still, this report showed that only 12% of new jobs were created in the private sector,” the Conservatives argued.

This is a direct effect of Trudeau’s relentless taxation and bureaucratic red tape, which have attacked private companies and industries. Because of Trudeau’s failing policies, Canada has lost more than $500 billion in foreign investment.

According to Conservatives, despite a 600,000 rise in the working population, Canada only added 329,000 jobs in the past year.

The third quarter GDP slowed significantly to 1% annualized, while Canada’s GDP per capita has been declining for six consecutive quarters, according to another Statistics Canada data released last week.

However, a Scotiabank economist has cautioned about Canada’s delayed government budget update. The Liberal government’s silence means Canadians may not receive a national update until after Christmas.

Rebekah Young, an economist at the Bank of Nova Scotia, said in a note on Wednesday that there are even speculations “swirling” that there won’t be a fiscal update. “It’s not clear when — or even if — it will come before the holidays, but the writing is mostly on the wall,” Young said.

She stated, ” More spending is clearly in the offing ” regarding the Liberals’ recently announced GST vacation and $250 rebate checks for working Canadians.

The House of Commons approved the GST component of that $6.3 billion economic stimulus package on November 28.

She stated, “the balance and then some is expected to keep Canadians from the polls a bit longer.”

The Liberals are financing the stimulus package to maintain the support of the New Democratic Party and prevent a vote of no-confidence.

As evidence of the government’s economic restraint, Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland promised in the 2024 budget that government expenditures would not exceed a $40.1 billion deficit in 2023–2024.

But the Parliamentary Budget Officer recently cautioned that the government has probably overreached itself.

Related News:

Beef Prices in Canada Reach Record Highs

As Trudeau Gaslights About a Great Economy, Canadians See the Truth

Continue Reading

Business

TikTok Ban Upheld By US Federal Appeals Court

Published

on

TikTok Ban USA
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied TikTok’s petition to overturn the law

The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has upheld a lower court’s ban on TikTok, forcing it to cut ties with its Chinese parent business, ByteDance or face suspension.

TikTok and ByteDance, the second plaintiff in the complaint, are now expected to appeal to the US Supreme Court, but it is uncertain whether the court would hear the case.

“The Supreme Court has an established historical record of protecting an individual’s right to free expression, and we expect them to do so on this critical constitutional issue,” TikTok spokesperson Michael Hughes told AP.

“Unfortunately, the TikTok ban was conceived and pushed through based upon inaccurate, flawed and hypothetical information, resulting in outright censorship of the American people,”

Hughes stated. Unless stopped, he claimed, the act “will silence the voices of over 170 million Americans here in the US and around the world on January 19th, 2025.”

Trump TikTok Ban

Though the issue is in court, President-elect Donald Trump would likely hand the two firms a lifeline. Trump attempted a TikTok ban during his first term but stated during the presidential campaign that he is now opposed.

President Joe Biden signed the measure in April, capping a years-long saga in Washington over the short-form video-sharing app. Due to its ties to China, the government views it as a national security danger.

“Today’s decision is an important step in blocking the Chinese government from weaponising TikTok to collect sensitive information about millions of Americans, to covertly manipulate the content delivered to American audiences, and to undermine our national security,” Merrick Garland, the attorney general, said in a statement.

On Friday, a federal appeals court panel upheld a statute that might result in a TikTok ban in the United States within a few months. Here’s what you should know.

The United States has expressed worry that TikTok is gathering huge amounts of user data, particularly sensitive information about watching patterns, which may fall into the hands of the Chinese government through pressure.

Officials have also cautioned that the proprietary algorithm that drives what users view on the app is susceptible to manipulation by Chinese authorities, who can use it to alter information on the platform in difficult-to-detect ways. The European Union raised similar concerns on Friday as it probed intelligence, suggesting Russia may have abused the platform to influence Romania’s elections.

TikTok, which sued the government over the law in May, has long disputed that Beijing could use it to spy on or control Americans.

TikTok’s counsel has correctly stated that the US has not given proof demonstrating that the business gave over user data to the Chinese government or changed material for Beijing’s benefit in the US.

They have also contended that the statute is based on future threats, which the Department of Justice has emphasized, citing unnamed actions the two businesses allegedly took in the past in response to Chinese government demands.

Related News:

WhatsApp Now Features a Mention  Tool for Status Updates and Stories

FBI Warns iPhone and Android Users to Stop Texting

 

 

Continue Reading

Trending