Connect with us

Business

Elon Musk Will Be Investigated Over Fake News And Obstruction In Brazil After A Supreme Court Order

Published

on

musk

Rio de Janeiro: A crusading Brazilian Supreme Court justice has named Elon Musk as a target in an ongoing inquiry into the spread of fake news, and he has launched a second investigation into the US business tycoon for possible obstruction.

In his decision, Justice Alexandre de Moraes noted that Musk began waging a public “disinformation campaign” regarding the top court’s actions on Saturday and that Musk continued the next day, most notably with comments that his social media company X would cease to comply with the court’s orders to block certain accounts.

Elon Musk Will Be Investigated Over Fake News And Obstruction In Brazil After A Supreme Court Order

Musk, the CEO of Tesla and SpaceX who took over Twitter in late 2022, accused de Moraes of repressing free expression and violating Brazil’s constitution and stated on X that users might try to avoid any suspension of the social media platform by utilizing VPNs, or virtual private networks.

According to the decision’s language, Musk will be investigated for alleged purposeful illegal instrumentalization of X as part of an inquiry into a network of digital militias accused of spreading defamatory fake news and threats against Supreme Court justices. The new probe will determine whether Musk engaged in obstruction, criminal organization, or incitement.

“The flagrant conduct of obstruction of Brazilian justice, incitement of crime, the public threat of disobedience of court orders and future lack of cooperation from the platform are facts that disrespect the sovereignty of Brazil,” de Moraes wrote in a letter on Sunday.

X’s press office did not respond to The Associated Press’ request for comment, and Musk had not publicly spoken as of Monday morning, save from brief posts on X.

Brazil’s political right has long accused de Moraes of overstepping his authority by restricting free expression and engaging in political persecution. In the digital militias probe, parliamentarians from former President Jair Bolsonaro’s circle have been imprisoned, and the residences of his followers have been raided. Bolsonaro himself became the focus of the probe in 2021.

In March 2022, the justice ordered the nationwide shutdown of messaging app Telegram because the platform had repeatedly ignored requests from Brazilian authorities, including a police request to block profiles and provide information related to blogger Allan dos Santos, a Bolsonaro ally accused of spreading falsehoods. Dos Santos’ account is among those blocked on X in Brazil. Less than 48 hours after announcing his ruling in 2022, Judge Moraes stated that Telegram had cooperated and allowed operations to restart.

De Moraes’ supporters have argued that his decisions, while extraordinary, are legally sound and necessary to rid social media of fake news and eliminate threats to Brazilian democracy, as highlighted by the Jan. 8, 2023, uprising in Brazil’s capital, which resembled the Jan. 6, 2021 insurrection in the United States Capitol.

The Supreme Court’s chief justice, Luís Roberto Barroso, stated that while judicial decisions can be appealed, deliberate non-compliance is never acceptable.

On Saturday, Musk, a self-proclaimed free speech absolutist, said on X that the platform would relax all limitations on barred accounts. He predicted that the move would dry up revenue in Brazil and cause the firm to close its local operation.

“But principles matter more than profit,” he stated in a letter.

Elon Musk Will Be Investigated Over Fake News And Obstruction In Brazil After A Supreme Court Order

Brazil is a major market for social media companies. According to the market research firm Emarketer, over 40 million Brazilians, or roughly 18% of the population, use X at least once monthly.

Musk also ordered Brazilian customers to use a VPN to maintain access if X was shut down, and he stated that X would disclose all of de Moraes’ demands, saying they violated Brazilian law.

In a follow-up letter, he added, “These are the most draconian demands of any country on Earth!”

Brazil’s constitution, drafted following the 1964-1985 military dictatorship, has a long list of aspirational aims as well as prohibitions on particular offenses such as racism and, more recently, homophobia. However, freedom of speech is not absolute.

Musk had yet to release de Moraes’ demands as of Monday morning, and prominent blocked accounts remained so, indicating that X had failed to act on Musk’s previous promises.

Moraes’ decision advised against doing so, stating that each blocked account X later reactivates will result in a fine of 100,000 reais ($20,000) per day, and individuals involved would be held criminally accountable for violating a court order.

“Incorporating Elon Musk into the digital militias inquiry is one thing. Another option is to block X. Moraes is nodding, indicating that he did not remain silent in the face of Elon Musk’s provocations,” said Carlos Affonso, director of the Rio de Janeiro-based think tank Institute for Technology and Society, speaking by phone from Washington. “It is a warning shot so that lines aren’t crossed.”

Affonso, a civil rights professor at the State University of Rio de Janeiro, was at Georgetown Law School on Monday for a symposium on Brazil’s business climate and regulations, and the ramifications of Moraes’ ruling for Musk and X were “the talk of the town.” Affonso is also concerned about what the building conflict may imply for Musk’s Starlink satellites, which give internet access to distant Brazilian locations such as the Amazon rainforest and Pantanal wetlands.

Elon Musk Will Be Investigated Over Fake News And Obstruction In Brazil After A Supreme Court Order

Bolsonaro, who awarded Musk a prestigious medal on his visit to Brazil in 2022, was among those pressing Musk to keep his pledge to publish records. He claimed they would reveal how the top electoral court was pressed to interfere in the 2022 election, which he lost. Bolsonaro has frequently made such allegations without providing evidence.

“Our freedom today is largely in his hands,” Bolsonaro said of Musk during a live social media broadcast Sunday night. “The action he’s taking, what he’s been saying, he hasn’t been intimidated, and he has stated that he will put forward this idea of fighting for freedom for our country. That is good.”

The lower house politician in charge of a bill to establish restrictions for social media sites stated on X that the experience highlighted the importance of putting the idea to a vote. The Senate approved it in 2020. On Saturday night, Brazil’s attorney general announced his support for regulation.

“We cannot live in a society where billionaires based abroad control social media and put themselves in a position to undermine the rule of law by failing to comply with court decisions and threatening our officials. “Social peace is not negotiable,” Jorge Messias wrote on X.

President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva’s minister of institutional relations, Alexandre Padilha, stated Monday on X that the administration will support the Supreme Court and its investigations and collaborate with Congress and civil society to develop a regulatory framework.

SOURCE – (AP)

Kiara Grace is a staff writer at VORNews, a reputable online publication. Her writing focuses on technology trends, particularly in the realm of consumer electronics and software. With a keen eye for detail and a knack for breaking down complex topics, Kiara delivers insightful analyses that resonate with tech enthusiasts and casual readers alike. Her articles strike a balance between in-depth coverage and accessibility, making them a go-to resource for anyone seeking to stay informed about the latest innovations shaping our digital world.

Business

Trump Media’s Newly Hired Auditing Firm Was Just Busted By The SEC For ‘Massive Fraud’

Published

on

AP - VOR News Image

SAN FRANCISCO — The Securities and Exchange Commission charged an auditing firm hired by Trump Media and Technology Group only 37 days ago with “massive fraud” on Friday, but not for any work done for former President Donald Trump’s media company.

The SEC accused the accounting firm BF Borgers and its owner, Benjamin F. Borgers, of “deliberate and systematic failures” in over 1,500 audits.

CNN – VOR News Image

Trump Media’s Newly Hired Auditing Firm Was Just Busted By The SEC For ‘Massive Fraud’

The charges include failing to follow accounting regulations, falsifying documents to conceal flaws, and falsely claiming in audit reports that its work fulfilled audit criteria.

To settle SEC accusations, BF Borgers agreed to pay a $12 million fine, while its owner consented to pay a $2 million fine, according to the SEC. Benjamin Borgers did not immediately return a phone for comment.

BF Borgers and Benjamin Borgers both agreed to permanent sanctions, which will take effect immediately and prevent them from handling SEC-related matters as accountants.

According to the company’s most recent annual report filing, Trump Media appointed BF Borgers as its auditor on March 28. The business acknowledged that BF Borgers had similarly addressed its audits before its public offering by combining with a cash-rich shell company called Digital World Acquisition Corp.

The company had already hired at least two other auditors, one who resigned from the account in July 2023 and another who was fired by the board in March, just as it was rehiring BF Borgers.

Trump Media “looks forward to working with new auditing partners in accordance with today’s SEC order.”

AP – VOR News Image

Trump Media’s Newly Hired Auditing Firm Was Just Busted By The SEC For ‘Massive Fraud’

The SEC discovered that BF Borgers’ shortcuts included:

  • Copying audit documents from the prior year.
  • Changing the pertinent dates.
  • Passing it off as current documentation.

In addition to inaccurately recording work that was never completed, the fake documentation detailed planning meetings with clients that never took place and “falsely represented” that both Benjamin Borgers and another reviewer had authorized the audit work.

AP – VOR News Image

Trump Media’s Newly Hired Auditing Firm Was Just Busted By The SEC For ‘Massive Fraud’

“Ben Borgers and his audit firm, BF Borgers, were responsible for one of the largest wholesale failures by gatekeepers in our financial markets,” stated Gurbir Grewal, the SEC’s enforcement director. “Thanks to the painstaking work of the SEC staff, Borgers and his sham audit mill have been permanently shut down.”

SOURCE – (AP)

Continue Reading

Business

Royal Bank of Canada Sacks CFO Over Company Romance

Published

on

The Royal Bank of Canada, the country’s largest bank, has removed Chief Financial Officer Nadine Ahn following a probe into a personal relationship she allegedly had with another employee, according to the NDTV.

Ms Ahn joined Royal Bank in 1999 and worked in treasury, risk, investor relations, and other financial responsibilities before becoming CFO in September 2021.

In a press release on April 5, the bank stated that it became aware of ”allegations” against Ms Ahn and initiated an investigation. It discovered she breached its code of conduct by having a ”undisclosed close personal relationship with another employee, that led to preferential treatment of the employee, including promotion and remuneration increases.

The Royal Bank’s code of conduct states: “While we are all held to the high ethical standards set out in our Values and the Code, those of us who are people managers are accountable for leading by example,” which includes “being respectful, transparent, and fair in all relationships.”

Violation of Royal Bank’s code of conduct

Though the investigation absolved both workers of any malfeasance involving the bank’s financial statements, it stated that, despite the lack of financial impropriety, the bank saw her acts as a violation of its code of conduct.

As a result, both employees had their jobs terminated, according to the Royal Bank.

According to The Globe and Mail, the other employee is Ken Mason, a vice president and head of capital and term funding at RBC with 23 years of experience. Katherine Gibson, the bank’s senior vice president of finance and controller, has been designated temporary CFO while the hunt for a permanent successor continues.

An RBC spokesperson said “in her new role, Ms Gibson will bring a wide range of experience leading global teams and major strategic enterprise initiatives, including a deep understanding of business drivers and growth opportunities across several areas of the bank,” RBC stated.

Bank of Canada Ponders Rate Drop

Meanwhile, Governor Tiff Macklem of the Bank of Canada told Senators that it is coming closer to being able to begin reducing interest rates from their current 23-year highs.

Macklem told the Senate Banking Committee that inflation was falling and Canadians wanted to know when the central bank would begin decreasing interest rates.

“The short answer is we are getting closer,” he went on to say.

Canada’s annual inflation rate in March was 2.9%, slightly higher than the previous month. The Bank of Canada has set a 2% inflation objective.

Inflation has remained below 3% since January, in keeping with the central bank’s prediction for the first half of 2024, with carefully watched core consumer price indicators also falling steadily.

“We are seeing what we need to see, but we need to see it for longer to be confident that progress toward price stability will be sustained,” he said.

Continue Reading

Business

Google, Justice Department Make Final Arguments About Whether Search Engine Is A Monopoly

Published

on

Washington — Google’s dominance as an internet search engine is an illegal monopoly supported by the tech giant’s annual spending of more than $20 billion to lock out competition, Justice Department lawyers contended after a high-stakes antitrust case.

Conversely, Google claims its success stems from its quality and capacity to offer the results that customers seek.

The United States government, a coalition of states, and Google all submitted their closing arguments in the 10-week lawsuit to U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta, who must now rule whether Google violated the law by preserving a monopoly status in search.

AP – VOR News Image

Google, Justice Department Make Final Arguments About Whether Search Engine Is A Monopoly

Much of the lawsuit, the largest antitrust trial in over two decades, has focused on how much Google’s strength stems from partnerships with firms such as Apple to make Google the default search engine preloaded on iPhones and laptops.

At trial, evidence revealed that Google spends over $20 billion annually on such contracts. According to Justice Department lawyers, the large payment demonstrates how crucial it is for Google to establish itself as the default search engine and prevent competitors from gaining a foothold.

Google says that clients can readily switch to other search engines if they choose but always prefer Google. Companies like Apple testified at trial that they work with Google because they believe its search engine is superior.

Google also claims that the government defines the search engine market too narrowly. While it has a commanding lead over rival general search engines such as Bing and Yahoo, Google claims it faces even more fierce competition when customers conduct focused searches. For example, the internet titan claims buyers are more inclined to search for things on Amazon than Google, vacation planners may search on AirBnB, and hungry eaters may search for a restaurant on Yelp.

AP – VOR News Image

Google, Justice Department Make Final Arguments About Whether Search Engine Is A Monopoly

Google has also stated that social media businesses such as Facebook and TikTok are formidable competitors.

During Friday’s discussions, Mehta questioned if some other companies were in the same market. He explained that social media companies can make ad money by presenting advertising that fits consumers’ interests. However, he stated that Google has the potential to display advertising in front of users in direct response to inquiries they enter.

“It’s only Google where we can see that directly declared intent,” Mehta said.

Google’s attorney, John Schmidtlein, responded that social media companies “have lots and lots of information about your interests, which I would say is just as powerful.”

The corporation has also said its market dominance is precarious as the internet constantly reinvents itself. Earlier in the trial, it was shown that many experts previously believed that Yahoo would always remain dominating in search. It was reported that younger tech users sometimes refer to Google as “Grandpa Google.”

While Google’s search services are free for customers, the business makes money from searches by selling adverts that appear alongside a user’s search results.

During Friday’s remarks, Justice Department attorney David Dahlquist stated that Google could raise ad income by increasing the number of inquiries submitted until around 2015, when inquiry growth stagnated, and they needed to make more money per search.

The government claims that Google’s search engine monopoly enables it to charge unduly high fees for advertising, which eventually trickle down to consumers.

“Price increases should be limited by competition,” Dahlquist stated. “It should be the market deciding what the price increases are.”

AP – VOR News Image

Google, Justice Department Make Final Arguments About Whether Search Engine Is A Monopoly

According to Dahlquist, internal Google records demonstrate that the business, without any meaningful competition, began altering its ad algorithms to occasionally offer customers with inferior search ad results to raise income.

Schmidtlein, Google’s lawyer, stated that the record demonstrates that its search ads have become more effective and useful to customers, rising from a 10% click rate to 30%.

Mehta has yet to say when he will rule, although it is expected to take many months.

If he decides that Google breached the law, he will set up a “remedies” phase of the trial to assess what should be done to increase competition in the search engine industry. The administration has yet to state what type of remedy it will pursue.

SOURCE – (AP

Continue Reading

Volunteering at Soi Dog

Download Our App

Trending

Exit mobile version