Connect with us

Business

Google’s Millisecond Ad Auctions Are The Focus Of A Monopoly Claim

Published

on

Google's Latest Spam Update Met with Widespread Criticism Amidst a Year of Turbulent Changes
google | AP News image

Alexandria, Virginia – It happens in milliseconds, preferably as you browse the internet. Computer and software networks analyze who you are, and what you are looking at, and buy and sell website adverts.

Google is most likely responsible for determining which ads you see and how much an advertiser pays to be on your screen.

google

AP News Image

Google’s Millisecond Ad Auctions Are The Focus Of A Monopoly Claim

In reality, the Justice Department and a coalition of states argue that Google’s domination over the technology that governs the sale of billions of Internet display ads every day represents an illegal monopoly that should be split up.

A trial is underway in federal court in Alexandria, Virginia, to establish if Google’s ad tech stack represents an illegal monopoly. The first week has included a thorough examination of how Google’s products interact to perform behind-the-scenes computerized auctions that place advertising in front of people in the blink of an eye.

Online advertising has grown rapidly. If you saw an online display ad fifteen years ago, there was a high chance it depicted individuals dancing over their excitement for cheap mortgage rates, and those commercials were pushed on you whether you were browsing real estate or checking for baseball statistics.

google

AP News Image

Google, for its part, claims to have invested billions of dollars in improving the quality of ads seen by consumers and ensuring that marketers can reach the consumers they seek.

According to the Justice Department, Google has also rigged automated ad sales auctions to favor itself over other would-be industry players, denying the publishing industry hundreds of millions of dollars that it would have received if the auctions were truly competitive.

During the Virginia trial, government witnesses detailed the auction process and how it has developed over time.

In the government’s picture, three distinct instruments work together to sell an ad and present it in front of a consumer. There are ad servers that publishers use to sell space on their websites, particularly the rectangular advertising that displays at the top and right sides of a page. Ad networks are used by advertisers to purchase ad space on a variety of related websites.

In the middle is the ad exchange, which pairs website publishers with potential advertisers through an instant auction.

Publishers naturally want to earn the highest possible price for their ad space, but testimony at trial revealed that this did not always occur due to Google’s policies.

For years, Google provided its ad exchange, AdX, the first opportunity to match a publisher’s requested floor price. For example, if a publisher wished to sell an ad impression for at least 50 cents, Google’s engine would prioritize its own ad exchange. If Google’s ad exchange bid 50 cents, it would win the auction, even if competing ad exchanges offered higher bids later on.

google

AP news Image

Google’s Millisecond Ad Auctions Are The Focus Of A Monopoly Claim

Google claimed the approach was required to ensure advertising loaded promptly. It would be too time-consuming for the computers to accept bids from every ad exchange.

Publishers were displeased with the system and devised a workaround to conduct auctions outside of Google’s purview, a procedure known as “header bidding.” Internal Google documents presented at the trial depicted header bidding as a “existential threat” to Google’s market domination.

Google’s reaction was based on its control over all three components of the process. If publishers held an auction outside of Google’s purview but still used Google’s publisher ad server, DoubleClick For Publishers, the program would force the winning bid back into Google’s Ad Exchange. If Google was willing to match the price earned by publishers in the header-bidding auction, it would win the auction.

According to Professor Ramamoorthi Ravi, an expert at Carnegie Mellon University, Google’s regulations failed to maximise value for publishers and “seem to have been designed to advantage Google’s own products.”

Publishers could cease utilising Google’s ad exchange totally, but they were hesitant to do so at trial because it would mean losing access to Google’s massive, exclusive cache of advertisers in its Google Ads network, which was only accessible through Google’s ad exchange.

Google, for its side, claims that it has not conducted auctions in this manner since 2019, and that its proportion of the display ad market has dwindled over the last five years. It claims that integrating its buy side, sell side, and middleman solutions allows them to work more smoothly and rapidly, while also reducing the danger of misleading ads or malware.

Google also claims that its developments over the previous 15 years have helped to better the matching of internet adverts to consumer interests. Google claims it was at the vanguard of introducing “real-time bidding,” which allowed an advertiser selling shoes, for example, to be matched with a consumer whose web profile indicated an interest in purchasing shoes.

According to Google, these developments enabled publishers to charge a premium for their available ad space because the advertiser knew the ad would be seen by someone interested in their product or service.

According to the Justice Department, even though Google no longer conducts auctions in the manner described, it assisted Google in maintaining its monopoly in the ad tech market in the years preceding 2019, and that its current monopoly allows Google to keep up to 36 cents on the dollar of every ad purchase it brokers when the transaction runs through all of its various products.

The Virginia trial comes barely a month after a court in Washington ruled that Google’s search engine is also an unconstitutional monopoly. There has been no ruling in that case as to what remedies, if any, the judge will impose.

SOURCE | AP

Business

Ikea Revenue Falls After It Lowered Prices

Published

on

ikea

Last year, Ikea reduced prices on over 2,000 products to offer inflation-weary customers a reprieve. Although this resulted in an increase in orders, revenue declined for the first time in four years as discounts cut into its bottom line.

Ikea’s sales fell 4% to €45.1 billion ($49.3 billion) in the fiscal year 2024, which ran from September 1, 2023 to August 31, 2024, the Swedish business said Thursday.

ikea

Ikea Revenue Falls After It Lowered Prices

Ikea, the world’s largest furniture retailer, has stated that it has no regrets about emphasizing “lowering the prices” in a $2 billion discount push across all of its locations worldwide.

In a news release, Jesper Brodin, CEO of Ingka Group, Ikea’s largest franchisee, stated that “inflation and interest rates have impacted people’s wallets, and when times are challenging for people, we want to support in the best possible way.”

“Investing into lowering our prices is our long-term promise and this has been a year where the strength of the Ikea vision, our togetherness, and our entrepreneurship lived up to the test of time,” he tweeted.

Ikea, like its competitors, has gradually raised prices since the Covid-19 high in 2020, as material and transportation costs have risen. Last year, the company’s main discount promotion reduced the price of several of its most popular items, including the Billy bookcase.

ikea

Ikea Revenue Falls After It Lowered Prices

Lower prices increased visitors to its stores and website by 21%. Ikea sold 1.2 billion meatballs this year, and a company representative told CNN that it also sold more meals at its cafés.

Ikea has announced that it will provide additional reductions this year, although they will be less.

SOURCE | CNN

Continue Reading

Business

Marriott Agrees To Pay $52 Million, Beef Up Data Security To Resolve Probes Over Data Breaches

Published

on

marriot

Marriott International has agreed to pay $52 million and make improvements to improve its data security in order to satisfy state and federal claims stemming from catastrophic data breaches that affected over 300 million of its customers globally.

On Wednesday, the Federal Trade Commission and a consortium of attorneys general from 49 states and the District of Columbia announced separate settlement agreements with Marriott. The FTC and the states conducted parallel investigations into three data breaches that occurred between 2014 and 2020.

marriot

Marriott Agrees To Pay $52 Million, Beef Up Data Security To Resolve Probes Over Data Breaches

According to the FTC’s proposed complaint, the data breaches enabled “malicious actors” to collect passport information, payment card numbers, loyalty numbers, dates of birth, email addresses, and/or personal information from hundreds of millions of consumers.

The FTC stated that the breaches were caused by weak data security measures at Marriott and its subsidiary Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide.

Specifically, the agency said that the hotel operator failed to secure its computer system with proper password management, network monitoring, or other data-protection methods.

As part of its proposed settlement with the FTC, Marriott agreed to “implement a robust information security program” and give all U.S. customers with a method to request the deletion of any personal information connected with their email address or loyalty rewards account number.

Marriott also paid similar charges filed by a group of attorneys general. In addition to committing to improve its data security processes, the hotel operator will pay a $52 million penalty, which will be shared among the states.

Marriott, based in Bethesda, Maryland, stated on its website Wednesday that its agreements with the FTC and states included no acknowledgment of liability. It also stated that it has already implemented data privacy and information security measures.

In early 2020, Marriott discovered that an unexpected amount of visitor information was accessed using the login credentials of two workers at a franchisee location. At the time, the business assessed that the personal information of approximately 5.2 million guests worldwide may have been compromised.

marriot

Marriott Agrees To Pay $52 Million, Beef Up Data Security To Resolve Probes Over Data Breaches

In November 2018, Marriott reported a huge data breach in which hackers gained access to information on up to 383 million guests. In that case, Marriott stated that unencrypted passport numbers for at least 5.25 million visitors were accessed, as well as credit card information for 8.6 million guests. Starwood operated the affected hotel brands prior to its acquisition by Marriott in 2016.

The FBI spearheaded the investigation into the data theft, and investigators assumed the hackers were working for China’s Ministry of State Security, which is roughly similar to the CIA.

SOURCE | AP

Continue Reading

Business

US: Amazon Adds Apple TV+ As A Prime Video Add-On Subscription.

Published

on

Amazon

(VOR News) – A partnership between Apple and Amazon is being formed in order to further strengthen their existing partnership in the streaming business.

An announcement that was issued by Amazon on Wednesday stated that beginning later this month, customers in the United States would be able to subscribe to Apple TV+ through Amazon Prime Video for a monthly charge of $9.99.

This will be available on Amazon.

Apple TV+ will be added to the broad selection of more than one hundred different subscription options that Prime Video now provides as a result of this move. HBO Max, Paramount+, and Discovery+ are some examples of platforms that could be considered for this category.

As part of Amazon’s overall goal to provide its consumers with a streaming experience that encompasses everything, this connection is a component of that strategy. Rather than having to handle several subscriptions on an individual basis, this technique gives consumers the ability to manage many subscriptions through a single platform and billing system.

Mike Hopkins, who is Senior Vice President of Prime Video and Amazon MGM Studios, underlined the importance of simplifying the process by which customers may tailor their streaming experience within a single app. This initiative is intended to make it easier for customers to do so.

“We are proud to welcome Apple TV+ and its celebrated, critically acclaimed shows, films, and events to Prime Video,” he stated in addition. “We are excited to be a part of this partnership.”

As a result of the exceptional material that Apple TV+ has produced, such as “Ted Lasso,” “The Morning Show,” “Severance,” and “Shrinking,” the service has garnered a reputation for being of high quality. Not only does it offer live broadcasts of Major League Soccer and Major League Baseball, but it also offers exclusive films that are only accessible through this platform.

These films feature top Hollywood talent such as Brad Pitt, George Clooney, Matt Damon, and Casey Affleck, and they are only available through this platform.

When compared to other major platforms like Netflix, Apple TV+ has had a far higher amount of cancellations, which is proof that the service has struggled to maintain its user base.

They provide a vast array of Amazon titles.

Eddy Cue, who serves as Apple’s Senior Vice President of Services, has expressed that the business is filled with enthusiasm regarding the cooperation. According to him, Apple has the intention of making its critically acclaimed television shows and films accessible to a larger audience by exploiting the massive user base that Prime Video possesses.

Amazon Prime Video continues to increase its original content and live sports services, including the National Football League’s “Thursday Night Football,” despite the fact that it is behind Netflix in terms of overall viewing time in the United States. Other live sports offers include the National Football League’s “Monday Night Football.”

Prime Video recently announced that it has reached 200 million monthly viewers across all of its platforms.

Amazon’s goal is to reinforce its position as the industry leader by expanding the variety of content it provides to its customers through the inclusion of Apple TV+ to its roster of subscription services.

In the latter part of the month of October, Prime Video subscribers will have the opportunity to gain access to Apple TV+. This will give them with a convenient way to access Apple’s premium content in addition to the subscriptions they already have.

In the past, Amazon was successful in obtaining a partial victory in an antitrust action that was brought forward in the United States of America. According to the judge, certain allegations that were filed against the corporation were dismissed.

It is still possible that the technology corporation will be subject to an inquiry for additional accusations, such as allegations that its business practices hinder competition and restrict the number of options available to customers. This does not change the fact that the firm will continue to be investigated.

SOURCE: TET

SEE ALSO:

Since February 2021, Inflation Has Dropped To Its Lowest Point.

US Considers Asking Court To Break Up Google As It Weighs Remedies In The Antitrust Case

 

Continue Reading

Download Our App

vornews app

Buy FUT Coins

comprar monedas FC 25

Volunteering at Soi Dog

Soi Dog

Trending