Connect with us

News

Factbox: Differences Between Donald Trump’s Transition Ethics Pledge and Recent Standards

Published

on

Donald Trump
REUTERS/Carlos Barria/File Photo

(VOR News) – The team of President-elect Donald Trump signed an agreement on Tuesday with the office of Vice President Joe Biden to engage with government agencies and exchange records.

The contract was executed to enhance communication between the two parties. Following several weeks of postponement, this agreement was ultimately finalized.

Experts in ethics indicate that the Donald Trump campaign furthermore released a specific ethical pledge on the General Services Administration’s website. This vow differs significantly from the traditional ethical pledge previously signed by presidential candidates.

Although this commitment resembles the standard ethical pledge, there are several distinctions between them.

This text compares the commitments made by Donald Trump to the pledge signed by Vice President Kamala Harris, which is also available on the GSA website, along with those of other presidential candidates.

Assignments and Projects Pertaining to Stocks

A regulation stipulates that “Transition Team members (along with their spouses and minor children) are prohibited from purchasing or selling individual stocks during their tenure with the Transition unless prior authorization is obtained from the office of general counsel.”

This guideline constitutes a basic commitment that the president undertakes to maintain ethical standards. This rule does not pertain to minor children or spouses of Transition Team members.

These pledges encompass those signed by Mr. Harris in 2024 and Mr. Biden in 2020. Both commitments were made by men.

Conversely, Donald Trump’s vow does not impose any limitations on the sale of particular stocks or any stock transactions either. The calculation excludes these two categories of stock sales.

ADVOCACY BY LOBBYISTS

Registered lobbyists are prohibited from gifting to the transition team or soliciting funds for it, as outlined in the Harris agreement. This limitation pertains to both the giving and solicitation of contributions.

Furthermore, to be permitted to participate on the transition team, they must first secure authorization from the general counsel. If an individual has lobbied on a specific transition issue in the last year or intends to do so in the upcoming year, they are prohibited from working on that matter.

This is due to their prior opportunity to do so. The agreement negotiated with Trump differs somewhat from the other accords.

Members of the transition team are presumed to exclude themselves from engaging in any subject on which they have previously advocated within the past year. Any registered lobbyist is explicitly forbidden from serving on the transition team.

Furthermore, Donald Trump possesses both assets and conflicts.

The candidate pledges to “eschew both actual and perceived conflicts of interest” and to “possess solely non-conflicting assets, such as those exempt from conflict by regulation.” This commitment includes both the candidate’s real and perceived conflicts of interest.

This commitment considers both the candidate’s actual conflicts of interest and those that seem to exist. This pledge is made in anticipation of the candidate’s potential electoral triumph.

It is important to observe that the pledge provided by the Donald Trump transition team lacks any details regarding Donald Trump’s personal ethics or interests. This is an essential consideration to remember.

The Partnership for Public Service, responsible for overseeing transitions, has a representative, Enzo Benoit, who asserts that a substantial distinction exists between the two. Benoit stated that this is the situation.

Nonetheless, it is quite probable that this specific danger is of a rather modest type. This is due to the fact that once Donald Trump assumes office, he will be bound by strict regulations against conflicts of interest. This explains why this is the situation.

The plural version of the pronoun WHISTLEBLOWERS

The Harris ethics agreement specifies that the transition “has implemented a whistleblower policy and will promptly address any alleged breaches of ethical standards.” This statement pertains to the changeover.

This policy has been established to safeguard employees who report unethical conduct. The vow made by Donald Trump does not reference anyone who provides information about malfeasance.

SOURCE: USN

SEE ALSO:

Canada to Expedite the Rejection of Bogus Refugee Claims

‘Keep Calm and Gobble On’: Joe Biden Holds Trump’s Final Turkey Pardon.

Continue Reading

News

Macron of France Greets Donald Trump at a Grand Presidential Reception in Paris.

Published

on

Donald Trump
Aurelien Morissard/AP

(VOR News) – French President Emmanuel Macron greeted Donald Trump to Paris on Saturday with presidential grandeur following a four-year hiatus.

Claiming to be in a “a little crazy” world as they met one-on-one before Notre Dame Cathedral’s reopening five years following a catastrophic fire, Donald Trump, the future president, said.

As Trump arrived at the Elysee Palace, the official house of the French president, Macron extended numerous handshakes and back-patted him. Declaring it “a great honour,” Donald Trump hailed their “great relationship.”

As they met one-on-one before Notre Dame Cathedral reopened five years following a catastrophic fire, Trump suggested the two would talk about a “a little crazy” world.

Like the French do for sitting American presidents, the palace spread out a red carpet. Trump noted before he came in, “The world feels wild right now.” We will explore that.

Accepting the Paris invitation, Donald Trump asserted Macron had done “a wonderful job ensuring that Notre Dame has been restored to its full glory, and even more so”. Today will be unique for each of us! A 2019 fire almost destroyed the 861-year-old monument.

More than 20 French government security agents were guarding Trump alongside the Secret Service, according to the French national police. Trump’s procession was guarded from drones by a specially equipped French police truck.

Scores of international VIPs were expected at the Notre Dame reopening, hence security was more rigorous than usual outside the U.S. Embassy and other Paris sites.

Despite Donald Trump’s loss last month, Macron has tried to repair his relationship.

Macron’s staff minimised the offer, citing invitations to other former leaders.

Declaring Trump invited as president-elect of a “friendly nation,” Macron’s office added, “This is in no way exceptional. We’ve done it before.”

Red carpet treatment by Macron and other European leaders revealed their aim to placate Trump prior to his inauguration. Trump enjoys pomp and spectacle. During his first tenure as president, he paid Paris a guest of honour visit for Bastille Day events. Macron Later on, Trump insisted he wanted a US large military exhibition.

Democratic President Joe Biden is also invited but won not be present. White House communications secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said first lady Jill Biden will represent the US due to a scheduling issue.

Trump last visited Jill Biden at the White House for the customary farewell-incoming president’s conference following the election.

During Donald Trump trip to France, Macron and other European leaders are trying to convince him to help Ukraine fight Russia’s intrusion. According to Macron’s office, Macron and Donald Trump would discuss Middle East conflicts as well as others.

Prince William and Jill Biden will meet prior to Notre Dame, according to the British royal house.

Macron would meet Volodymyr Zelenskyy, President of Ukraine. It depends on whether Trump meets Zelenskyy. Future conversations worry Kyiv as Trump has vowed to swiftly stop the war on Ukraine but has not said how.

On a two-day trip earlier this week, Zelenskyy’s top advisor Andriy Yermak visited important Donald Trump team members to build confidence in the incoming government. Requesting anonymity, a senior Ukrainian official hailed the discussions as successful but omitted specifics.

Under Donald Trump’s first term, France-US relations deteriorated.

Trump paid many trips to France and introduced Macron at his first state dinner. Macron attacked Trump for challenging NATO’s necessity and America’s dedication to the mutual defence agreement, therefore endangering the alliance.

If France taxed American businesses during the 2024 presidential campaign, Trump often mimicked Macron’s accent and threatened to levy high taxes on wine and champagne bottles shipped to the U.S.

Among the first international leaders to congratulate Trump last month was Macron. Noted for its stained glass, the Notre Dame fire destroyed its spire in 2019, endangering one of the most iconic architectural sites worldwide. At the time Trump was president.

“So horrible to watch the massive fire at Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris,” he wrote, counselling Paris. “Perhaps flying water tanks could help eradicate it. Be fast!” he advised.

Shortly afterwards, French officials reported that “all means” were being employed to put out the flames, “except water-bombing aircrafts which, if used, could lead to the collapse of the entire structure of the cathedral.”

Last weekend, Trump declared he would name Jared Kushner’s father, Charles Kushner, ambassador to France. Pioneers in such a great role were Franklin and Jefferson.

SOURCE: NPR

SEE ALSO:

Elon Musk Expended Over $260 Million To Facilitate The Election Of Donald Trump.

The US Court of Appeals Affirms the TikTok Ban While Dismissing a Free Speech Challenge.

Continue Reading

News

Elon Musk Expended Over $260 Million To Facilitate The Election Of Donald Trump.

Published

on

Elon Musk
Reuters

(VOR News) – Elon Musk, the wealthiest man in the world, is said to have made a significant contribution to the re-election campaign of Donald Trump, President-elect of the United States of America, in the year 2024.

This information has been reported. Specifically, the information in question was collected from the Federal Election Commission by means of their most current filings.

More than $259 million was contributed by Elon Musk to the campaign of Donald Trump, which he subsequently used to support his own campaign.

Elon Musk contributed a total of $269.

The Chief Executive Officer of Tesla and the owner of SpaceX is now in the position of being one of the top donors in the history of a presidential campaign in the United States.

This is due to the massive financial support that has been provided to him. Consequently, this contributes to the strengthening of his power in the area of the Republican Party. One of the corporations that own Tesla is SpaceX, which is a corporation.

There was a contribution of two hundred and thirty-nine million dollars made by Elon Musk to America PAC, which is a super PAC that he founded with the goal of assisting in the mobilisation of votes in support of Trump. This represents a big new development that has taken place.

RBG PAC is an organisation that makes an effort to persuade voters that President Trump, who is 78 years old, would not sign into law a national abortion ban. It is alleged that Musk, who is 53 years old, contributed an additional twenty million dollars to RBG PAC.

There is strong suspicion that Elon Musk made this financial contribution to RBG PAC. As can be seen from the documentation that was handed over to the Federal Election Commission (FEC), Elon Musk was the one who made this donation.

This organisation got its name from the late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who was well-known for her advocacy of abortion rights. Ginsburg was the inspiration behind the name of this organisation. In addition to being a well-known liberal personality, Ginsburg was also well-known for her advocacy of the right to abortion.

Ginsburg was a significant figure in the feminist community and a prominent member of the liberal community.

In addition to being the owner of the social networking platform known as X, Elon Musk has emerged as a prominent counsellor to the transition team that Trump has gathered. This is a significant development.

The platform’s owner is Elon Musk, so keep that in mind.

Trump has nominated him, together with Vivek Ramaswamy, a former candidate for the Republican presidential nomination and an entrepreneur, to lead a task group that will strive to minimise the amount of money that the government spends and the number of rules that it imposes. Ramaswamy is also an entrepreneur.

Ramaswamy is also an entrepreneur in his way. In his own way, Ramaswamy is likewise recognised as an entrepreneur.

Thursday was the day that Elon Musk and Ramaswamy met with senators on Capitol Hill in an effort to obtain the significant cutbacks in expenses that Trump has asked.

The gathering was held on Thursday of this week. On the other hand, in order for them to be successful in their ambitions, they will want the support of these politicians.

These two individuals have not only advocated for the termination of thousands of federal employees, but they have also battled for the reduction of regulations and the elimination of programs that have had their authorisation revoked, such as healthcare for veterans. In addition to this, they have campaigned for the dismissal of all employees and employees of the government.

At the Mar-a-Lago residence in Florida, where the president-elect has been residing during the transition, Musk has been a frequent visitor and a close confidante of Trump.

Musk has attended the residence on multiple occasions. Many times, Elon Musk has been seen on the premises of the mansion. In addition to that, Musk has been a frequent visitor to the home on a number of occasions.

SOURCE: TN

SEE ALSO:

The US Court of Appeals Affirms the TikTok Ban While Dismissing a Free Speech Challenge.

Jagmeet Singh May Lose the Next Federal Election

Continue Reading

News

The US Court of Appeals Affirms the TikTok Ban While Dismissing a Free Speech Challenge.

Published

on

TikTok
PHOTO: PEXELS

(VOR News) – A federal appeals court dismissed TikTok’s assertion that the crackdown infringes upon the free expression rights of millions of Americans on Friday.

The court affirmed a statute that would ban the viral video application from usage nationwide unless its Chinese parent company divested from it.

The court’s verdict led the president and Congress to determine that TikTok’s “expansive reach” necessitated its divestiture from Chinese ownership, which is “essential to protecting our national security.”

The court’s ruling indicates that TikTok’s ownership by the Chinese corporation ByteDance poses a greater national security threat than the issues related to free expression associated with TikTok.

In the United States, the First Amendment safeguards the right to free expression. The official court acknowledged that the government acted to safeguard this freedom from a foreign adversary and to restrict that adversary’s ability to acquire information about American citizens.

TikTok critics include the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University.

“This ruling is fundamentally flawed, interpreting significant First Amendment precedents too restrictively and granting the government extensive authority to limit Americans’ access to foreign information, ideas, and media,” stated Jameel Jaffer, the executive director of the organization.

“This decision is fundamentally erroneous.” “We anticipate that the appellate court’s decision will not be final.”

The decision issued by the three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit was a notable triumph for the administration of Vice President Joe Biden; yet, it concurrently places TikTok in a precarious position.

Donald Trump, the future president, has pledged to guarantee the continued existence of TikTok. Nonetheless, that may be construed to signify a multitude of alternative interpretations.

According to the law, TikTok faces a potential ban throughout the state unless it divests from its Beijing-based parent company, ByteDance, by January 19th.

The deadline may be prolonged by ninety days if “significant progress” is made towards finalising a sale. Consequently, one possibility is that Trump may seek to negotiate an agreement for the app to be held by an American entity or consortium of investors, while concurrently postponing the implementation date.

Notwithstanding China’s enduring opposition to the compelled divestiture of the application, analysts contend that Chinese authorities may want to auction TikTok to enhance their bargaining position in trade discussions with President Trump’s new administration.

Notwithstanding this, TikTok maintains that it is not available for acquisition from any third party.

TikTok’s initiatives to separate itself from ByteDance, exemplified by Project Texas, which seeks to segregate American data from China, represent divestiture, and Trump possesses the authority to assert that these initiatives qualify as divestiture. Furthermore, Trump may instruct his attorney general to abstain from enforcing the law.

Merely disabling TikTok is inadequate to preclude its utilisation. The regulation targets app stores operated by Google and Apple, leading to the removal of TikTok from their platforms by the digital giants.

Moreover, TikTok cannot be endorsed by web hosting companies.

Neither Apple nor Google has issued any statements concerning their possible reactions to the legislation. Moreover, given that Trump has expressed his intention to maintain the application despite an impending court-imposed deadline, it remains unclear what precise measures web-hosting companies would undertake.

TikTok would ultimately deteriorate, even if the legislation were implemented by a presidential administration. The application will remain accessible on devices for its 170 million users in the United States.

Conversely, the program would become ineligible for software updates. TikTok is on the verge of being inoperable because to its sluggish performance and numerous glitches.

A prohibition on the social media site would solely benefit Meta, which Trump has condemned for his unfounded assertion that the network adversely affected him during the 2020 presidential election.

Trump, who previously sought to prohibit TikTok during his initial presidency, reversed his stance and asserted that a restriction on the platform would merely benefit Meta. This transpired throughout his political efforts.

The subsequent phase may involve an appeals process that requires considerable time to finalise. The DC appeals court can entertain petitions from any party involved to reassess the case. The Supreme Court may then be requested to deliberate on it following its presentation.

SOURCE: TET

SEE ALSO:

FBI Warns iPhone and Android Users to Stop Texting

The US FDA Cited Musk’s Neuralink Animal Laboratory For ‘Objectionable Conditions.’

Continue Reading

Trending