Connect with us

Politics

Hamas Calls for Peace After Trump Wins Election

Published

on

Hamas, Trump
Mahmoud Abbas, the President of the Palestinian National Authority, congratulated Trump on his election victory

After former President Donald Trump’s election victory, a senior Hamas official issued a statement in which he called for the immediate cessation of Israel’s war against the group in Gaza and a strategy to achieve Palestinian statehood.

“The election of Trump as the 47th president of the USA is a private matter for the Americans,” the political bureau member and spokesperson for Hamas, Basem Naim, told The Washington Post.

Palestinians look forward to an immediate cessation of the aggression against our people, especially in Gaza, and look for assistance in achieving their legitimate rights of freedom, independence, and the establishment of their independent self-sovereign state with Jerusalem as its capital.”

“The blind support for the Zionist entity ‘Israel’ and its fascist government, at the expense of the future of our people and the security and stability of the region, must stop immediately,” according to him.

During his tenure in office, Trump developed a close relationship with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is currently involved in a multi-front war against the Iran-aligned Axis of Resistance. This conflict commenced with a large-scale Hamas-led attack on Israel in October 2023.

An Israeli official informed Newsweek that “the special relationship between the U.S. and Israel has been a bipartisan feature of American politics since the founding of the Jewish state” when contacted for comment.

Netanyahu congratulates Trump

The Israeli official stated, “We are certain that this will persist.” “Going forward, we look forward to a strong working relationship with his administration to bring about a more peaceful, secure and prosperous Middle East.”

President Joe Biden and Netanyahu disagreed regarding the war’s progression despite substantial U.S. military assistance. Consequently, Netanyahu was the first to congratulate Trump on “history’s greatest comeback.”

In his statement on Wednesday, Netanyahu declared, “Your historic return to the White House offers a new beginning for America and a powerful recommitment to the great alliance between Israel and America.”

Afterward, Netanyahu conversed with Trump. The Israeli side characterized the conversation as a “warm and cordial” exchange in which the two “agreed to work together for Israel’s security and also discussed the Iranian threat.”

The Israel-Hamas war, which has since expanded to include an Israeli air and land offensive against the Hezbollah movement in Lebanon, strikes from other Axis of Resistance factions in Iraq, Syria, and Yemen, and even direct exchanges of strikes between Israel and Iran, has served as a polarizing foreign policy issue in the United States.

Biden has been accused by Israel supporters of not doing enough to aid the U.S. ally and by pro-Palestinian factions of failing to sufficiently rein in Netanyahu, despite his continued provision of military assistance to Israel and his advocacy for greater safeguards to mitigate civilian harm.

Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign largely mirrored the Biden administration’s stance, calling for peace and expressing empathy for the plight of civilians entangled in the conflict. However, she rejected any demands to withhold arms sales to Israel.

Hamas Issues Statement

Additionally, Hamas issued a statement on Wednesday that urged the United States to “cease providing military support and political cover to the Zionist entity and to recognize the legitimate rights of our people.” The statement also called for an end to Israel’s campaign in Lebanon.

“The American president-elect is required to listen to the voices that have been raised from American society itself for more than a year regarding the Zionist aggression on the Gaza Strip,” according to the statement, “rejecting the occupation and genocide, and objecting to support and bias toward the Zionist entity.”

On Wednesday, Mahmoud Abbas, the President of the Palestinian National Authority, congratulated Trump on his election victory. Abbas is the leader of the West Bank-based government that competes with Hamas, which is based in Gaza.

The Palestine News and Information Agency (WAFA) released a statement in which Abbas expressed “his aspiration to collaborate with President Trump to promote peace and security in the region” and underscored “the dedication of our people to the pursuit of statehood, self-determination, and freedom in compliance with international law.”

Abbas was reported to have said, “We will remain steadfast in our commitment to peace,” and we are confident that under your leadership, the United States will support the legitimate aspirations of the Palestinian people.”

While in office, both Hamas and Abbas had frequently denounced Trump’s Middle East policies, such as his 2018 decision to relocate the U.S. embassy from Tel Aviv to the disputed city of Jerusalem and his 2020 proposal to resolve the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The Abraham Accords

The proposal, which was widely referred to as the “deal of the century,” would have conferred Israel control over occupied areas along the Jordanian border and internationally unrecognized Jewish settlements in the West Bank.

Hamas and other Palestinian factions would be disarmed, Palestinians would acknowledge Israel as a Jewish state, refrain from participating in any international organizations without Israeli consent, and receive the right to access international investments and a portion of the desert territory along the Israel-Egypt border.

In addition, the proposition proposed the construction of a tunnel connecting Gaza and the West Bank, one of its most ambitious moves.

Even though the Arab world did not support the plan, Trump successfully oversaw the Abraham Accords later that year, establishing diplomatic relations between Israel and the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Sudan, and Morocco.

The U.S. withdrawal from a multilateral nuclear agreement in 2018 and the U.S. killing of Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Quds Force chief Major General Qassem Soleimani in Iraq in 2020 were also significant factors in the sharp increase in tensions between Washington and Tehran that Trump oversaw.

The Republican leader has since accused Biden and Harris of being too lenient toward Iran and has consistently maintained that the war in Hamas would not have occurred under his presidency. In the meantime, Trump has accused his Democratic opponents of attempting to incite a more extensive conflict in the Middle East, a course of action that he has pledged to avoid.

Trump stated during his election night victory speech, “We desire a robust and capable military, and we would prefer not to employ it.” He also said, “You are aware that we did not experience any wars for four years.” There were no conflicts. Except for the fact that we defeated ISIS, we did so in record time.

“They predicted that he would initiate a conflict.” “I will not initiate a war,” Trump declared in the early hours of Wednesday. “I’m going to stop wars.”

Source: Newsweek

Related News:

The FBI Looks At Claimed Leaks Of Sensitive Israel Attack Records

The FBI Looks At Claimed Leaks Of Sensitive Israel Attack Records.

Politics

Trudeau Examining Retaliatory Tariffs After Trump Meeting

Published

on

Trudeau, Tariffs, Trump
Trudeau made a hastily arranged visit to Mar-a-Lago after Trump threatened Canada with tariffs

Senior officials report that days after meeting with President-elect Donald Trump, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is already examining possible retaliatory tariffs on certain items from the United States.

According to a government official, Trudeau has begun considering which goods to target with tariffs in retaliation and is ready for any scenario. The official emphasized that no decision has been made.

Since they were not permitted to speak in public, the individual spoke under the condition of anonymity.

This action’s announcement would not go over well, and Trump might conclude that Trudeau is unreliable again. Trudeau has frequently made controversial remarks in the past, which caused Trump to question his moral character.

Following a G7 summit in Quebec in 2018, Trudeau declared that all seven G7 nations had signed an accord.

Trump, however, attacked Trudeau shortly after, claiming that the US did not sign the declaration.

Trump wrote, “I have instructed our U.S. Reps not to endorse the Communique based on Justin’s false statements at his news conference and the fact that Canada is charging our U.S. farmers, workers, and companies massive Tariffs.”

Then, in 2019, US President Donald Trump referred to Justin Trudeau as “two-faced” when he appeared to make fun of him in a video during a NATO leaders’ meeting.

The White House intensified its trade rant and criticized Trudeau more harshly than ever, calling him a traitor who wasn’t worthy of President Donald Trump’s time.

In a nationally televised interview, Trump trade adviser Peter Navarro stated, “Any foreign leader who engages in bad faith diplomacy with President Donald J. Trump and then tries to stab him in the back on the way out the door has a special place in hell.”

On Tuesday, Trudeau called an emergency meeting with opposition leaders to present a more cohesive front in response to Trump’s tariff threat. Green Party Leader Elizabeth May, Bloc Quebecois Leader Yves-François Blanchet, NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh, and Poilievre were present.

Trudeau, Public Safety Minister Dominic LeBlanc, Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland represented the federal government.

Meanwhile, Canadian premiers are pressing Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to increase defence expenditures and border security to allay the fears of US President-elect Donald Trump.

Following a conference of premiers, Doug Ford of Ontario stated that he has been pressuring Trudeau’s administration for months to demonstrate that Canada is concerned about the security and economic concerns of the United States.

Related:

Canadian Dollar Drops After Trudeau Passes GST Holiday

Continue Reading

Politics

Biden Pardoning Hunter Sparks Anger From Both Sides of the Isle

Published

on

Hunter Biden Pardoned

Both Republican and Democratic lawmakers have criticized President Joe Biden’s decision to pardon his son Hunter on Sunday after he was found guilty of federal felonies related to guns and taxes.

Before the convictions in the Delaware and California cases, President Biden had stated that he would not commute his son’s sentence or grant him a pardon. The pardon was granted just weeks before Hunter Biden was scheduled to be sentenced for his guilty plea to tax crimes and trial conviction in the gun case.

The president’s broad pardon includes any “offences against the United States which he has committed or may have committed or taken part in during the period from January 1, 2014 through December 1, 2024,” in addition to the tax and firearms offences committed by the younger Biden.

When he announced his decision to pardon his son, President Biden said prosecutors “treated Hunter differently” and accused Republicans of unjust treatment.

“From the day I took office, I said I would not interfere with the Justice Department’s decision-making, and I kept my word even as I have watched my son being selectively, and unfairly, prosecuted,” the statement added.

Biden’s Pardon “Self-Serving”

Lawmakers from both parties claimed that Biden’s choice to pardon his son was self-serving and would exacerbate the decline in American trust in democracy and the rule of law.

After Trump’s first term in office, Biden promised Americans he would restore standards and respect for the rule of law. However, he broke his public promise to Americans by using his position to assist his son.

Colorado’s Democratic governor, Jared Polis, swiftly expressed his disappointment and claimed that the action would “tarnish” the outgoing president’s reputation.

The leader of the Democratic Senate campaign arm, Senator Gary Peters of Michigan, referred to Mr. Biden’s decision to pardon his son as “wrong.”

In a statement, Mr. Peters stated that “a president’s family and allies shouldn’t get special treatment.” “This misuse of authority undermines confidence in our government and gives others the confidence to manipulate the law to their advantage.”

According to Democratic Representative Marie Gluesenkamp Perez of Washington, the president’s action provided evidence of a two-tiered legal system that treated the wealthy and politically influential differently from regular citizens.

Representative Jason Crow, a Democrat from Colorado, expressed disappointment with President Biden’s decision in an interview. He pledged that he wouldn’t do this, which, in my opinion, will make it more difficult for us to discuss preserving democracy in the future.

Unprecedented Pardon

The Republican chairs of congressional probes investigating Biden’s family, including Rep. James Comer, criticized the president’s pardon, claiming that the evidence against Hunter was “just the tip of the iceberg.”

Meanwhile, the office of Special Counsel David Weiss firmly resisted President Joe Biden’s defence of his son Hunter’s pardon. The president said his son was “selectively, and unfairly, prosecuted” when he announced the pardon on Sunday.

“There was and has never been any evidence of vindictive or selective prosecution in this case,” the filing from Weiss’s team stated. Hunter Biden had earlier this year brought up the issue of selective prosecution, but two courts had rejected it, the statement noted.

While acknowledging that the pardon ends the matter, the agency cautioned against formally dismissing it, which would have withdrawn the charges against Hunter Biden. Instead, the office seeks to close the matter.

When Trump becomes office, he won’t be able to reverse the pardon. Additionally, because of its broad scope, the Trump Justice Department will not be able to resume the lengthy criminal investigation of the president’s son, according to clemency-focused attorney Samuel Morison, who worked for 13 years in the Justice Department’s Office of the Pardon Attorney.

Related News:

Mark Zuckerberg Accuses Biden Administration of COVID-19 Censorship Pressure

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continue Reading

Politics

Carney says Canada Has Failed New Immigrants

Published

on

Former Bank of Canada governor Mark Carney
Former Bank of Canada governor Mark Carney

Under Justin Trudeau’s leadership, Canada has failed to live up to its immigration values in recent years by allowing more people into the country than it could absorb, Former Bank of Canada governor Mark Carney has told reporters.

Mark Carney, a special adviser to the Liberal Party of Canada, made the remarks during a Wednesday event at Cardus, a Christian think tank in Ottawa, Canada.

“I think what happened in the last few years is we didn’t live up to our values on immigration,” Mr. Carney said.

“We had many more foreign workers, students, and new Canadians than we could house, care for, socialize, and provide opportunities for. And, quite simply, we are failing Canadians and the folks we have admitted into Canada.”

The Trudeau government indicated earlier this fall that it would considerably reduce its immigration objective for permanent residents and temporary residents in Canada. These developments occurred following a rapid population increase and rising criticism of Trudeau’s immigration policies.

Statistics Canada just announced that on July 1, the population was 3% higher than a year ago. Between 1998 and 2018, annual population increase was less than 1.5%.

With the anticipated modifications to immigration targets, the Trudeau government expects Canada’s population to fall by 0.2% in 2025 and 2026 before returning to 0.8% growth in 2027. Numbers that are highly criticized by opponents of Trudeau’s failed immigration policies.

In a recent interview with the CBC, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said that his government did not strike the correct balance on immigration following the COVID-19 outbreak.

He said he elected to ease its regulations in response to demand from businesses facing a labor shortage. He claimed that the authorities “lost track” during the procedure.

Trudeau then blamed the provinces for underfunding higher education, which pushed institutions to turn to foreign students to make money.

Meanwhile, Immigration Minister Marc Miller expects nearly five million temporary residents with expiring visas to leave Canada next year. Miller commented during a House of Commons citizenship and immigration committee meeting on Monday.

Miller said that he expects these permit holders to leave “voluntarily” and that the feds will be working with the Canadian Border Services Agency (CBSA) to “investigate and prosecute those who violate immigration law.”

The minister clarified that isn’t the only path forward for students with expiring study permits. Some students get renewals, while others can get post-graduate work permits, allowing them to stay in Canada longer.

“We do work with CBSA to monitor these things,” stated Miller.

He added that more international students are making asylum claims “with very little hope,” the federal government will propose amendments to the immigration and asylum systems in the next few weeks.

Miller’s comments come after Trudeau said his government would slash its immigration targets by at least 20% next year.

Source: The Canadian Press

Related News:

Canada’s Premiers Criticize Trudeau Over Border Security

Canada’s Premiers Criticize Trudeau Over Border Security

Continue Reading

Trending