Connect with us

Politics

Trump Would Veto Legislation Establishing A Federal Abortion Ban, Vance Says

Published

on

trump

NEW YORK — Republican vice presidential candidate JD Vance claims that if elected president, Donald Trump would oppose a national abortion ban and would veto such legislation if it reached his desk.

“I can absolutely commit that,” Vance said on NBC’s “Meet the Press” when asked if he could guarantee Trump would not impose such a ban. “Donald Trump’s view is that we want the individual states and their individual cultures and their unique political sensibilities to make these decisions because we don’t want to have a nonstop federal conflict over this issue.”

The Ohio senator also insisted that if such legislation were passed by Congress, Trump, the former president and this year’s Republican contender, would veto it.

“I mean, if you’re not supporting it as president of the United States, you fundamentally have to veto it,” he said in a Sunday interview.

Trump Would Veto Legislation Establishing A Federal Abortion Ban, Vance Says

Vance’s remarks come after Democrats spent night after night at their national convention in Chicago last week criticizing Trump for his role in appointing the Supreme Court Justices who overturned Roe v. Wade, effectively ending the constitutional right to abortion in the United States and paving the way for bans and restrictions in Republican-led states.

However, efforts to neutralize an issue that Democrats believe would galvanize voters this autumn risk alienating members of Trump’s base who oppose abortion rights.

“God have mercy on this nation if this is now the position of what was the Pro-Life Party,” said Family Research Council president Tony Perkins in a post on Sunday, linked to a report about Vance’s remarks.

While Trump has regularly boasted about his part in overturning Roe, he has recently responded to Democrats’ threats that if he wins a second term, he will go even further in restricting access.

“My Administration will be great for women and their reproductive rights,” he wrote Friday on his Truth Social platform, using rhetoric from abortion rights campaigners and the left.

His remarks sparked a barrage of criticism from anti-abortion activists, including the editor of the conservative National Review, who wrote an essay headed “Trump’s Abandonment of Pro-Lifers Is Complete.”

Hours later, during an event in Las Vegas, Trump repeated the story.

“I strongly support women’s reproductive rights. The IVF (in vitro fertilization) is quite powerful. I mean, we’re at the forefront of this. “I believe people are noticing that,” he told reporters.

Democrats have expressed profound skepticism towards Trump.

“American women are not stupid and we are not going to trust the futures of our daughters and granddaughters to two men who have openly bragged about blocking access to abortion for women all across this country,” said Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, speaking to NBC.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., brushed off a question about how Trump would be “great” for reproductive rights.

“You should ask him about that. “I would say that President Trump was a very good pro-life president,” he told CNN’s “State of the Union.”

“The pro-life community,” Graham told reporters, “is organised around the well-being of the child, giving the mother options other than an abortion.” Graham stated, “that movement will continue after he’s gone.”

Trump has often hesitated to discuss abortion. Before entering politics, he defined himself as “very pro-choice.” Earlier this year, he struggled with his position on a federal abortion ban, stating at one point that he would support one at roughly 15 weeks of pregnancy, with exceptions for rape, incest, and when the mother’s life is in danger. He subsequently arrived at his current position, which is that limits should be left to individual states.

Trump has yet to state how he intends to vote on an upcoming ballot proposal addressing Florida’s six-week prohibition.

In an interview with CBS News earlier this week, Trump said he had “no regrets” about his involvement in overturning Roe v Wade. However, after months of contradictory pronouncements, he stated that he would not use the Comstock Act, a federal law, to try to prohibit the distribution of drugs used as an alternative to surgical abortions. Some of his allies have advocated for this, and Vance has previously backed it.

“We will be discussing specifics of it, but generally speaking, no,” he told me. “I would not do that.”

“It will be available, and it is now. As far as I know, the Supreme Court has said, ‘Keep it running the way it is.’ “I will enforce and agree with the Supreme Court, but they have said, keep it the way it is now,” he stated.

Trump Would Veto Legislation Establishing A Federal Abortion Ban, Vance Says

Abortion has been a significant motivation for Democrats since the Roe decision in the summer of 2022, and the party anticipates it will continue to play an important role this year.

On stage at the Democratic convention, women shared horrific personal tales about having to carry unviable pregnancies to term and being denied miscarriage care, putting their future fertility at risk.

“This is what’s going on in our country due of Donald Trump. And recognise that he is not done,” Vice President Kamala Harris stated in her acceptance speech for her party’s nomination.

Trump, who was replying to the address in real time, incorrectly said, “Everybody, Democrats, Republicans, Liberals, and Conservatives, wanted Roe v. Wade TERMINATED, and brought back to the States.”

“I do not limit access to birth control or I.V.F. – THAT IS A LIE, these are all false stories that she’s making up,” claimed the author. “I TRUST WOMEN, ALSO, AND I WILL KEEP WOMEN SAFE!”

SOURCE | AP

Politics

Trudeau Courts Canadian Separatists Party to Stay in Power

Published

on

The Bloc Québécois is ready to give the Trudeau government
The Bloc Québécois is ready to help Trudeau for concessions for Quebec - CBC Image

Just days after Canada’s NDP party cut ties with Canada’s liberal party Justin Trudeau has approached the Bloc Quebecois a Canadian separatists party to maintain his grip on power in Canada. Trudeau is facing pressure to resign as nearly 78 Percent of Canadians disapprove of his leadership.

The Bloc Quebecois expressed its willingness to collaborate with the Liberals in order to secure support during confidence ballots in the wake of the supply and confidence agreement with the NDP expiring on Sunday. The BQ has formulated a list of demands in response.

Bloc House Leader Alain Therrien expressed his satisfaction that his party has regained its balance of power in the House at Trudeau’s expense in an interview conducted prior to Monday’s party caucus retreat in the Outaouais region.

He referred to the circumstance as a “window of opportunity” now that the Liberals are genuine minority government.

In the interim, Premier Danielle Smith of Alberta has explicitly stated that she does not wish for the Liberals to join forces with the Bloc Quebecois in order to preserve their position of authority.

Although the Liberals may collaborate with the Bloc Quebecois, Smith stated that it “does not have a mandate to negotiate with Quebec separatists at the expense of Alberta, the West, and the rest of the country.”.

Smith tweeted on Monday, ““If the Liberals go down this path, we need an election to be called immediately”.

The NDP has expressed its willingness to contemplate supporting Trudeau on a “vote-by-vote basis,” while the Conservatives have promised to introduce a motion of no confidence in the current government.

Despite the fact that Pierre Poilievre’s Conservatives have pledged to hold numerous confidence votes in order to precipitate a general election, the Bloc’s approach is to leverage their newly acquired status to achieve what they perceive as significant benefits for Quebec.

Related News:

Justin Trudeau Faces an Uncertain Political Future

Justin Trudeau Faces an Uncertain Political Future

Continue Reading

Politics

Judge Sides With Special Counsel Over Trump’s 2020 Election Case

Published

on

Judge Trump Trial
Judge in Trump's 2020 election case sides with special counsel - File Image

The federal judge supervising former President Trump’s case in the aftermath of the 2020 election spelled out the timeline for the prosecution’s next actions following the Supreme Court’s declaration that Trump is immune for “official acts.”

Hours after the two parties met in her courtroom earlier Thursday, U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan issued an order that generally supported special counsel Jack Smith’s timing proposal.

Former President Trump faces four counts in connection with his alleged efforts to alter election results, including conspiracy to defraud the United States. Trump pleaded not guilty to the allegations again, but waived his appearance in court on Thursday CBS News reported.

The judge’s order rejects Trump’s lawyers’ proposed timeline for extending pretrial hearings into the spring or fall of 2025, well beyond the November presidential election.

Smith and his team had pushed for immunity conversations to take place alongside motions and other matters raised by the former president’s legal team.

Chutkan ordered federal prosecutors to send over all necessary information to Trump’s team by September 10, and Smith’s team had until September 26 to submit an opening brief detailing their views on presidential immunity. Smith’s prosecutors stated in court Thursday that the immunity motion will include fresh material not found in the indictment. Chutkan’s order allows the material to become public before the November election.

The judge set an Oct. 17 deadline for Trump’s team to respond to the special counsel’s claims and file their own motion to dismiss the indictment on immunity grounds. The administration will then have until October 29 to submit their response.

Chutkan stated in her two-page order that once the filings on the immunity issue are received, she will determine whether additional proceedings are required.

The judge also ordered Trump’s lawyers to file a petition by September 19 that includes “any specific evidence related to presidential immunity” that the former president feels prosecutors wrongfully concealed.

The decision also indicates that Trump has until October 24 to petition the court to enable him to file a move to dismiss the case based on accusations that Smith’s appointment and financing are unconstitutional. The special counsel’s team has until October 31 to file documents contesting this request.

The criminal case in Washington, DC, had been delayed several times as courts considered Trump’s immunity from prosecution. From 2017 to 2021, Trump claimed “absolute” immunity for any actions he took as president.

On July 1, the Supreme Court delivered a ruling denying any claims to absolute immunity while allowing extensive “presumptive immunity” to any “official” activities the president may take.

The ruling did not specify what constitutes a “official” or “unofficial” activity, but it implied that conversations with government officials, such as the vice president, would be exempt from prosecution.

As a result, the verdict was interpreted as expanding presidential power beyond what the US Constitution allows.

Related News:

Judge delays Donald Trump’s Hush Money Sentencing Until After the Election

Judge delays Donald Trump’s Hush Money Sentencing Until After the Election

Continue Reading

Politics

Judge delays Donald Trump’s Hush Money Sentencing Until After the Election

Published

on

Judge delays Donald Trump’s Hush Money Sentencing Until After the Election

The sentencing of Donald Trump in his New York hush money trial was postponed Friday until after November’s presidential election, a victory for the Republican as he faces Democrat Kamala Harris in a razor-thin race.

The former president was set to be sentenced on September 18 for fabricating business records in an attempt to hush a porn star’s politically damaging story.

However, Judge Juan Merchan postponed it until November 26 – well after the November 5 election, as asked by Donald Trump’s lawyers.

“This is not a decision this Court makes lightly but it is the decision which in this Court’s view, best advances the interests of justice,” he wrote at the time.

Donald Trump was convicted in May on 34 charges of falsifying business records to conceal hush money payments to porn star Stormy Daniels to prevent her from reporting an alleged sexual encounter on the eve of the 2016 election.

He was originally set to be sentenced on July 11.

However, that was postponed because the US Supreme Court determined that a former president had wide immunity from criminal prosecution.

Following the Supreme Court’s immunity decision, Donald Trump’s lawyers requested that his New York conviction be dismissed. Merchan stated that he would rule on the dismissal request on November 12.

The postponement comes as the already remarkable White House contest enters a new tense phase, with Harris and Donald Trump scheduled for their first televised debate next Tuesday.

Donald Trump’s Public Remarks and Election Campaign Strategies

Instead of addressing major voter issues such as immigration or the economy, Trump was in New York hours before the ruling, making meandering speeches about his numerous legal troubles while denying multiple women’s allegations of sexual harassment or assault.

“This is not the kind of publicity you like,” Trump said from the lobby of Trump Tower, despite spending an hour unprompted reminding voters of his long legal troubles and allegations of rape and sexual assault by various women, including writer E. Jean Carroll.

The legal drama occurred on the day that the first mail-in ballots of the election were scheduled to be distributed.

North Carolina, a battleground state, was expected to mail out some 130,000 absentee voting papers, signalling the symbolic start of a nationwide process that saw 155 million Americans vote in the heated 2020 election.

However, a state appeals court suspended the process in response to a last-minute lawsuit filed by independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who wants his name deleted from ballots. The fringe candidate from America’s most famous political dynasty has dropped out and backed Donald Trump.

North Carolina is one of several swing states that Harris and Donald Trump have been visiting as they enter the most intense part of an election that is likely to be determined by razor-thin margins.

Other states will shortly send out initial batches of ballots, and early in-person voting will begin in 47 states as soon as September 20.

Donald Trump is set to speak in North Carolina later on Friday.

Continue Reading

Download Our App

vornews app

Advertise Here

Volunteering at Soi Dog

Soi Dog

Trending