Connect with us


Tucker Carlson’s Eye-Opening Interview with Vladimir Putin Stirs Controversy



Tucker Carlson, Putin

The recent interview between Tucker Carlson and Vladimir Putin has garnered significant attention and sparked massive backlash from liberal media outlets.

Russian President Vladimir Putin sat down with journalist Tucker Carlson to discuss a range of topics, including the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. 

The conversation between Putin and Carlson provided a platform for Putin to share his perspective and motives concerning the war in Ukraine.  Through this interaction, viewers gained insights into Putin’s narrative and reasoning behind his actions in the region.

During the extensive interview session, Carlson delved into various aspects of Putin’s views on history, politics, and current affairs. This in-depth conversation between the two notable figures shed light on Putin’s ideologies and his approach to geopolitical issues. 

By engaging with Carlson, Putin seized the opportunity to articulate his stance and influence public opinion through a well-known media platform.

The dialogue between Tucker Carlson and Vladimir Putin revealed Putin’s strategic thinking and offered audiences a glimpse into the mindset of one of the most influential political figures of our time. 

As the interview unfolded, viewers were presented with a unique opportunity to witness firsthand the perspectives and convictions of a leader whose actions carry significant global implications.

Several key points were discussed during the interview, ranging from historical perspectives to current geopolitical affairs. Vladimir Putin provided his viewpoints on topics such as the situation in Ukraine, global security concerns, and potential pathways for diplomatic resolutions. 

The exchange between Tucker and Putin shed light on differing perspectives, adding depth to understanding complex political dynamics.

The interaction between Tucker Carlson and Vladimir Putin in this interview captured the attention of audiences worldwide, offering a glimpse into the minds of influential figures and the complexities of international relations.

Following the interview, reactions and criticisms emerged from various quarters, reflecting the diverse interpretations of the dialogue. Some praised the interview’s depth and transparency, commending Carlson’s readiness to delve into complex issues. 

However, others raised concerns about certain aspects of the conversation, pointing out potential gaps or areas that could have been explored further. The varied responses underscored the nuanced nature of the discussion and its impact on the audience.

The two-hour sitdown with a man the Western world has assured us is a psychopathic aggressor, hell-bent on destroying democracy in all its forms, with no regard for the lives that are lost in his greedy quest for global domination.

The interview has raised eyebrows in political circles, with many questioning the motives behind the meeting. Given Putin’s controversial stance on various global issues, the interview has sparked debates about the role of media in shaping political narratives. 

For daring to even want to speak to Russian President Vladimir Putin, journalist Carlson was demonized as the propaganda puppet of a bloodthirsty maniac before two words were exchanged between them.

When the interview finally dropped on X and the Tucker Carlson Network, it’s a wonder the world didn’t stop rotating, if only for a moment.

Less than 24 hours after it was posted on X, the conversation that some predicted would spark a “civil war” in America has racked up more than 82 million views. Critics argued that giving a platform to a world leader with a track record of human rights abuses can inadvertently legitimize their actions. 

On the other hand, supporters see it as an opportunity to engage in diplomatic dialogue and gain insights into the leader’s perspectives. This polarizing effect highlights the complex intertwining of journalism, politics, and international relations.

Despite the nuanced tone of the interview, there were still similarities in the key talking points addressed by Putin. The Russian president reiterated his stance on Ukraine, emphasizing Russia’s perspective on the conflict and justifying its actions based on historical and geopolitical considerations. 

Additionally, Putin touched upon themes of sovereignty, national security, and the role of Russia on the global stage, echoing sentiments expressed in previous interviews.

The media coverage of the interview has been extensive, with both mainstream and alternative news outlets dissecting every aspect of the conversation. 

Public perception has been mixed, with some praising Carlson for his bold approach in interviewing a figure as controversial as Putin, while others criticize the lack of hard-hitting questions and the potential validation of propaganda. 

On any day, it would have been enough to stir up a social media frenzy, but, as fate would have it, Thursday also saw President Joe Biden face off with the media in what many call the most disastrous press conference in the history of press conferences.

Social media platforms have been abuzz with discussions, memes, and analyses, further amplifying the reach and impact of the interview beyond traditional media channels. 

On X formally Twitter, one commentator of the interview said while many may have tuned in expecting to see a cat-stroking James Bond villain, they got an in-depth history lesson from an eloquent leader who appeared sincere in his desire to have a “serious conversation.”

Another wrote that Putin effortlessly recalled “the establishment of the Russian state in 862,” Meanwhile, President Biden, to prove he isn’t senile, was forgetting “the name of the church where his late son Beau got the rosary he now wears every day” and confusing Egypt’s leader with the president of Mexico.

The similarities were abundant and nasty.

“President Putin just showed the world with Tucker Carlson that he can accurately recount Centuries of History,” remarked influencer Liz Churchill. “Joe Biden is an embarrassment.”

“Putin just spent 28+ minutes going through 100s years of Eastern European history without a single note on him,” the popular End Wokeness account stated. “Biden doesn’t know what he ate for lunch. “Terrifying.”

“Whoever thought having Biden do a press conference after the Putin interview needs to be fired,” stated another X user. “Putin said, ‘Let me give you a half-hour, college-level lecture on Russia’s 900-year political history from memory. Biden: “The Mexican president should open the border to Gaza.”

It was an unintended consequence of allowing Putin to address Americans that no one could have seen coming, and it is now by far the dominant takeaway on X:

To make matters worse for the Biden administration, when they weren’t marvelling at Putin’s grasp of history, users on X were praising Carlson for “opening the door” to peace:


Navalny: Body Returned To Mother, Spokeswoman Says




The body of leading Russian opposition politician Alexei Navalny has been returned to his mother, according to his spokesman.

In a post on X, Kira Yarmysh thanked everyone who asked that the authorities hand over his remains.
“The funeral is yet to take place,” she wrote.


Navalny: Body Returned To Mother, Spokeswoman Says

Navalny’s mother, Lyudmila, was reportedly told to agree to a “secret” funeral. If she refused, he would be buried in the penal colony where he had died.

She had spent the previous week in the town near the prison where he died, attempting to ascertain the whereabouts of his remains before requesting that they be delivered to her.

After signing a death certificate stating that he died of natural causes, she was allowed three hours to settle on a “secret” burial for her son.

Ms Yarmysh claims his mother was warned that if she did not consent, he would be buried on the grounds of the prison where he had died.

However, Lyudmila appears to have declined to engage with the authorities.

Ms Yarmysh stated that the funeral plans were still unclear.

“We don’t know whether the authorities will interfere with it being carried out in the way the family wants and as Alexei deserves,” she said.

Earlier on Saturday, Yulia Navalnaya, Navalny’s widow, accused Vladimir Putin of holding her late husband’s body “hostage” and demanded its unconditional release.


Navalny: Body Returned To Mother, Spokeswoman Says

“Give us the body of my husband,” she pleaded in a video message.

“You tortured him living, and now you continue to punish him in death. “You mock the remains of the deceased.”

Ms Navalnaya again accused the Russian president of being responsible for her husband’s death.
The Kremlin has dismissed the charges, calling the Western outrage to the killing “hysterical”.

Navalny died on February 16 in a Russian prison located inside the Arctic Circle.
Details concerning what happened to him are scant. His team has offered security officers €20,000 ($22,000; £17,000) as a prize and aid in fleeing Russia in exchange for information concerning his death in custody.


Navalny: Body Returned To Mother, Spokeswoman Says

For years, he was the most prominent critic of Russia’s leader.

In August 2020, a team of would-be assassins from the Russian secret services poisoned Navalny with the Novichok nerve agent.

He was airlifted to Germany and recovered before being imprisoned upon his return to Russia in January 2021.

Attempts to commemorate his death have been greeted with a heavy-handed response from Russian authorities, with improvised monuments removed and hundreds jailed.


Continue Reading


In His Annual Letter, Warren Buffett Tells Investors To Ignore Wall Street Pundits




OMAHA, Nebraska – Warren Buffett credited his longtime partner, the late Charlie Munger, with creating the Berkshire Hathaway conglomerate he is credited with leading, and warned shareholders in his annual letter on Saturday not to listen to Wall Street pundits or financial advisors who advise them to trade frequently.

Buffett said he always writes his letters with knowledgeable, long-term investors in mind, such as his sister Bertie, and attempts to give them what he believes they want to know about Berkshire.

“She is sensible – very sensible – instinctively knowing that pundits should always be ignored,” Buffett wrote about Bertie. “After all, if she could accurately forecast tomorrow’s winners, would she openly share her unique insights, increasing competitive buying? That would be like discovering gold and then throwing out a map to the neighbours indicating its whereabouts.”

Buffett told investors that Berkshire is a safe place to park their money as long as they don’t expect “eye-popping performance” like in the past because there are no attractively priced acquisition targets large enough to make a meaningful difference in the Omaha, Nebraska-based company’s results. However, he stated that Berkshire would be ready to invest $167.6 billion when the casino-like stock market seizes.

Munger, Buffett’s longtime investing partner, died in November at the age of 99, removing one of the key sounding boards Buffett relied on for decades as Berkshire acquired companies such as See’s Candy, Geico Insurance, BNSF Railway and others to reshape the failing textile mill they took over in the 1960s into the massive eclectic conglomerate Berkshire is today.


In His Annual Letter, Warren Buffett Tells Investors To Ignore Wall Street Pundits

Buffett devoted a portion of last year’s annual letter to Berkshire shareholders to an homage to Munger, but this year’s edition began with even more appreciation for the revered curmudgeon’s services to the company over the years. Buffett stated that “Charlie was the ‘architect’ of the present Berkshire”, who recognised early on that buying excellent enterprises at reasonable rates was preferable.

“Charlie never sought to take credit for his role as creator but instead let me take the bows and receive the accolades,” Buffett said in a statement. “In some ways, his connection with me was like that of an elder brother and a caring father. Even when he knew he was correct, he handed me the reins, and when I made a mistake, he never reminded me of it.”


In His Annual Letter, Warren Buffett Tells Investors To Ignore Wall Street Pundits

Buffett also discussed how Berkshire’s insurance businesses, such as Geico, excelled last year, but its enormous utilities and BNSF railway underperformed. He also informed shareholders that he has no plans to sell its shares in approximately 30% of Occidental Petroleum and 9% of five significant Japanese trading companies but that he has yet to buy the oil company completely.

Berkshire’s diverse portfolio of operations and the good performance of its investments generated a profit of $37.57 billion, or $26,043 per Class A share, in the fourth quarter. This is more than double Berkshire’s $18.08 billion profit, or $12,355 per Class A share, posted a year ago.

However, Buffett emphasised that investors should mainly overlook such bottom-line figures since the paper worth of its stocks heavily influences them. Instead, he has always encouraged investors to focus on Berkshire’s operating earnings, which exclude investments.

By that metric, Berkshire reported a 28% increase in operating earnings to $8.48 billion, or $5,878.21 per Class A share. This is up from $6.63 billion, or $4,527.06 per Class A share.


In His Annual Letter, Warren Buffett Tells Investors To Ignore Wall Street Pundits

FactSet Research questioned three analysts, and they expected that Berkshire would report quarterly operating earnings of $5,717,17 per Class A share.

Berkshire’s stock has established several new peaks in recent weeks, reaching $632,820 per Class A share Friday morning as investors eagerly awaited Buffett’s letter. Buffett is admired for his extremely successful track record and the wise advice he has given over the years. His yearly letter is consistently one of the most-read papers in the corporate sector.

Berkshire also repurchased $2.2 billion of its stock in the fourth quarter, bringing the total to $9.2 billion for the year.


Continue Reading


Reddit Hasn’t Turned A Profit In Nearly 20 Years, But It Just Filed To Go Public Anyway




Reddit, the discussion board site noted for its constantly online user base and for sparking much internet debate, filed for its long-awaited initial public offering on Thursday.

This would make Reddit the first social media business to go public since Snapchat in 2017. The offering will include a twist that may allow some of the most ardent of its more than 70 million daily users to purchase shares in the IPO — something generally reserved for institutional investors.


Reddit Hasn’t Turned A Profit In Nearly 20 Years, But It Just Filed To Go Public Anyway

The company  claimed that top users can buy shares based on their “karma,” a term the network uses to describe its users’ contributions and reputation on the website.

“Our users feel a strong feeling of ownership over the communities they form on Reddit. We want this sense of ownership to translate into real ownership — for our users to be our owners’, co-founder and CEO Steve Huffman wrote in a Thursday filing letter. “Becoming a public company makes this possible.”

The company’s registration comes amid a dip in the overall IPO market, with Wall Street hoping that a blockbuster offering will help revitalise dealmaking.

According to a Securities and Exchange Commission filing, the San Francisco-based company plans to list on the New York Stock Exchange under the “RDDT.” The filing comes nearly three years after Reddit recruited its first CFO, and officials, including co-founder and CEO Steve Huffman, began publicly discussing the potential of an IPO to raise the company’s visibility.

Reddit, which has not been profitable, plans to expand its revenue through advertising, offering more e-commerce options, and licensing its data to other companies to train their artificial intelligence models.

“Our work to make Reddit faster, easier to use, easier to moderate and govern, and simpler to navigate and find relevant communities is driving growth today and will continue to be our focus into the future,” Ms. Huffman said.

The company was sold to media giant Condé Nast in 2006 by its co-founders Alexis Ohanian, who left the company in 2020, and Huffman, who now owns 3.3%. According to the IPO filing, the company’s top shareholders are currently Advance Publications (30.1%), which owns Condé Nast, Tencent (11%) from China, and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman (8.7%).

History of the ‘Front Page of the Internet’
The company, dubbed the “front page of the internet,” is a social media veteran; the firm was founded in 2005, the year college buddies Huffman and Ohanian graduated from the University of Virginia. It was the same year that Facebook became Facebook, YouTube released its first video, and Twitter (now known as X) launched.

Reddit’s 18-year history as an online social hub has witnessed tremendous growth, occasional controversy, and sometimes market-shifting pranks.

The network is well-known for its “subreddits,” which are distinct, user-generated discussion boards where users establish communities around various topics ranging from sports to politics to religion and everything in between. the company  users frequently post anonymously in these areas, debating topics ranging from memes to big news events.


Reddit Hasn’t Turned A Profit In Nearly 20 Years, But It Just Filed To Go Public Anyway

In 2021, Reddit created widespread market disruption when a community of day traders on the WallStreetBets platform began buying up GameStop shares in an attempt to harm hedge funds that bet against it. Many Redditors who joined the craze late suffered big losses.

Still, the episode highlighted the power of the company communities. Following the WallStreetBets incident, Reddit announced a fresh $250 million investment round, valuing the firm at $6 billion. It also declared plans to grow its workforce and enter overseas markets.

A significant user outcry earlier this year over a proposal to charge some third-party apps millions of dollars in fees to continue using the network brought the company back into the public eye. As a result, hundreds of the platform’s most popular subreddits were offline for weeks. The protest ended after Reddit threatened to expel forum moderators if the blackout continued.

Thursday’s filing provides the most extensive look yet at Reddit’s business, which aims to expand beyond the traditional ad-supported model on which other social networks still rely heavily.

The company  says it had more than 73 million daily active users in the latter three months of 2023, up from 52 million in 2021. In its filing, the company stated that the platform would have over 100,000 active communities by December 2023.

The company’s revenues in 2023 were $804 million, up 21% from $666.7 million in 2022. Reddit recorded a net loss of $90.8 million in 2023, less than the $158.6 million loss it experienced in 2022.


Reddit Hasn’t Turned A Profit In Nearly 20 Years, But It Just Filed To Go Public Anyway

While the company estimates its total addressable market in advertising to reach $1.4 trillion by 2027, it also stated in the filing’s risk factors statement that it has “a history of net losses and we may not be able to achieve or maintain profitability in the future.”

The company  also announced intentions to increase revenue by selling data to AI startups and focusing on the “user economy.” The filing outlines a future goal to enhance e-commerce on the site and increase user incomes through the Reddit Contributor Programme and Reddit Collectible Avatars Creators Programme. According to the filing, these systems allow users to earn monetary gifts and prizes, from which the corporation may receive a share.

On Thursday, the company also announced an expanded cooperation with Google, which includes access to Reddit data to train Google’s AI models and improve the display of Reddit content across Google platforms.


Continue Reading