Connect with us

World

Biden Escalates Ukraine War With Long-Range Missiles

Published

on

Biden Missiles Ukraine War

The Kremlin announced on Monday that President Joe Biden’s decision to allow Ukraine to hit targets inside Russia with US military long-range missiles is “fuel to the fire” and will exacerbate international tensions.

Biden’s decision to allow Ukraine to employ US military long-range missiles to strike deep within Russia has raised concerns about growing tensions, with many fearing that this decision could lead to world conflict.

On Monday, with less than two months remaining in office, President Joe Biden authorized American-provided Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) to strike deep within Russia.

“It is obvious that the outgoing administration in Washington intends to take steps and they have been talking about this, to continue adding fuel to the fire and provoking further escalation of tensions around this conflict,” said Peskov, the spokesman for the president.

Peskov reminded journalists of a September statement by President Vladimir Putin, who stated that enabling Ukraine to target Russia would dramatically raise the stakes.

It would alter “the very nature of the conflict dramatically,” Putin stated. This would mean that NATO countries, the United States, and European countries would be at war with Russia.”

Peskov asserted that Western countries that deliver longer-range weaponry also provide targeting services to Kyiv. “This fundamentally changes the modality of their involvement in the conflict,” he said.

Ukraine War Escalation

In June, Putin threatened that if NATO permitted Ukraine to utilize the arsenal of its partners to attack Russian territory, Moscow would send longer-range weapons to others to strike Western targets.

“The Westerners supply weapons to Ukraine and say: ‘We do not control anything here anymore and it does not matter how they are used.'” Putin had said. “We can also say, ‘We supplied something to someone — and now we have no control over anything.'” “And let them think about it.”

Putin again emphasized Moscow’s willingness to deploy nuclear weapons if it perceived a threat to its sovereignty.

Biden’s decision will “mean the direct involvement of the United States and its satellites in military action against Russia, as well as a radical change in the essence and nature of the conflict,” Russia’s Foreign Ministry stated.

The new policy has unpredictable consequences. ATACMS, with a range of roughly 300 kilometers (190 miles), can travel deep behind Ukraine’s 1,000-kilometer (600-mile) front line, although their range is modest compared to other types of ballistic and cruise missiles.

President-elect Donald Trump, who takes office on January 20, has not responded, but he won the election on promises to stop the conflict, and some people close to him have decried the action as a hazardous escalation.

Missile Decision Sparks Anger

The Military Industrial Complex appears to want to start World War III before my father has a chance to restore peace and rescue lives. We need to lock in those $Trillions. Life be damned!! Imbeciles!” Donald Trump Jr., the President-elect’s son, posted on X

“On his way out of office, Joe Biden is dangerously trying to start WWIII by authorizing Ukraine to use U.S. long-range missiles against Russia,” said Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., on X. “The American people gave a mandate on November 5 against these exact American last decisions.”

Rebekah Koffler, a former Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) officer and author of “Putin’s Playbook,” speculated that the stories were a “trial balloon to disrupt Trump” and that Biden may not have authorized the ATACMS strikes yet.

According to Dani Belo, PhD, Director of Security and International Relations at Global Policy Horizons Research Lab, Ukraine’s ability to currently hit Russian territory has the potential to escalate the war with Russia.

However, Donald Trump’s victory is likely to moderate the escalation.

There is speculation that Donald Trump’s administration would restrict military hardware deliveries to Ukraine, putting political pressure on Kyiv to resolve the crisis. This implies Ukraine has no motivation to escalate now and lose its fighting capability in a matter of months.

Russia sees no reason to escalate the situation at this time. Moscow expects that Trump’s administration will try to finish the war soon, so the Kremlin will likely take a wait-and-see approach until the new presidential administration takes office without significantly escalating the conflict. As a result, any escalation is unlikely.

Source: AP

Related News:

Trump Shakes Up Pentagon Names Pete Hegseth Defence Secretary

Trump Shakes Up Pentagon Names Pete Hegseth Defence Secretary

World

The Observer, The World’s Oldest Sunday Newspaper And A Liberal Staple, Will Be Sold.

Published

on

Observer
(AP Photo/Raphael Satter, File)

(VOR News) – Even though journalists had organised a two-day protest earlier this week, the sale of the Observer, which is the world’s oldest Sunday newspaper and a stronghold of liberal principles in Britain’s media landscape, was sanctioned on Friday.

The Observer is still the oldest newspaper in the world.

The Scott Trust, the owner of the Guardian Media Group, which is comprised of the Observer and the Guardian, has made the announcement that the sale to Tortoise Media is anticipated to be finalised within the next few days.

It has been reported that the Scott Trust has made an investment in Tortoise Media. As a result, the Scott Trust has become a significant shareholder in the company and has assumed roles on both the editorial and commercial boards respectively.

Tortoise must invest 25 million pounds (32 million dollars) in the Observer.

In the year 1791, The Observer was established, and in 1993, it became a member of the Guardian Media Group. On the other hand, Tortoise is dedicated to maintaining its Sunday print edition while also expanding its presence on the internet.

The editorial code of the Observer has made a commitment to respect the “liberal values and journalistic standards” of the Scott Trust. This commitment is part of the Observer’s commitment to protecting journalistic freedom and the editorial autonomy of the publication.

In 2019, James Harding, who had previously served as the editor of the London Times and as the chief of news at the BBC, and Matthew Barzun, who had previously served as the United States ambassador to London, established Tortoise publishing.

The readers were given the assurance that “we will make every effort to honour its legacy as a champion of human dignity and to revitalise it as a formidable, progressive voice globally.”

This was a pledge that was made to the readers. Harding argued that the Observer exemplifies “the pinnacle of liberal, pioneering journalism.” He said this on multiple occasions.

Ole Jacob Sunde, who serves as the chairperson of the Scott Trust, stated that the Observer need “a sufficiently funded, long-term ally that upholds editorial independence and liberal values.”

Wednesday and Thursday, Guardian and Observer journalists struck.

In addition to publishing print editions from Monday through Saturday, The Guardian also maintains a significant presence on the internet around the world. There has been a walkout that has been started by journalists from both organisations.

Despite the fact that the Guardian is unquestionably the more prestigious brand, particularly in the realm of digital media, the two newspapers have maintained a strong partnership, sharing resources and operating from the same site in London.

Katharine Viner, editor-in-chief of Guardian News & Media, remarked, “I acknowledge the disquiet this period has caused for Observer staff, yet we are assured that we have determined the most advantageous path forward for the title’s journalists, its readership, and the future of both the Observer and the Guardian.”

It has been announced by Laura Davison, who will soon take over as general secretary of the National Union of Journalists, that union members from both publications will get together later on Friday to discuss the next steps that will be taken.

She stated that the timing of the decision, which was made prior to the conclusion of two days of action that received a lot of support, was particularly unfortunate.

Giao Pacey, a partner at Simkins LLP, a law firm that specialises in media and entertainment, says that the new leadership of the Observer must exercise caution in order to protect the value of the newspaper, which is inextricably linked to the brand that it has created over the course of centuries.

Keeping the company’s legacy, culture, and integrity intact while also securing the resources and support necessary for success in a market that is constantly shifting is something that Pacey believes the leadership team needs to accomplish in order to strike a balance. “Upon completion of the sale, the leadership team must achieve an appropriate equilibrium for the business.”

SOURCE: AP

SEE ALSO:

French President Macron Shifts Blame for Government Collapse

Macron of France Will Complete His Tenure And Choose a New Prime Minister Shortly.

 

Continue Reading

World

French President Macron Shifts Blame for Government Collapse

Published

on

Emmanuel Macron addresses the nation from the presidential palace
Emmanuel Macron addresses the nation from the presidential palace

French President Emmanuel Macron has refused to acknowledge or take responsibility for the collapse of Michel Barnier’s government, blaming “cynical” and “anti-Republican” opposition politicians.

On Thursday, Mr. Macron, 46, issued a defiant 10-minute televised address in which he denied the possibility of resigning more than two years prior to the conclusion of his tenure. He declared that he would continue to serve his “full mandate” until 2027.

The French president has committed to appointing a new prime minister in the near future and draughting a new budget measure by a new government of the willing early next year.

After losing a vote of no-confidence in his government the previous day, Mr. Barnier, 73, tendered his resignation on Thursday. Consequently, France’s oldest prime minister also became its shortest-serving.

“Until the appointment of a new government, he and his ministers will be responsible for daily business,” according to the Telegraph.

Macron promises solution

Mr. Macron endeavoured to rectify the situation with the French electorate and the opposition during his brief address.

Mr. Macron took full responsibility for his decision to hold snap elections in June and July, which he said had been “misunderstood” and “criticised,” and thanked Mr. Barnier for “rising to the occasion, as so many others have not.”

“I shall never assume the negligence of others, particularly the MPs who have deliberately chosen to undermine France’s budget and government mere days before Christmas.”

On Thursday, Ms. Le Pen stated that the French president’s resignation was not appropriate at this time.

“That can only occur, in my opinion, when a political crisis or an institutional crisis can no longer be resolved through the resignation of the president of the republic,” she stated in an interview with Bloomberg. She noted that this was not the case at the moment.

Rather, the populist opposition figure pledged to “collaborate” with the incoming prime minister and maintained that a budget could be approved within a matter of weeks.

Macron to Blame

However, polls conducted on Thursday indicate that the French are primarily attributing the most severe political crisis to Macron since 1958, when Charles de Gaulle returned from retirement to establish the Fifth Republic and prevent civil war.

An Odaxa Backbone survey revealed that six out of ten individuals now desire Macron’s resignation, while a Toluna Harris Interactive poll indicated that an even greater number, 64 percent, desired his departure.

Mathilde Panot, the chair of the parliamentary faction of the hard-Left France Unbowed (LFI) party, has advocated for “early presidential elections,” stating, “We are now calling on Macron to go.”

According to Mr. Macron, he will not be resigning until 2027, and French law prohibits the holding of new legislative elections until July of the following year.

Simultaneously, there is considerable speculation regarding the individual whom Mr. Macron will select to succeed Mr. Barnier.

He is eager to designate a replacement before dozens of heads of state, including the newly elected US president, Donald Trump, descend on Paris for a ceremony to reopen Notre-Dame on Saturday, according to a variety of sources.

Related News:

France’s Macron Says Arrest Of The Head Of The Telegram Messaging App Wasn’t Political

France’s Right-Wing Leader Le Pen Projected to Win Snap Election

 

 

 

Continue Reading

World

Magnitude 7.0 Earthquake Strikes North Coast of California

Published

on

California Earthquake
A tsunami warning was issued but has since been cancelled

The US Geological Survey reports that a significant 7.0 magnitude earthquake struck off the coast of northern California.

A tsunami warning was initially issued for the beaches of northern California and southern Oregon, affecting around 4.7 million people, but has since been lifted.

The epicentre of the earthquake was located near Ferndale, California, a small settlement in Humboldt County about 260 miles (418 km) north of San Francisco.

At 10:51 a.m. PST, cellphones throughout Northern California and Southern Oregon rang with a “Emergency Alert” message.

The National Tsunami Warning Centre cancelled the tsunami warning shortly before noon local time.

According to the Associated Press, the US Geological Survey said that more than 5.3 million people in California were under a tsunami warning, and more than 1.3 million people lived close enough to the epicentre to feel the earthquake.

Tremors are widespread in the US West Coast, which is where many of the Earth’s tectonic plates meet. However, a strong 7-magnitude earthquake is unusual in the region. Experts estimate that 10 to 15 earthquakes of this size occur globally each year.

A number of severe earthquakes have impacted the area, including a 1994 quake in Northridge, Los Angeles, which killed scores of people and injured thousands more while causing billions of dollars in damage to homes and infrastructure.

Related News:

Google Agreed To Pay Millions For California News. Journalists Call It A Bad Deal

Unprecedented 4.7 Earthquake Strikes Near Los Angeles.

 

Continue Reading

Trending