News
Biden Turns His Back on Venezuelans at the US Border
With a rising number of Venezuelans arriving at the US-Mexico border as the November midterm elections approach, Joe Biden has sought help from an unlikely source: Trump’s playbook.
Two years ago, Democrat Joe Biden slammed President Donald Trump’s immigration policies for inflicting “cruelty and exclusion at every turn,” even against those leaving Venezuela’s “brutal” socialist government of socialist Nicolas Maduro.
Last week, Biden utilized Title 42, a Trump-era law that his own Justice Department is challenging in court, to deny Venezuelans leaving their crisis-torn country the right to seek asylum at the border.
The measure, first implemented by Trump in 2020, claims emergency public health power to bar people from requesting asylum at the border, citing the need to prevent the spread of COVID-19.
Venezuelans who walk or swim across America’s southern border will be deported, and any Venezuelan who unlawfully enters Mexico or Panama will be ineligible to enter the United States. However, up to 24,000 Venezuelans would be allowed to enter the United States through airports, similar to how Ukrainians have been admitted since Russia’s incursion in February.
According to a Mexican official who was not authorized to address the topic publicly and spoke anonymously, Mexico has requested that the US admit one Venezuelan on humanitarian parole for every Venezuelan it expels to Mexico. So, if the Biden administration paroles 24,000 Venezuelans to the United States, Mexico will only accept 24,000 Venezuelans ejected from the United States.
The Biden policy represents a sharp departure from the White House, which had chastised Florida Governor Ron DeSantis and Texas Governor Greg Abbott, both Republicans, for transporting Venezuelan migrants “fleeing political persecution” a few weeks ago to Democratic strongholds.
“These were children, mothers fleeing communism,” stated White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre.
Immigrant advocates have quickly criticized Biden’s new proposal, with many pointing out Trump comparisons.
Venezuelan migrants have returned to Mexico.
“Rather than restoring the right to asylum decimated by the Trump administration,” Jennifer Nagda, from the Young Center for Immigrant Children’s Rights, said, “the Biden administration has dangerously embraced the failures of the past and expanded upon them by explicitly allowing expulsions of Venezuelan migrants.”
According to the government, the program is intended to provide a “lawful and orderly” pathway for Venezuelans to join the United States.
Why the abrupt change from Joe Biden?
After assuming office in January 2021, Biden deferred to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which utilized its authority to maintain the Trump administration’s conclusion that a public health concern existed, necessitating the expedited expulsion of asylum seekers.
Members of Biden’s own party and activist groups had expressed concern about the public health justifications for keeping Title 42 in place, especially since COVID-19 was spreading more broadly in the United States than abroad.
After months of internal deliberation and planning, the CDC announced on April 1 that it would lift the public health order and resume routine border processing of migrants, providing them the opportunity to seek refugee status in the United States.
Homeland Security authorities were bracing for an increase in border crossings.
According to top administration sources, officials inside and outside the White House were divided over eliminating the power since they believed it effectively reduced the number of people crossing the border illegally.
According to an Associated Press source, a court order in May that kept Title 42 in place owing to a challenge from Republican state authorities was met with quiet satisfaction by some in the administration.
The recent increase in migration from Venezuela, caused by political, social, and economic instability, dashed officials’ hopes of finally seeing a pause in the mayhem that had defined the border region for the previous year.
Venezuelans were the second-largest nationality coming at the US border after Mexicans by August. Given that the United States’ relations with Venezuela meant that migrants from the country could not be readily returned, the situation became increasingly difficult to manage.
So an administration that had rejected several Trump-era initiatives geared at keeping migrants out sought to make the asylum procedure easier, and boosted the number of refugees permitted into the United States, went to Title 42.
It arranged for the Venezuelans to be sent to Mexico, which has already agreed to receive migrants expelled under Title 42 if they are from Guatemala, Honduras, or El Salvador.
Meanwhile, Justice Department lawyers continue challenging a court decision that maintains Title 42. They are fighting Republican attorneys general from more than 20 states, who say Title 42 is “the sole safety valve stopping this Administration’s already terrible border control tactics from devolving into an utter disaster.”
Under Title 42, migrants have been ejected from the United States more than 2.3 million times after crossing the country’s land borders from Canada or Mexico, while the majority attempt to enter through Mexico.
Beginning May 23, the administration declared that it would cease removing migrants under Title 42 and return to detaining and deporting migrants who did not qualify to enter and remain in the United States – a lengthy process that permits individuals to seek asylum in the United States.
“We are deeply alarmed by the apparent acceptance, codification, and expansion of the use of Title 42, an irrelevant health order, as a cornerstone of border policy,” Witness at the Border’s Thomas Cartwright stated. “One that revokes the legal right to seek refuge.”
A rival lawsuit from the American Civil Liberties Union is also attempting to eliminate Title 42, which could render the administration’s proposal ineffective.
“Anyone has the right to seek asylum regardless of where they came from, how they arrived in the United States, or whether they have family here,” said ACLU lawyer Lee Gelernt.
The new head of the Army has stated that Britain must be prepared to fight a war within three years.
Gen Sir Roland Walker has issued a warning about a variety of risks in what he calls a “increasingly volatile” environment.
However, he stated that war was not inevitable and that the Army had “just enough time” to prepare to prevent conflict.
He stated that the Army’s fighting capacity would be doubled by 2027 and tripled by the end of the decade.
Gen Walker warned that the Britain was under threat from a “axis of upheaval” in his first speech as Prime Minister on Tuesday.
Among the primary concerns confronting the Britain in the next years, as noted by the general in a briefing, is an enraged Russia, which may seek vengeance on the West for helping Ukraine, regardless of who wins the war.
He stated: “It doesn’t matter how it finishes. I believe Russia will emerge from it weaker objectively – or completely – but still very, very dangerous and seeking some form of retaliation for what we have done to assist Ukraine.”
Britain’s Government Defence Review and Military Challenges
He also warned that China was determined to retake Taiwan, and Iran was likely to seek nuclear weapons.
He stated that the threats they posed may become particularly acute in the next three years, and that these countries had formed a “mutual transactional relationship” since the war in Ukraine, sharing weaponry and technology.
However, he stated that the path to conflict was not “inexorable” if the UK re-established credible land troops to assist its deterrent strategy for avoiding war.
In his speech, he described his force of slightly over 70,000 regular troops as a “medium-sized army” and made no direct call for additional resources or men.
However, he pushed the British Army to adapt swiftly, focussing on technology such as artificial intelligence and weaponry rather than numbers.
His ultimate goal is for the Army to be capable of destroying an opponent three times its size.
This would entail firing quicker and farther, he said, aided by lessons learnt from the Ukraine war.
The general’s speech at the Royal United Services Institute land warfare conference comes only one week after the government began a “root and branch” defence review to “take a fresh look” at the challenges facing the armed services.
Defence Secretary John Healey launched the assessment, describing the existing status of the armed forces as “hollowed-out” and stating that “procurement waste and neglected morale cannot continue”.
According to the most recent Ministry of Defence (MoD) numbers from April 2024, the Britain’s regular Army forces total 75,325 troops (excluding Gurkhas and volunteers).
That figure has been declining in recent years, as recruiting has failed to match retention. The previous Conservative administration lowered the planned headcount from 82,000 to 72,500 by 2025.
Members of the NATO military alliance have agreed to spend at least 2% of GDP on defence by 2024, but several countries are unlikely to fulfil this goal.
The Britain presently spends 2.3% of its GDP on defence. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has previously stated that the defence review will include a “roadmap” for increasing this to 2.5%, however he has yet to provide a date for this promise.
Source: BBC
News
Katie Ledecky Hopes For Clean Races At Paris Olympics In The Aftermath Of The Chinese Doping Scandal
PARIS — Katie Ledecky is looking for clean Olympic races. On Wednesday, Hope had pretty much reached her limit.
The American swimmer hopes to add to her six gold medals as she competes in the 400, 800, and 1,500 meters at the Paris Games. Her program starts with the heavy 400 on Saturday, featuring Ariarne Titmus and Summer McIntosh.
Katie Ledecky | ESPN Image
Katie Ledecky Hopes For Clean Races At Paris Olympics In The Aftermath Of The Chinese Doping Scandal
The 27-year-old Katie is competing in her fourth Summer Olympics, but the first since a doping scandal involving almost two dozen Chinese swimmers who tested positive for a banned chemical before the Tokyo Games — yet were permitted to compete with no consequences. The controversy has raised serious worries regarding the effectiveness of anti-doping initiatives.
Katie Ledecky | Vogue Image
“I hope everyone here is going to be competing clean this week,” Ledecky claimed. “But what truly counts is, were they training cleanly? Hopefully this has been the case. Hopefully, there has been worldwide testing.”
The International Olympic Committee has expressed concern over the ongoing US investigation into possible doping by Chinese swimmers. While awarding the 2034 Winter Olympics to Salt Lake City on Wednesday, the IOC urged Utah officials to do whatever they could to stop the FBI investigation.
“I think everyone’s heard what the athletes think,” Katie added. “They seek transparency. They want more answers to the remaining questions. At this point, we are here to race. We are going to race whoever is in the lane next to us.
“We are not paid to conduct the tests, so we trust those who follow their regulations. That applies both today and in the future.
Katie Ledecky | ESPN Image
Katie Ledecky Hopes For Clean Races At Paris Olympics In The Aftermath Of The Chinese Doping Scandal
SOURCE | AP
As the summer holidays begin, London may experience an official heatwave with temperatures reaching up to 29 degrees Celsius.
The Met Office predicts a long period of sunny and dry weather for London after a soggy spring and summer.
After a cloudy day on Saturday, temperatures are expected to reach 27C on Sunday, with lots of sunlight.
On Monday and Tuesday, temperatures are forecast to peak at 29 degrees Celsius. Monday is forecast to offer more sunlight, while Tuesday may see some gloomy weather.
Temperatures are expected to remain in the high 20s next week, with lows of approximately 18C.
According to the Met Office, a heatwave is “an extended period of hot weather relative to the expected conditions of the area at that time of year, which may be accompanied by high humidity.”
In the United Kingdom, a heatwave is proclaimed when daily temperatures meet or surpass a certain level for at least three consecutive days.
In London, the heatwave threshold is 28 degrees Celsius.
The Met Office reported that the UK is experiencing hotter and wetter weather on average due to climate change.
The UK experienced its warmest May and April on record this year, despite damp and dismal conditions in many areas.
According to the Met Office’s State Of The UK Climate 2023 report published on Thursday, the UK experienced historic levels of extreme weather last year.
In the United Kingdom, 2023 was the second warmest year on record, bringing storms, flooding, strong heatwaves, and rising sea levels; only 2022 was warmer.
It was 0.8°C higher than the average from 1991 to 2020, and 1.66°C higher than the 1961 to 1990 average.
However, 2023 will be a “cool year” in comparison to 2100, based on the planet’s warming trajectory.
The government’s plan to adapt to the hazards presented by climate change is currently being challenged in the High Court by campaigners who allege the Tory administration’s July 2023 National Adaptation Programme (NAP) fails to adequately address 61 concerns.
Source: The Standard
-
World2 weeks agoFormer President Trump Survives Being Shot at Pennsylvania Rally
-
Tech4 weeks ago
Huawei Launches 5G-A Pioneers Program at MWC Shanghai 2024: Paving the Way for a Connected Future
-
Sports4 weeks ago
NBA Draft: Kyle Filipowski Withdraws Unexpectedly From The First Round
-
Tech4 weeks ago
ChatGPT Answers Undiscovered Questions and Outperforms Students.
-
News4 weeks ago
US Supreme Court Rejects Drug Deal that Protects the Sackler Family
-
Health4 weeks ago
US Health Agency Issues Dengue Virus Infection Warning
