Connect with us


Elon Musk Slams Physician “I Eat a Donut a Day and I’m Still Alive”



Elon Musk Slams Physician "I Eat a Donut a Day and I'm Still Alive"

Elon Musk, who previously stated that he would rather “eat tasty food and live a shorter life,” has kept his word, saying he enjoys a breakfast donut daily.

In response to a tweet from Peter Diamandis, a physician and the CEO of the non-profit organization XPRIZE, the Twitter CEO revealed his sweet tooth.

On Tuesday, Diamandis tweeted, “Sugar is poison.” Musk replied: “I eat a donut every morning. Still alive.”

At press time, Musk’s tweet had been viewed more than 11.4 million times.

Musk’s daily donut diet revelation is unsurprising, given his previous remarks about his eating habits.

In 2020, Musk told podcaster Joe Rogan, “I’d rather eat tasty food and live a shorter life.” Musk said that while he works out, he “wouldn’t exercise at all” if he could.

According to CNBC, it’s unclear whether Musk’s diet was influenced by his mother, Maye Musk, a model who worked as a dietitian for 45 years.

Musk is not the only celebrity with unusual eating habits.

Rep. Nancy Pelosi, the former House Speaker, survives — and thrives — on a diet of breakfast ice cream, hot dogs, pasta, and chocolate.

Former President Donald Trump has a well-documented fondness for fast food, telling a McDonald’s employee in February that he knows the menu “better than anyone” who works there.

Amazon founder Jeff Bezos enjoys octopus for breakfast, and Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg prefers to eat meat from animals he has slaughtered himself.

Musk representatives did not respond immediately to Insider’s request for comment after regular business hours.

Elon Musk wants pause on AI Work.

Meanwhile, four artificial intelligence experts have expressed concern after their work was cited in an open letter co-signed by Elon Musk calling for an immediate halt to research.

The letter, dated March 22 and with over 1,800 signatures as of Friday, demanded a six-month moratorium on developing systems “more powerful” than Microsoft-backed (MSFT.O) OpenAI’s new GPT-4, which can hold human-like conversations, compose songs, and summarize lengthy documents.

Since GPT-4’s predecessor, ChatGPT, last year, competitors have rushed to release similar products.

According to the open letter, AI systems with “human-competitive intelligence” pose grave risks to humanity, citing 12 pieces of research from experts such as university academics and current and former employees of OpenAI, Google (GOOGL.O), and its subsidiary DeepMind.

Since then, civil society groups in the United States and the European Union have urged lawmakers to limit OpenAI’s research. OpenAI did not immediately return requests for comment.

Critics have accused the Future of Life Institute (FLI), primarily funded by the Musk Foundation and behind the letter, of prioritizing imagined apocalyptic scenarios over more immediate concerns about AI, such as racist or sexist biases being programmed into the machines.

“On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots,” a well-known paper co-authored by Margaret Mitchell, who previously oversaw ethical AI research at Google, was cited.

Mitchell, now the chief ethical scientist at Hugging Face, slammed the letter, telling Reuters that it was unclear what constituted “more powerful than GPT4”.

“By taking a lot of dubious ideas for granted, the letter asserts a set of priorities and a narrative on AI that benefits FLI supporters,” she explained. “Ignoring current harms is a privilege some of us do not have.”

On Twitter, her co-authors Timnit Gebru and Emily M. Bender slammed the letter, calling some of its claims “unhinged.”

FLI president Max Tegmark told Reuters that the campaign did not undermine OpenAI’s competitive advantage.

“It’s quite amusing; I’ve heard people say, ‘Elon Musk is trying to slow down the competition,'” he said, adding that Musk had no involvement in the letter’s creation. “This isn’t about a single company.”

Shiri Dori-Hacohen, an assistant professor at the University of Connecticut, took issue with the letter mentioning her work. She co-authored a research paper last year arguing that the widespread use of AI already posed serious risks.

Her research claimed that the current use of AI systems could influence decision-making in the face of climate change, nuclear war, and other existential threats.

“AI does not need to reach human-level intelligence to exacerbate those risks,” she told Reuters.

“There are non-existent risks that are extremely important but don’t get the same level of Hollywood attention.”

When asked about the criticism, FLI’s Tegmark stated that AI’s short-term and long-term risks should be taken seriously.

“If we cite someone, it just means we claim they’re endorsing that sentence, not the letter or everything they think,” he told Reuters.

Dan Hendrycks, director of the California-based Center for AI Safety, also cited in the letter, defended its contents, telling Reuters that it was prudent to consider black swan events – those that appear unlikely but have catastrophic consequences.

According to the open letter, generative AI tools could be used to flood the internet with “propaganda and untruth.”

Dori-Hacohen called Musk’s signature “pretty rich,” citing a reported increase in misinformation on Twitter following his acquisition of the platform, as documented by the civil society group Common Cause and others.

Twitter will soon introduce a new fee structure for access to its data, which could hinder future research.

“That has had a direct impact on my lab’s work, as well as the work of others studying misinformation and disinformation,” Dori-Hacohen said. “We’re doing our work with one hand tied behind our back.”

Musk and Twitter did not respond immediately to requests for comment.

Geoff Thomas is a seasoned staff writer at VORNews, a reputable online publication. With his sharp writing skills and deep understanding of SEO, he consistently delivers high-quality, engaging content that resonates with readers. Thomas' articles are well-researched, informative, and written in a clear, concise style that keeps audiences hooked. His ability to craft compelling narratives while seamlessly incorporating relevant keywords has made him a valuable asset to the VORNews team.

Continue Reading


Apple IPhones Sales Fall 24% In China Amid Competition And Headwinds



Apple IPhones Sales Fall 24% In China Amid Competition And Headwinds

According to a new report, iPhone sales fell 24% in the first six weeks of 2024, posing substantial challenges for Apple and other Western technology businesses in a critical market.

According to Counterpoint Research, the overall mobile market in China declined by 7%, with businesses such as Apple, Oppo, and Vivo seeing decreases.

However, the difficulty for Apple has been ongoing for a year; as China’s economy has weakened, trade tensions and nationalism have risen. Counterpoint reported that customers who may have previously considered now opt for national brands, namely Huawei.


Apple IPhones Sales Fall 24% In China Amid Competition And Headwinds

“Primarily, faced stiff competition at the high end from a resurgent Huawei while getting squeezed in the middle by aggressive pricing from the likes of Oppo, Vivo, and Xiaomi,” Mengmeng Zhang, a Counterpoint senior analyst, stated in a press statement. “Although the iPhone 15 is a great device, it has no significant upgrades from the previous version, so consumers feel fine holding on to the older-generation iPhones for now.”

Apple shares fell 2.8% on Tuesday. The stock has lost 11.6% this year due to concerns about slowing sales, notably in China.

The corporation did not respond to a request for comment.

The research comes amid a faltering Chinese economy, a challenging housing market, increasing unemployment among younger workers, and increased rivalry among higher-end vendors in China, particularly from Chinese device giant Huawei.

China is an important market for the company, as it is the second largest after the United States. Apple previously achieved significant gains during its launch period last year. The company continues to give discounts to assist in alleviating some of the downturn.


Apple IPhones Sales Fall 24% In China Amid Competition And Headwinds

Last year, Huawei’s Mate 60 made headlines when the US authorities requested further information on the Pro variant, which included a sophisticated CPU. Its appearance astounded industry observers, who questioned how the company could produce such a device in the wake of the United States’ extensive attempts to limit China’s access to foreign semiconductor technology due to alleged national security concerns.

Some Chinese buyers believe US government sanctions have victimized them and are gravitating toward Huawei’s Mate 60 smartphone, which is approaching Apple sales.

According to Jeff Fieldhack, a research director at Counterpoint, one issue is that Apple had a strong January last year owing to part shortages but did not have any shortages this year.


Apple IPhones Sales Fall 24% In China Amid Competition And Headwinds

“This isn’t a major deal for Apple in the long term,” he added. “It is still a successful iPhone launch and there is more discounting and marketing they can do this year in China to help alleviate the competition from Huawei.”

In January, Huawei held 17% of the mobile market in China, compared to the iPhone’s 16%. Huawei’s demand exceeds its supply, implying that it might sell more, according to Fieldhack.

“Apple, to its credit, ended the year at number one, which was extraordinary despite headwinds from China,” added the analyst.


Continue Reading


Microsoft Says It Hasn’t Been Able To Shake Russian State Hackers




BOSTON — Microsoft said Friday that it is still working to evict the elite Russian government hackers who broke into senior business officials’ email accounts in November and are attempting to enter consumer networks using stolen access data.

According to the software giant’s blog and regulatory filing, the hackers from Russia’s SVR foreign intelligence service used data gained during the intrusion, which was exposed in mid-January, to compromise some source-code repositories and internal systems.


Microsoft Says It Hasn’t Been Able To Shake Russian State Hackers

A corporate official declined to specify the source code and capabilities the hackers gained to further attack customers and systems. Microsoft claimed Friday that hackers obtained “secrets” from email contacts between the business and certain customers, including cryptographic secrets like passwords, certificates, and authentication keys, and that it was contacting them “to assist in mitigating measures.”

Hewlett Packard Enterprise, a cloud computing business, revealed on January 24 that it was also an SVR hacking victim and had been notified of the breach — by whom it would not say — two weeks earlier, coinciding with the revelation that it had been compromised.

“The threat actor’s ongoing attack is characterized by a sustained, significant commitment of the threat actor’s resources, coordination, and focus,” the company said Friday, adding that it may be utilizing acquired data “to accumulate a picture of areas to attack and enhance its ability to do so.” According to cybersecurity experts, Microsoft’s admission that the SVR hack had not been contained highlights the risks of government and business relying heavily on the Redmond, Washington-based company’s software monoculture — and the fact that so many of its customers are linked via its global cloud network.


Microsoft Says It Hasn’t Been Able To Shake Russian State Hackers

“This has tremendous national security implications,” said Tom Kellermann of the cybersecurity firm Contrast Security. “The Russians can now leverage supply chain attacks against Microsoft’s customers.”

Tenable’s CEO, Amit Yoran, also published a statement expressing shock and dismay. He is among security pros who believe Microsoft is extremely secretive about its vulnerabilities and how it handles intrusions.

“We should all be furious that this keeps happening,” he continued. “These breaches aren’t isolated from each other and Microsoft’s shady security practices and misleading statements purposely obfuscate the whole truth.”

Microsoft said it has yet to establish if the incident will have a material impact on its profitability. It also stated that the intrusion’s persistence “reflects what has become a more broadly unprecedented global threat landscape, especially in terms of sophisticated nation-state attacks.”

The hackers, known as Cozy Bear, are the same ones responsible for the SolarWinds breach.


Microsoft Says It Hasn’t Been Able To Shake Russian State Hackers

When Microsoft first reported the intrusion, it stated that the SVR unit got into its corporate email system and accessed the accounts of certain senior executives and staff from its cybersecurity and legal departments. It did not specify how many accounts were compromised.

At the time, Microsoft stated that it could terminate the hackers’ access to the compromised accounts on or around January 13. But by then, they had certainly established a footing.

It said they gained access via compromising credentials on a “legacy” test account but did not elaborate.

Microsoft’s newest disclosure comes three months after a new Securities and Exchange Commission rule went into effect, requiring publicly traded corporations to disclose breaches that potentially harm their businesses.


Continue Reading


Dodge Muscle Cars Live On With New Versions Of The Charger Powered By Electricity Or Gasoline




DETROIT — America’s muscle car culture will endure while the country shifts to electric vehicles, but the gas-powered performance automobile will be there for at least a few more years.

On Tuesday, Dodge debuted two battery-powered Charger muscle cars that still roar like a large V8 engine but emit no pollution from the tailpipe.


New iterations of the Charger that run on gasoline or electricity continue to be Dodge muscle cars.

However, the Stellantis brand, which has carved out a market niche for high-performance vehicles, will continue selling a gas-powered Charger without the large Hemi V8.

Both will be based on Stellantis’ worldwide large vehicle platform, and the Windsor, Ontario, factory that will produce them will be able to switch between gasoline and electric power depending on market demand. Stellantis’ flexibility will allow it to hedge its bets on whether electric vehicle sales take off or slow.

Last year, Stellantis discontinued production of the gas-powered Chargers and Challengers, and many believed it would be the end of the thundering sedans.

However, Dodge CEO Tim Kuniskis hinted that a gasoline version would continue to exist. “It was always there.” It was always in the plans. “It was always coming,” he explained.


Dodge Muscle Cars Live On With New Versions Of The Charger Powered By Electricity Or Gasoline

However, the business downplayed the gas version in favour of two- and four-door electric variants that resemble Chargers from the 1960s, with aerodynamic lines and hatchbacks rather than trunks.

The electric versions, branded Charger Daytona after the NASCAR raceway in Florida, will have two powertrains, one with up to 670 horsepower and the ability to accelerate from 0 to 60 mph (97 km/h) in 3.3 seconds. The other is no slouch, with 496 horsepower and a zero to 60 time of 4.7 seconds.

Dodge boasts that its high-performance electric version is the world’s fastest and most powerful muscle car. Next year, an even higher-performing version will be released.

The 496-horsepower Daytona is predicted to have a range of 317 miles (510 kilometres) per charge, while the high-performance version can travel 260 miles (418 kilometres).

Both will include the company’s Fratzonic Chambered Exhaust, which routes air through a chamber to replicate the roar of a V8.

Both are hefty because of their large batteries, with gross vehicle weights of more than three tons.

The new gas-powered Charger Sixpack will have a similar design to the electric variants and be powered by a new 3-litre six-cylinder engine with two turbochargers. Standard variants will generate 420 horsepower, while high-output engines will produce 550.

According to the firm, the new engine will produce more horsepower and torque than the previous 5.7- and 6.4-liter Hemi V8s. According to company executives, fuel efficiency tests on the Charger’s new engine still need to be finished.


Dodge Muscle Cars Live On With New Versions Of The Charger Powered By Electricity Or Gasoline

All variants have all-wheel drive, although they can be converted to rear-wheel drive, so owners may still experience burnout and drift. There will be alternatives to prepare the automobiles for the racecourse.

The two-door coupe Daytona models are anticipated to go into production this summer, while the electric four-door and gas-powered versions will begin early next year.

Kuniskis said he is still determining which kind will sell better, electric or gas. With federal tax breaks on electric vehicles, leasing payments are anticipated to be quite appealing, which could convince some consumers, he added.

Environmentalists will almost definitely attack the firm for releasing EVs that prioritize performance efficiency while maintaining the gas-powered muscle car. However, Kuniskis stated that in typical circumstances, approximately 17 million new vehicles are sold annually in the United States.

“It’s a 17 million unit industry,” he said. “And you know what? People require options,” he added, adding that the corporation could face criticism if it did not produce electrified versions.


Continue Reading