News
Liberal Appointee Clears Justin Trudeau for Using Canada’s Emergency Powers Act
An inquiry led by a Liberal appointee has found that Justin Trudeau and the Canadian government met the “high” criterion by invoking the never-before-used emergency powers act to terminate trucker demonstrations last February.
Justice Paul Rouleau, a long-time Liberal supporter who led the examination into the usage of the 1988 Emergencies Act, called the decision a “drastic move” but not a “dictatorial one”. In times of crisis, the legislation gives the government new authority.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau used it three weeks into the protests on February 14, 2022.
“Lawful protest deteriorated into lawlessness, resulting in a national emergency,” Mr. Rouleau said in his report to the Public Order Emergency Commission (POEC), which was tabled in the House of Commons on Friday.
Mr. Rouleau was a member of John Turner’s campaign for Liberal Party of Canada leadership when Pierre Trudeau announced his retirement. Rouleau then assisted in the selection of Turner’s cabinet after he was elected leader of the Liberal Party of Canada.
Justice Paul Rouleau, who has been with the Liberal Party for over 40 years, was appointed by Justin Trudeau to investigate Trudeau’s invocation of the Emergencies Act. Mr. Rouleau said he did not conclude lightly, but the federal government’s actions were “appropriate” and “effective”.
Though the report claims that emergency powers were required, it also claims that Prime Minister Trudeau inflamed the situation by calling the movement a “fringe minority,” reinforcing demonstrators’ resolve.
At a press conference on Friday afternoon, Prime Minister Trudeau stated that his administration will take the report’s recommendations seriously and that a response will be issued within the next year following an analysis.
He also agreed with the criticism of his remarks on the protesters, adding he wished he had said them differently.
The “Freedom Convoy,” a three-week-long demonstration against the government’s Covid-19 vaccine mandate, had gridlocked Canada’s national capital and received international attention.
Justin Trudeau used 1988 legislation, which empowered the government to impose prohibitions on public assembly in some locations and to bar travel to protest zones, including by foreign nationals, among other steps.
It also needs a formal investigation after the emergency action is invoked.
Late last year, the POEC heard from over 70 witnesses and 50 specialists. Judge Paul Rouleau of the Ontario Court of Appeal presided over the hearings.
On the final day of the hearings, Mr. Trudeau testified before the commission.
He defended his administration’s use of the act, claiming that law enforcement could not confront the protest in Ottawa and that he was afraid about what would happen if the government did not end it.
The measure authorized the federal authorities to evict and arrest protestors and freeze the financial assets of anyone involved in the protests.
Mr. Trudeau testified that he would not have utilized the powers if he thought another option existed.
“If I had been confident that other orders of government or any other law in Canada would have sufficed to deal with this emergency,” he stated, “we would not have met the threshold” to invoke the act.
In addition, the 2000-page report includes 56 recommendations to strengthen intelligence sharing, police reaction to large-scale protests, and the Emergencies Act itself.
The Emergencies Act was enacted in 1988 but has never been used. The law was explored in the early stages of the epidemic under public welfare but was ultimately deemed superfluous.
The antecedent law, known as the War Measures Act, was utilized three times in Canadian history: during the First World War, the Second World War, and, most controversially, during the October Crisis by Pierre Trudeau, Justin Trudeau’s father.
Meanwhile, Justin Trudeau expresses sorrow for describing Freedom Convoy demonstrators as a ‘fringe minority’. Trudeau claimed he spoke too broadly about demonstrators, many of whom wanted to be heard in their opposition to two years of pandemic restrictions.
“I wish I had framed things differently,” Trudeau said at a press conference on Friday.
Trudeau claimed he was speaking too broadly about protestors, many of whom, he said, merely wanted to make their opinions heard in opposition to the government’s pandemic restrictions imposed for two years.
Trudeau admitted that he could have been more precise about a tiny group of people with anti-vaccine attitudes that he believed were causing harm.
“The truth is that there are a very small number of people in this nation who purposefully promote misinformation and deception that has resulted in Canadian fatalities and extreme hardship in others who trust them,” he stated. “But, that is a small subset of folks who were simply hurting, worried, and wanted to be heard.”
Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre accused Trudeau of being the main source of division in Canada at a second press conference held shortly after Trudeau’s.
“He intends to divide and conquer. “He believes that if he can divide Canadians against one another, they will forget how horrible life has become,” Poilievre explained.
“He thinks that if you’re terrified of your neighbor, you’ll forget that you can’t pay your rent. If you’re terrified of a trucker, you might forget you’re hungry and divert your gaze away from the person who caused the situation in the first place.”
The new head of the Army has stated that Britain must be prepared to fight a war within three years.
Gen Sir Roland Walker has issued a warning about a variety of risks in what he calls a “increasingly volatile” environment.
However, he stated that war was not inevitable and that the Army had “just enough time” to prepare to prevent conflict.
He stated that the Army’s fighting capacity would be doubled by 2027 and tripled by the end of the decade.
Gen Walker warned that the Britain was under threat from a “axis of upheaval” in his first speech as Prime Minister on Tuesday.
Among the primary concerns confronting the Britain in the next years, as noted by the general in a briefing, is an enraged Russia, which may seek vengeance on the West for helping Ukraine, regardless of who wins the war.
He stated: “It doesn’t matter how it finishes. I believe Russia will emerge from it weaker objectively – or completely – but still very, very dangerous and seeking some form of retaliation for what we have done to assist Ukraine.”
Britain’s Government Defence Review and Military Challenges
He also warned that China was determined to retake Taiwan, and Iran was likely to seek nuclear weapons.
He stated that the threats they posed may become particularly acute in the next three years, and that these countries had formed a “mutual transactional relationship” since the war in Ukraine, sharing weaponry and technology.
However, he stated that the path to conflict was not “inexorable” if the UK re-established credible land troops to assist its deterrent strategy for avoiding war.
In his speech, he described his force of slightly over 70,000 regular troops as a “medium-sized army” and made no direct call for additional resources or men.
However, he pushed the British Army to adapt swiftly, focussing on technology such as artificial intelligence and weaponry rather than numbers.
His ultimate goal is for the Army to be capable of destroying an opponent three times its size.
This would entail firing quicker and farther, he said, aided by lessons learnt from the Ukraine war.
The general’s speech at the Royal United Services Institute land warfare conference comes only one week after the government began a “root and branch” defence review to “take a fresh look” at the challenges facing the armed services.
Defence Secretary John Healey launched the assessment, describing the existing status of the armed forces as “hollowed-out” and stating that “procurement waste and neglected morale cannot continue”.
According to the most recent Ministry of Defence (MoD) numbers from April 2024, the Britain’s regular Army forces total 75,325 troops (excluding Gurkhas and volunteers).
That figure has been declining in recent years, as recruiting has failed to match retention. The previous Conservative administration lowered the planned headcount from 82,000 to 72,500 by 2025.
Members of the NATO military alliance have agreed to spend at least 2% of GDP on defence by 2024, but several countries are unlikely to fulfil this goal.
The Britain presently spends 2.3% of its GDP on defence. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has previously stated that the defence review will include a “roadmap” for increasing this to 2.5%, however he has yet to provide a date for this promise.
Source: BBC
News
Katie Ledecky Hopes For Clean Races At Paris Olympics In The Aftermath Of The Chinese Doping Scandal
PARIS — Katie Ledecky is looking for clean Olympic races. On Wednesday, Hope had pretty much reached her limit.
The American swimmer hopes to add to her six gold medals as she competes in the 400, 800, and 1,500 meters at the Paris Games. Her program starts with the heavy 400 on Saturday, featuring Ariarne Titmus and Summer McIntosh.
Katie Ledecky | ESPN Image
Katie Ledecky Hopes For Clean Races At Paris Olympics In The Aftermath Of The Chinese Doping Scandal
The 27-year-old Katie is competing in her fourth Summer Olympics, but the first since a doping scandal involving almost two dozen Chinese swimmers who tested positive for a banned chemical before the Tokyo Games — yet were permitted to compete with no consequences. The controversy has raised serious worries regarding the effectiveness of anti-doping initiatives.
Katie Ledecky | Vogue Image
“I hope everyone here is going to be competing clean this week,” Ledecky claimed. “But what truly counts is, were they training cleanly? Hopefully this has been the case. Hopefully, there has been worldwide testing.”
The International Olympic Committee has expressed concern over the ongoing US investigation into possible doping by Chinese swimmers. While awarding the 2034 Winter Olympics to Salt Lake City on Wednesday, the IOC urged Utah officials to do whatever they could to stop the FBI investigation.
“I think everyone’s heard what the athletes think,” Katie added. “They seek transparency. They want more answers to the remaining questions. At this point, we are here to race. We are going to race whoever is in the lane next to us.
“We are not paid to conduct the tests, so we trust those who follow their regulations. That applies both today and in the future.
Katie Ledecky | ESPN Image
Katie Ledecky Hopes For Clean Races At Paris Olympics In The Aftermath Of The Chinese Doping Scandal
SOURCE | AP
As the summer holidays begin, London may experience an official heatwave with temperatures reaching up to 29 degrees Celsius.
The Met Office predicts a long period of sunny and dry weather for London after a soggy spring and summer.
After a cloudy day on Saturday, temperatures are expected to reach 27C on Sunday, with lots of sunlight.
On Monday and Tuesday, temperatures are forecast to peak at 29 degrees Celsius. Monday is forecast to offer more sunlight, while Tuesday may see some gloomy weather.
Temperatures are expected to remain in the high 20s next week, with lows of approximately 18C.
According to the Met Office, a heatwave is “an extended period of hot weather relative to the expected conditions of the area at that time of year, which may be accompanied by high humidity.”
In the United Kingdom, a heatwave is proclaimed when daily temperatures meet or surpass a certain level for at least three consecutive days.
In London, the heatwave threshold is 28 degrees Celsius.
The Met Office reported that the UK is experiencing hotter and wetter weather on average due to climate change.
The UK experienced its warmest May and April on record this year, despite damp and dismal conditions in many areas.
According to the Met Office’s State Of The UK Climate 2023 report published on Thursday, the UK experienced historic levels of extreme weather last year.
In the United Kingdom, 2023 was the second warmest year on record, bringing storms, flooding, strong heatwaves, and rising sea levels; only 2022 was warmer.
It was 0.8°C higher than the average from 1991 to 2020, and 1.66°C higher than the 1961 to 1990 average.
However, 2023 will be a “cool year” in comparison to 2100, based on the planet’s warming trajectory.
The government’s plan to adapt to the hazards presented by climate change is currently being challenged in the High Court by campaigners who allege the Tory administration’s July 2023 National Adaptation Programme (NAP) fails to adequately address 61 concerns.
Source: The Standard
-
World2 weeks agoFormer President Trump Survives Being Shot at Pennsylvania Rally
-
Tech4 weeks ago
Huawei Launches 5G-A Pioneers Program at MWC Shanghai 2024: Paving the Way for a Connected Future
-
Sports4 weeks ago
NBA Draft: Kyle Filipowski Withdraws Unexpectedly From The First Round
-
Tech4 weeks ago
ChatGPT Answers Undiscovered Questions and Outperforms Students.
-
News4 weeks ago
US Supreme Court Rejects Drug Deal that Protects the Sackler Family
-
Health4 weeks ago
US Health Agency Issues Dengue Virus Infection Warning
