Connect with us

News

Panthers Now 2 Wins From The Stanley Cup, Top Oilers 4-1 For 2-0 Lead In Title Series

Published

on

panthers
Panthers | AP News Image

SUNRISE, Florida – Leon Draisaitl of Edmonton knocked out Florida’s Aleksander Barkov. The Panthers were sure to reply by landing the greater blow.

And the Stanley Cup Final heated up Monday night.

Evan Rodrigues scored twice in the third period, Niko Mikkola and Aaron Ekblad also scored, and the Panthers used another close finish to defeat the Oilers 4-1 and take a 2-0 lead in the Stanley Cup Final.

Sergei Bobrovsky stopped 18 shots for Florida, which had a 1-8 record in Cup final games prior to this series and is now two wins away from its first championship. The score in the two games was Florida 7, Edmonton 1.

panthers

Panthers | AP News Image

Panthers Now 2 Wins From The Stanley Cup, Top Oilers 4-1 For 2-0 Lead In Title Series

“A six-man job against the best players in the world,” Ekblad stated.

But the victory came at a cost for Florida, as the Panthers lost captain Barkov after Edmonton forward Draisaitl rushed at him midway through the third period and smacked him in the head. Barkov stayed down for some time, required assistance getting to the bench, and then went down the tunnel to the Florida locker room for additional evaluation.

Florida coach Paul Maurice provided no update on Barkov’s status and was significantly more reserved than he usually is after a win.

“This isn’t The Oprah Winfrey Show,” Maurice commented about the Barkov hit. “My feelings don’t matter.”

Mattias Ekholm scored, and Stuart Skinner made 25 saves for the Oilers, who now must overcome some heavy history.

Edmonton has only once overcome a 2-0 deficit in a best-of-seven series against San Jose in Round 2 of the 2006 playoffs. In 54 previous Stanley Cup Finals, teams that have fallen 2-0 have won only five times.

“I think we believe we came here and played well enough to deserve a split,” Oilers coach Kris Knoblauch said. “It doesn’t always happen.”

The series will resume with Game 3 in Edmonton on Thursday night.

“We can certainly do better,” Draisaitl added. “It begins with me… I surely have a lot more to offer. Not my greatest night. Of course, I’m taking responsibility for that.”

Draisaitl received only a minor penalty for roughing on the hit that removed Barkov from the game. Rodrigues scored on a tip-in to make it 3-1, the first power-play goal Edmonton has allowed in its previous 34 man-down situations.

With around 6 minutes remaining, Connor McDavid had a breakaway opportunity to pull Edmonton within one. Bobrovsky stopped him, and he and Matthew Tkachuk tussled a bit along the boards after the play, with the Panthers still upset about the hit on Barkov.

“I have no response or comment on that,” Tkachuk said when asked what he thought of Draisaitl’s hit on Barkov and whether he was concerned that Florida’s captain would miss time.

McDavid said of the hit, “I thought it was part of the game.”

Ekblad added: “We’re hoping he’ll be fine.”

Emotions were intense all night. Edmonton’s Warren Foegele was ejected in the first period for a knee-on-knee hit that briefly took Florida’s Eetu Luostarinen out of the game; that ejection, along with an injury to Oilers defenseman Darnell Nurse, left the team with only 11 forwards and five defensemen for much of the game.

panthers

Panthers | AP News Image

Panthers Now 2 Wins From The Stanley Cup, Top Oilers 4-1 For 2-0 Lead In Title Series

Rodrigues scored early in the third period following a turnover, giving Florida a 2-1 lead and setting the tone for another comeback. The Panthers, who trailed 1-0 after 20 minutes, are now an NHL-best 5-2 when trailing after one period in the playoffs.

With 2:28 remaining, Ekblad sealed the deal with an empty netter.

“It’s intended to be hard. “It’s supposed to be difficult,” McDavid explained. “I’m excited to see what our group’s made of.”

Just as in Game 1, one team capitalized on its first shot. On Saturday, it was Florida, and now it’s Edmonton.

There wasn’t much to it: Ekholm skated nearly the whole length of the ice as the teams played 4-on-4, taking a harmless-looking shot that went between Bobrovsky’s leg pads and into the back of the net. McDavid, playing in the same venue where he was selected in 2015, assisted on the goal, giving him 27 assists this playoffs.

The Panthers tied the game halfway through the second period. Mikkola had two shots in a shift; one was at the wrong net and the other more than made up for that near-miss.

Moments after clumsily wheeling a backhand toward Bobrovsky, who was alert enough to spare his teammate from the shame of an own goal, Mikkola handled an Anton Lundell delivery and blasted it past Skinner to level the game at one.

panthers

Panthers | AP news Image

Panthers Now 2 Wins From The Stanley Cup, Top Oilers 4-1 For 2-0 Lead In Title Series

“Bob was awake,” Mikkola explained.

Shots were 22-7. After 40 minutes, Florida leads the league in shots on goal, while the Oilers are kept to a season low entering the third. Bobrovsky was put to the test far more in the third period than in the first two, but he rose to the occasion, allowing two goals or fewer for the 12th time in 13 games.

And, for the first time, Florida is two wins away from the Cup.

“It’s special,” Rodrigues stated. “I’m trying to embrace it. Trying to stay present. That’s two significant wins for our team, but I believe we’ve already turned the page and are preparing for Game 3.”

Kiara Grace is a staff writer at VORNews, a reputable online publication. Her writing focuses on technology trends, particularly in the realm of consumer electronics and software. With a keen eye for detail and a knack for breaking down complex topics, Kiara delivers insightful analyses that resonate with tech enthusiasts and casual readers alike. Her articles strike a balance between in-depth coverage and accessibility, making them a go-to resource for anyone seeking to stay informed about the latest innovations shaping our digital world.

News

2024: Supreme Court Rules California Man Can’t Trademark ‘Trump Too Small’

Published

on

trump
Trump | Pixa Bay Image

WASHINGTON The Supreme Court decided unanimously on Thursday against a man seeking to trademark the oblique phrase “Trump too small.”

The court maintained that the government had the right to refuse Steve Elster, a Californian who wanted to use the slogan only on T-shirts and maybe other products, a trademark. It is one of many legal proceedings involving former President Donald Trump, including significant ones about the bloody assault on the Capitol in 2021. The court established guidelines earlier in the current term enabling public officials to be sued for removing detractors from their social media accounts. These instances had to do with Donald as well.

trumpe

trump | AP News image

Supreme Court Rules California Man Can’t Trademark ‘Trump Too Small’

The Justice Department backed President Joe Biden’s presumed opponent in the 2024 election, his predecessor. According to government representatives, the phrase “Trump too small” may still be used, but as Donald had not given his approval, it could not be trademarked. You can already buy “Trump too small” T-shirts online.

Elster’s attorneys had contended that the ruling infringed his right to free speech, and a federal appeals court agreed.

Chief Justice John Roberts warned at arguments that if Elster prevailed, individuals would rush to trademark “Trump too this, Trump too that.”

While the nine judges unanimously agreed to reject Elster’s First Amendment argument, their reasoning varied and comprised 53 pages of opinions.

In the last six years, the justices have twice overturned federal law clauses that denied trademarks deemed scandalous or immoral in one case and insulting in another.

trump

Trump | PixaBay Image

Supreme Court Rules California Man Can’t Trademark

Elster’s case addressed a different rule that states that unless the person has provided “written consent,” a trademark application containing a name, photograph, or signature “identifying a particular living individual” will be denied.

The core of the lawsuit refers to a conversation Donald had with Florida Senator Marco Rubio during the 2016 campaign. At the time, Rubio was vying for the Republican presidential nomination.

At a speech, Rubio started the verbal sparring by telling supporters that Donald, who claims to be 6 feet 3 inches tall, had disproportionately small hands and that Donald had always called him “little Marco.” Had you looked at his hands? And you are aware of the saying regarding males with little hands, Rubio added. “You can’t rely on them.”

trump

Trump | Pixa Bay Image

Supreme Court Rules California Man Can’t Trademark ‘Trump Too Small’

Donald later brought up the remark during a televised debate on March 3, 2016.

Stare at those hands. Are those little hands? And he said something about my hands being small, so something else had to be, too. There is no difficulty, I promise you. You have my word,” he declared.

SOURCE – (AP)

Continue Reading

News

Yellen Says China’s Trade Policies Could ‘Interfere Significantly’ With US Bilateral Relationship

Published

on

yellen

Chinese “overconcentrated supply chains” threaten American jobs and recent investments intended to strengthen the country’s green energy industry, according to Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen. The Asian superpower’s trade policies “may interfere significantly with our efforts to build a healthy economic relationship.”

Yellen endorsed Biden administration initiatives meant to boost American economic competitiveness in a prepared speech she gave to Wall Street and corporate executives at the Economic Club of New York on Thursday afternoon.

yellen

Yellen | AP News Image

Yellen Says China’s Trade Policies Could ‘Interfere Significantly’ With US Bilateral Relationship

“When foreign subsidies threaten the viability of domestic firms” in important industries like green energy, she added, the United States should react. China’s green energy products are especially feared to undercut significant climate-friendly investments made possible by the Democrats’ August 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, which President Joe Biden signed into law.

Former President Donald Trump is making his argument to the Business Roundtable in Washington, an organization of over 200 CEOs, on why the economy would be better if he were back in the White House while Yellen is speaking.

Voters have heard from Biden and Trump, his likely Republican opponent, that they will be harsh on China.

The United States imposed major new duties this month on Chinese electric cars, cutting-edge batteries, solar cells, steel, aluminum, and medical equipment. On Wednesday, the European Union also acted to increase import duties, or tariffs, on Chinese-made electric vehicles after preliminary findings of a continuing inquiry into Chinese EV subsidies revealed that the nation’s battery electric vehicle “value chain” benefited from “unfair subsidization” that damaged EU competitors.

yellen

Yellen | Forbes Image

Yellen Says China’s Trade Policies Could ‘Interfere Significantly’ With US Bilateral Relationship

Chinese companies can charge as little as $12,000 for an electric vehicle. Chinese officials contend that their manufacturing keeps costs low and would support a shift to a green economy. They also claim that their solar cells and steel and aluminum mills have enough capacity to supply most of the world’s demand.

Among other concerns, Yellen mentioned in her statement on Thursday the proportion of Chinese manufacturing companies that are losing money, the high savings rates compared to other OECD nations, and the stringent investment regulations.

Yellen listed industries where Chinese government subsidies have fueled fast output growth, including the production of electric cars and their batteries and solar energy equipment, which the U.S. administration is attempting to boost domestically.

yellen

Yellen | CNN Image

Yellen Says China’s Trade Policies Could ‘Interfere Significantly’ With US Bilateral Relationship

“I reject the idea that ‘decoupling’ would help the US economy in any way,” she stated. Concurrently, a level playing field is necessary for us to fully enjoy the possible advantages of our economic partnership.

Her trip to Guangzhou and Beijing earlier this year was centered on industrial strategy and what the United States and Europe call China’s manufacturing overcapacity.

SOURCE – (AP)

Continue Reading

News

President Joe Biden Faces First Lawsuit Over New Asylum Crackdown At The Border

Published

on

Biden Administration Plans for Potential Presidential Transition

Washington, D.C. On Wednesday, a coalition of immigrant advocacy groups sued the Biden administration, claiming that President Joe Biden’s recent order to essentially stop asylum claims at the southern border is no different from a similar action by the Trump administration that was thwarted by the courts.

The American Civil Liberties Union and others filed the lawsuit on behalf of the Las Americas Immigrant Advocacy Centre and the Refugee and Immigrant Centre for Education and Legal Services, or RAICES. It is the first legal challenge to Biden’s broad border crackdown, which followed months of internal White House deliberations and is intended in part to fend off political criticism of the president’s immigration policy.

biden

Joe Biden | AP News Image

President Joe Biden Faces First Lawsuit Over New Asylum Crackdown At The Border

“We were forced to file this lawsuit by enacting an asylum ban that is legally indistinguishable from the Trump ban we successfully blocked,” said ACLU attorney Lee Gelernt.

The directive Biden issued last week will restrict the processing of asylum applications once 2,500 people are encountered between ports of entry each day. The current estimates were significantly higher, at almost 4,000 daily, so it went into effect right away.

The limits would remain in place for two weeks following the seven-day average of those daily encounter counts at or below 1,500. When the numbers might fall that low, though, is unclear; the last time was in July 2020, during the COVID-19 epidemic.

When the order entered into force on June 5, officials of the Biden administration stated they anticipated record numbers of deportations.

Advocates counter that, among other issues, suspending asylum for refugees who fail to show up at a predetermined point of entry—as the Biden administration is attempting to do—violates current federal immigration law.

For a long time, the United States has welcomed refugees seeking protection from persecution. That national commitment became legally codified with the Refugee Act of 1980. The groups said in their case filed on Wednesday that although Congress has, throughout time, imposed certain restrictions on the right to seek asylum, it has never allowed the Executive Branch to outright prohibit asylum based on where a noncitizen enters the nation.

Biden cited Section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, the same legal basis that the Trump administration used to justify its asylum restriction. Under this clause, a president may restrict the number of migrants admitted if it is judged “detrimental” to the country’s interests.

While running, Biden has frequently attacked the immigration policy of former President Donald Trump. His government counters that his order is unique because it has multiple humanitarian exclusions. Limits would not apply, for instance, to victims of human trafficking, unaccompanied minors, or people experiencing serious medical difficulties.

“The Securing the Border rule is legal, important to enhancing border security, and is already having an impact,” a Department of Homeland Security spokesman said, declining to comment on the complaint. We shall keep putting the contested actions into practice; they are still in force.

biden

Joe Biden | AP news Image

President Joe Biden Faces First Lawsuit Over New Asylum Crackdown At The Border

The immigrant rights organisations contend in the complaint that exceptions are “extremely limited.”

The White House forwarded questions regarding the complaint to the Justice Department, which declined to comment. According to White House spokesman Angelo Fernández Hernández, Biden’s action was required because congressional Republicans thwarted a bipartisan agreement that “would have provided critical resources, statutory changes, and additional personnel to the border.”

As per Biden’s decision, migrants who show up at the border without expressing a fear of going back to their own countries will be deported from the US in a few days or even hours. Sanctions for those migrants can include a five-year ban on entering the country again or criminal prosecution.

Proponents of the lawsuit contended that it is the migrants’ responsibility to exhibit fear, which is sometimes known as displaying fear.

“In practice, noncitizens who have just crossed the border, and may be hungry, exhausted, ill, or traumatised after fleeing persecution in their home countries and danger in Mexico, are likely to be intimidated by armed, uniformed Border Patrol officers, and are thus unlikely to ‘manifest’ their fear of return,” the lawsuit states.

However, a U.S. asylum officer will evaluate anyone who indicates fear or a desire to seek asylum, but to a higher level than is now in place. Should they clear the screening, they are eligible for more restricted humanitarian protection, such as the U.N. Convention Against Torture, which forbids sending someone back to a nation where they are likely to be subjected to torture.

biden

Joe Biden | NY Times Image

President Joe Biden Faces First Lawsuit Over New Asylum Crackdown At The Border

These revised, more stringent asylum limitations do not apply to migrants who utilise the CBP One app while in Mexico to make an appointment to present themselves at an official border crossing point to seek admission. The app is a component of the administration’s attempts to persuade migrants to attempt to enter the nation through its preferred routes rather than just crossing the border, locating a Border Patrol agent, and turning themselves in.

Advocates did, however, provide a laundry list of grievances against the app in the case. Many immigrants, for instance, lack the Wi-Fi connectivity or cellphone data plan required to use it. While some migrants are illiterates, others do not speak any of the languages the programme offers. And compared to the amount of migrants wishing to enter the nation, there are only a few spots open each day.

“As a result, numerous asylum seekers have been forced to wait indefinitely under precarious conditions in Mexico in the hope of obtaining scarce appointments,” the lawsuit says.

Together with the ACLU, additional organisations filing the complaint were the Texas Civil Rights Project, Jenner & Block LLP, National Immigrant Justice Centre, Centre for Gender & Refugee Studies, and ACLU of the District of Columbia.

SOURCE – (AP)

Continue Reading

Download Our App

vornews app

Advertise Here

Volunteering at Soi Dog

People Reading

Trending