Connect with us

Business

The House Votes For Possible TikTok Ban In The US, But Don’t Expect The App To Go Away Anytime Soon

Published

on

Why Buying TikTok Views is the Best Way to Maximize Followers
Getty Images - VOR News Image

Washington — The House passed legislation Saturday that would prohibit TikTok from operating in the United States if the popular social media platform’s Chinese owner does not sell its stake within a year, but the app is unlikely to disappear anytime soon.

The decision by House Republicans to include TikTok as part of a bigger foreign aid package, a priority for President Joe Biden with broad congressional backing for Ukraine and Israel, accelerated the prohibition after an earlier version had been blocked by the Senate. A standalone bill with a shorter, six-month selling period cleared the House in March with an overwhelming bipartisan majority, as both Democrats and Republicans expressed national security worries about the app’s owner, Chinese technology firm ByteDance Ltd.

tiktok

global news – VOR News Image

The House Votes For Possible TikTok Ban In The US, But Don’t Expect The App To Go Away Anytime Soon

The updated bill, which passed by a vote of 360-58, now goes to the Senate following discussions that extended the company’s selling timeframe to nine months, with an extra three months conceivable if a sale is in the works.

Legal disputes may extend that period even further. If the law passes, the corporation has stated that it will likely file a lawsuit to block it, claiming that it will deprive the app’s millions of users of their First Amendment rights.

TikTok has fought aggressively against the proposal, encouraging the app’s 170 million U.S. users, many of whom are young, to contact Congress and express their objections. However, the intensity of the backlash enraged politicians on Capitol Hill, where there is widespread worry about Chinese threats to the US and few members use the platform themselves.

“We will not stop fighting and advocating for you,” TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew said in a video released on the platform last month, addressing the app’s users. “We will continue to do all we can, including exercising our legal rights, to protect this amazing platform that we have built with you.”

The bill’s rapid passage through Congress is remarkable because it only affects one firm and Congress has adopted a hands-off approach to technology regulation for decades. Lawmakers had failed to act despite efforts to protect children online, preserve users’ privacy, and hold firms more accountable for content put on their platforms, among other things. However, the TikTok ban reflects broad fears among lawmakers about China.

Members of both parties, as well as intelligence officials, have expressed concern that Chinese authorities may force ByteDance to pass over American user data or direct the business to suppress or promote TikTok content that benefits its interests. TikTok has disputed claims that it is being utilized as a tool by the Chinese government and has stated that it has not shared user data from the United States with Chinese authorities.

The US government has not publicly shown evidence that TikTok exchanged US user data with the Chinese government or tampered with the company’s popular algorithm, which impacts what Americans see.

The corporation has good reason to believe that a legal challenge will be successful, as it has already won court battles over its operations in the United States. In November, a federal judge halted a Montana law that would have prohibited TikTok use throughout the state after the business and five TikTok content providers sued.

tiktok

forbes – VOR News Image

The House Votes For Possible TikTok Ban In The US, But Don’t Expect The App To Go Away Anytime Soon

In 2020, federal courts blocked then-President Donald Trump’s executive order to ban TikTok after the firm sued, claiming that the order violated its free speech and due process rights. His administration arranged a deal in which US businesses Oracle and Walmart would have acquired a significant share in TikTok. The transaction fell through for a variety of reasons, including China’s tougher export curbs on technology companies.

Dozens of states and the federal government have imposed TikTok restrictions on official equipment. The Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University filed a lawsuit last year, claiming that Texas’ restriction violated academic freedom because it applied to public universities. In December, a federal judge decided in favor of the state.

The software has received support from organizations including the American Civil Liberties Union. “Congress cannot take away the rights of over 170 million Americans who use TikTok to express themselves, engage in political advocacy, and access information from around the world,” Jenna Leventoff, a lawyer for the group, stated

According to AdImpact, an advertising tracking service, TikTok has spent $5 million on television ads opposing the law since mid-March. The advertisements have featured a variety of content creators, including a nun, touting the platform’s benefits in their life and claiming that a prohibition would violate the First Amendment. The corporation has also urged its customers to contact Congress, with some lawmakers receiving profanity-laced calls.

tiktok

Cato – VOR News Image

The House Votes For Possible TikTok Ban In The US, But Don’t Expect The App To Go Away Anytime Soon

“It is unfortunate that the House of Representatives is using the cover of important foreign and humanitarian assistance to once again jam through a ban bill that would trample the free speech rights of 170 million Americans, devastate 7 million businesses, and shutter a platform that contributes $24 billion to the U.S. economy, annually,” Alex Haurek, a spokesperson for the organization, said.

California Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna voted against the bill. He believes there could have been less restrictive ways to pursue the corporation that would not end in a blanket ban or jeopardize free speech.

“I don’t think it will be well received,” Khanna remarked. “It’s a sign of the Beltway being out of touch with where voters are.”

Nadya Okamoto, a TikTok content creator with approximately 4 million followers, stated that she has been speaking with other creators who are expressing “so much anger and anxiety” about the bill and how it will affect their life. The 26-year-old, whose company “August” offers menstrual goods and is recognized for her activism for de-stigmatizing monthly cycles, earns the majority of her money via TikTok.

“This is going to have real repercussions,” she told me.

SOURCE – (AP)

Kiara Grace is a staff writer at VORNews, a reputable online publication. Her writing focuses on technology trends, particularly in the realm of consumer electronics and software. With a keen eye for detail and a knack for breaking down complex topics, Kiara delivers insightful analyses that resonate with tech enthusiasts and casual readers alike. Her articles strike a balance between in-depth coverage and accessibility, making them a go-to resource for anyone seeking to stay informed about the latest innovations shaping our digital world.

Business

FTC Investigating TikTok Over Privacy And Security

Published

on

Understanding What Happens When You Buy TikTok Followers

The Federal Trade Commission is looking into TikTok’s data and security procedures, two individuals told CNN on the condition of anonymity.

The investigation adds to the social media platform’s already difficult situation, which includes the possibility of a US ban or forced divestment from its Chinese parent firm.

According to reports, the FTC is investigating for allegedly violating the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule. This rule requires corporations to notify parents and acquire consent before collecting data from children under the age of 13.

tiktok

CNN – VOR News Image

FTC Investigating TikTok Over Privacy And Security

According to the sources, the agency is also looking into whether they violated a provision of the FTC Act that forbids “unfair or deceptive” business practices by denying that user data may be accessible by individuals in China.

According to one of the sources, the FTC may file a lawsuit against TikTok or reach an agreement with the firm over the coming weeks. Politico reported on the investigation earlier.

When contacted about the probe, FTC Director of Public Affairs Douglas Farrar said, “No comment.”

TikTok did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The FTC investigation comes as they faces an existential threat in the US. A bipartisan coalition in the US House of Representatives voted earlier this month to adopt legislation mandating that ByteDance distribute TikTok or face a ban in US app stores.

tiktok

The Hill -VOR News Image

FTC Investigating TikTok Over Privacy And Security

The law is before the Senate, and President Joe Biden said he will sign it if it reaches his desk. On the other hand, Senate leaders have signaled that they are taking a cautious approach, which may result in delays or perhaps the failure of the House plan.

ByteDance, a Chinese corporation in control of the short-form video company, has denied claims that US citizens using its app pose a threat to national security. TikTok, which does not operate in China, claims that the Chinese government has never obtained US customer data.

According to cybersecurity experts, Chinese laws force ByteDance to assist with the country’s intelligence demands, which, given ByteDance’s ownership of TikTok, could theoretically jeopardize the privacy of US users. To address this risk, TikTok has kept its US user data on cloud servers operated by US tech giant Oracle, as well as implemented internal policies that prevent non-US staff access.

tiktok

NY Mag – VOR News Image

FTC Investigating TikTok Over Privacy And Security

TikTok admitted to Congress in 2022 that staff headquartered in China could access US user data, following BuzzFeed News’ story that year that ByteDance employees had obtained that information on multiple instances. In his initial appearance before Congress last year, TikTok CEO Shou Chew admitted that many ByteDance workers were fired for spying on specific US journalists as part of a “misguided attempt” to find leakers within the company.

SOURCE – (AP)

Continue Reading

Business

Amazon CEO Andy Jassy’s Comments About Unions Violated Federal Law, NLRB Judge Rules

Published

on

amazon

A federal administrative law judge found that Amazon CEO Andy Jassy violated labor law by making anti-union remarks during media interviews two years ago.

The verdict, published Wednesday, comes after the National Labor Relations Board filed a complaint in 2022 accusing Jassy of breaching the line during sit-down interviews by saying that workers were better off without a union.

National Labor Relations Board Judge Brian D. Gee cited statements made by Amazon’s CEO on CNBC’s television show “Squawk Box,” as well as two summits arranged by Bloomberg News and the New York Times, in his decision.

amazon

Hollywood Reporter – VOR News Image

Amazon CEO Andy Jassy’s Comments About Unions Violated Federal Law, NLRB Judge Rules

Gee said Jassy’s projections regarding unionization altering the employee-employer relationship were legal. However, the judge ruled that other statements regarding how employees would be less empowered under a union, “find it harder to get things done quickly, and would be better off” without one violating federal labor law.

In a prepared statement, Amazon spokesperson Mary Kate Paradis stated that the business strongly disagrees that “any part of these comments” were inappropriate and plans to challenge the decision through the administrative law system.

amazon

VOX – VOR News Image

Amazon CEO Andy Jassy’s Comments About Unions Violated Federal Law, NLRB Judge Rules

“The decision reflects poorly on the state of free speech rights today, and we remain optimistic that we will be able to continue to engage in a reasonable discussion on these issues where all perspectives have an opportunity to be heard,” Paradis said.

Jassy’s statements come amid intensified unionization attempts at Amazon following the Amazon Labor Union’s historic victory in a union representation ballot at a New York City warehouse. The firm has disputed the union’s victory and refused to negotiate.

amazon

reuters – VOR News Image

Amazon CEO Andy Jassy’s Comments About Unions Violated Federal Law, NLRB Judge Rules

In his verdict, Gee advised the company to avoid “threatening its employees” with similar comments in the future and to post a notice in its facilities countrywide indicating the company’s compliance with the judge’s decision.

SOURCE – (AP)

Continue Reading

Business

Ex-Nickelodeon Producer Schneider Sues ‘Quiet On Set’ Makers For Defamation And Sex Abuse Implications

Published

on

schneider

Los Angeles — Dan Schneider, a former Nickelodeon producer and writer, sued the makers of “Quiet on Set: The Dark Side of Kids TV” on Wednesday, claiming the documentary series falsely claimed that he sexually abused the child actors with whom he worked.

Schneider filed a defamation lawsuit in Los Angeles Superior Court against Warner Bros. Discovery and the other corporations involved in the series.

Schneider, a former teen actress, was a key figure in Nickelodeon’s dominance of youth culture in the 1990s and 2000s. She worked on sketch series “All That,” “The Amanda Show,” and “Kenan & Kel,” as well as as an executive producer on shows such as “Zoey 101,” “iCarly,” and “Victorious.”

schneider

The Sun – VOR News Image

Ex-Nickelodeon Producer Schneider Sues ‘Quiet On Set’ Makers For Defamation And Sex Abuse Implications

He is also a prominent figure in “Quiet on Set,” which premiered on true crime cable channel ID in March. It has since been streamed on Max, creating a big splash among Nickelodeon’s former stars and fans. It includes cast and crew interviews to expose the show’s sexualization of young teens, as well as a poisonous and abusive work climate that many blamed Schneider for. It also contains accounts of sexual assault of young performers, including “The Amanda Show” and “Drake & Josh” star Drake Bell, by crew members who were eventually convicted.

Schneider, who left Nickelodeon in 2018, claimed in the lawsuit that the “Quiet on Set” trailer and episodes of the show purposefully mixed and juxtaposed images and mentions of him with criminal sexual abusers to imply he was complicit.

“The portrayal of Schneider in ‘Quiet on Set’ is a hit job,” according to the lawsuit. “While it is indisputable that two bona fide child sexual abusers worked on Nickelodeon shows, it is likewise indisputable that Schneider had no knowledge of their abuse, was not complicit in the abuse, condemned the abuse once it was discovered and, critically, was not a child sexual abuser himself.”

The lawsuit names Warner Bros. Discovery, the parent company of ID and Max, as defendants as well as the show’s producing firms, Sony Pictures Television and Maxine Productions.

Emails requesting comments from representatives of the three companies were not immediately replied.

The four-part series implies that Schneider’s shows had a tendency to place young women in funny situations with sexual connotations, and it portrays him as an angry and emotionally abusive boss.

schneider

Hollywood Reporter – VOR News Image

Ex-Nickelodeon Producer Schneider Sues ‘Quiet On Set’ Makers For Defamation And Sex Abuse Implications

It includes direct charges of sexual harassment and gender discrimination from women who worked as writers for him on “All That.” They claimed he exhibited pornography on his computer in their presence in the writers’ room and asked for massages, joking that they would lead to the women’s sketches appearing on the show, which Schneider denies.

It also includes an interview with Bell, who claims “extensive” and “brutal” sexual assault at the hands of a dialogue coach when he was 15, as well as an interview with the mother of another girl who was sexually abused by one of the crew members.

The Associated Press normally does not identify persons who claim to have been sexually abused unless they come forward publicly, as Bell has.

Following the show’s release, Schneider apologized in a YouTube video for “past behaviors, some of which are embarrassing and that I regret.”

However, the lawsuit claims that the show, particularly the trailer, unjustly implicates him in child sexual abuse by presenting photographs of him — including some with his arm around young actors — during discussions about an unsafe atmosphere for children.

The lawsuit seeks damages to be assessed at trial for “the destruction of Schneider’s reputation and legacy” caused by “false statements and implications.”

schneider

People – VOR News Image

Ex-Nickelodeon Producer Schneider Sues ‘Quiet On Set’ Makers For Defamation And Sex Abuse Implications

Nickelodeon, which is not involved in the lawsuit, stated in a statement about the series that it cannot “corroborate or negate” allegations made decades ago, but it investigates all formal complaints and has strict processes for working with minors.

“Our highest priorities are the well-being and best interests not just of our employees, casts and crew but of all children,” a spokesperson for the network said in a statement. We have adopted numerous safeguards over the years to help ensure we are living up to our own high standards and the expectations of our audience.”

SOURCE – (AP)

Continue Reading

Volunteering at Soi Dog

Download Our App

vornews app

Trending