Connect with us


Worldcoin Scans Eyeballs And Offers Crypto. What To Know About The Project From OpenAI’s CEO

Avatar for Kiara Grace




NEW YORK — Worldcoin is attracting the attention of privacy regulators worldwide weeks after its global launch, with the Kenyan government even going to shut down the site permanently.

The Silicon Valley-backed international ID business is currently defending itself in inquiries into whether the biometric data it is gathering is secure.

What you should know about Worldcoin and the issues it is causing is as follows:


Sam Altman, the CEO of the business famed for its artificial intelligence chatbot ChatGPT and for which he is best known, is the creator of Worldcoin.

Giving people a form of identification that can never be stolen or copied is the aim of Worldcoin and the business that supports it, Tools for Humanity. A person’s eyeballs are scanned by “orbs,” a gadget that takes a photo of their iris, the colored area of the eye, to establish a “World ID” for Worldcoin.

Online services, where users frequently need to remember numerous passwords and usernames for various websites they have registered for, are one potential application for such an ID.

However, such websites’ security can have issues, and there have been many security lapses where usernames and passwords have been taken. Users might sign up using their World ID rather than antiquated technology like passwords.



Although Worldcoin is primarily an identity initiative, it uses cryptocurrencies to entice users to sign up. The price of a Worldcoin token is currently around $1.90. However, speculation has more of an impact on the token’s worth than that it can currently be used as money.

Early adopters of Worldcoin were given a quantity of cryptocurrency valued between $50 and $60 as part of the promotion when it first launched in July. Most nations where Worldcoin first debuted don’t use or accept cryptocurrency widely.

Furthermore, in developing nations where people are being urged to join, like Kenya, where the average monthly salary is around $170, $50 is a significant sum.



At a registration center in Nairobi last week, tens of thousands of Kenyans lined up to have their irises scanned by Worldcoin in exchange for 25 coins worth approximately $50. A separate queue for women who waited with their toddlers strapped to their backs was part of the predominantly youthful audience.

Some people waiting in queue informed the local media that they had come a long way because friends had told them “free money” was being distributed. They admitted they had no idea why their irises needed to be scanned or what would be done with the data, but they just cared about getting paid.

University graduates were among those who waited for hours, referring to Kenya’s high unemployment rate and the nation’s widespread resentment of the country’s rising cost of living.

Since then, the Kenyan government has halted new Worldcoin registrations while examining whether users’ data is protected appropriately.

According to last week’s statement from Interior Minister Kithure Kindiki, “investigations of the safety and protection of the data being harvested and how the harvesters intend to use the data” have begun.



By snapping pictures of a person’s iris, Worldcoin’s orbs gather biometric information. Privacy experts worry that Worldcoin may use the data for other purposes, such as personalized marketing, despite its claim that it generates a distinctive, secure form of identification.

This has prompted various nations, like France, Germany, and most recently Kenya, to look into the workings of Worldcoin.

According to the Bavarian State Office for Data Protection Supervision, Worldcoin and Tools for Humanity’s data security procedures are the subject of a thorough examination.

The organization is investigating whether the rights of those who provided their personal information were upheld. According to Michael Will, the office’s head, they ought to have had adequate information about how their data would be used and had the option to object, have their data erased, or revoke their consent.

He stated that the information also has to be secured against unauthorized access to, among other things, stop identity theft.

The legality of Worldcoin’s data gathering and storage practices, according to France’s data privacy authorities, “seems questionable.” It investigated and discovered that Europe’s strong data privacy laws gave the German privacy watchdog jurisdiction.

According to the U.K. Information Commissioner’s Office, it is looking into Worldcoin.

Privacy experts are concerned that someday, like with data breaches at other major corporations, Worldcoin may be vulnerable to criminals accessing it. According to privacy experts, biometric data is already being sold in places like China, and this may expand to other nations or jurisdictions.

People’s lives are at risk when biometric data is compromised, particularly in the developing nations where Worldcoin has been active, according to Pete Howson, an international development professor at Northumbria University in Newcastle upon Tyne, England.

The privacy issues around its new service were addressed by Worldcoin last week in a blog post, but the company also stated that “everything is optional, and no personal data is disclosed by default, enabling each holder to decide which (if any) personal data to share with third parties when using World ID.”

In the past, Worldcoin has claimed that it follows industry best practices to protect user data, citing an assessment conducted by two security organizations in late July.


Continue Reading


Hyundai And Kia Recall Nearly 3.4 Million Vehicles Due To Fire Risk And Urge Owners To Park Outdoors

Avatar for Kiara Grace




DETROIT — Due to the risk of engine compartment fires, Hyundai and Kia are recalling nearly 3.4 million vehicles in the United States and advising owners to park them outside.

Multiple car and SUV models from 2010 to 2019 have been recalled, including the Hyundai Santa Fe SUV and the Kia Sorrento SUV.

According to documents published Wednesday by the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the anti-lock brake control module can leak fluid and cause an electrical short, which can spark a fire in stationary or moving vehicles.

The dealer will replace the anti-lock brake fuse free of charge. According to company documents, Kia will begin sending notification letters to owners on November 14. The date for Hyundai is November 21.

According to the documents, Hyundai reported 21 vehicle fires and 22 “thermal incidents,” including combustion, burning, and melting parts in the United States. Kia reported ten incidents of fire and dissolving.

According to a statement from Hyundai, no collisions or injuries have been reported. The automaker said it was doing the recall to assure the safety of its customers.


Hyundai And Kia Recall Nearly 3.4 Million Vehicles Due To Fire Risk And Urge Owners To Park Outdoors.

Due to moisture, grime, and dissolved metals in the brake fluid, an O-ring in the antilock brake motor shaft can lose its sealing strength over time, resulting in leaks. According to the statement, the new fuse limits the brake module’s operating current.

Kia stated that an electrical failure resulting in excessive current could cause an engine compartment fire near the brake control unit. The statement indicates that the precise cause of the short circuit is unknown and that no accidents or injuries have occurred.

Michael Brooks, executive director of the non-profit Centre for Auto Safety, questioned why the companies are not addressing the breach issue and why they are taking so long to send letters to owners.

Brooks stated that replacing the fuse is the solution, but brake fluid can still escape, posing a potential safety risk.

He asked, “Why not fix the problem?” “What you’re not doing here is repairing the O-ring and the discharge that initially caused the issue. You are addressing a symptom or portion of the problem, but not the underlying design flaw.”

Brooks also questioned why the NHTSA is allowing the companies to replace only the fuse and why owners must receive interim letters promptly warning them of a serious problem. “You would think that you should immediately notify those owners that they shouldn’t be parking in their garages, lest their home catch fire,” he said.

Statements from both companies need to address why the fluid breaches aren’t being repaired or why it will take about two months to notify owners by letter. Both companies’ spokespersons stated they would investigate the concerns.

Wednesday, a message was left with the NHTSA requesting comment on the recall remedy and why the notices would take so long. Wednesday, the agency released a statement cautioning owners to park their vehicles outside until repairs are made.


Hyundai And Kia Recall Nearly 3.4 Million Vehicles Due To Fire Risk And Urge Owners To Park Outdoors.

Affected Kia models include the 2010-2019 Borrego, 2014-2016 Cadenza, 2010-2013 Forte, Forte Koup, and Sportage, 2015-2019 K900, 2011-2015 Optima, 2011-2013 Optima Hybrid, and Soul, 2012-2017 Rio, 2011-2014 Sorento, and 2010-2011 Rondo.

2011-2015 Elantra, Genesis Coupe, and Sonata Hybrid, 2012-2015 Accent, Azera, and Veloster, 2013-2015 Elantra Coupe and Santa Fe, 2014-2015 Equus, 2010-2012 Veracruz, 2010-2013 Tucson, 2015 Tucson Fuel Cell, and 2013 Santa Fe Sport are included in the recall.

Owners can enter their 17-digit vehicle identification number at to determine if their vehicle is affected.

Since 2015, Hyundai and Kia have been beset by fire issues. The Centre for Auto Safety successfully petitioned U.S. regulators to seek recalls in 2018, and according to its website, automakers have already recalled more than 9.2 million vehicles for fires and engine problems, not including Wednesday’s recalls. More than two dozen of the recalls involved more than 20 vehicles from the model years 2006 to 2021.

In addition, the NHTSA is investigating three million vehicles manufactured by manufacturers between 2011 and 2016. NHTSA reports receiving 161 complaints of engine fires, some of which occurred in previously recalled vehicles.

In June 2018, the NHTSA reported receiving complaints from vehicle owners regarding over 3,100 fires, 103 injuries, and one fatality. The NHTSA fined Hyundai and Kia in 2020 for recalling vehicles with a propensity for engine failure too slowly.


Continue Reading


Amazon: US Accuses Online Giant Of Illegal Monopoly

Avatar for Kiara Grace



Amazon Faces Multiple Allegations of Employee Mistreatment

The U.S. government has filed a lawsuit against Amazon, alleging that the internet giant unlawfully maintains monopoly power.

According to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), Amazon engages in “a set of interlocking anticompetitive and unfair strategies” to increase prices and stifle competition.

Amazon stated that the lawsuit was “incorrect based on the facts and the law, and we look forward to defending ourselves in court.”

It is the most recent technology titan to be sued by U.S. authorities.

Lina Khan, the head of the FTC, has had Amazon in her sights for years.

In 2017, Ms. Khan, who was only 29 then, published a significant academic article arguing that the online retailer had evaded antitrust scrutiny.

“With its missionary zeal for consumers, Amazon has marched towards monopoly,” she stated then.


The U.S. government has filed a lawsuit against Amazon, alleging that the internet giant unlawfully maintains monopoly power.

Since her unexpected appointment as FTC Chair in 2021, this case has been widely anticipated and regarded as a crucial leadership test.

Some U.S. legislators have called for action to increase competition in online search, retail, and social media in response to the dominance of a handful of large tech companies.

However, under Ms. Khan, the FTC’s robust rhetoric against Big Tech has yielded few results.

It failed in its endeavor to prevent Meta from acquiring V.R. company Within in February.

And in July, it failed to prevent Microsoft from acquiring the Call of Duty developer.

Ms. Khan is pressured to make at least one prominent complaint stick, and the FTC has high aspirations for this case.


The U.S. government has filed a lawsuit against Amazon, alleging that the internet giant unlawfully maintains monopoly power.

Along with 17 state attorneys, the agency asserts that the company is a “monopolist” that prevents competitors and sellers from lowering pricing.

In addition, the regulator claimed Amazon’s actions “degrade quality for consumers, overcharge sellers, stifle innovation, and prevent rivals from competing fairly with Amazon.”

However, the company claims that if the “misguided” FTC lawsuit is successful, consumers will have fewer options, pay higher prices, and experience delayed delivery times.

Due to the alleged monopoly, consumers lose money and receive worse bargains, which is the central argument of the case.

U.S. anti-competition law is complex, but prosecutors must demonstrate that a company’s actions have caused financial harm to consumers.

Many of Big Tech’s services, such as Google’s search engine and Meta’s Instagram, are free, proving this is only sometimes straightforward.

Google and the United States government began a court battle earlier this month, with the government accusing Google of monopolizing advertising technology.


Continue Reading


Sony Is Once Again Facing A Potential Security Breach, This Time By A Ransomware Group

Avatar for Kiara Grace




Once more, Sony faces the possibility of a security breach, this time from a ransomware group alleging to have compromised PlayStation systems. On Sunday, the group LAPSUS$ proclaimed the alleged hack on their dark website. This could have significant implications for PlayStation users, although details remain scant.

According to the ransomware group, they have compromised all Sony systems and seized valuable information, including game source code and firmware. As “proof,” they have provided screen captures of what appears to be an internal login page, PowerPoint presentation, and file directory.

However, according to cybersecurity specialists, this information could be more convincing. Cyber Security Connect stated, “None of it appears to be particularly compelling information.” They suspect that LAPSUS$ may have exaggerated the scope of their breach.

Based on the limited data available, it is extremely difficult to determine the scope or integrity of the hackers’ claims. PlayStation’s online services do not appear to have been impacted so far, with no word if user data is at risk.


Sony Is Once Again Facing A Potential Security Breach, This Time By A Ransomware Group.

Not for the first time have Sony’s systems been targeted. In 2011, the PlayStation Network was compromised, exposing the personal information of 77 million users. Sony ultimately locked down PSN for nearly a month to improve security.

In 2014, North Korea launched a devastating cyberattack against Sony Pictures in retaliation for the film The Interview. The release of terabytes of sensitive data, including scripts for upcoming films and employees’ personal and medical information. Time will tell if Sony can once again recover its systems from a significant cyberattack. However, PlayStation users may need to prepare for potential consequences.

If LAPSUS$’s claims are accurate, this breach could have comparable repercussions. There is a possibility that sensitive source code and intellectual property could be compromised. There is also the possibility of significant PlayStation Network service disruptions. As with any hack, we recommend that users alter any passwords used on any PlayStation service to avoid problems with other online accounts.

CGMagazine has sought out Sony for comment, but at the time of publication, the company has neither confirmed nor denied the breach’s scope; we will update the article if the situation changes.

SOURCE – (cgmagonline)

Continue Reading

Recent News