Connect with us

News

Rosalynn Carter, Outspoken Former First Lady, Dead At 96

Published

on

carter

ATLANTA, Ga. – Rosalynn Carter, Jimmy Carter’s closest counsel throughout his one time as President of the United States and for the next four decades as a worldwide humanitarian, has died at the age of 96.

According to the Carter Center, she died on Sunday after suffering from dementia and poor health for several months. According to the announcement announcing her death, she “died peacefully, with family by her side” at 2:10 p.m. in Plains, Georgia.

“Rosalynn was my equal partner in everything I ever accomplished,” Carter stated. “She provided me with sound advice and encouragement when I needed it.” “As long as Rosalynn was alive, I knew someone loved and supported me.”

Jill Biden said she had to “lead this off with a sad announcement” of Rosalynn Carter’s death while speaking at a Naval Air Station event in Norfolk, Virginia. “She was well-known for her work in mental health, caregiving, and women’s rights.” So I hope you’ll remember the Carter family in your prayers during the holidays,” she stated.

She spoke at a hangar where she and President Joe Biden prepared to host an early Thanksgiving dinner for service members and their families.

rosalynn carter

Rosalynn Carter, Outspoken Former First Lady, Dead At 96

The Carters were married for over 77 years, forming what they both called a “full partnership.” Unlike many prior first ladies, Rosalynn Carter attended Cabinet meetings, spoke out on difficult matters, and accompanied her husband on foreign tours. Aides to President Carter secretly referred to her as “co-president.”

“Rosalynn is my best friend… the perfect extension of me, probably the most influential person in my life,” Jimmy Carter told aides during their time in the White House, which lasted from 1977 to 1981.

Rosalynn Carter was a fiercely loyal and caring first lady who was also politically smart, and no one denied her influence behind the scenes. When her role in a widely publicized Cabinet shuffle was revealed, she was forced to publicly declare, “I am not running the government.”

Many presidential advisers claimed that her political instincts were superior to her husband’s, and they frequently sought her approval for a project before discussing it with the president. Her steely determination, ostensibly modest attitude, and sweet Southern accent prompted Washington reporters to dub her “the Steel Magnolia.”

According to both Carters, Rosalynn Carter was always the more political of the two. After Jimmy Carter’s overwhelming defeat in 1980, it was she, not the former president, who considered an unlikely comeback, and she said years later that she missed their life in Washington.

Jimmy Carter trusted her so much that, just months into his presidency, he dispatched her on a mission to Latin America to assure dictators that he meant what he said about refusing military aid and other forms of support to human rights abusers.

She also had strong sentiments about the Carter White House’s style. The Carters did not serve hard liquor at public events, but Rosalynn did allow US wine. There were fewer ballroom dancing nights and more square dancing and picnics.

Throughout her husband’s political career, she made mental health and senior issues her defining policy focus. When the news media didn’t cover her efforts as much as she thought they deserved, she chastised them for writing solely about “sexy subjects.”

rosalynn carter

Rosalynn Carter, Outspoken Former First Lady, Dead At 96

As honorary chairwoman of the President’s Commission on Mental Health, she once spoke before a Senate subcommittee, becoming the first lady to do so since Eleanor Roosevelt. She returned to Washington in 2007 to lobby Congress for better mental health care, stating, “We’ve been working on this for so long, and it finally seems to be in reach.”

She stated she became interested in mental health during her husband’s run for governor of Georgia.

“I used to come home and tell Jimmy, ‘Why are people telling me about their problems?'” “And he said, ‘Because you may be the only person they’ll ever see who knows someone who can help them,'” she explained.

Rosalynn Carter appeared more distraught than her husband after Ronald Reagan won the presidency in 1980. She first hesitated to return to Plains, Georgia, where they were both born, married and lived the majority of their life.

“I was hesitant, not at all sure that I could be happy here after the dazzle of the White House and the years of stimulating political battles,” she said in her autobiography, published in 1984, “First Lady from Plains.” Eventually, “we slowly rediscovered the satisfaction of a life we had left long before.”

Jimmy and Rosalynn co-founded The Carter Center in Atlanta to continue their work after leaving Washington. She led the center’s annual mental health symposium and gathered funds for programs to help the mentally ill and homeless. She also published “Helping Yourself Help Others,” a memoir about the difficulties of caring for elderly or unwell family, and a sequel, “Helping Someone With Mental Illness.”

rosalynn carter

Rosalynn Carter, Outspoken Former First Lady, Dead At 96

The Carters frequently departed home on humanitarian missions, building houses with Habitat for Humanity and supporting public health and democracy in foreign countries.

“I get tired,” she admitted of her journeys. “However, something wonderful always happens.” Going to a town where they have Guinea worm and then returning a year or two later and there is no Guinea worm, the people dance and sing — it’s so amazing.”

Jimmy Carter’s physicians identified four tiny lesions on his brain in 2015. The Carters felt he had only a few weeks to live. He was given a medicine to enhance his immune system and later declared that no indications of cancer remained. But when they first heard the news, she stated she didn’t know what to do.

“I depend on him when I have questions, when I’m writing speeches, anything, I consult with him,” she said.

She later assisted Carter’s recovery after he had hip replacement surgery at the age of 94 and had to relearn how to walk. She was with him earlier this year when he opted to forego additional medical procedures and initiate end-of-life care following a series of hospital stays.

Jimmy Carter is the longest-serving president of the United States. Rosalynn Carter was the second-longest-living first lady in American history, trailing only Bess Truman, who died at 97.

rosalynn carter

Rosalynn Carter, Outspoken Former First Lady, Dead At 96

Eleanor Rosalynn Smith, the eldest of four children, was born in Plains on August 18, 1927. Her father died while she was young, so when her mother went to work part-time, she took on much of the responsibility of caring for her siblings.

Rosalynn Carter also helped support the family by working at a beauty salon after school. “We were very poor and worked very hard,” she once stated, yet she continued her education, finishing as class valedictorian from high school.

Rosalynn Carter quickly fell in love with one of her best friend’s brothers. Jimmy and Rosalynn had known each other their entire lives — Jimmy’s mother, nurse Lillian Carter, was the one who delivered Rosalynn — but he went to the Naval Academy in Annapolis, Maryland, while she was still in high school.

Jimmy told his mother after a blind date, “That’s the girl I want to marry.” They married in 1946, shortly after his Annapolis graduation and Rosalynn’s graduation from Georgia Southwestern College.

Their boys were born at the locations where Jimmy Carter was stationed: John William (Jack) in Portsmouth, Virginia, in 1947; James Earl III (Chip) in Honolulu, Hawaii, in 1950; and Donnel Jeffery (Jeff) in New London, Connecticut, in 1952. Amy was born in 1967 in Plains. Carter was a state senator at the time.

Rosalynn Carter’s first opportunity to travel the world came from her Navy time. When Carter’s father, James Earl Sr., died in 1953, Jimmy Carter returned the family to Plains, where he took over the family property without asking his wife. She worked with him daily, keeping the books and weighing fertilizer trucks.

“We developed a partnership when we were working in the farm supply business,” Rosalynn Carter said proudly in an interview with The Associated Press in 2021. “On paper, I knew more about the business than he did.” He would listen to my suggestions.”

Lillian Carter said of her daughter-in-law at the height of the Carters’ political power: “She can do anything in the world with Jimmy, and she’s the only one.” He pays attention to her.”

SOURCE – (AP)

Kiara Grace is a staff writer at VORNews, a reputable online publication. Her writing focuses on technology trends, particularly in the realm of consumer electronics and software. With a keen eye for detail and a knack for breaking down complex topics, Kiara delivers insightful analyses that resonate with tech enthusiasts and casual readers alike. Her articles strike a balance between in-depth coverage and accessibility, making them a go-to resource for anyone seeking to stay informed about the latest innovations shaping our digital world.

Continue Reading

News

Heatwave in Delhi Claims 200 Homeless Lives in One Week

Published

on

Heatwave in Delhi Claims 200 Homeless Lives in One Week

Around 200 homeless people have died in the Indian capital in the last week as a result of the country’s ongoing heatwave, according to a group committed to assisting homeless people.

The Times of India reported on Thursday that 52 bodies had been brought to hospitals in the previous two days, with the majority of them being poor people who lived and worked outside.

Delhi Heatwave

According to the Centre for Holistic Development, 192 homeless individuals died in New Delhi between June 11 and June 19, which is more than the number reported in prior years.

“The poorest people face the brunt of such climate change. Most of these folks live beneath flyovers and in the open, with no protection from the heat. According to Sunil Kumar Aledia, the head of CHD, heatwaves were primarily to blame for these deaths.

VOR News

This summer, India reported over 40,000 suspected heatstroke cases and at least 110 verified deaths between March 1 and June 18, when northwest and eastern India had more than double the typical number of heatwave days.

“A prolonged summer should be classified as a natural disaster,” the Hindu newspaper wrote in an editorial on Thursday, citing water shortages and record power demand.

VOR News

The health ministry asked federal and state institutions to provide rapid care to patients, while hospitals were told to make more beds available.

The meteorological office has anticipated above-normal temperatures for this month as well, and Delhi experienced its warmest night in over 50 years on Wednesday, with a minimum temperature of 35.2°C (95°F), according to weather department data.

Temperatures in the capital fell nearly 6°C to 37°C (98.6°F) on Thursday as rain provided relief from the heat, according to weather service data.

 

Continue Reading

News

UAE Predicted to Become World’s Top Wealth-Attracting Country for Third Consecutive Year

Published

on

UAE Predicted to Become World's Top Wealth-Attracting Country for Third Consecutive Year

(CTN News) – The Henley Private Wealth Migration Report predicts that the UAE will become the world’s top wealth-attracting country for the third year in a row.

The survey, which was released earlier this week, expects an extraordinary inflow of 6,700 millionaires from all over the world by the end of 2024, CNBC reported.

The United States is trailing behind the UAE in second place, with an expected inflow of 3,800 millionaires by year end.

According to Henley, the analysis projects that 128,000 millionaires, or high-net-worth individuals with one million dollars or more, will relocate in 2024, breaking the previous record of 120,000 millionaires set last year, signaling a watershed moment in global wealth migration.

The analysis is based on data provided by the global wealth intelligence business, New World Wealth. It provides information on millionaires’ inflows and outflows, as well as their global mobility trends.

Why the UAE is a Top Choice for Millionaires

“This great millionaire migration is a canary in the coal mine, signaling a profound shift in the global landscape and tectonic plates of wealth and power, with far-reaching implications for the future trajectory of the nations they leave behind or those which they make their new home,” said Dominic Volek, director of private client services at Henley & Partners, an international law firm.

The UAE is becoming a popular choice for high-net-worth individuals worldwide, thanks to its favorable tax regulations, strategic location, and modern infrastructure.

The country offers a “golden visa” to attract foreign talent, intending to “provide long-term residence to investors, entrepreneurs, specialists, students, and researchers who make a significant investment in the country,” according to Henley & Partners.

People from the Middle East, India, Russia, Africa, and most recently, the anticipated migration from the United Kingdom and Europe, are driving an increase in migration to the UAE.

According to Henley & Partners, the top ten countries expecting the biggest net inflows of millionaires this year are listed below.

  • United Arab Emirates: +6,700
  • United States of America: +3,800
  • Singapore: +3,500
  • Canada: +3,200
  • Australia: +2,500
  • Italy: +2,200
  • Switzerland: +1,500
  • Greece: +1,200
  • Portugal: +800
  • Japan: +400
Continue Reading

News

Supreme Court Upholds Trump-Era Foreign Earnings TAX

Published

on

US Supreme Court Upholds Trump- Era Tax

On Thursday, the US Supreme Court upheld an obscure tax established as part of Trump’s big 2017 reform package that targets U.S. taxpayers who own shares in certain foreign firms.

The Supreme Court concluded 7-2 that the so-called mandatory repatriation tax, or MRT, is constitutional under Article I and the 16th Amendment, rejecting a lawsuit by a Washington couple, Charles and Kathleen Moore, who claimed the provision violated the Constitution. Justice Brett Kavanaugh authored the majority opinion. Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch dissented.

The Supreme Court’s decision was narrow, but by declining to overturn the tax, the justices avoided closing the door on Democrats’ proposals to levy taxes on the nation’s richest earnings. Kavanaugh emphasized that the court’s analysis ignores the difficulties created by holdings, wealth, or net worth taxes, as well as appreciation taxes.

“Those are potential issues for another day, and we do not address or resolve any of those issues here,” the Supreme Court judge’s counsel wrote. “In the Moores’ instance, Congress has long taxed an entity’s shareholders on its undistributed revenue, as it did with the MRT. This Court has long sustained such taxes, and we continue to do so with the MRT.

The high court opinion is also expected to allay fears about the impact of a sweeping decision rejecting the required repatriation tax on other elements of the tax legislation. Kavanaugh acknowledged the potential repercussions of such a finding, stating that if the Moores’ argument is adopted, “vast swaths” of the Internal Revenue Code may be declared unconstitutional.

“And those tax provisions, if suddenly eliminated, would deprive the U. S. government and the American people of trillions in lost tax revenue,” he wrote on behalf of the coalition. “The logical ramifications of the Moores’ thesis would thus oblige Congress to either dramatically slash important national programs or significantly increase taxes on the remaining sources available to it—including, of course, ordinary Americans. The Constitution does not need such a fiscal disaster.”

Dan Greenberg, general counsel of the Competitive Enterprise Institute, which represented the Moores, expressed disappointment with the verdict, which allows the government to collect income taxes on overseas stockholders who have never earned income.

“We think that is unfair, because the Constitution authorizes Congress to tax people on their income, not the income of foreign businesses that they do not control,” according to a press release.

US Supreme Court

Supreme Court Moore v. U.S.

The tax at the center of the case, known as Moore v. U.S., is imposed one time on U.S. taxpayers who hold shares of certain foreign corporations. The Moores challenged the measure after they were hit with a nearly $15,000 tax bill for 2017 as a result of the law, which required them to pay levies on their share of reinvested lifetime earnings from an India-based company called KisanKraft Tools.

The Moores had invested $40,000 in the company in 2006 in exchange for a 13% stake, and did not receive any distributions, dividends or other payments from it.

But the mandatory repatriation tax, enacted through the Tax Cut and Jobs Act that was signed into law by former President Donald Trump, taxed U.S. taxpayers who owned at least 10% of a foreign company on their proportionate share of that company’s earnings after 1986. The tax was projected to generate roughly $340 billion in revenue over 10 years.

Though KisanKraft reinvested its earnings in the years after its founding, rather than distributing dividends to shareholders, the tax still applied to the Moores.

The Moores paid, but filed a lawsuit against the federal government to obtain a refund and challenge the constitutionality of the mandatory repatriation tax.

A federal district court ruled for the government and dismissed the case, finding that the mandatory repatriation tax is permitted under the 16th Amendment, which grants Congress the authority to tax “incomes, from whatever source derived.”

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit upheld the lower court’s decision, ruling that nothing in the Constitution prohibits Congress from “attributing a corporation’s income pro-rata to its shareholders.” The 9th Circuit noted that courts have consistently upheld other similar taxes, and warned that finding the measure unconstitutional would call into question many other long-standing tax provisions.

The Supreme Court affirmed the 9th Circuit’s ruling and found that by 1938, its precedents had established a rule that contradicted the Moores’ argument in their case. That line of prior decisions, Kavanaugh wrote for the court, “remains good law to this day.”

Citing those earlier rulings and the similarities between the mandatory repatriation tax and other tax provisions, the court concluded that the measure “falls squarely within Congress’s constitutional authority to tax.”

Justice Amy Coney Barrett issued a concurring opinion, joined by Justice Samuel Alito, in which she agreed with the outcome of the case, but split with the majority’s reasoning. Addressing the question that was before the court, Barrett said that the 16th Amendment does not authorize Congress to tax unrealized sums without apportionment to the states.

In a dissenting opinion joined by Gorsuch, Thomas said the Moores were correct in challenging the mandatory repatriation tax as unconstitutional. Because the couple never actually received gains from their investment, those unrealized gains couldn’t be taxed as income under the 16th Amendment, he wrote.

“The fact that the MRT has novel features does not mean that it is unconstitutional. But, the MRT is undeniably novel when compared to older income taxes, and many of those differences are constitutionally relevant,” he wrote. “Because the MRT is imposed merely based on ownership of shares in a corporation, it does not operate as a tax on income.”

Thomas criticized the majority over its concerns about the impact a broad decision would have on other longstanding taxes, writing that “if Congress invites calamity by building the tax base on constitutional quicksand, ‘the judicial power’ afforded to this court does not include the power to fashion an emergency escape.”

He also rebuffed the majority’s contention that its ruling does not speak to the constitutionality of other taxes that may be passed by Congress, such as a wealth tax.

“Sensing that upholding the MRT cedes additional ground to Congress, the majority arms itself with dicta to tell Congress ‘no’ in the future,” Thomas wrote. “But, if the court is not willing to uphold limitations on the taxing power in expensive cases, cheap dicta will make no difference.”

During oral arguments in December, the justices seemed sympathetic to concerns about how a sweeping ruling would reverberate across the U.S. tax system and threaten existing tax laws.

But some of the justices sought clarity on the limits of Congress’ taxing power. Lawyers for the Moores had warned the court that allowing a tax on income that has not yet been realized, or received, would pave the way for lawmakers to levy taxes on all manner of things, such as retirement accounts or gains in the value of real estate.

Justice Samuel Alito had faced pressure from some congressional Democrats to recuse himself from the case because of interviews he participated in with an editor at the Wall Street Journal and David Rivkin, a lawyer who represented the Moores.

The justice declined to step aside from the case, arguing there was “no valid reason” for him to do so.

Source: CBS News

 

 

Continue Reading

Download Our App

vornews app

Advertise Here

Volunteering at Soi Dog

People Reading

Trending