Connect with us

News

Karoline Leavitt Slams Joe Kent’s Resignation Letter Says Many False Claims Made

VORNews

Published

on

Karoline Leavitt Slams Joe Kent

WASHINGTON, D.C. – White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt publicly pushed back on former National Counterterrorism Center Director Joe Kent’s resignation letter, saying it included “many false claims” about whether Iran posed an immediate danger to the United States.

Kent, a longtime Trump ally and military veteran, stepped down from his senior intelligence role on March 17, 2026. In his letter, he argued that the U.S. struck Iran based on false grounds and pressure from Israel. Leavitt answered within hours, saying President Donald Trump moved forward because of “strong and compelling evidence” that Iran was preparing to attack.

The dispute has exposed strain inside the Trump administration early in its military campaign against Iran, called Operation Epic Fury. It has also stirred new concerns about internal trust, alleged leaks, and who had access to classified intelligence.

Joe Kent’s resignation letter claims Iran was not an immediate threat

Early Tuesday, Kent posted his resignation letter on X, formerly Twitter. In it, he wrote:

“I cannot in good conscience support the ongoing war in Iran. Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation, and it is clear that we started this war due to pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby.”

Kent, a former congressional candidate from Washington state and a strong “America First” voice, called on Trump to change direction and consider the human and political cost of the conflict. He argued the strikes did nothing for the American public and put U.S. lives at risk.

The letter spread quickly online and split many conservatives. Some applauded Kent for speaking against another Middle East war. Others, including senior Trump officials, viewed it as a break from a man who had once held the president’s confidence.

Karoline Leavitt says Kent’s claims are false

Leavitt responded on X with a pointed statement aimed directly at Kent’s version of events. Her message left little room for doubt.

“There are many false claims in this letter but let me address one specifically: that Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation,” Leavitt wrote. “This is the same false claim that Democrats and some in the liberal media have been repeating over and over.”

She then pointed to Trump’s own position. “As President Trump has clearly and explicitly stated, he had strong and compelling evidence that Iran was going to attack the United States first.”

Leavitt also stressed that the president decides what rises to the level of a national threat. She added that, from what she sees inside the White House, Trump focuses on what he believes serves the country’s best interests.

She also rejected Kent’s claim that Israel drove the decision. Leavitt called that charge “both insulting and laughable” and said Trump’s stance on Iran has been consistent for years, especially on the issue of Iran obtaining a nuclear weapon.

Her response framed the strikes as the result of intelligence from multiple sources, not pressure from another country. She also repeated the administration’s view that Iran remains the leading state sponsor of terrorism and has long threatened Americans at home and abroad.

Insider says Kent had been shut out of key briefings for months

The White House case grew stronger after Fox News correspondent Aishah Hasnie reported details from a senior administration official. Those details offered a clear reason for the gap between Kent’s claims and the administration’s position.

According to the official:

  • Joe Kent had a reputation inside the administration as a suspected leaker.
  • Because of those concerns, officials cut him off from presidential intelligence briefings months ago.
  • He did not take part in Iran planning meetings or related briefings.

That helps explain the disconnect Leavitt pointed to earlier in the day. Kent did not have access to the classified material that, according to the White House, showed Iran had strengthened its capabilities and may have been preparing an attack against the United States.

Hasnie later added that, according to background from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard was not directly told to remove Kent. Still, the core point remained the same. Kent had been kept away from Iran-related intelligence, which left him working from old or incomplete information.

Officials cited several reasons for sidelining him:

  • Suspected leaks tied to sensitive operations
  • A months-long removal from top-level presidential briefings
  • No role in Iran strike planning sessions
  • A major information gap on the evidence Trump reviewed before authorizing action

Taken together, those details support the administration’s claim that Kent resigned over a policy area from which he had already been excluded. In the White House view, that made his letter both inaccurate and poorly informed.

Trump says Kent is out for the right reason.

Trump addressed the resignation during remarks from the Oval Office on Tuesday afternoon. He called Kent “very weak on security” and made his position plain.

“It’s a good thing he’s out, because he said that Iran was not a threat. Iran was a threat, every country realized what a threat Iran was.”

His remarks matched Leavitt’s response and showed the administration speaking with one voice on the Iran strikes. Trump also repeated that Iran’s regime is “evil” and said it has targeted America for years.

The fallout points to bigger divisions inside Trump’s coalition

Kent’s exit is the first major resignation inside the Trump administration tied directly to the Iran conflict. As a result, it highlights early splits inside the broader “America First” movement.

Backers of Kent say his letter reflects real concern about repeating old mistakes in the Middle East. On the other hand, his critics say his removal from briefings proves he was out of the loop and no longer a reliable voice on the matter.

The episode also puts a spotlight on larger issues inside the White House, including intelligence security and staff oversight:

  • Why were leak concerns allowed to linger for months?
  • What part did Tulsi Gabbard play in handling Kent’s status?
  • Will more officials break ranks as the Iran campaign continues?

Administration officials say the strikes were needed to stop an Iranian attack before it reached U.S. soil. Leavitt’s statement, along with the briefing details shared later, appears meant to block any claim that Trump acted too quickly or under outside pressure.

As the conflict moves forward, the White House is trying to project unity and control. Leavitt’s fast response sent a blunt message. Internal disagreement may happen, but the administration says the fact, and the classified intelligence behind Trump’s decision comes first.

Kent has not publicly answered the leak claims or Leavitt’s remarks since resigning. The National Counterterrorism Center has not named an acting director.

The full picture of Iran’s nuclear progress and any planned attacks remains classified. Even so, the administration says the evidence was overwhelming and that Trump made the call on his own authority as commander in chief.

The fight over Kent’s resignation shows how much access matters in national security. Real-time intelligence can shape how leaders see a threat, and without it, they may reach very different conclusions.

Related News:

Karoline Leavitt Corrects CBS News, Over ICE Deportation Numbers

Continue Reading

News

Trump Warns China as Vance Leads Peace Talks with Iran

VORNews

Published

on

By

Donald Trump, JD Vance, China Iran

WASHINGTON, D.C. – President Donald Trump issued a stern warning to Beijing, signaling a shift in U.S. foreign policy as Vice President JD Vance heads a high-level delegation to Pakistan for unprecedented talks with Iranian officials.

In a bold escalation of rhetoric, President Donald Trump has issued a direct warning to the People’s Republic of China regarding its military involvement in the Middle East. Speaking from the Oval Office, the President made it clear that any attempt by Beijing to supply weaponry to Iran would be met with severe consequences.

“China is going to have big problems—very big problems—if they decide to ship weapons to Iran,” Trump stated. “We are looking for peace, but we are also looking at the facts. You cannot play both sides of the fence when the stability of the world is at stake.”

The warning comes as intelligence reports suggest increased logistics cooperation between Beijing and Tehran. For the Trump administration, the message is twofold: a demand for Chinese neutrality and a demonstration of American leverage over global trade routes and sanctions.

Potential Consequences for China

The administration has hinted at several “levers” it could pull should Beijing ignore this warning:

  • Secondary Sanctions: Targeting Chinese banks and firms that facilitate arms transfers.
  • Trade Restrictions: Implementing further tariffs or export controls on sensitive technology.
  • Diplomatic Isolation: Working with allies to limit Chinese influence in Middle Eastern security frameworks.

The Islamabad Summit: A High-Stakes Peace Mission

While the President maintains a hardline stance toward external interference, a different scene is unfolding in Pakistan. Vice President JD Vance is currently leading a specialized U.S. delegation to Islamabad for a Saturday meeting with high-ranking Iranian officials.

This mission represents one of the most significant diplomatic gambles of the Trump presidency. The goal is clear: to establish a “path to peace” and de-escalate years of mounting tension that have brought the region to the brink of open conflict.

The Delegation Members

The composition of the U.S. team suggests a blend of traditional diplomacy and transactional deal-making:

  • Vice President JD Vance: Representing the administration’s “America First” foreign policy, focused on ending “endless wars” while maintaining U.S. strength.
  • Steve Witkoff: A trusted confidant of the President and special envoy known for his pragmatic approach to complex negotiations.
  • Jared Kushner: The architect of the Abraham Accords, returning to the diplomatic fold to leverage his existing relationships in the region.

Why Pakistan?

The choice of Pakistan as a venue is no accident. Islamabad has long maintained a delicate balancing act between its relationship with the United States and its neighbor, Iran. By choosing this neutral ground, both Washington and Tehran are signaling a willingness to step outside the usual frameworks of Western-led summits.

Sources close to the delegation suggest that Pakistan’s leadership has been instrumental in facilitating the logistics for this meeting, acting as a “quiet bridge” between the two adversaries.

The Iranian Perspective

Tehran’s decision to meet with the Vance-led delegation follows months of economic pressure and internal debate. While the Iranian leadership remains publicly cautious, the presence of figures like Kushner—who has a track record of facilitating regional agreements—indicates that the talks may move beyond rhetoric into the realm of tangible concessions.

Key discussion points are expected to include:

  1. Sanctions Relief: Iran is seeking a pathway to re-enter global energy markets.
  2. Regional Security: A cessation of hostilities involving proxy groups.
  3. Nuclear Limitations: Reviving a framework for monitoring Iranian nuclear capabilities that satisfies U.S. security requirements.

Global Reactions and AI Search Trends

The news has sent ripples through global markets and digital spaces. International observers are questioning whether this “Carrot and Stick” approach—threatening China while talking to Iran—can produce a lasting equilibrium.

Market Impact:

  • Oil Prices: Crude futures showed volatility following the announcement, as traders weighed the possibility of a “peace dividend” against the threat of new sanctions on China.
  • Defense Stocks: Renewed interest in maritime security and surveillance technology as the U.S. monitors Chinese shipping lanes.

Challenges to the Peace Path

Despite the optimistic headlines, significant hurdles remain. Hardliners in both Washington and Tehran are skeptical of a “quick fix.” Furthermore, China’s reaction to Trump’s warning could redefine the success of the Pakistan summit. If Beijing feels backed into a corner, it may increase its support for Iran simply to counter American influence.

Conclusion: A New Era of Diplomacy?

The events of this Saturday could define the foreign policy legacy of the current administration. By combining aggressive economic threats against spoilers like China with direct, high-level engagement with adversaries like Iran, President Trump is attempting to rewrite the diplomatic playbook.

Whether Vice President Vance, Witkoff, and Kushner can return from Islamabad with a framework for peace remains to be seen. However, the world is now on notice: the United States is willing to talk, but it is equally prepared to act.

Trending News:

Starmer Bizarrely Tries to Take Credit for the US- Iran Ceasefire

Trump Axes Starmer’s Chagos Deal: Calls It An Act of Great Stupidity 

 

 

Continue Reading

News

Eric Swalwell Faces Explosive Rape Accusation From Former Staffer

VORNews

Published

on

By

Eric Swalwell Now Faces Rape Accusation

SACRAMENTO, CA — U.S. Representative Eric Swalwell, a prominent Democrat and a front-runner in the 2026 California gubernatorial race, is facing a political and legal firestorm following a series of explosive sexual misconduct allegations.

On Friday, the San Francisco Chronicle and CNN reported that a former congressional staffer has accused Swalwell of raping her, while three other women have come forward with claims of sexual harassment and inappropriate behavior.

The allegations have sent shockwaves through the Democratic Party, leading to a mass exodus of campaign staff and a chorus of calls for Swalwell’s resignation from high-ranking officials, including former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries.

The most serious charge comes from an unnamed woman who previously worked in Swalwell’s district office. In interviews, the woman detailed two non-consensual encounters:

  • 2019 Incident: The staffer claims she was sexually assaulted by Swalwell in California while she was an employee in his office. She stated she was “heavily intoxicated” and unable to provide consent.
  • 2024 Incident: A second alleged assault occurred in a New York hotel room after she had left his staff. The woman told CNN she was “pushing him off” and saying no, but he did not stop.
  • Physical Evidence: The accuser described being left “bruised and bleeding” following the 2024 encounter. Reports indicate that friends and family members have corroborated that she spoke to them about the trauma shortly after it occurred.

The Manhattan District Attorney’s Office confirmed on Saturday that it has opened an investigation into the New York allegations, urging any potential witnesses to contact their Special Victims Division.

A Pattern of Misconduct: Three Other Accusers

Beyond the former staffer’s harrowing account, three additional women have come forward to detail a pattern of alleged sexual harassment by the Congressman. These claims include:

  • Unsolicited Explicit Material: Two women allege receiving unwanted sexual messages and explicit images from Swalwell.
  • Unwelcome Advances: Accusers described a history of “unwelcome advances” and “inappropriate touching” that occurred over several years.
  • Retaliation Claims: Some women reported receiving “cease-and-desist” letters from Swalwell’s legal team shortly before the stories went public, which critics describe as an attempt to silence victims.

Rep. Swalwell has vehemently denied the allegations of sexual assault, calling them “politically motivated lies” timed to sabotage his bid for Governor. In a video statement released Friday night, a defiant Swalwell addressed the public.

“These allegations of sexual assault are flat false. They did not happen,” Swalwell said. While he admitted to “mistakes in judgment” regarding his marriage—issuing a public apology to his wife, Brittany Ann Watts—he maintained that no criminal or non-consensual acts ever took place. His legal team argues that the former staffer maintained a “voluntary and cooperative relationship” with him for years, even seeking job references after the alleged incidents.

Political Fallout and Resignations

The impact on Swalwell’s campaign has been immediate and devastating. His bid to succeed Governor Gavin Newsom appears to be in a state of collapse as key supporters withdraw their endorsements.

Major Developments in the Scandal:

  • Staff Resignations: Senior campaign advisers, including Courtni Pugh, and several congressional staffers have resigned, stating they are “horrified” by the reports.
  • Loss of Endorsements: High-profile Democrats, including California Senators Adam Schiff and Alex Padilla, have called for him to drop out of the race.
  • Democratic Leadership Response: Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries called the allegations “deeply disturbing” and urged a swift, transparent investigation.
  • Suspended Funding: “Californians for a Fighter,” a major super PAC supporting Swalwell, has suspended its operations.

As the Manhattan DA begins its probe, the House Ethics Committee is also expected to face pressure to open a formal inquiry. While Swalwell has vowed to “fight with everything I have,” the severity of the “bruised and bleeding” testimony, combined with the testimony of three other women, has created a hurdle that many political analysts believe is insurmountable.

The June non-partisan primary is just weeks away. For now, the Congressman remains in his seat, though his future in both the Capitol and the Governor’s mansion hangs by a thread.

Trending News:

Eric Swalwell’s Governor Campaign in Crisis After Multiple Assault Allegations Surface

 

 

 

Continue Reading

News

Moon Mission Success: Artemis II Crew Splashes Down Safely in the Pacific

VORNews

Published

on

By

Moon Mission Success: Artemis II Crew Splashes Down Safely in the Pacific

SAN DIEGO – The roar of the engines has been replaced by the gentle lapping of Pacific waves. Today, humanity took its biggest leap toward the lunar surface in over fifty years as the Artemis II mission concluded with a perfect splashdown off the coast of California.

The Orion spacecraft, scorched from its fiery re-entry through Earth’s atmosphere, bobbed in the water as Navy recovery teams moved in. Onboard were four pioneers who now hold a place in the history books, having completed a ten-day journey that took them further into deep space than any human has ever traveled.

The recovery operation was a precision dance between NASA and the U.S. Navy. The USS San Diego stood by as helicopters and inflatable boats surrounded the capsule.

The crew—Commander Reid Wiseman, Pilot Victor Glover, and Mission Specialists Christina Koch and Jeremy Hansen—emerged from the hatch to the cheers of recovery teams. Despite the physical toll of returning from microgravity, the astronauts appeared in high spirits, waving to the cameras that captured the moment for millions watching around the globe.

Key Milestones of the Artemis II Mission

This wasn’t just a flight; it was a stress test for the future of human exploration. During their 10.3-day mission, the crew achieved several historic firsts:

  • Deep Space Record: The crew traveled thousands of miles beyond the far side of the moon, setting a record for the furthest distance from Earth reached by a crewed spacecraft.
  • Life Support Validation: This was the first time the Orion’s life support systems were tested with humans on board in the harsh environment of deep space.
  • Diverse Representation: The mission included the first woman, the first person of color, and the first non-American (Canadian) to fly to the vicinity of the moon.

The Fiery Path Home

The return to Earth is often the most dangerous part of any lunar mission. Orion hit the top of the atmosphere traveling at nearly 25,000 miles per hour.

As the spacecraft pushed against the air, the heat shield endured temperatures of about 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit—half as hot as the surface of the sun. For several minutes, the friction of re-entry caused a total communications blackout, a tense period of silence that ended only when the first drogue parachutes blossomed against the blue California sky.

“Everything worked exactly as the simulations predicted,” said a NASA flight director during a press briefing shortly after the landing. “The heat shield performed flawlessly, and the skip-entry maneuver allowed us to pinpoint the landing site with incredible accuracy.”

Why Artemis II Matters

While Artemis II did not land on the moon, it paved the way for those who will. By proving that the Space Launch System (SLS) rocket and the Orion capsule can safely transport humans to lunar orbit and back, NASA has cleared the final major hurdle before Artemis III.

Artemis III, currently scheduled for late 2026 or 2027, aims to put boots back on the lunar South Pole. This mission will include the first woman and person of color to actually walk on the moon’s surface.

What Happens Next?

Now that the crew is back on solid ground, the work for NASA scientists is just beginning.

  1. Medical Evaluations: The astronauts will undergo weeks of testing to see how deep-space radiation and weightlessness affect their bodies.
  2. Data Analysis: Engineers will strip down the Orion capsule to study how the hardware held up.
  3. Future Training: The lessons learned from this flight will be integrated into the training for the Artemis III crew.

A New Era of Discovery

The success of Artemis II signals a shift in how we view space. We are no longer just visiting; we are preparing to stay. With the planned Lunar Gateway station and future base camps on the surface, the moon is becoming a stepping stone for the eventual journey to Mars.

As the sun sets over the Pacific today, the world looks up at the moon with a little more familiarity. We’ve been back, we’ve seen the far side with our own eyes, and soon, we will be walking among the craters once again.

Trending News:

New Cicada COVID Variant Emerges: What to Know About BA.3.2

Elon Musk Builds a $1.25 Trillion Giant as SpaceX Buys xAI in Landmark Merger

 

Continue Reading

Get 30 Days Free

Express VPN

Create Super Content

rightblogger

Flight Buddies Needed

Flight Volunteers Wanted

Trending