News
China Backed US Billionaire Singham Allegedly Funding of Anti-ICE Protests
The Quiet Controversy: Neville Roy Singham’s CCP Links and Money Behind US Unrest
Mapping the Network: Singham’s Past and Reported CCP Connections
NEW YORK – Neville Roy Singham is a US-born tech entrepreneur who sold his software firm, Thoughtworks, for close to $1 billion in 2017. Since then, he has moved to Shanghai and has become a key name in claims of foreign influence tied to US activism.
Critics and congressional investigators say he has sent millions of dollars to left-leaning groups in the United States, including groups involved in protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
Investigators allege the funding supports goals aligned with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and they point to public reporting that describes Singham attending CCP workshops focused on overseas messaging. Other reports say he has shared office space with organizations such as the Maku Group, a media company that has displayed banners praising Xi Jinping.
Singham has been active in political causes since the 1970s, but his work after 2017 has drawn the most attention. Reports describe money moving through layers of shell companies, donor-advised funds, and nonprofits, including the United Community Fund and the Justice Education Fund.
These groups have little public presence, which critics say makes it easier to move money quietly into activist and media efforts. One example raised in public reporting is that nearly $1.8 million from related funding streams went to Chinese media outlets that echo CCP messaging. His wife, Jodie Evans, a co-founder of Code Pink, is also connected to this ecosystem, and Code Pink has reportedly received a large share of its donations from sources tied to Singham.
Supporters of Singham-funded groups often describe the network as values-driven, not just financial. Some groups have called him a “Marxist comrade,” and critics say the model matches a CCP approach sometimes described as a “Strategy of Sowing Discord,” meant to deepen divisions inside rival countries.
The concern is that money and organizing support can amplify protests, strain local systems, and harden social conflict, while still flowing through tax-exempt structures that reduce oversight.
Claims Around Singham Funding Anti-ICE Protests
The biggest flashpoint is Singham’s alleged role in bankrolling anti-ICE protests across the US. Reports and committee statements have named organizations such as The People’s Forum, Code Pink, and the Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL) as major beneficiaries.
The People’s Forum is said to have received more than $20 million from Singham between 2017 and 2022, with funds routed through intermediaries that keep the source hard to trace. The New York-based group has been accused by critics of encouraging aggressive protest tactics aimed at ICE, including disruptions in large cities and actions on college campuses.
In Los Angeles, riots linked to PSL, described by some reports as Singham’s “main backer,” led President Trump to deploy the National Guard after federal officers were attacked. In Minneapolis, investigators and critics have also pointed to activists tied to these funding lines, saying they coordinated efforts to pressure or harass ICE during enforcement actions.
Protests in Minnesota and other places, including Buffalo, have featured calls to abolish ICE. Some participants have discussed tactics on encrypted apps, according to reporting cited by critics.
These actions are not limited to immigration. They also overlap with pro-Palestine campus occupations and wider anti-capitalist organizing. Critics argue that some messaging in these circles lines up with CCP-friendly narratives, including defenses of China’s actions toward Uyghurs.
The overall funding totals cited in public claims are large, with reports saying Singham has directed as much as $250 million into connected organizations and projects. The People’s Forum has also hosted events that praise China and promote Leninist ideas, which critics say support the argument that this is coordinated influence work, not simple grassroots activism.
Capitol Hill Pressure: Multiple Investigations
Singham and his network have drawn attention from several congressional committees. The House Ways and Means Committee, chaired by Rep. Jason Smith (R-MO), has pointed to The People’s Forum as a possible CCP-linked propaganda hub operating under tax-exempt status.
In a September 2025 letter, Smith requested records and described the group as tied to unrest while receiving large sums linked to Singham. The committee framed the issue as protecting the tax code from abuse and keeping nonprofit benefits from being used against US interests.
The House Oversight Committee, led by Rep. James Comer (R-KY) and joined by Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL), opened an inquiry in June 2025 focused on funding connected to the Los Angeles riots. The committee subpoenaed Singham for records tied to his relationship with PSL and warned that failure to comply could trigger contempt steps.
Oversight also raised concerns about possible Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) violations, which can apply when someone acts in the US on behalf of a foreign principal. In September, the committee went further and asked Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to review options such as sanctions, asset freezes, or seizures tied to Singham-connected entities.
The Senate Judiciary Committee, led by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), has also focused on The People’s Forum and Code Pink. Grassley’s April 2025 letter raised concerns about possible FARA duties tied to CCP-linked funding and influence. He also pointed to appearances by leaders of these groups in state-owned Chinese media as part of the broader picture.
Together, these inquiries show growing concern about foreign influence, even if the loudest push has come from Republicans in the current Congress.
Why the Story Hasn’t Broken Through in Mainstream Media
Despite the seriousness of the claims, coverage in major outlets has been limited. Critics point out that CNN, MSNBC, and The Washington Post have spent extensive time on Donald Trump’s policies and personal controversies, while giving far less attention to the Singham story. They argue that this gap is not random. Anti-ICE protests often fit into progressive political narratives, and a deeper look at possible CCP ties could complicate the way those protests are framed in public debate.
A few outlets have given the topic more airtime. Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News has run segments focused on Singham and featured Rep. Jason Smith discussing claims that violence is being fueled through tax-exempt channels. NewsNation has also covered the subpoenas and the broader claims about money supporting campus actions and anti-ICE protests.
Critics say the uneven attention leaves the public with an incomplete picture. They argue that when headlines focus on familiar political drama, quieter stories about foreign meddling can fade into the background, even when the national security stakes are high.
Bessent Signals a Push for Oversight
As congressional pressure builds, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has moved toward stronger enforcement. Appointed in the Trump administration, Bessent has been recruiting a senior enforcement official, described as a new “top cop,” to watch for nonprofits that misuse 501(c)(3) status.
The plan includes an interagency task force aimed at groups that cross legal lines through heavy political activity, improper lobbying, or fraud. Supporters of the effort say this approach speaks directly to concerns raised in the Singham-related probes.
This shift follows requests from congressional Republicans, including lawmakers on Ways and Means, who have called for tougher action against nonprofits they say promote “anti-American” goals or help fund terrorism. Oversight’s letter to Bessent also pressed Treasury to review steps like sanctions or asset actions tied to Singham-linked entities. Bessent has framed the effort as a way to trace money flows and reduce waste, fraud, and abuse.
If Treasury follows through, the impact could extend well past one donor network. A more aggressive review could disrupt how political money moves through nonprofit structures. Legal fights may still follow, including disputes over FARA requirements and any attempt to freeze or seize assets.
US Sovereignty and Public Trust
The Singham story highlights pressure points in US systems, including tax rules, free speech protections, and the way political movements are covered. Committees can investigate, and Treasury can tighten enforcement, but the public also depends on clear reporting to understand what is happening and why.
Supporters of the investigations say the goal is simple: protect lawful protest while stopping foreign-backed influence campaigns that use US freedoms as cover. With the Treasury building new enforcement capacity and Congress asking sharper questions, the next phase may bring more records into the open and more accountability for groups that used secrecy to avoid scrutiny.
Related News:
Why America is so Polarized in 2026: Expert Analysis of the Main Drivers
News
Trump Warns China as Vance Leads Peace Talks with Iran
WASHINGTON, D.C. – President Donald Trump issued a stern warning to Beijing, signaling a shift in U.S. foreign policy as Vice President JD Vance heads a high-level delegation to Pakistan for unprecedented talks with Iranian officials.
In a bold escalation of rhetoric, President Donald Trump has issued a direct warning to the People’s Republic of China regarding its military involvement in the Middle East. Speaking from the Oval Office, the President made it clear that any attempt by Beijing to supply weaponry to Iran would be met with severe consequences.
“China is going to have big problems—very big problems—if they decide to ship weapons to Iran,” Trump stated. “We are looking for peace, but we are also looking at the facts. You cannot play both sides of the fence when the stability of the world is at stake.”
The warning comes as intelligence reports suggest increased logistics cooperation between Beijing and Tehran. For the Trump administration, the message is twofold: a demand for Chinese neutrality and a demonstration of American leverage over global trade routes and sanctions.
Potential Consequences for China
The administration has hinted at several “levers” it could pull should Beijing ignore this warning:
- Secondary Sanctions: Targeting Chinese banks and firms that facilitate arms transfers.
- Trade Restrictions: Implementing further tariffs or export controls on sensitive technology.
- Diplomatic Isolation: Working with allies to limit Chinese influence in Middle Eastern security frameworks.
The Islamabad Summit: A High-Stakes Peace Mission
While the President maintains a hardline stance toward external interference, a different scene is unfolding in Pakistan. Vice President JD Vance is currently leading a specialized U.S. delegation to Islamabad for a Saturday meeting with high-ranking Iranian officials.
This mission represents one of the most significant diplomatic gambles of the Trump presidency. The goal is clear: to establish a “path to peace” and de-escalate years of mounting tension that have brought the region to the brink of open conflict.
The Delegation Members
The composition of the U.S. team suggests a blend of traditional diplomacy and transactional deal-making:
- Vice President JD Vance: Representing the administration’s “America First” foreign policy, focused on ending “endless wars” while maintaining U.S. strength.
- Steve Witkoff: A trusted confidant of the President and special envoy known for his pragmatic approach to complex negotiations.
- Jared Kushner: The architect of the Abraham Accords, returning to the diplomatic fold to leverage his existing relationships in the region.
Why Pakistan?
The choice of Pakistan as a venue is no accident. Islamabad has long maintained a delicate balancing act between its relationship with the United States and its neighbor, Iran. By choosing this neutral ground, both Washington and Tehran are signaling a willingness to step outside the usual frameworks of Western-led summits.
Sources close to the delegation suggest that Pakistan’s leadership has been instrumental in facilitating the logistics for this meeting, acting as a “quiet bridge” between the two adversaries.
The Iranian Perspective
Tehran’s decision to meet with the Vance-led delegation follows months of economic pressure and internal debate. While the Iranian leadership remains publicly cautious, the presence of figures like Kushner—who has a track record of facilitating regional agreements—indicates that the talks may move beyond rhetoric into the realm of tangible concessions.
Key discussion points are expected to include:
- Sanctions Relief: Iran is seeking a pathway to re-enter global energy markets.
- Regional Security: A cessation of hostilities involving proxy groups.
- Nuclear Limitations: Reviving a framework for monitoring Iranian nuclear capabilities that satisfies U.S. security requirements.
Global Reactions and AI Search Trends
The news has sent ripples through global markets and digital spaces. International observers are questioning whether this “Carrot and Stick” approach—threatening China while talking to Iran—can produce a lasting equilibrium.
Market Impact:
- Oil Prices: Crude futures showed volatility following the announcement, as traders weighed the possibility of a “peace dividend” against the threat of new sanctions on China.
- Defense Stocks: Renewed interest in maritime security and surveillance technology as the U.S. monitors Chinese shipping lanes.
Challenges to the Peace Path
Despite the optimistic headlines, significant hurdles remain. Hardliners in both Washington and Tehran are skeptical of a “quick fix.” Furthermore, China’s reaction to Trump’s warning could redefine the success of the Pakistan summit. If Beijing feels backed into a corner, it may increase its support for Iran simply to counter American influence.
Conclusion: A New Era of Diplomacy?
The events of this Saturday could define the foreign policy legacy of the current administration. By combining aggressive economic threats against spoilers like China with direct, high-level engagement with adversaries like Iran, President Trump is attempting to rewrite the diplomatic playbook.
Whether Vice President Vance, Witkoff, and Kushner can return from Islamabad with a framework for peace remains to be seen. However, the world is now on notice: the United States is willing to talk, but it is equally prepared to act.
Trending News:
Starmer Bizarrely Tries to Take Credit for the US- Iran Ceasefire
Trump Axes Starmer’s Chagos Deal: Calls It An Act of Great Stupidity
News
Eric Swalwell Faces Explosive Rape Accusation From Former Staffer
SACRAMENTO, CA — U.S. Representative Eric Swalwell, a prominent Democrat and a front-runner in the 2026 California gubernatorial race, is facing a political and legal firestorm following a series of explosive sexual misconduct allegations.
On Friday, the San Francisco Chronicle and CNN reported that a former congressional staffer has accused Swalwell of raping her, while three other women have come forward with claims of sexual harassment and inappropriate behavior.
The allegations have sent shockwaves through the Democratic Party, leading to a mass exodus of campaign staff and a chorus of calls for Swalwell’s resignation from high-ranking officials, including former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries.
The most serious charge comes from an unnamed woman who previously worked in Swalwell’s district office. In interviews, the woman detailed two non-consensual encounters:
- 2019 Incident: The staffer claims she was sexually assaulted by Swalwell in California while she was an employee in his office. She stated she was “heavily intoxicated” and unable to provide consent.
- 2024 Incident: A second alleged assault occurred in a New York hotel room after she had left his staff. The woman told CNN she was “pushing him off” and saying no, but he did not stop.
- Physical Evidence: The accuser described being left “bruised and bleeding” following the 2024 encounter. Reports indicate that friends and family members have corroborated that she spoke to them about the trauma shortly after it occurred.
The Manhattan District Attorney’s Office confirmed on Saturday that it has opened an investigation into the New York allegations, urging any potential witnesses to contact their Special Victims Division.
A Pattern of Misconduct: Three Other Accusers
Beyond the former staffer’s harrowing account, three additional women have come forward to detail a pattern of alleged sexual harassment by the Congressman. These claims include:
- Unsolicited Explicit Material: Two women allege receiving unwanted sexual messages and explicit images from Swalwell.
- Unwelcome Advances: Accusers described a history of “unwelcome advances” and “inappropriate touching” that occurred over several years.
- Retaliation Claims: Some women reported receiving “cease-and-desist” letters from Swalwell’s legal team shortly before the stories went public, which critics describe as an attempt to silence victims.
Rep. Swalwell has vehemently denied the allegations of sexual assault, calling them “politically motivated lies” timed to sabotage his bid for Governor. In a video statement released Friday night, a defiant Swalwell addressed the public.
“These allegations of sexual assault are flat false. They did not happen,” Swalwell said. While he admitted to “mistakes in judgment” regarding his marriage—issuing a public apology to his wife, Brittany Ann Watts—he maintained that no criminal or non-consensual acts ever took place. His legal team argues that the former staffer maintained a “voluntary and cooperative relationship” with him for years, even seeking job references after the alleged incidents.
Political Fallout and Resignations
The impact on Swalwell’s campaign has been immediate and devastating. His bid to succeed Governor Gavin Newsom appears to be in a state of collapse as key supporters withdraw their endorsements.
Major Developments in the Scandal:
- Staff Resignations: Senior campaign advisers, including Courtni Pugh, and several congressional staffers have resigned, stating they are “horrified” by the reports.
- Loss of Endorsements: High-profile Democrats, including California Senators Adam Schiff and Alex Padilla, have called for him to drop out of the race.
- Democratic Leadership Response: Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries called the allegations “deeply disturbing” and urged a swift, transparent investigation.
- Suspended Funding: “Californians for a Fighter,” a major super PAC supporting Swalwell, has suspended its operations.
As the Manhattan DA begins its probe, the House Ethics Committee is also expected to face pressure to open a formal inquiry. While Swalwell has vowed to “fight with everything I have,” the severity of the “bruised and bleeding” testimony, combined with the testimony of three other women, has created a hurdle that many political analysts believe is insurmountable.
The June non-partisan primary is just weeks away. For now, the Congressman remains in his seat, though his future in both the Capitol and the Governor’s mansion hangs by a thread.
Trending News:
Eric Swalwell’s Governor Campaign in Crisis After Multiple Assault Allegations Surface
News
Moon Mission Success: Artemis II Crew Splashes Down Safely in the Pacific
SAN DIEGO – The roar of the engines has been replaced by the gentle lapping of Pacific waves. Today, humanity took its biggest leap toward the lunar surface in over fifty years as the Artemis II mission concluded with a perfect splashdown off the coast of California.
The Orion spacecraft, scorched from its fiery re-entry through Earth’s atmosphere, bobbed in the water as Navy recovery teams moved in. Onboard were four pioneers who now hold a place in the history books, having completed a ten-day journey that took them further into deep space than any human has ever traveled.
The recovery operation was a precision dance between NASA and the U.S. Navy. The USS San Diego stood by as helicopters and inflatable boats surrounded the capsule.
The crew—Commander Reid Wiseman, Pilot Victor Glover, and Mission Specialists Christina Koch and Jeremy Hansen—emerged from the hatch to the cheers of recovery teams. Despite the physical toll of returning from microgravity, the astronauts appeared in high spirits, waving to the cameras that captured the moment for millions watching around the globe.
Key Milestones of the Artemis II Mission
This wasn’t just a flight; it was a stress test for the future of human exploration. During their 10.3-day mission, the crew achieved several historic firsts:
- Deep Space Record: The crew traveled thousands of miles beyond the far side of the moon, setting a record for the furthest distance from Earth reached by a crewed spacecraft.
- Life Support Validation: This was the first time the Orion’s life support systems were tested with humans on board in the harsh environment of deep space.
- Diverse Representation: The mission included the first woman, the first person of color, and the first non-American (Canadian) to fly to the vicinity of the moon.
The Fiery Path Home
The return to Earth is often the most dangerous part of any lunar mission. Orion hit the top of the atmosphere traveling at nearly 25,000 miles per hour.
As the spacecraft pushed against the air, the heat shield endured temperatures of about 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit—half as hot as the surface of the sun. For several minutes, the friction of re-entry caused a total communications blackout, a tense period of silence that ended only when the first drogue parachutes blossomed against the blue California sky.
“Everything worked exactly as the simulations predicted,” said a NASA flight director during a press briefing shortly after the landing. “The heat shield performed flawlessly, and the skip-entry maneuver allowed us to pinpoint the landing site with incredible accuracy.”
Why Artemis II Matters
While Artemis II did not land on the moon, it paved the way for those who will. By proving that the Space Launch System (SLS) rocket and the Orion capsule can safely transport humans to lunar orbit and back, NASA has cleared the final major hurdle before Artemis III.
Artemis III, currently scheduled for late 2026 or 2027, aims to put boots back on the lunar South Pole. This mission will include the first woman and person of color to actually walk on the moon’s surface.
What Happens Next?
Now that the crew is back on solid ground, the work for NASA scientists is just beginning.
- Medical Evaluations: The astronauts will undergo weeks of testing to see how deep-space radiation and weightlessness affect their bodies.
- Data Analysis: Engineers will strip down the Orion capsule to study how the hardware held up.
- Future Training: The lessons learned from this flight will be integrated into the training for the Artemis III crew.
A New Era of Discovery
The success of Artemis II signals a shift in how we view space. We are no longer just visiting; we are preparing to stay. With the planned Lunar Gateway station and future base camps on the surface, the moon is becoming a stepping stone for the eventual journey to Mars.
As the sun sets over the Pacific today, the world looks up at the moon with a little more familiarity. We’ve been back, we’ve seen the far side with our own eyes, and soon, we will be walking among the craters once again.
Trending News:
New Cicada COVID Variant Emerges: What to Know About BA.3.2
Elon Musk Builds a $1.25 Trillion Giant as SpaceX Buys xAI in Landmark Merger
-
China2 months agoChina-Based Billionaire Singham Allegedly Funding America’s Radical Left
-
Politics2 months agoCNN Delivers Stark Reality Check to Democrats Over Voter ID
-
Politics2 months agoIlhan Omar’s Connections to Convicted Somali Fraudsters Surface
-
Politics3 months agoPresident Trump Addresses ICE Actions Amid Minnesota Unrest
-
News3 months agoFormer CNN Anchor Don Lemon Facing Charges Under Ku Klux Klan Act
-
News3 months agoErika Kirk’s Early EMP Documentary Fuels CIA Grooming Rumors
-
Entertainment2 months agoCNN Admits Melania Documentary is HUGE Box Office Success
-
Business3 months agoTesla’s Strategic Retreat From California Due to Red Tape, Costs, and Taxes



