News
Legacy Media Scrambles to Defend Obama as Gabbard Releases Declassified Files
WASHINGTON, D.C. – The US Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, declassified more than 100 pages of U.S. intelligence documents on July 18, 2025, sparking intense debate across American politics.
These documents, according to Gabbard, show that former President Barack Obama and his key aides pushed a narrative of Russian interference in the 2016 election while ignoring their own intelligence agencies’ findings.
Gabbard described the actions outlined in the files as a “treasonous conspiracy” designed to discredit Donald Trump’s victory and disrupt his presidency. As the story gained traction, major media outlets appeared to minimize the impact or question the motives behind the DNI release, prompting discussion about media bias and the responsibility to report important news.
Inside the Declassified Files: Tracing the Events
A memo from Gabbard’s office outlines how members of the Obama administration worked together to promote the idea of Russian collusion, even though intelligence reports at the time suggested otherwise.
Documents show that, leading up to the 2016 election, agencies like the CIA and FBI believed Russia “probably [was] not trying…to influence the election by using cyber means.”
A President’s Daily Brief prepared in December 2016 by several agencies repeated that “Russian and criminal actors did not impact recent U.S. election results by conducting malicious cyber activities against election infrastructure.”
After Trump defeated Hillary Clinton, however, the focus changed. On December 9, 2016, top officials met in the White House Situation Room. Attendees included Obama, DNI James Clapper, CIA Director John Brennan, Susan Rice, John Kerry, Loretta Lynch, Andrew McCabe, and others.
According to the meeting record, they agreed to recommend sanctions on certain Russian intelligence personnel for their role in cyber activity related to the U.S. election, even though previous reports found no proof of vote tampering or serious interference.
Shortly after, an assistant to Clapper instructed senior intelligence officials by email to put together a new assessment “per the President’s request,” describing Russian methods and actions in the election.
This led to the January 6, 2017, Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA), which, Gabbard claims, ignored earlier conclusions and drew from the disputed Steele dossier. The dossier contained unverified claims funded by the Clinton campaign, and some intelligence officials dismissed its contents as an “internet rumour.”
Still, it made its way into the ICA’s annex at the insistence of FBI Director James Comey, despite opposition from CIA analysts.
Gabbard accuses Obama’s team of altering intelligence for political reasons, stating that this set the stage for the lengthy Trump-Russia investigation that dominated Trump’s first term and affected U.S.-Russia relations.
She has sent the files to the Justice Department to investigate possible criminal wrongdoing, a step supported by current CIA Director John Ratcliffe, who has ordered separate investigations into Brennan and Comey for their involvement.
Media Coverage: Downplaying and Questioning
Allegations described by Gabbard as a “years-long coup” would usually attract major media attention. Instead, mainstream outlets have often treated the story as a partisan attack. Network news review shows a trend of coverage that either casts doubt on Gabbard or largely ignores the evidence in the documents.
ABC News and NBC News did not mention the declassification on air up to July 20, as found by Grabien Media transcript searches. CBS News covered it briefly on “Face the Nation,” where anchor Margaret Brennan gave Rep. Jim Himes, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, a chance to dismiss Gabbard’s claims as “baseless.”
CNN mentioned the release twice, both times featuring Democratic lawmakers pushing back against the story but not addressing the actual content of the documents.
The New York Times called Gabbard’s report “politically motivated” and “error-ridden” in a July 19 article, mainly quoting Democrats like Himes who argue the release conflicts with the accepted story about Russian interference.
The Times leaned on a 2020 Senate Intelligence Committee report, which found Russia meddled with social media and hacking campaigns but turned up no evidence of vote tampering. Gabbard’s files do not challenge this point directly, instead arguing that the collusion narrative was blown out of proportion.
NPR and The Washington Post framed Gabbard’s move as part of Trump’s wider goal to change the history of his election win. NPR’s July 22 report noted that the 2017 ICA focused on influence operations, not actual vote changes, and accused Gabbard of misrepresenting the intelligence community’s findings.
The Washington Post, which had received many intelligence leaks in 2016 and 2017, cited unnamed sources who said Gabbard’s release aimed to distract from Trump’s links to Jeffrey Epstein.
Multiple outlets also questioned Gabbard’s background in intelligence and her past remarks on Russia, suggesting her comments align with Moscow’s viewpoint.
The Independent and Rolling Stone called her appointment as DNI “controversial” and speculated on her loyalty, with Rolling Stone labelling her a “former Democrat turned MAGA” working to back Trump.
Instead of focusing on the content of the documents, many stories focused on Gabbard’s political history or Trump’s public claims about the Russia investigation.
Obama’s Response and the Media’s Echo
On July 22, Obama’s team released a statement dismissing Gabbard’s allegations as “bizarre” and “an obvious attempt at distraction.” He repeated that the 2017 ICA’s conclusions are still widely accepted and argued that the declassified files do not challenge the idea that Russia tried to shape U.S. public opinion.
Media outlets such as CNN, The Guardian, and The Hill quickly picked up Obama’s rebuttal, giving it top billing and pushing Gabbard’s evidence into the background.
This pattern of supporting Obama brings back memories of 2016, when news outlets often published leaks about Russian interference from anonymous intelligence officials. Gabbard’s files suggest those leaks, which began after the December 9 White House meeting, were part of a plan to reinforce the collusion claims.
Even now, many outlets continue promoting the same narrative, treating Gabbard’s release as a politically charged move rather than a matter for careful review.
What It Means for Trust and Accountability
The decision by major news media to avoid a close look at Gabbard’s allegations highlights big questions about the media’s watchdog role. If the declassified files are accurate, they point to top Obama officials using intelligence to affect an election outcome.
Stories with this level of seriousness deserve thorough reporting, but so far, large outlets have focused on dismissing or downplaying the issue. This approach shields Obama and his administration while deepening public concerns about bias in both media and intelligence circles.
Social media is now filled with posts from users like @bennyjohnson and @saras76, who accuse mainstream media of ignoring a “huge scandal” to shield Obama.
One viral post stated, “Tulsi Gabbard just hit Barack Obama with a knockout punch,” highlighting the public’s view that a “coordinated hit job” targeted Trump. While these posts don’t prove anything on their own, they do reflect a wider mood that the media is avoiding tough questions about those in power.
What Happens Next
The Justice Department now has the declassified files, and Gabbard insists that everyone involved must be investigated. She’s promising to see the process through, saying, “No matter how powerful, every person involved in this conspiracy must be investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.”
Whether these allegations turn out to be the “treasonous conspiracy” Gabbard describes or a serious mistake by the outgoing administration, the public has a right to see a clear review of the evidence.
For now, the coverage by major news organizations suggests a reluctance to question the established story. By echoing Obama’s defence and playing down Gabbard’s statements, media outlets may fuel the sense that the press cares more about protecting certain figures than providing full transparency. As this issue unfolds, the press faces a choice—whether to dig into the facts or stick to defending the old narrative.
Related News:
Tulsi Gabbard DC Sparks Firestorm Accuses Obama Admin of Fabricating Trump-Russia Intel
News
New Detail Emerge on Alex Pretti Minneapolis Shooting
MINNESOTA – A major investigative report has surfaced new information about Alex Pretti’s final days. Sources cited in a CNN exclusive say Pretti had a previously unreported run-in with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents just a week before he was killed.
In that earlier incident, he reportedly left with a broken rib after a physical struggle with federal officers during protest activity in Minneapolis. The disclosure adds a new layer to what happened on Saturday, January 24, 2026, when Pretti, a 37-year-old intensive care nurse, was shot and killed by Border Patrol agents.
The shooting happened during the Trump administration’s broad immigration enforcement push, described by federal officials as the largest operation in U.S. history. The crackdown has led to thousands of arrests and sharp backlash, especially in sanctuary-leaning cities such as Minneapolis.
Alex Pretti’s death was the third shooting involving federal immigration agents in the city in under three weeks, following the January 7 death of Renee Nicole Good.
Alex Pretti’s Prior Encounter
People familiar with federal records and witness statements say the earlier clash took place during a protest tied to immigration raids. Witnesses and Alex Pretti reportedly described a scene in which five agents tackled him while he watched officers chase a family on foot.
During the restraint, one agent allegedly put a heavy weight on Alex Pretti’s back, which led to a fractured rib. He was released at the scene and was not charged, but he later told people close to him that he thought he might die during the encounter.
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has tracked contacts with protesters through internal paperwork described as “intel collection non-arrests.” Pretti’s name appeared in those records, according to the report, which suggests agents could have recognized him when they crossed paths again on January 24. That matters because it means Pretti may not have been viewed as a stranger at the scene, but as someone already known to immigration enforcement.
The new reporting also pushes back on early descriptions of Alex Pretti as a random troublemaker or only a “First Amendment witness,” a phrase used by Minnesota Governor Tim Walz. Instead, it paints a picture of repeated friction between Pretti and federal agents, with tensions that may have carried into the final encounter.
Shooting Video and Official Claims Collide
On the morning of January 24, near 26th Street and Nicollet Avenue in Minneapolis’s Whittier neighborhood, Alex Pretti was filming federal agents on his cellphone as they tried to enter a local business (reported as a donut shop) during protests.
Bystander video reviewed and verified by outlets including The New York Times and BBC Verify shows Pretti holding his phone in one hand while lifting his other, empty hand. The footage also appears to show him trying to protect a woman after agents pushed her down and used pepper spray.
Videos from multiple angles show agents taking Alex Pretti to the ground before shots were fired. Pretti, who held a legal firearm permit, had a gun on him, and agents tried to remove it during the struggle. Witnesses who later submitted affidavits with the ACLU said they did not see Pretti point or display the weapon.
A preliminary internal Customs and Border Protection review, leaked to congressional sources and reported by NPR, says Pretti resisted arrest, but it does not describe him attacking agents or making a lethal threat. That stands in contrast to early statements from the Trump administration that labeled him a “would-be assassin” planning to kill agents.
Alex Pretti’s family has strongly rejected those claims. In a statement, they called the government’s version “sickening lies” and pointed to a video that appears to show him unarmed in the moments before agents tackled him.
Megyn Kelly Truthful on Pretti
The new details have intensified debate across political media. Conservative commentator Megyn Kelly, host of The Megyn Kelly Show, drew widespread criticism after discussing the case on Monday. “I know I’m supposed to feel sorry for Alex Pretti, but I don’t,” Kelly said.
She argued that Pretti chose to “inject himself” into law enforcement activity, and she framed the outcome as “FAFO” (f*** around and find out). Kelly also called him an “agitator” and “subversive,” suggesting that staying away from federal operations could have prevented the death.
The remarks triggered accusations of cruelty, especially because Alex Pretti worked as an ICU nurse at a VA hospital caring for veterans.
Her response reflects the deep split over immigration enforcement. Supporters of tougher tactics see the earlier confrontation as proof that Pretti repeatedly interfered. Critics view the broken-rib incident as another example of excessive force by masked federal agents operating in city neighborhoods.
With the earlier ICE clash now public, the case looks less like a single confrontation and more like a series of escalating encounters between a committed protest observer and heavily armed federal agents.
The new context raises fresh concerns about training, de-escalation, and whether prior knowledge about Pretti affected how agents handled the January 24 scene.
Calls for an independent investigation have grown, including from some Republican lawmakers on Capitol Hill. Minnesota leaders continue pressing for federal agents to leave, while protests continue and memorials expand at the site of the shooting.
As the country argues over the costs of aggressive immigration enforcement on city streets, the report about Pretti’s earlier injury adds a troubling detail. It also may reshape how many Americans think about accountability during a period of mass arrests and deportation efforts.
Related News:
President Trump Addresses ICE Actions Amid Minnesota Unrest
News
Iran’s Supreme Leader Cowers in a Bunker, While his Security Forces Murder Thousands
Iranian Senior Health Ministry Sources Describe Enormous Casualty Count
Report Says Khamenei Ordered “No Mercy” Measures While Sheltered in a bunker Amid U.S. Strike Fears
TERRAN – A report coming from Iran describes what could be one of the worst cases of state violence against civilians in recent history. As many as 30,000 people may have been killed across Iran on January 8 and 9, based on claims shared with TIME by two senior officials in Iran’s Ministry of Health.
The reported figure comes from hospital logs and tallies kept by doctors and first responders. It suggests extreme force during a nationwide uprising that began in late December 2025. The unrest started with anger over economic collapse, then spread into calls to end the Islamic Republic’s rule. Hospitals in major cities, including Tehran and Shiraz, reportedly struggled to cope.
Morgues filled up, and authorities allegedly used trucks to move bodies after facilities reached capacity.
A confidential count inside the Ministry of Health listed 30,304 deaths recorded in civilian hospitals by late last week, according to Dr. Amir Parasta, a German-Iranian eye surgeon who reviewed the data.
The count reportedly does not include people taken straight to military morgues, those killed in rural areas, or bodies never entered into official systems. For that reason, the real number could be higher. Activists and human rights groups have reported lower totals, but still in the thousands, since protests began. Verification has been difficult because authorities imposed a near-total internet shutdown.
Accounts say the worst violence happened on January 8 and 9. Security forces, reportedly acting under direct orders, used live ammunition against crowds. Witnesses described streets filled with protesters chanting “Death to the Dictator” and “Death to Khamenei,” followed by heavy gunfire.
Cartridge cases reportedly covered the ground, then were cleared overnight by municipal crews. Demonstrations were reported in all 31 provinces, with claims that millions joined nationwide.
Large-scale killings in Iran
Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is described as central to the crackdown. Sources familiar with internal orders said that on January 9, he instructed the Supreme National Security Council to end the protests “by any means necessary.”
Security units reportedly received clear direction to shoot to kill and show no mercy. What began as protests over prices and jobs then shifted into a large-scale killing spree, according to the report’s sources.
As pressure rose at home and abroad, Khamenei reportedly moved into a fortified underground bunker in Tehran. Opposition-linked outlets and people close to the government said the relocation was driven by fears of a U.S. missile strike.
Those fears were tied to President Donald Trump’s warnings and U.S. military moves in the region, including the deployment of the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln.
Trump’s public messages urging protesters to keep going, along with statements suggesting U.S. action if killings continued, reportedly increased anxiety inside Iran’s leadership. Khamenei’s third son, Masoud, was said to be running daily operations of the Supreme Leader’s office, passing messages to government branches while Khamenei remained largely isolated.
Iran’s public messaging tells a different story. Hardliners tied to Khamenei announced 3,117 deaths on January 21. They described the dead as a mix of protesters, security forces, and people labeled as foreign-backed “rioters” or “terrorists,” with claims of links to the United States and Israel.
Crimes against humanity
Khamenei has also referred to “thousands” killed in speeches, while blaming outside powers and promising no retreat against what he called “saboteurs.” The internal Ministry of Health figures, as described in the report, point to a far larger toll and suggest an effort to hide the true scale.
The protests began in late December 2025 after the rial fell to new lows. Inflation rose, energy shortages worsened, and long-running mismanagement fueled public rage. Early action included bazaar merchants in Tehran closing shops.
It quickly expanded, with university students and everyday citizens joining rallies and chanting against the Supreme Leader. Some crowds also voiced support for exiled figures, including Reza Pahlavi, son of the late shah.
As unrest grew, the state response reportedly expanded, too. Reports described mass arrests, raids on hospitals treating injured protesters, and pressure on doctors and volunteers who helped the wounded.
Human rights groups, including Amnesty International and Iran Human Rights, condemned the crackdown as crimes against humanity. They pointed to what they described as systematic repression and planned killings.
Observers also drew stark historical comparisons. Analysts said a death toll of this size in 48 hours would rival major atrocities, including the Nazi massacre at Babyn Yar in 1941, where more than 33,000 people were executed over two days.
Anger and Outrage
In Iran, the killings described in the report were said to have taken place across many cities at once, not in a single location, which overwhelmed even parts of the state’s own system.
International reaction has been strong, though limited by the communications blackout. The United Nations and Western governments voiced alarm and called for independent investigations.
Trump increased his rhetoric, calling Khamenei a “sick criminal” and hinting at more steps, while the U.S. imposed sanctions on officials linked to the crackdown.
Inside Iran, the government appeared to have restored some control through force, but reports suggested the anger runs deep across regions and age groups. Families of victims said authorities forced them to pay for the bullets used to kill their relatives, a practice described as both cruel and extortionate.
As more details surface, the events of January 8 and 9 are being described as proof of how far the state will go to keep power. Whether the killings mark a turning point for the Islamic Republic or another brutal chapter remains unclear, but the growing list of names and numbers is unlikely to fade from public memory.
Related News:
Trump Positions U.S. Military Assets Closer to Iran Amid Deadly Crackdown
News
Tragic Private Plane Crash at Bangor International Airport Kills Six
Deadly incident ranks among Maine’s worst aviation disasters; NTSB investigation underway into possible icing, weather factors
BANGOR, Maine – A private business plane crashed during takeoff at Bangor International Airport on Sunday evening, killing all six people onboard. Officials say it is among the most deadly aviation accidents in Maine in recent years.
The aircraft, a Bombardier Challenger 600, flipped upside down and caught fire soon after leaving the runway around 7:45 p.m. The crash happened as a nor’easter began pushing snow across parts of the state.
The incident rattled the Bangor area, where the airport handles both commercial flights and private aircraft. Police, airport staff, and emergency teams secured the scene as investigators began gathering early information.
Bangor Fire Department crews, the Maine National Guard, and responders from nearby towns arrived within minutes. They fought the fire while snow and wind picked up. Witnesses described a dull orange flash, followed by a loud boom in the stormy night.
Local officials confirm six onboard plane
Bangor police and airport director Jose Saavedra said the flight manifest showed six people were on the twin-engine jet. No one was taken to the hospital, and all six are believed to have died at the scene.
Early FAA information confused stating there were eight people onboard, with seven deaths and one serious injury. Bangor officials pushed back Monday, saying the manifest listed six total passengers and crew, all fatally injured. The FAA noted that early details can change as investigators confirm facts.
Officials said the plane was a 2020 Bombardier Challenger 600 registered to KTKJ Challenger LLC in Houston, Texas. It reportedly arrived earlier from Houston. Sources familiar with the situation connected the jet to Arnold & Itkin, a Houston-based personal injury law firm.
Authorities have not released the victims’ names as they wait for identification and family notifications. One report named Tara Arnold as a victim, with a county official calling her “a phenomenal person, a bold leader.”
Winter weather and visibility issues at the time of the plane crash
The crash took place as heavy winter weather spread across the Northeast. National Weather Service data showed light but steady snow at the airport around the time of the incident. Temperatures were near 2 degrees Fahrenheit, with wind chills around minus 13.
Visibility dropped to about three-quarters of a mile in freezing fog. Bangor was under a winter storm warning. Snow buildup at the airport was still developing, but totals reached close to 10 inches by the next day.
Flights continued around the time of the crash, with de-icing operations underway. Other aircraft landed and took off safely before and after the incident. Saavedra said crews were already on site responding to the storm, and runways stayed open during active snow response.
The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) are investigating. The NTSB is expected to review weather conditions, aircraft performance, pilot actions, maintenance records, and the possibility of icing.
Aviation safety experts have pointed to the Challenger 600’s history of wing icing concerns during takeoff. Former NTSB investigator Jeff Guzzetti told media outlets that even small ice buildup can reduce lift and increase risk. Bombardier and regulators have issued guidance on de-icing practices, though it is not yet clear what steps were taken before this flight.
Air traffic control recordings captured the alarm in the moments after the plane went down, including a call reporting the aircraft was upside down. Responders reached the site in under a minute, but the fire made rescue and recovery difficult.
One of Maine’s deadliest aviation accidents in decades
The crash now joins a short list of Maine’s most tragic aviation events. Historic examples include two fatal accidents on July 11, 1944, one involving a B-17 bomber near Rangeley that killed 10 people, along with another deadly crash elsewhere in the state the same day.
More recent incidents have involved fewer victims, though Bangor International Airport saw another fatal crash just months earlier that killed one person.
Bangor International Airport remained closed through at least midday Wednesday as NTSB teams worked the scene and cleanup continued. The agency cited weather-related travel delays for investigators, but said the review will be thorough.
A preliminary NTSB update could come in the next few weeks. A final report often takes months.
The losses have hit hard in Bangor and beyond. Local leaders praised the fast work of first responders and asked the public to keep the victims’ families in mind as the investigation moves forward.
Trending News:
Facebook Loses $200 Billion as Users Shift to TikTok
-
Crime1 month agoYouTuber Nick Shirley Exposes BILLIONS of Somali Fraud, Video Goes VIRAL
-
Politics2 months agoIlhan Omar’s Ties to Convicted Somali Fraudsters Raises Questions
-
News2 months agoWalz Tried to Dodges Blame Over $8 Billion Somali Fraud Scandal
-
Asia2 months agoAsian Development Bank (ADB) Gets Failing Mark on Transparancy
-
Crime2 months agoSomali’s Accused of Bilking Millions From Maine’s Medicaid Program
-
Crime2 months agoMinnesota’s Billion Dollar Fraud Puts Omar and Walz Under the Microscope
-
Politics2 months agoSouth Asian Regional Significance of Indian PM Modi’s Bhutan Visit
-
Asia2 months agoThailand Artist Wins the 2025 UOB Southeast Asian Painting of the Year Award



