Crime
5 Alarming Ways Second Amendment Rights Under Threat in 2025
America needs to pay attention. The 2024 election ink is barely dry, and the gun-control crowd is already racking up the next round. While people argue over winners and losers, the anti-Second Amendment machine keeps grinding along. Here are five of the biggest current threats to the right to keep and bear arms, all unfolding right now.
1. The Federal “Assault Weapons” Ban Returns, And This Version Is Worse
Kamala Harris may have lost, but her agenda did not disappear. Her allies are already pushing a new, harsher version of the 1994 Crime Bill-style ban to newly elected Democrats who owe them political favors.
Capitol Hill sources tell The Post that the draft bill runs about 400 pages and is packed with restrictions. It bans AR-15s by name, outlaws magazines over 10 rounds, and only lets current owners keep their rifles if they register them with the ATF under the National Firearms Act.
That means a $200 tax stamp for each gun, fingerprints, and a 6-to-12-month wait just to hang on to firearms already bought legally. One Senate staffer called it “the mother of all backdoor registries.”
With budget reconciliation still an option, supporters would only need 50 Senate votes plus the vice president to ram it through.
2. ATF On The Warpath, And The “Zero Tolerance” Crackdown Is Underway
Joe Biden may have failed to install David Chipman as head of the ATF, but the agency kept the aggressive playbook. Over the last 60 days, ATF has reportedly pulled more Federal Firearms Licenses than in all of 2019.
Their new favorite move is simple and brutal. One mistake on a single Form 4473, and a local gun shop can lose its license for good. Under this “zero tolerance” approach, small family-owned dealers are shutting down by the dozen.
Fewer FFLs means fewer places to buy guns and ammo. It is slow-motion gun control by bureaucracy.
And the pressure is not just on dealers. The same ATF that flip-flopped on pistol braces is said to be finishing a rule that would turn roughly 40 million pistol-braced firearms into unregistered short-barreled rifles overnight.
Merry Christmas from the federal government.
3. Turbocharged Red-Flag Laws Are Headed For Traditionally Pro-Gun States
Nineteen states and Washington, D.C. already have red-flag laws. Now the anti-gun lobby thinks it smells an opportunity in states that used to be safe. Everytown and Giffords are dumping tens of millions of dollars into campaigns in places like Missouri, Texas, and Georgia.
Their new talking point is simple: “Extreme Risk Protection Orders are just common sense.”
Translation in plain English: a hostile ex, bitter neighbor, or angry coworker can file a secret statement, a judge signs off without hearing from the gun owner, and a SWAT team shows up before sunrise to seize the guns.
No criminal charge. No conviction. No actual due process before the raid. The firearms are gone first, and the court fight comes later.
Getting them back is another nightmare. In many states, even if the owner wins, they still have to pay the storage bills to reclaim their own property.
4. The Hidden Credit-Card Gun Registry No One Wants To Admit Exists
Anyone who thinks the government cannot track gun and ammo purchases needs to rethink that belief. Starting next year, Visa, Mastercard, and American Express will use a new Merchant Category Code for gun stores.
Every purchase at a gun shop, from a case of 9mm to a simple cleaning kit, will be tagged in a separate category. Banks are already telling investors this will help with “risk mitigation.”
In practice, that means financial companies will know where someone shops, what type of products they buy at gun stores, and how often they spend money there. Pair that with a growing federal data appetite and an IRS boosted by 87,000 new agents, and it begins to look like the skeleton of a national registry created without a single vote in Congress.
That is not just slippery. That is a greased slide.
5. Supreme Court Packing, The Nuclear Option Still Waiting In The Wings
The left has not dropped its dream of expanding the Supreme Court. Progressive favorite Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez reintroduced her court-packing bill last week, and this time it has 72 co-sponsors.
Add four new justices who see the Second Amendment as a “colonial relic,” and landmark decisions like Bruen and Heller could vanish overnight. The entire modern foundation of gun rights could get shredded in a single term.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg once called Roe v. Wade a case of “heavy-handed judicial activism.” Imagine what a bench stacked with nine AOC-style justices would do to the right to keep and bear arms.
So What Now? Conservative Action Plan For 2025
First, join a gun-rights group today. NRA, GOA, or a strong state-level rifle association, they all count. Membership numbers are the headcount that politicians look at before they vote.
Second, light up the phones. Call both senators and make it clear that any “assault weapons” ban needs to die in committee, or they will face a primary challenge.
Third, buy standard-capacity magazines now, while they are still legal in most of the country. Waiting for a ban to pass is a losing plan.
Fourth, get a concealed-carry permit if possible, even in permitless-carry states. Constitutional carry is great until a big-city prosecutor decides to make an example out of a gun owner caught in a gray area.
Fifth, vote in every primary election, not just in November. The so-called moderates who cut deals on gun control usually win in low-turnout primaries that hardly anyone watches.
Last, talk to that anti-gun cousin at Thanksgiving. Share facts, not insults. If gun owners let the other side control the story, they lose the culture fight before the legal battle even starts.
The Second Amendment is not a favor from politicians. It is not a bargaining chip. It is the backbone that protects every other right written on that “parchment barrier” the Founders warned about.
Gun-control activists are not hiding their goals anymore. They are coming after firearms through laws, regulations, banks, and courts. The only real question is whether gun owners will still have their rights when that 3 a.m. knock hits the front door.
Stack up knowledge, stay informed, stock up on legal gear and ammo, and never hand over a right without a fight.
Related News:
Chicago’s Mayor Puts Partisan Poison Over People’s Safety as Trump Troops Roll In
Crime
Mainstream Media and Democrats Pivot on Portland Shooting Amid DHS Revelations
PORTLAND, Oregon – American politics moves fast, and public stories can change just as quickly. The Portland shooting is a clear example. Early coverage centered on claims of federal overreach. Within a day, the focus shifted after the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) released information about the two people who were shot.
Since then, mainstream outlets and Democratic voices have adjusted their messaging, and the changes say a lot about how today’s news cycle works. The shift also arrives as fraud investigations in several states keep expanding, adding more pressure to an already tense moment.
On January 8, 2026, reports said U.S. Border Patrol agents shot two people in Portland, Oregon. Legacy outlets and many Democratic politicians reacted quickly. Headlines from outlets like Axios and The Seattle Times highlighted the basic claim, federal agents shot two people in Portland, and framed it as another example of aggressive immigration enforcement under the Trump administration.
Progressive accounts on X (formerly Twitter) called the shooting “un-American” and demanded body-camera video. Some Democratic lawmakers condemned what they described as “lawless agents.” Others used the moment to renew calls to abolish ICE. Early posts and commentary often treated the two people who were shot as innocent migrants.
Portland’s recent history helped that framing spread. Images and clips circulated of protesters clashing with police outside the ICE building. Those clips traveled faster than the details of what happened during the encounter. With Democrats still trying to rebuild after the 2024 election, the incident became a rallying point, and critics of the administration accused it of militarizing domestic law enforcement.
DHS Releases Names of Portland Shooting
On January 9, DHS identified the people who were wounded as Luis David Nico Moncada and Yorlenys Betzabeth Zambrano-Contreras. DHS described them as Venezuelan nationals in the US illegally, and said they were suspected affiliates of Tren de Aragua, a transnational criminal organization DHS said is designated as a foreign terrorist group.
DHS also shared its account of the incident. According to the agency, agents were conducting a targeted traffic stop when the driver, Moncada, allegedly used the vehicle as a weapon and tried to run them over. DHS said agents fired in response.
DHS claimed Zambrano-Contreras was tied to a prostitution ring and a prior shooting in Portland. DHS also said Moncada had a DUI arrest and a final removal order. The information appeared in a post on X from DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin.
That disclosure changed how the story read. The earlier “innocent victims” framing no longer matched DHS’s description. Conservative outlets, including Fox News, highlighted the new details and argued they undercut the initial coverage. On X, users and some journalists also pointed to early reports, including skeptical coverage from the Oregon Capital Chronicle, and criticized what they saw as missing context during the first news cycle.
A New Focus as Fraud Stories Grow
As more details about Portland circulated, critics said another pattern showed up. Coverage and political messaging seemed to move toward other fights, with more attention on claims of “excessive force” and less emphasis on DHS’s allegations about criminal ties.
This happened while major fraud investigations continued to spread. In Minnesota, federal investigators have reported more than $1 billion in welfare fraud tied to COVID-era programs, with reporting and commentary often pointing to Somali-run child care centers. The situation also created political fallout for Governor Tim Walz, who faced growing calls for accountability and later abandoned his re-election bid, according to the text’s account.
Trump has used the Minnesota case to push for similar probes elsewhere, including California. The same account says his team froze billions in funds and used the label “CALIFRAUDIA” while promoting the effort.
Democratic leaders pushed back. Figures, including Governor Gavin Newsom, criticized federal actions in blue states as “witch hunts,” framing them as political payback instead of anti-corruption enforcement. Supporters of that view said the investigations were meant to punish opponents. Critics said the message served another purpose: keep the spotlight off programs that failed under Democratic leadership.
What Gets Left Out and What Gets Repeated
A close review of the Portland coverage shows how different choices can shape the same event. Early reporting from outlets like USA Today and OPB focused on where the shooting happened, the nearby medical office, and arrests tied to protests. Those early stories did not include the DHS allegations about Tren de Aragua.
On cable news, critics said edited segments and short clips leaned heavily on community outrage and past complaints about ICE. They argued that DHS statements received less attention, which left audiences with a familiar picture of federal agents as reckless and aggressive. Supporters of the administration saw it differently and said the agents responded to a direct threat.
On X, some accounts first described the victims as a “husband and wife” running from ICE. Later replies cited DHS’s claims and corrected that framing. Independent voices said the problem was not disagreement; it was the speed of first impressions and the way missing details can harden into “facts” online. They compared it to earlier Portland coverage in 2020, when critics accused major outlets of downplaying antifa violence while focusing on federal responses.
Vance Blasts Media Coverage, Ties It to Corruption Claims
Vice President JD Vance addressed the topic during a January 8 press conference. He accused major outlets of bias and said poor reporting helps fuel public anger. He also announced a new Justice Department assistant attorney general position focused on nationwide fraud investigations.
Vance connected the new role to the Minnesota case and said the work would extend to other states, including California and Ohio. He also pointed to incidents in Portland and Minneapolis as examples of stories he said were misreported. In his remarks, he called on Governor Walz to resign and labeled the Minnesota fraud “staggering,” describing it as a betrayal of taxpayers.
Others in the administration, including Karoline Leavitt, echoed the theme that media narratives can deepen distrust and worsen public conflict. The message from the White House was clear: it plans to keep pressing both fraud investigations and public critiques of major media outlets.
The Portland shooting shows how quickly a political storyline can flip. DHS’s claims about Tren de Aragua challenged early assumptions and forced a reset in how the victims were described. At the same time, the broader fight over fraud investigations is pushing both parties into sharper rhetoric.
The account points to Minnesota’s alleged child care fraud and compares it to California’s reported $32 billion unemployment fraud, arguing that the numbers are too large to ignore. It also warns that brushing off DHS claims about organized crime risks public safety, while acknowledging that evidence and accountability still matter.
The FBI is now investigating the Portland incident, and that makes transparency more important than ever. If officials, media outlets, and political leaders keep treating headlines as the final truth, public trust will keep dropping. With the 2026 midterms on the horizon, the struggle to control the narrative is likely to shape what voters hear and what they believe.
Related News:
Mainstream Media Spins Minnesota ICE Shooting to Stoke Outrage
Crime
Trans Activist Vandalizes Vice President JD Vance’s Home Windows
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Just after midnight on January 5, a 26-year-old from Cincinnati’s Hyde Park area was arrested after police say the person used a hammer to break windows at Vice President JD Vance’s Cincinnati home.
Authorities accuse William DeFoor, who identifies as transgender and uses the name Julia DeFoor, of smashing four windows and causing major property damage. DeFoor was charged with felony vandalism, plus misdemeanor counts of criminal trespass, obstructing official business, and criminal damaging or endangering.
The damage happened at a home in East Walnut Hills that is described as a secondary residence for Vance, his wife, Usha, and their three young children. Secret Service agents assigned to protect the property reported hearing a loud noise, then seeing the suspect on the grounds.
According to arrest reports, the suspect broke four exterior windows and also struck a Secret Service vehicle parked in the driveway. After that, the suspect tried to run. Agents detained the individual quickly, and Cincinnati Police officers took custody and booked the suspect into the Hamilton County Justice Center. The Vance family was not home during the incident. They had traveled back to Washington, D.C., the day before, after spending the weekend in Ohio.
Vance addressed the case on social media, calling the suspect “a crazy person” who tried to get in by hammering the windows. He said he appreciated the fast response from the Secret Service and Cincinnati police. He also said he tries to shield his children from the downsides of public life, and questioned the value of sharing photos of the home showing broken windows.

Prior Pandemonium Before Attacking JD Vance’s Home
Court records show DeFoor has been tied to similar incidents in the past. In April 2024, the suspect pleaded guilty to two vandalism counts after causing more than $2,000 in damage to an interior design firm in Hyde Park.
That case was handled through the county’s mental health court program. DeFoor was ordered to complete two years of treatment and pay $5,550 in restitution. Records show treatment was still underway at the time of the latest arrest.
In 2023, a trespassing case tied to a psychiatric emergency services facility was dismissed after DeFoor was found incompetent to stand trial.
Investigators cited the prior record and concerns about repeat behavior when recommending a higher bond, according to court documents. DeFoor is set for arraignment in Hamilton County Municipal Court. Federal authorities are also reviewing whether additional charges could apply, including damaging government property and interfering with federal officers.

Parents Prominent Democrat Donors
DeFoor is listed as the eldest child of Dr. William R. DeFoor Jr., a pediatric urologist at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, and Dr. Catherine DeFoor, a general pediatrician. Both parents are registered Democrats and have a record of political donations.
Public records say Dr. William DeFoor Jr. gave more than $11,600 to Kamala Harris’s 2024 presidential campaign and related Democratic committees through ActBlue. The family lives in a $1.3 million home in Hyde Park, one of the city’s wealthiest neighborhoods, and the suspect attended private schools while growing up, according to the report.
Social media accounts linked to DeFoor show interest in transgender wellness resources, including likes tied to the Heartland Trans Wellness Center, a local group that supports transgender people. The family has not made a public statement about the arrest, and attempts to contact relatives did not succeed.
The vandalism comes as concerns about political violence aimed at public figures remain high. In recent years, attacks have targeted lawmakers’ homes, including the fatal shooting of conservative activist Charlie Kirk in 2025 and the June 2025 killings of a Minnesota state legislator and her husband.
Vance has drawn criticism for his views on gender and family policy, and he has dealt with protests near his home before, including incidents that involved his young daughter.
Officials have not released a motive. Investigators are still working to determine whether the act was political, personal, or tied to other factors. Federal prosecutors and local law enforcement are coordinating as they decide whether the case will expand.
As the investigation continues, the incident highlights the security pressures that come with high-profile public service. Vance’s statement focused on keeping his children safe, and he urged restraint in sharing images of the home.
Trending News:
Tim Walz Ends Re-Election Bid Amid Escalating Fraud Scandal
Crime
YouTuber Nick Shirley Exposes BILLIONS of Somali Fraud, Video Goes VIRAL
MINNEAPOLIS -A YouTube video titled “I Investigated Minnesota’s Billion Dollar Fraud Scandal” shook social media platforms. The footage, created by independent reporter Nick Shirley, quickly drew millions of viewers. Shirley and his colleague, David, visited several Somali-owned daycare centers throughout Minneapolis to verify reports of financial misconduct.
Instead of busy classrooms, they found vacant buildings, blocked-off windows, and signs with glaring typos. Shirley described the situation as “open and blatant fraud” fueled by taxpayer money. His project brought new attention to federal probes into social services within the local Somali community. Estimates regarding the scale of the theft vary, with some reports suggesting over $1 billion was diverted through different schemes.
Nick Shirley is a 23-year-old content creator who focuses on on-the-ground interviews. Since launching his channel in 2015, he’s gained over a million subscribers by filming in diverse and often tense environments. He’s known for a blunt and confrontational style that avoids traditional media filters.
In his late December video, Shirley pretended to be a parent looking for childcare services. Each facility he visited turned him away or refused to show him around. One notable moment involved a building labeled the “Quality Learing Center.” Despite receiving millions in state funds and being licensed for dozens of kids, the center appeared abandoned. When Shirley tried to film, workers shouted at him to stop and refused to answer questions.
The video aligns with several high-profile scandals that have hit Minnesota programs. Federal investigators have worked since the pandemic to charge dozens of people for stealing from food and healthcare initiatives. The largest case, Feeding Our Future, involved fake nonprofits that billed for meals never served to children.
Other schemes targeted autism therapies and daycare assistance. Prosecutors say the suspects used the money for expensive cars, luxury homes, and transfers to other countries.
By late 2025, more than 70 people faced charges, and several had already received long prison sentences. While some critics link these funds to overseas groups, those legal connections are still being settled in court.
Youtuber Exposed Minnesota’s Billion-Dollar Fraud Scandal
The visual evidence of empty hallways and misspelled signs gave critics plenty of ammunition. Public officials, including House Majority Whip Tom Emmer, used the footage to demand answers from Governor Tim Walz. Conservative news outlets featured the video as proof of a broken system and poor government oversight.
They argued that officials were too afraid of being called racist to properly audit these centers. On the other hand, reports from the New York Times mention that many people in the Somali community acted as whistleblowers to expose the theft. While the fraud is massive, it involves a specific group rather than the community as a whole.
Shirley’s reach didn’t stop with a single upload. Clips of the investigation spread across X and were shared by other popular influencers like Benny Johnson. This cross-platform sharing kept the story in the news for weeks.
Supporters praised him for doing the work that major news stations seemed to ignore. Even though some people on platforms like Reddit debated his methods, they couldn’t ignore the physical evidence of the ghost operations he found.
The video eventually reached the national political stage, where leaders used it to argue for stricter immigration and welfare policies.
The success of Shirley’s video shows how much power independent creators have today. By taking a camera directly to the source, he forced a conversation about government spending and accountability. He argued that taxpayers work too hard to have their money stolen through simple scams.
Whether this leads to actual policy changes in Minnesota is still unclear. However, the viral nature of the report proves that one person with a camera can still change the national conversation. Shirley’s work remains a prime example of how modern reporting can bypass traditional newsrooms to reach a massive audience.
Related News:
Minnesota Mayors Press Walz for Answers as Federal Probe Ramps Up
Somali’s Accused of Bilking Millions from Maine’s Medicaid Program
-
Crime2 weeks agoYouTuber Nick Shirley Exposes BILLIONS of Somali Fraud, Video Goes VIRAL
-
Politics1 month agoIlhan Omar’s Ties to Convicted Somali Fraudsters Raises Questions
-
Crime3 months agoAntifa Accused of Using Homeless Elderly as Human Shield Agianst Federal Agents
-
News1 month agoWalz Tried to Dodges Blame Over $8 Billion Somali Fraud Scandal
-
News3 months agoThe Democrats’ Great Betrayal, Champions of the Working Man to Handmaids of the Elite
-
Asia2 months agoAsian Development Bank (ADB) Gets Failing Mark on Transparancy
-
Politics3 months agoThe Democratic Party’s Reckoning: From People’s Champion to Elite Enclave
-
Politics3 months agoThe Democrats Now the Party of White Voters with College Degrees



