Politics
Bill and Hillary Clinton to Be Charged With Criminal Contempt of Congress
WASHINGTON, D.C. – House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) said the committee will begin contempt of Congress proceedings against former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. The announcement comes as the committee widens its investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking network and how federal agencies handled key parts of the Epstein cases.
Comer said the Clintons did not show up for closed-door depositions scheduled for this week, even though both were subpoenaed. The committee now plans to treat the missed appearances as subpoena defiance, an unusual step involving two high-profile figures and a subpoena approved with bipartisan support at the subcommittee level.
The subpoenas were issued in August 2025. They were approved unanimously by the Federal Law Enforcement Subcommittee, including Democratic members. The panel requested testimony about the Clintons’ known contacts with Epstein and his associate Ghislaine Maxwell. Committee leaders say the broader goal is oversight of federal law enforcement decisions tied to Epstein’s crimes, including plea deals and prosecutions.
Comer made his statement after Bill Clinton did not appear for a January 13 deposition. Hillary Clinton also did not appear on January 14. “The Clintons are not above the law,” Comer said. He added that the committee spent five months trying to reach an agreement, and that a subpoena is a legal order, not a request.
The committee has scheduled a markup on January 21, 2026, to consider contempt resolutions for both Clintons. If the committee approves them, the next steps could include a vote by the full House and a referral to the Department of Justice.
What Contempt of Congress Means
Contempt of Congress is a misdemeanor under federal law (2 U.S.C. § 192). It applies when someone willfully refuses to comply with a valid congressional subpoena for testimony or documents tied to a committee inquiry.
Congress has long claimed this authority as part of its power to investigate for lawmaking purposes. The Supreme Court backed that role in cases such as McGrain v. Daugherty (1927).
The usual path starts with a committee vote. If the committee reports a contempt citation and the full House (or Senate) approves it by majority vote, the matter is certified and sent to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia for possible prosecution.
A conviction can bring a fine of up to $100,000 and up to one year in jail, with some readings of the law requiring at least one month.
Criminal contempt cases are still uncommon, but they have become more frequent in recent years. Under the Biden administration, the Justice Department pursued several of these cases, and some defendants served jail time.
What Could Happen Next for the Clintons
If the Oversight Committee approves contempt resolutions on January 21, and the full House (now led by Republicans) also votes yes, the referrals would go to the DOJ. A case does not automatically become a prosecution. The department can decline, push for compliance, negotiate, or bring charges.
The Clintons’ attorneys have said the subpoenas are “invalid and legally unenforceable.” They argue the committee lacks a real legislative purpose and is using the process for politics. In a joint letter, the Clintons offered sworn statements saying they did not know about Epstein’s crimes. They also criticized the investigation’s direction and said they would prefer to testify in a public hearing.
Their legal team has also stressed that neither Clinton has been accused of wrongdoing. The attorneys say the Clintons shared more voluntary information than some other subpoenaed witnesses, including former attorneys general. On the Democratic side, committee members have largely skipped the depositions and described the effort as partisan.
Recent Precedent: Former Trump Officials Sent to Jail in Contempt Cases
Republicans point to recent contempt prosecutions tied to the House Select Committee investigation of the January 6 attack. During the Biden administration, the Justice Department brought cases that led to convictions and prison time for two former Trump officials who refused to comply with subpoenas.
- Steve Bannon, a former Trump chief strategist, was convicted in 2022 on two contempt counts after refusing to provide documents and testimony. He served a four-month prison sentence in 2024 after losing his appeals.
- Peter Navarro, a former White House trade adviser, was convicted in 2023. He began serving a four-month federal sentence in March 2024, becoming the first former White House official jailed on a contempt of Congress charge.
Supporters of the current Oversight push say those outcomes show the statute has real teeth when the DOJ chooses to act. They argue the same standard should apply to the Clintons.
Bill Clinton’s Documented Links to Jeffrey Epstein
The subpoenas are tied to documented connections between Bill Clinton and Epstein, a convicted sex offender who died in 2019 while awaiting trial. Flight logs show Clinton took multiple trips on Epstein’s private jet between 2001 and 2003. Reports often describe four trips that included more than a dozen separate flights. Clinton’s representatives have said the travel was connected to Clinton Foundation work and international trips.
Clinton’s camp has also said he ended contact with Epstein in 2005, before Epstein’s later legal crises. The former president has denied knowing about any crimes and has denied visiting Epstein’s private island.
More recently, Justice Department releases connected to the Epstein Files Transparency Act included photos showing Clinton with Epstein and Maxwell, which renewed attention. No evidence has surfaced that Bill Clinton engaged in misconduct, and Maxwell has denied deeper ties. Even so, committee leaders say they want testimony to see whether these relationships point to failures in federal enforcement or decisions that deserve review.
With the January 21 markup approaching, the standoff is shaping up as a test of congressional subpoena power and how far oversight can go, even when it involves former top officials. Republicans say the issue is equal accountability. Democrats say the effort reflects selective outrage and partisan aims.
Trending News:
DOJ Issues Grand Jury Subpoena to Federal Reserve Over $2.5 Billion Renovation Overruns
Politics
Eric Swalwell’s Governor Campaign in Crisis After Multiple Assault Allegations Surface
SACRAMENTO – The race for California’s next governor took a seismic shift Friday as Representative Eric Swalwell’s campaign plummeted into chaos. Two separate investigative reports have surfaced detailing serious allegations of sexual assault and professional misconduct, leading to a mass exodus of campaign staff and a chorus of voices demanding his immediate withdrawal from the contest.
By Friday afternoon, what began as a promising bid to lead the nation’s most populous state appeared to be on the verge of total collapse.
The crisis began with a series of investigative reports published late Thursday and early Friday morning. The reports include testimony from former aides and acquaintances who allege a pattern of inappropriate behavior spanning several years.
One report details an incident of alleged sexual assault involving a former campaign volunteer during a 2022 fundraising event. A second report outlines multiple accounts of “predatory” professional misconduct, with several women describing an environment where career advancement was allegedly tied to personal favors.
While the Congressman has long been a fixture in national politics—known for his frequent cable news appearances and high-profile role in impeachment proceedings—these new allegations have created a political firestorm that transcends his usual partisan battles.
Eric Swalwell’s Campaign in Freefall
The internal reaction to the news was swift and devastating. By Friday morning, at least six senior staffers, including his campaign manager and communications director, had tendered their resignations.
In a joint statement, several departing aides expressed their inability to continue their work:
“We joined this campaign because we believed in a vision for California’s future. However, the nature of the allegations brought to light today is inconsistent with the values we hold. We can no longer, in good conscience, represent this candidacy.”
The loss of top-tier talent leaves the Swalwell operation without a functional leadership structure at a critical juncture in the primary cycle.
The political fallout has not been limited to internal staff. In California, where the Democratic Party holds a supermajority, the “blue wall” of support for Swalwell is rapidly crumbling.
Calls for Withdrawal
- Prominent Allies: Several high-ranking members of the California Democratic delegation, who had previously endorsed Swalwell, issued a “wait-and-see” stance earlier in the day before eventually calling for him to step aside to “allow the party to heal.”
- Gubernatorial Rivals: Rival candidates were more direct. State Senator Aisha Wahab and Lieutenant Governor Eleni Kounalakis both issued statements Friday suggesting that the allegations make Swalwell’s continued presence in the race a “distraction” from the needs of Californians.
- Advocacy Groups: Women’s rights organizations and political action committees that typically support Democratic candidates have frozen their funding and called for an independent investigation.
Swalwell’s Response
Representative Swalwell’s office released a brief, defiant statement Friday afternoon. In it, the Congressman denied the most severe allegations, calling them “politically motivated attacks” intended to derail his momentum.
“I have spent my career fighting for justice and the rule of law,” the statement read. “I am deeply saddened by the departure of my staff, but I intend to stay in this race and allow the facts to come out. I ask for the public to reserve judgment until the full story is told.”
Despite the defiance, political analysts suggest the path forward is nearly non-existent. With no campaign infrastructure and a rapidly evaporating donor base, the logistics of a statewide run become nearly impossible.
The 2026 California Gubernatorial race is already one of the most expensive and watched contests in the country. With Governor Gavin Newsom termed out, the field is crowded with ambitious Democrats.
If Swalwell exits the race, it would trigger a massive realignment of endorsements and campaign contributions. Political strategist Marcus Thorne noted that the “Swalwell lane”—which focused on gun control and tech-forward policy—is now wide open.
“This isn’t just about one man anymore,” Thorne said. “This is about the integrity of the Democratic primary. If he stays in, he risks dragging the entire party down with him in a year where every vote counts.”
The coming days will be decisive. California’s filing deadlines are approaching, and the pressure from the Democratic National Committee (DNC) is reportedly intensifying behind the scenes.
For now, the Congressman remains in the race, but he finds himself increasingly isolated on a political island. As the sun set over the State Capitol on Friday, the question among Sacramento insiders was no longer if Swalwell would exit, but when.
Key Takeaways from the Friday Crisis:
- Two Investigative Reports: Allegations include sexual assault and workplace misconduct.
- Mass Resignations: Key leadership, including the Campaign Manager, has quit.
- Bipartisan Pressure: Both allies and rivals are demanding he end his bid for Governor.
- Political Vacuum: A Swalwell exit would shift millions of dollars in potential donations to other candidates.
The scandal marks a stunning turn for a politician who once sought the Presidency and has been a leading voice in the House of Representatives. In the fast-moving world of California politics, the next 72 hours will likely determine if Eric Swalwell’s political career can survive or if this is the final chapter.
Related News:
Major Lawsuit Questions Eric Swalwell’s California Governor Eligibility
Politics
New York Governor Hochul Slammed For Begging Rich to Return
NEW YORK – Governor Kathy Hochul faces criticism from both sides of the aisle. She recently urged wealthy people who fled the state to come back. However, folks still remember her 2022 campaign remarks. Back then, she told opponents to grab a bus ticket to Florida.
This change fuels charges of inconsistency. It also spotlights New York’s shrinking tax base. The state struggles to fund its big social programs as a result.
At a Politico event this month, Hochul discussed state finances. She rejected New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s push for higher taxes on the rich. Instead, she stressed the need to keep or attract high earners.
“We need high-net-worth people to back our generous social programs,” she said. Some patriotic millionaires already pay extra, she noted. Then she added a key point. “First, let’s head to Palm Beach and convince some to return home. Our tax base has shrunk too much.”
Hochul admitted that other states offer lower taxes for people and businesses. Data backs this up. Many rich New Yorkers have moved to Florida, Texas, and similar spots in recent years.
Critics point to her words from four years ago. Hochul campaigned against Republican Lee Zeldin. She aimed barbs at Donald Trump and Dutchess County Executive Marc Molinaro.
“Trump, Zeldin, and Molinaro should jump on a bus to Florida where you fit. Get out of town. You don’t match our values,” she declared.
Now, people say those comments pushed conservatives and tax-weary wealthy folks to leave. Many packed up for warmer, cheaper states. Social media lights up with side-by-side videos of her old rant and new appeal. Commentators call it desperate or a total reversal. Budget woes drive the shift, they claim.
New York’s Tax Base Challenges
The state counts on top earners for most income tax revenue. A few percent of residents cover a huge chunk. When they go, schools, health care, transit, and services suffer big losses.
IRS data shows an outflow of rich people and workers. Palm Beach County in Florida draws a lot of that wealth.
Hochul’s camp highlights New York’s strengths in finance, tech, culture, and business. Still, they recognize the competition. Florida’s no-income-tax policy and lower living costs pull people away.
Several factors fuel this exodus, reports show. High income taxes lead the pack since New York tops national rates. Housing, utilities, and daily costs stay sky-high, especially near the city. Remote work after COVID lets pros relocate easily. Policy clashes over crime, schools, and rules send some packing. Plus, many skipped town during pandemic lockdowns and stayed gone.
Reactions Roll In from New Yorkers
Responses hit fast and hard. Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman, a Republican running for governor, dubbed it Hochul’s most honest moment. He mocked the pitch to swap Palm Beach sunshine, no state tax, and calm for New York’s issues. Cut taxes and costs instead of pleading, he advised.
Conservatives and business leaders agree. They push for tax cuts, fewer rules, and safer streets to compete. Appeals to patriotic millionaires won’t cut it, they say.
Some Democrats back her, though. They view it as facing facts. A wide tax base funds key services without slamming one group. The state offers incentives to lure businesses and people, they add. Online, memes mock the flip. “Come back, we need your tax money” pops up everywhere.
Bigger Picture: Blue State Exodus
New York isn’t unique. California and Illinois lose residents and firms to low-tax red states, too. This trend stirs national debates. Experts warn of a downward spiral. Fewer taxpayers force rate hikes. That chases away more people.
Hochul resists broad tax hikes on the rich during budget battles. She wants the state to stay competitive. Yet progressives like Mamdani demand more from top earners. Her words seek balance. Keep taxes fair and draw back high earners. With re-election looming, this topic matters. Voters watch budget moves, the economy, and daily life.
Tax-cut fans urge affordable homes, safe streets, cheap energy, and pro-business rules. Left-leaning critics want steeper taxes on the rich and bigger social spending.
Regular New Yorkers ask why people left and what pulls them back for good. Hochul reopened that talk publicly. Her Palm Beach plea may fall flat without policy fixes. Reactions so far scream too late. The next months will show if migration reverses or wealth keeps flowing out. Her mixed signals leave some confused and others mad.
Trending News:
Who Is Leading the Democratic Party in 2026?
Politics
Trump Ousts Attorney General Pam Bondi, Taps Loyalist Todd Blanche
WASHINGTON, D.C. – President Donald Trump shocked the Justice Department on Thursday. He fired Pam Bondi as U.S. Attorney General. Her deputy, Todd Blanche, steps in right away as acting attorney general.
Trump posted the news on Truth Social. He called Bondi a great American patriot. She now heads to a key private-sector job. Trump praised Blanche as a talented legal expert. This switch follows weeks of backlash against Bondi’s leadership. People questioned her work on big cases.
Bondi served about a year as attorney general. She started in early 2025. The Senate confirmed her on strict party lines.
Both parties criticized her during that time. Some said she chased politically driven cases. Others doubted the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files. Epstein, the convicted sex offender, still draws huge attention.
Lawmakers from both sides accused her team of delaying sensitive papers. They wanted more openness. Bipartisan pressure built up.
Bondi fought back in statements. She highlighted fraud fights and immigration work. Reports show Trump talked with advisors for days about a change. Bondi knew about those chats.
In her statement, Bondi said she felt proud to serve. She plans a smooth handover with Blanche over the next month. She looks forward to her private job. There, she will keep backing Trump’s goals.
Meet Todd Blanche: Trump’s Pick for Acting AG
Todd Blanche, age 51, has a solid legal background. He began as a federal prosecutor in New York City’s Southern District. For almost 10 years, he tackled violent crimes, fraud, and corruption.
Later, he joined private practice at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft as a partner. He handled investigations and defenses. His clients included Paul Manafort and Rudy Giuliani. Most importantly, he defended Donald Trump.
Blanche led Trump’s team in the New York hush-money case with Stormy Daniels. He also worked on the 2020 election issues and the classified documents matter.
Trump trusted him after that close teamwork. Post-2024 election, Trump picked him as deputy attorney general. The Senate approved him 52-46 in March 2025.
As deputy, Blanche ran daily operations. That covers the FBI, DEA, ATF, and U.S. Marshals. He even acted as the librarian of Congress briefly. This firing marks the second major cabinet exit lately. Other spots in the administration faced shake-ups, too.
Friction points included several issues. First, the Epstein files stirred trouble. People questioned the release timing and fullness. That led to favoritism claims.
Next, some saw aggressive pursuits against Trump’s foes. In addition, internal fights over staff, focus, and messages grew. Trump stressed loyalty and outcomes in his post. He thanked Bondi. He showed faith in Blanche’s skills. Blanche replied fast on social media. He thanked Bondi for leadership and friendship. He also thanked Trump for the chance.
How Parties Responded
Democrats hit back hard. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer worried about Blanche’s Trump lawyer’s past. They fear it mixes loyalty with fair justice. Some noted his Ghislaine Maxwell interview. Maxwell is linked to Epstein. Critics called it wrong, but transcripts showed no formal deal.
Republicans backed the move. They praised Bondi’s crime and border work. They view Blanche as a steady prosecutor who gets Trump’s plans. Experts note acting AGs often fill in short-term. The White House hunts for a Senate-approved permanent pick. EPA head Lee Zeldin pops up in talks.
The department has over 115,000 staff. It covers security and rights protection. Top changes hit morale, probes, and policies. Blanche promises steady work in key spots. He talks up fraud battles, police support, and trust-building lately.
Fans like his prosecutor-defense mix for balance. Critics worry Trump ties mean more politics. For now, he handles the switch. He juggles big cases while they pick a long-term boss.
Trump might nominate Blanche full-time. Sources say he considers other loyal conservatives, too. Any pick needs Senate okay. Republicans hold a slim edge. Hearings could spark fights over independence. Bondi’s leave prompts oversight vows. Both parties plan checks, maybe testimony on old calls.
Trump ousted Pam Bondi after 14 months. Todd Blanche, his ex-lawyer and deputy, takes the acting AG role. Criticism over the Epstein files and more drove it. Bondi heads private; she sees it as an honor.
Todd Blanche offers New York prosecution chops and private know-how. Parties split: loyalty vs. fairness worries. It fits recent staff shifts. Blanche now guides Justice amid heat. Watch how he handles probes and politics.
Related News:
Democrat Mayors Reject Trump’s Help as Crime Explodes in Blue Cities
-
China3 months agoChina-Based Billionaire Singham Allegedly Funding America’s Radical Left
-
Politics2 months agoCNN Delivers Stark Reality Check to Democrats Over Voter ID
-
Politics2 months agoIlhan Omar’s Connections to Convicted Somali Fraudsters Surface
-
Politics3 months agoPresident Trump Addresses ICE Actions Amid Minnesota Unrest
-
News3 months agoFormer CNN Anchor Don Lemon Facing Charges Under Ku Klux Klan Act
-
Entertainment2 months agoCNN Admits Melania Documentary is HUGE Box Office Success
-
News2 months agoChina Backed US Billionaire Singham Allegedly Funding of Anti-ICE Protests
-
News3 months agoFBI Investigates Who’s Funding and Coordinating ICE Protests and Attacks



