News
Democratic Party is Facing an Existential Crisis as it Hemorrhages Voters
NEW YORK – The Democratic Party is facing a tough moment, with party registration numbers falling in every state that reports political affiliation. Across the United States, Democrats are losing registered voters at an accelerating pace, with many switching to the Republican Party or becoming independents.
The decline is especially steep among single men (including Black and Hispanic men), voters under age 35, and working-class men, all groups that once made up the core of the Democratic coalition. Major donors are also starting to step back, frustrated by the party’s focus on policies that appeal to only a small fraction of voters. If the Democrats don’t change course, they risk slipping into long-term irrelevance.
Shrinking Democratic Voter Base from Coast to Coast
Recent numbers show just how serious the situation is. A New York Times analysis found that in all 30 party-registration states (and Washington, D.C.), the share of registered Democrats dropped from 2020 to 2024. In those states, Republicans either pulled further ahead or closed gaps with the Democrats. Between 2020 and 2024, Democrats lost 2.1 million registered voters, while Republicans gained 2.4 million. That’s a shift of 4.5 million voters in the GOP’s favour.
Battleground states are seeing the sharpest drops. In North Carolina, Republicans erased almost all of the Democrats’ 2020 registration advantage. In Nevada, Democrats experienced the largest percentage decline outside of West Virginia, with Republicans even overtaking them for a period in 2024.
Florida and New Hampshire now have more registered Republicans than Democrats. Even in traditional Democratic strongholds like Pennsylvania and Nevada, the gap is closing, with Nevada showing just under 4,000 more Democrats than Republicans by August 2025.
This problem is widespread, not just regional. Back in 2018, Democrats made up about 34% of new voter registrations versus 20% for Republicans. Fast forward to 2024,
Republicans have not only closed the gap, but now claim a larger share of new registrants. The GOP’s share jumped by 9 percentage points, while the Democratic share fell by nearly 8. For new party registrants, Democrats’ portion dropped from almost two-thirds to under half. This is especially noticeable since most new voters are young and nonwhite—groups once solidly in the Democratic camp—that now are picking the GOP or declining any affiliation.
There’s another trend adding to the party’s trouble: more people are registering as unaffiliated or independent than ever before. Since 2000, the share of unaffiliated American voters has grown by nearly 9 percentage points, mostly at the expense of Democrats. In 2023, a record 43% of adults described themselves as independents, while only 27% identified as Democrats. This shows growing dissatisfaction with the party and a move away from traditional labels.
Key Demographics Walk Away from the Party
This isn’t just about numbers. The core groups that used to keep the Democratic Party strong are now leaving. Economic worries, cultural issues, and a disconnect with the party’s current focus are pushing these voters to reconsider their loyalty.
Single Men, Including Black and Hispanic Men
Few trends stand out more than the shift among single men, especially in Black and Hispanic communities. In 2020, nearly half of newly registered men who picked a major party chose the Democrats. By 2024, it was only 39%. More than 60% chose the Republicans in 2024, flipping a gender gap that once favoured Democrats.
This change is especially clear among Black men. Gallup reports that the Democrats’ advantage among Black adults hit a record low of 47 points in 2023, down from 66 points only three years earlier. In 2014, almost 8 in 10 Black men identified as Democrats or leaned left.
By 2023, that had dropped to just under 6 in 10. Black voters still largely support Democrats in presidential races, but the party is seeing more and more Black men step away. Younger Black men seem especially skeptical, with a little over half rating President Joe Biden positively.
Hispanic men are moving as well. Florida saw the Democratic share of new Latino party registrants fall from 52% in 2020 to 33% in 2024. In North Carolina, the drop was from 72% to 58%.
Many Hispanic voters, especially in places like Starr County, Texas (the nation’s most Latino county), named everyday economic struggles like gas and rent prices as their main reasons for supporting Donald Trump. The Democrats’ focus on progressive social issues over immediate pocketbook concerns hasn’t brought these voters back.
Voters Under 35
Young voters, once a solid base for the party, are shifting away as well. In 2018, about two-thirds of new voters under 45 choosing a party went with the Democrats. By 2024, Republicans will lead within this age group.
In Nevada alone, Republicans registered nearly twice as many voters under 35 as Democrats did last year. The Democrats’ share among new voters under 45 dropped much faster than it did for older age groups.
Young voters are also less likely to identify with any political party. Only about half of voters under 25 consider themselves allied with a party, compared to over three-quarters of those aged 80 and up.
If the Democratic Party can’t make stronger connections, it risks raising a generation of voters who don’t feel drawn to any party or who lean right. Experts warn that this could weaken the party’s ability to recruit strong candidates and keep its organization active in future elections.
Working-Class Men: The Lost Foundation of the Democratic Party
For decades, working-class men—often white voters without a college degree—were a big part of the Democratic base. These men have steadily shifted to the GOP, and the pace has only quickened recently. In 2024, almost two-thirds of white men without a college degree were with the Republicans. Just a third aligned with the Democrats.
This trend now includes blue-collar Hispanic and Black men. Exit polls from 2024 show non-college-educated and lower-income voters, including many Latinos, breaking heavily for Trump, pushed by worries over the cost of living and job security.
Democratic leadership, like Chris Deluzio in Pennsylvania, have admitted that the party’s focus didn’t connect with working-class voters on bread-and-butter issues. Many see the party’s messaging as distant or focused on priorities that do not relate to everyday struggles.
Trouble with Messaging and Ideology
Much of the current trouble can be traced back to choices about which policies and messages the party prioritizes. Moderate Democrats believe the party has gone too far left, focusing on issues that resonate mostly with activists, not everyday voters. These include things like expanded immigration policies, climate agendas, and certain social topics.
Figures like Representative Henry Cuellar say the party’s approach to issues like border security has backfired, especially with Latino voters concerned about migration. Progressive leaders, such as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, excite a small slice of the base, but their brand of politics has turned off many traditional voters.
In 2020, Republicans made “socialism” a dirty word in places like South Florida, helping them flip seats and narrow Democratic margins among Hispanic voters.
The party’s focus on issues like transgender rights and abortion is important to some, but it hasn’t reached working-class and minority voters who are focused on paying bills and keeping stable jobs.
One Democratic strategist summed up the problem: when the party addresses people in ways that feel out of touch with everyday experiences, even great ideas get ignored. In the current party base, only about 8% consider themselves “very liberal,” but party strategy seems to focus on this small group instead of trying to appeal more widely.
Money Problems and Donor Fatigue
The struggle doesn’t stop with voters. Democrats are having a harder time raising money. Reports suggest the party is “broke” compared to the Republicans, who are benefitting from a big rush of grassroots donations. Some of the party’s biggest donors have pulled back, blaming this on the party’s leftward move and the loss of connection with mainstream voters.
Registering new voters is costly, with each sign-up costing somewhere between $30 and $80. In 2020, recruiting a new Black voter for the Democrats cost an estimated $575 per vote.
Now, with donor support drying up, large-scale registration drives have slowed dramatically. Advocacy leaders like Héctor Sánchez Barba warn that cutting funds for Latino voter outreach is a mistake, but it has been hard to bring donors back on board.
A rising number of funds now flow through outside groups and super PACs, which act independently and have little coordination with the national party. This takes resources away from official Democratic efforts and weakens the party’s role in organizing, raising questions about leadership and strategy.
A Party Forced to Reconsider Its Future
The registration crisis is a warning sign of bigger problems that go beyond numbers or fundraising. Democrats need to reconnect with working-class communities and men by focusing on real economic priorities, not only progressive social policies.
The party also has to address the concerns of Black and Hispanic voters, many of whom have lost faith that it can deliver results. It will need a way to show donors that there’s a concrete path forward without leaving regular voters behind.
Some party leaders believe a backlash against Republican policies, especially with Trump back in the picture, could bring voters back, but there’s no sign of this happening yet. As of August 2025, Democrats continue to fall behind. Across the 30 states with party registration, Democrats counted 160,000 fewer voters than on Election Day 2024, while Republicans grew by another 200,000.
Disagreement over the way forward is growing. Moderates like Representative Cuellar push for a centre-left approach that appeals to everyday people, while progressives like Representative Pramila Jayapal call for big changes, acknowledging the party has become too focused on well-educated elites. Veteran strategist Maria Cardona says it’s simple: “We fell asleep at the switch.”
The Democratic Party stands at a key turning point. The drop in registered voters—driven by the loss of single men, youth, and working-class men—shows the party’s message no longer lands with its base.
Focusing tightly on far-left policies draws activists, but drives away swing voters needed for future wins. Add the party’s money problems and shrinking donor trust, and the challenge grows. If these trends keep going, the Democrats will lose even more ground to Republicans and independents, putting their chances for 2028 and later races at risk. The party has a choice: change strategy or face even more losses in the years ahead.
Related News:
Mainstream Media Bias Against Trump Persists Six Months Into Second Term
News
Mosque Set Ablaze in Iran a Citizens Revolt Against the Islamic Regime
TERRAN – Protests across Iran have surged in a way opposition voices and activists abroad call the biggest threat to the Islamic Republic since 1979. In city after city, crowds have torched mosques, hit government sites, and attacked symbols tied to clerical power.
Women have also burned mandatory hijabs in public, a blunt act of defiance that recalls the 2022 Women, Life, Freedom protests, but appears broader and more confrontational.
The unrest is now in its third week. It began on December 28, 2025, driven by economic strain, soaring inflation, a crashing rial, and growing shortages. Early rallies started among merchants, truckers, and workers in places such as Bandar Abbas.
Within days, chants shifted from economic anger to demands for the fall of the regime. By early January 2026, demonstrations had reached all 31 provinces. Many point to years of resentment after past crackdowns, plus a government seen as weakened after recent regional blows, including a 12-day war with Israel.
Economic Anger in Iran Turns Into Attacks
Videos and eyewitness reports, shared despite near-total internet shutdowns, show crowds lighting fires at mosques in Tehran neighborhoods such as Saadat Abad and Gholhak. One verified video dated January 8 shows the Al-Rasool Mosque burning as people chant “Death to the dictator” and wave pre-revolution Lion and Sun flags. State outlets, including Press TV, have aired images of the damage. They describe those involved as “rioters” supported by foreign enemies, naming the United States and Israel.
Anti-regime sources say more than 30 mosques have been attacked nationwide. Other reported targets include seminaries in Mashhad, Islamic Republic Broadcasting offices in Isfahan, and vehicles tied to security units.
In southern cities such as Lordegan and Fasa, protesters have pushed into administrative offices, Foundation of Martyrs buildings, and banks. Videos also show crowds burning pictures of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and the Iranian flag. In some clips, women use the flames to light cigarettes, a message meant to show full rejection of clerical rule.
Hijab burnings have become one of the clearest images of this wave. Young women in Tehran and other cities take off their headscarves, set them on fire, and walk uncovered in public. That directly challenges the state’s core policy of forced Islamic dress.
Many tie this defiance to Mahsa Amini, the 22-year-old Kurdish woman whose death in morality police custody in 2022 sparked nationwide outrage. That movement was crushed with deadly force and mass arrests, but analysts say public trust in the government has slipped even more since then.
Regime Pushes Back Hard
Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei has denounced the crowds as “saboteurs” and “vandals,” insisting they are being steered by foreign powers. In a televised speech on January 9, he promised “no leniency.” Security forces have answered with live fire, tear gas, and large-scale arrests.
Human rights groups, including Iran Human Rights and the Center for Human Rights in Iran, say at least 51 people have been killed since late December, including minors, with hundreds more hurt. Reports say hospitals in Tehran, Mashhad, and Karaj are struggling under the load.
On January 8, authorities rolled out wide internet and communications restrictions. The blackout has limited outside reporting and led Nobel Peace Prize winner Shirin Ebadi to warn that mass killings could be hidden from the public. Even so, protests have continued. Crowds have returned to streets in Tehran, Karaj, Zahedan, Tabriz, and Qom, even after deadly crackdowns.
Tehran’s prosecutor has threatened death sentences for people accused of burning state buildings or fighting security forces. The army and the IRGC have mobilized, but some reports suggest units are stretched and have pulled back in places due to the size of the crowds.
Regime Change Chants Grow
Many protesters now call openly for regime change. Some back a return of the monarchy under Reza Pahlavi, the exiled crown prince. He has called for a peaceful transition and a referendum on Iran’s future. The movement has no clear leadership on the ground, but its reach appears to have grown since his January 8 call for large demonstrations.
Outside Iran, the United States under President Donald Trump has issued warnings, saying the U.S. would step in if authorities increase killings. Leaders in Europe, including Germany, France, and the UK, have condemned the crackdown and urged Iran to restore internet access. Airlines have also canceled flights into Iran as the situation worsens.
A Moment That Could Redefine Iran
Iran’s leadership blames “Zionist” and American interference. Analysts point to pressures at home, including economic breakdown, uneven hijab enforcement, a high number of executions (reported as more than 1,500 in 2025), and stress linked to war.
As the uprising moves deeper into its second week, the torching of mosques and the burning of hijabs mark a sharp symbolic break. These acts strike at institutions that sit at the center of the Islamic Republic. It’s not clear if this ends with the regime falling or a harsher crackdown. For many Iranians in the streets, it looks like a point of no return.
With communication lines cut and violence rising, the world is watching a country under extreme pressure. The next days may shape whether 2026 becomes the year Iran’s theocracy collapses, or holds on through more bloodshed.
Related News:
Iran’s Exiled Crown Prince Urges Khamenei’s Removal
News
AOC Accuses Jessie Watters of Fox News of Sexualizing and Harassing Her
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez AOC rejected an invitation to appear on Fox News’ Jesse Watters Primetime on January 7, saying host Jesse Watters has “sexualized and harassed” her on air.
The back-and-forth, filmed outside the U.S. Capitol, quickly spread online and set off another round of partisan arguing. Her response, delivered while cameras and reporters crowded around, pulled millions of views and landed where most political clips do now, in fast-moving social media fights.
The moment happened just after Ocasio-Cortez spoke to reporters about a separate issue, a fatal shooting involving an ICE agent in Minneapolis. She framed it as part of wider problems tied to immigration enforcement.
As she wrapped up, Fox producer Johnny Belisario walked up with a microphone and a camera crew and passed along an invitation. “Jesse Watters would like you on his show,” Belisario said, according to video shared by MeidasTouch Network and reposted widely on X (formerly Twitter).
Ocasio-Cortez didn’t hesitate. “He has sexualized and harassed me on his show,” she replied, sounding angry and firm. She added that Watters “has engaged in horrific, sexually exploitative rhetoric.”
Belisario responded, “That’s not true, Congresswoman.” Ocasio-Cortez pushed back with a direct example. “It is true, because he accused me of wanting to sleep with Stephen Miller,” she said. “So why don’t you tell me what you think is acceptable to tell a woman?” She then walked away, leaving the producer without much to add.
AOC’s Comment Sets Off a Dispute
Her reference pointed to an October 2025 segment on Fox’s The Five. During a panel discussion about an Ocasio-Cortez post that mocked Stephen Miller’s height, calling him “4’10” and “insecure,” Watters joked, “I think AOC wants to sleep with [Stephen] Miller… it is so obvious. I’m sorry you can’t have him.”
The line got laughs on set, but it also drew criticism from women’s rights advocates who said it reduced her to a punchline and treated her like an object. Ocasio-Cortez, who has spoken publicly about being a sexual assault survivor, later reposted the clip on X with the caption: “You can either be a pervert or ask me to be on your little show. Not both. Good luck!”
Watters Responds On Air, Calls It Another “Fabrication”
Watters addressed the exchange on his January 8 broadcast and rejected Ocasio-Cortez’s claim. He described her response as “dramatic street theater” and said she was calling a joke harassment. He also argued that her accusation fit what he called a pattern of exaggeration and lies.
Watters pointed to past moments he says show she plays loose with the facts, including debates about her background and protest footage. He also ran clips, including Ocasio-Cortez’s 2019 60 Minutes interview, where she suggested being “morally right” matters more than being “factually” exact, a comment Watters mocked as an excuse to stretch the truth.
This wasn’t his first attack along those lines. In 2023, he criticized her during a segment about the Green New Deal and accused her of having “a history of lying.” On the January 8 show, he told viewers that if she wouldn’t come on the program, he would keep “fact-checking” her anyway.
Fox News has not released an official statement about the clash. The original report also claimed Primetime viewership rose 15% after the exchange.
The argument also landed in a bigger debate about media standards and how public figures get treated on air. Ocasio-Cortez has avoided Fox for years. Since Watters Primetime launched in 2022, she has said she doesn’t want to help what she describes as disinformation aimed at Democrats. Watters has regularly targeted Ocasio-Cortez and other members of “the Squad,” often painting her as a socialist who is out of touch.
This time, the language got sharper. By using the term “sexual harassment,” Ocasio-Cortez raised the stakes and put more pressure on the network. Progressive groups, including UltraViolet, called for Fox to look at its internal standards and how hosts talk about women on air.
OOC Faces Long-Running Claims About Truthfulness
Ocasio-Cortez has drawn intense attention since she arrived in Congress, and critics, especially on the right, often accuse her of making misleading statements. Supporters say the attacks are political and designed to discredit her. Some fact-checking groups have rated certain claims as wrong or misleading. Below is a partial list of criticisms that have circulated in public reporting and commentary.
- Background and class messaging (2018 to present): Ocasio-Cortez has often described herself as coming from the working-class Bronx. Critics, including National Review, have pointed to her family’s home in Yorktown Heights, Westchester County, reported as costing more than $500,000. A 2018 Washington Post fact-check described parts of her narrative as “misleading,” noting her father worked as an architect. Conservative outlets, including The Daily Caller, accused her of playing up class identity for political effect.
- Unemployment claim (2019): She tweeted that unemployment under Democratic presidents was “significantly lower” than under Republicans. PolitiFact rated it False, saying the comparison didn’t hold up when looking at the broader context and economic cycles.
- Medicare for All election claim (2020): After the election, she said on X that “every single swing-seat House Democrat who endorsed #MedicareForAll won re-election.” PolitiFact rated that False, saying at least two endorsers lost or faced very tight outcomes.
- Bernie Sanders and lobbyist money (2020): While backing Sanders, she said he had “never taken corporate lobbyist money” in his career. Fact-checkers called the claim misleading, citing campaign fundraising details that included bundled donations tied to lobbyist-connected sources.
- Debt and deficit comments (2023): She said the Trump tax cuts were “the largest contributor” to the debt ceiling and deficit. The Washington Post gave the claim Four Pinocchios, pointing to pandemic spending and policies from multiple administrations as larger drivers.
- Texas abortion law statement (2022): She said Republicans “passed a law allowing rapists to sue their victims for getting an abortion.” PolitiFact rated the claim Mostly False, saying the law’s private enforcement system allows lawsuits but doesn’t set it up in the way the tweet described.
- Migrant detention remarks (2019): Ocasio-Cortez called some detention facilities “concentration camps” and said women were told to “drink out of toilets.” Critics said she was lying, while reports acknowledged harsh conditions, and the “toilets” line was tied to detainee accounts that inspectors and others disputed as overstated.
- “Faked arrest” claim (2022): Viral posts said she pretended to be arrested during an abortion-rights protest. FactCheck.org said that claim was false and pointed to Capitol Police records, though critics still frame the moment as performative.
- Social Security rumor (2025): A viral story claimed her family cashed her deceased grandmother’s checks for 15 years. Reuters traced it to a satire site. The rumor spread anyway, alongside talk about a 2025 House Ethics Committee review of her campaign finances, which the text says ended without findings.
Together, these disputes feed a familiar argument about her style. Critics say she favors punchy lines over careful wording. Supporters say she speaks plainly, pushes hard, and gets nitpicked because she threatens the status quo. Her 2019 60 Minutes comments about moral clarity versus “semantic correctness” still get quoted by opponents who say it proves she’s fine with bending facts.
What It Says About Politics and Cable News Right Now
The clash landed as political tensions rose again, with Donald Trump’s second term looming in the background of many debates. Ocasio-Cortez has positioned herself as a leading voice against tougher immigration moves she expects from a new administration.
Her refusal also fit a wider feminist argument about how women in politics get talked about on male-led shows, including reminders of Fox’s own history with harassment scandals and the 2023 settlements.
Watters’ response speaks to a different crowd. He framed Ocasio-Cortez as someone using “woke” outrage for attention, a message that often plays well with Trump-aligned viewers.
As clips and memes continued to bounce around X, the fight turned into what cable news often rewards most, a loud moment that keeps people watching. Ocasio-Cortez remains one of the most visible Democrats in the country, and she also remains one of the most targeted.
Whether the dispute becomes a formal complaint or fades into the next news cycle, it underlines how quickly “banter” can turn into a boundary fight, and how rarely either side backs down once cameras are rolling.
Trending News:
Democrats in Turmoil Over Hopeless Impeachment Drive Against HHS Secretary RFK Jr.
News
JD Vance Exposes Walz’s Fraud and CNN’s Lies in White House Presser
WASHINGTON, D.C – Vice President JD Vance stepped to the White House podium in an unusually blunt briefing and went after Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, calling his administration a mess tied to widespread welfare fraud. He also accused major outlets, including CNN, of misreporting key facts to shield Democrats, a move he said puts law enforcement officers in danger.
Vance spoke as tensions rose after a fatal ICE shooting in Minneapolis and fresh claims of billions in taxpayer-funded fraud tied to programs run under Walz. Standing with Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, Vance outlined new actions the administration says it will take to fight fraud across the country and defend federal agents facing backlash from state and local officials.
Walz Under Fire as Fraud Investigations Grow
Vance focused much of his criticism on Walz, whose administration has faced investigations tied to fraud estimates that Vance said top $9 billion. He pointed to the Feeding Our Future case, which involved allegations that hundreds of millions were siphoned from child nutrition programs during the COVID era.
“Look, Tim Walz is a joke. His entire administration has been a joke,” Vance said, linking those claims to Walz’s recent announcement that he will not run for re-election. Vance framed the decision as a retreat brought on by growing scrutiny.
He argued that Walz either knew the fraud was happening or failed to act when warning signs appeared. Vance said the schemes allowed organized networks to exploit programs meant to help children and families, and he claimed some of those networks were tied to parts of the Somali immigrant community in Minnesota.
Conservative researchers and whistleblowers, boosted by widely shared reports online, have pointed to daycare sites that appeared empty while still submitting claims for large reimbursements, including meals that investigators say never existed. Vance said the administration has already stopped billions in federal funding to Minnesota and other Democrat-led states it suspects of similar misuse.
Vance also announced a new Assistant Attorney General role focused on prosecuting fraud nationwide, with Minnesota as a top priority. “This official will have nationwide jurisdiction over the issue of fraud,” he said, adding that the White House plans to push for a fast Senate confirmation. He described the alleged fraud as a large network that has drained public money for years.
Vance Targets CNN, Calls Coverage an “Absolute Disgrace”
Vance also aimed his sharpest words at the national press, singling out CNN over its reporting on Wednesday’s ICE shooting in Minneapolis that killed 37-year-old Renee Nicole Good.
He read a CNN headline during the briefing and argued it painted a one-sided picture of what happened. “The way that the media, by and large, has reported this story has been an absolute disgrace, and it puts our law enforcement officers at risk every single day,” Vance said.
According to Vance, videos show Good attempting to hit federal agents with her car during an immigration enforcement action. He said the ICE officer fired in self-defense and noted the agent had been badly hurt in a prior incident involving a vehicle.
Vance claimed some coverage left out those details and helped stir anger against law enforcement. “They’re lying about this attack,” he said, warning that misleading reports can feed hostility and raise the risk for officers in the field.
He also said the administration will back the ICE officer and pushed back on talk of investigations into the agent’s actions. Vance said the officer should not be punished for following orders during a dangerous situation, and he criticized Walz and local activists for pushing the issue.
Backing ICE and Federal Agents, Message to Sanctuary Cities
The briefing reinforced the Trump administration’s support for ICE and tougher enforcement, while Vance blamed Democratic leadership for disorder in sanctuary cities, including Minneapolis.
As protests build and Walz calls in the National Guard, Vance urged the public to reject what he described as a false story pushed by political leaders and friendly media outlets. He said criticism of immigration policy should not turn into attacks on officers.
With fraud investigations expanding and more federal attention on Minnesota, Vance’s appearance signaled that the administration plans to press harder on both corruption claims and public safety. Republicans praised the remarks as overdue accountability, while Democrats pushed back and defended Walz’s record.
Vance ended with a clear message: the administration says it will no longer allow large fraud cases to be ignored, and it will not stay quiet when federal agents are publicly blamed for carrying out their jobs.
Related News:
Sen. Joni Ernst Targets Minnesota Nonprofit Amid Fraud Scandal
Tim Walz Ends Re-Election Bid Amid Escalating Fraud Scandal
-
Crime2 weeks agoYouTuber Nick Shirley Exposes BILLIONS of Somali Fraud, Video Goes VIRAL
-
Politics1 month agoIlhan Omar’s Ties to Convicted Somali Fraudsters Raises Questions
-
Crime3 months agoAntifa Accused of Using Homeless Elderly as Human Shield Agianst Federal Agents
-
News1 month agoWalz Tried to Dodges Blame Over $8 Billion Somali Fraud Scandal
-
News3 months agoThe Democrats’ Great Betrayal, Champions of the Working Man to Handmaids of the Elite
-
Asia2 months agoAsian Development Bank (ADB) Gets Failing Mark on Transparancy
-
Politics3 months agoThe Democratic Party’s Reckoning: From People’s Champion to Elite Enclave
-
Politics3 months agoThe Democrats Now the Party of White Voters with College Degrees



