Crime
New Jersey Twins Arrested in Over Alleged Death Threats Against DHS Official
ABSECON, NJ – Twin brothers from New Jersey are in custody after a joint operation by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and local police. They face serious charges tied to alleged online death threats directed at DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin and other federal law enforcement officers.
Emilio Roman-Flores and Ricardo Antonio Roman-Flores, both U.S. citizens who live in Absecon, were arrested Tuesday.
Investigators traced a series of social media posts that allegedly included threats to “hang” the Assistant Secretary and a broader call to “shoot ICE on sight.” Federal officials say the case reflects a stronger push to respond to violent threats aimed at public officials online.

The Charges: Weapons Offenses and Terroristic Threats
In a press release, DHS outlined the charges against the brothers, describing them as serious and wide-ranging.
Emilio Roman-Flores is charged with multiple felonies, including:
- Unlawful possession of an assault weapon
- Possession of prohibited weapons
- Conspiracy
- Terroristic threats
- Criminal coercion
- Cyber harassment
Ricardo Antonio Roman-Flores is charged with:
- Conspiracy
- Terroristic threats
Both men are being held by the Absecon Police Department in Atlantic County while the case moves into the court system.
Federal Officials Respond With Strong Warning
Soon after the arrests, federal leaders issued sharp statements, describing the action as a clear warning to anyone considering violent threats against officers.
Acting ICE Director Todd Lyons released a brief but intense statement about the case and the broader climate officers face. “Let this be a warning to anyone who dares threaten or attack our brave law enforcement officers,” Lyons said. “We will find you, we will arrest you, and we will prosecute you to the fullest extent of the law. We are NOT afraid of you.”
Lyons said the current political and media environment is driving a sharp spike in threats against ICE officers. He cited what he called an 8,000% increase in death threats targeting ICE agents while they perform their duties.
“The extreme rhetoric of the news media, sanctuary politicians, and activists is leading directly to our law enforcement officers facing an 8,000% increase in death threats against them,” Lyons said in the DHS release. “If you threaten our law enforcement or DHS officials, we will hunt you down and you will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.”
DHS stressed that the search and arrest warrants were carried out through a coordinated operation that involved federal agents and the Absecon Police Department’s SWAT team. Officials said this approach was necessary to address what they viewed as a serious potential threat tied to the Roman-Flores brothers.
Online DHS Threats Turning Into Criminal Cases
This case shows how posts on social media can quickly turn into criminal charges when they cross the line into direct threats. Authorities have not publicly detailed the brothers’ motives, but the alleged posts targeted a senior spokesperson for a Trump administration official and urged violence against federal agents. That mix of politics, online platforms, and violent language has become a growing concern for law enforcement.
Federal and state prosecutors are using cyber harassment and terroristic threat laws more often to respond to credible threats against public figures. The anonymity and reach of the internet have made it easier for some people to issue violent statements they might not make face-to-face. The weapons charges against Emilio Roman-Flores suggest that officers found physical evidence during the search that raised even more concern about the seriousness of the threats.
Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin, a top spokeswoman for DHS, is now among the many high-profile government officials targeted by intense hostility online.
The arrests send a direct message from federal authorities: threats against DHS staff, ICE agents, or other federal personnel, even when made online, will be taken seriously and pursued through criminal charges, no matter the political views or status of the people involved.
The Roman-Flores twins are awaiting arraignment, which will outline the next steps in the legal process. VORNews will keep following the case and share updates as new information comes out.
Trending News:
Federal Watchdog Uncovers $550M Fraud in Biden DEI Business Programs
Crime
Somali’s Accused of Bilking Millions From Maine’s Medicaid Program
LEWISTON, Maine- Maine’s Medicaid system, known as MaineCare, is under serious scrutiny after a series of alleged Somali fraud schemes drained millions of taxpayer dollars from the program. Federal and state investigators have tracked several cases that show a clear pattern of abuse, many tied to people of Somali origin working in health care and interpreter services in the Lewiston-Auburn area.
These schemes redirected money meant for low-income and medically fragile residents, raised doubts about oversight, and sparked public concern about how MaineCare is managed and protected.
The Somali Kickback Scheme
One of the most serious recent cases ended in 2021 with the sentencing of two Lewiston men, Abdirashid Ahmed, 41, and Garat Osman, 35. Both were ordered to repay more than $2.4 million to MaineCare. Ahmed and Osman, who worked as Somali interpreters, pleaded guilty to health care fraud tied to a scheme involving a local counseling agency, Facing Change.
Court records show the fraud took place from late 2015 through 2018. Prosecutors said Ahmed asked Nancy Ludwig, the owner of Facing Change, for kickbacks in return for sending MaineCare patients to her clinic. Once clients arrived, Ahmed, Osman, and others joined with Ludwig to file false claims with MaineCare.
The group billed for services that were never provided or inflated the level of care given. In many cases, they claimed both counseling and interpreter services, which did not happen at all.
When MaineCare rules changed in 2016, the group allegedly found a way to keep the money flowing. According to the government, Ludwig and Ahmed agreed to change many patients’ diagnoses to schizophrenia so they would still qualify for high-paying services at Facing Change.
When the MaineCare Program Integrity Unit showed up to audit the agency in fall 2016, the people involved did not stop. Investigators say they created fake records to back up their false claims and mislead auditors. Osman, who joined the plot in late 2016, set up his own interpreter company and used it to keep the fraud going and move the illegal payments.
Acting U.S. Attorney Donald E. Clark praised investigators and made clear how serious the case was, saying that federal and state agencies will keep going after anyone who cheats public health programs. Phillip M. Coyne, Special Agent in Charge for HHS-OIG, said that health care fraud drains money that should help the most vulnerable patients.
Ahmed received a two-year prison sentence. Osman was sentenced to three years of probation, along with heavy restitution and financial penalties.
Early Home Care Fraud Case
The interpreter case did not come out of nowhere. Years earlier, in 2012, another Lewiston resident, Somali native Mohdi M. Ali, 56, pleaded guilty to several federal charges, including making false statements involving a health care benefit program.
Ali was the former head of Decent Home Care Inc., a company that provided nonmedical services to seniors and people with disabilities under MaineCare. According to prosecutors, Ali obtained a Social Security number and an alien registration card by lying about his background, including falsely claiming that he had lived in refugee camps in Kenya.
Decent Home Care Inc. took in more than $1 million from MaineCare in 2008 alone. Ali used his fraudulently obtained documents to sign up for MaineCare benefits in 2006, the same year he created his company.
A 2007 review found that Ali had lied to the Maine Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). He hid about $29,000 in bank savings and $24,000 in wages he earned as the executive director of his own firm. By hiding that income and those assets, he got approved as a MaineCare provider for his company.
Ali faced a possible 15-year prison sentence and up to $500,000 in fines. As part of his plea deal, he also agreed that he would be removed to Canada after serving any prison time. His case showed how MaineCare can be exploited when someone is willing to lie about their status, income, and assets.
The Cost to Maine Residents
Taken together, these fraud cases reveal long-term weaknesses in how MaineCare is monitored. The numbers are large on their own, with more than $2.4 million tied to the interpreter scheme and more than $1 million linked to Decent Home Care. The broader impact is even larger, since every stolen dollar is money that does not go to people who need health care help.
The Maine Attorney General’s Healthcare Crimes Unit, which receives federal funding, leads many of these investigations. State officials are encouraging residents and health care workers to report suspicious billing, fake records, or unusual patterns of service use. Public tips often help stop fraud before it grows.
The fact that several high-profile cases involve members of the Somali community has caused tension in Lewiston-Auburn and beyond. Community leaders, providers, and state agencies are debating how to strengthen background checks and monitoring for health care and interpreter services, while also avoiding unfair treatment of honest providers.
Federal and state law enforcement agencies say they will keep working together to track and prosecute Medicaid fraud. Their message is direct: those who abuse MaineCare for personal gain can expect aggressive investigation and serious legal consequences.
For a broader look at similar issues in another state, the video Unmasking the Minnesota Somali Fraud Network discusses alleged fraud involving Somalis and government-funded programs, which mirrors some of the patterns seen in the MaineCare cases.
Related News:
Ilhan Omar’s Ties to Convicted Somali Fraudsters Raises Questions
Crime
DHS Accused Illinois Governor of Releasing Violent Illegal Criminals
SPRINGFIELD, IL—The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has leveled a devastating indictment against Illinois, alleging the state’s “sanctuary” policies have led to the systemic release of at least 1,768 criminal illegal aliens since January 20th of this year.
This staggering figure represents individuals who should have been transferred to federal custody but were instead released back into Illinois communities due to the state’s refusal to honor lawful federal arrest detainers.
The DHS press release, issued on December 8, 2025, did not mince words, directly accusing Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker and his administration of recklessly endangering the public. Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin stated plainly, “Governor Pritzker and his fellow Illinois sanctuary politicians are releasing murderers, pedophiles, and kidnappers back into our neighborhoods and putting American lives at risk.”
The “Worst of the Worst” on the Streets
The list of offenses detailed by DHS and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials includes crimes that shock the conscience. Among the released are individuals convicted of or charged with:
-
Aggravated Kidnapping/Ransom
-
Attempted Murder and Aggravated Criminal Sexual Assault
-
Sexual Assault of a Victim Less Than 13 Years of Age
-
Child Abduction/Lure Child
ICE Director Todd Lyons has publicly called on Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul to reverse course and cooperate immediately, emphasizing that there are currently more than 4,000 criminal illegal aliens in the state’s custody for whom ICE detainers have been lodged.
“It is common sense,” McLaughlin asserted. “Criminal illegal aliens should not be released back onto our streets to terrorize more innocent Americans.”
Sanctuary Policy: A Direct Threat to Public Safety
At the heart of the crisis is Illinois’ status as a “sanctuary state,” a designation that shields illegal immigrants from the full force of federal immigration enforcement. ICE detainers are requests to state and local law enforcement agencies to hold an individual suspected of being deportable for up to 48 hours after they would otherwise be released, giving ICE agents time to take them into federal custody.
Illinois authorities, citing the state’s “sanctuary” laws, have systematically disregarded these federal requests. This defiance effectively transforms local jails and prisons into revolving doors for deportable, convicted, or accused foreign nationals.
DHS provided harrowing case studies illustrating the consequences of this non-cooperation:
-
Victor Manuel Mendoza-Garcia, an illegal alien from Mexico, convicted of three counts of aggravated kidnapping/ransom, was sentenced to 18 years. Despite an ICE detainer, he was released by the Illinois Department of Corrections (IDOC). ICE was later forced to track him down and re-arrest him.
-
Leonardo Ignot-Osto, an illegal alien with a criminal history, including a conviction for child abduction/lure child, was released from Cook County Jail in September 2025, despite an active detainer.
These cases, DHS argues, are not isolated mistakes but the direct, foreseeable outcome of policies prioritized over public safety.
The Legal Battle: Federal Supremacy vs. State Autonomy
This dramatic confrontation reignites the long-running constitutional battle between the federal government’s authority over immigration and state resistance. DHS asserts that the state’s failure to honor detainers—requests that are central to enforcing federal law—violates the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
Illinois officials, however, have doubled down. Governor Pritzker signed an executive order creating the Illinois Accountability Commission, ostensibly to investigate what he terms “federal immigration agent abuses.” Illinois Senate President Don Harmon stated that a newly passed state law, HB 1312, provides victims of what he called a “chaotic federal assault” a legal path to pursue their “abusers.”
This framing—of federal law enforcement as “abusers” and violent criminals as victims of overreach—is precisely what infuriates DHS leadership. Former Acting DHS Secretary Chad Wolf warned on Varney & Co. that Illinois’ “refusal to honor ICE detainers has led to the release of more than 1,700 criminal migrants, fueling concerns over rising sanctuary policies and public safety risks.”
Credibility Questioned
While DHS claims to target only the “worst of the worst” criminal illegal aliens, a recent court filing in a separate case—concerning ICE’s “Operation Midway Blitz” in Chicago—introduced a complication. DOJ records from November 2025 showed that out of a sample of 614 immigrants arrested during the operation, 97% did not have a criminal record.
This data point, though separate from the detainer issue, has provided political ammunition to Illinois officials and immigrant advocates, who accuse federal agents of conducting broad, indiscriminate sweeps that undermine the narrative of targeted enforcement against dangerous criminals. DHS has not directly addressed the discrepancy but insists its focus remains on the 1,768 criminals released due to the sanctuary policies.
The core issue remains: as long as Illinois refuses to cooperate with federal law enforcement, a population of convicted and accused criminals, who have no legal right to be in the country, will continue to be released from custody and vanish back into American communities. The question facing Illinois residents is whether their state’s commitment to “sanctuary” is worth the demonstrable risk to public safety.
Related News:
New Jersey Twins Arrested in Over Alleged Death Threats Against DHS Official
Crime
Minnesota’s Billion Dollar Fraud Puts Omar and Walz Under the Microscope
MINNEAPOLIS, Minnesota – In the dense, bustling streets of Cedar-Riverside, where Somali and American flags hang side by side, and the smell of spiced tea lingers in the cold air, a massive fraud case has shaken one of Minnesota’s most tight-knit immigrant communities.
What started as an inquiry into pandemic-era child nutrition programs has grown into what federal prosecutors call the largest welfare fraud case in U.S. history, a $1 billion theft of funds meant for low-income families, schools, and children.
Caught in the center of the political firestorm is U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., whose push to expand child nutrition access during COVID-19 is now being reviewed for its unintended, or possibly ignored, fallout.
Federal officials refer to the case as the “Feeding Our Future” fraud. Dozens of people have been charged, including 79 defendants of Somali descent, in a state that hosts the largest Somali population in the country.
Prosecutors describe a network of fake nonprofits, ghost meal claims, and money laundering schemes that siphoned money from the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Child Nutrition Programs.
Shell companies allegedly submitted bills for meals that never existed, then channeled the money into luxury cars, international transfers, and, under current Treasury Department review, suspected links to the Somalia-based terror group Al-Shabaab.
Minnesota Whistleblowers Come Forward
Whistleblowers from the Minnesota Department of Human Services say state leaders brushed aside early warnings. As those claims surface, critics are asking whether Omar’s drive to ease rules on child nutrition funding created a perfect opening for fraud, and how closely she and her allies crossed paths with those now convicted.
Omar, a former nutrition educator and anti-hunger organizer who represents Minnesota’s 5th Congressional District, has built much of her political identity on feeding children and fighting poverty. In 2020, when COVID school closures cut off daily meals for roughly 30 million students, she sponsored the bipartisan Maintaining Essential Access to Lunch for Students (MEALS) Act.
Folded into the sweeping CARES Act under emergency authority, the law approved waivers meant to speed payments to off-site meal providers. The waivers relaxed routine audits and paperwork to move food to families faster. On the House floor, she argued that “bureaucracy” should not block hungry children from getting food, pointing to her own experience as a Somali refugee.
The measure passed with broad support and opened the door to about $250 million in additional federal child nutrition funds for Minnesota alone. Those dollars now sit at the heart of the fraud case. Prosecutors say many defendants used the very waivers approved during the pandemic to flood the system with fake invoices for meals that were never served.
Feeding Our Future, the nonprofit at the center of the scandal, allegedly moved tens of millions through a maze of businesses, including Somali-owned restaurants and sports clubs that reported feeding thousands of children per day. Investigators say in many cases the sites produced little to no food at all. Of the 87 people charged so far, a large share live in Omar’s district, turning what she once hailed as a policy win into a political liability.
Ilhan Omar Denies Everything
Omar’s office flatly rejects any suggestion that she aided or tolerated the fraud. “Rep. Omar fought to feed children during a crisis, not to enable theft,” said spokesperson Jeremy Slevin in a written statement. “Any claim that she is complicit is a baseless smear pushed by people who want to weaponize a tragedy against immigrants.”
During an appearance on CBS’s “Face the Nation” last weekend, Omar condemned the fraud and its fallout in her own community. “Somalis are taxpayers too, and this hurts us all,” she said. She argued that warning signs were missed across many levels of government, calling the failure “systemic” and saying the breakdown came from weak federal oversight, not one piece of legislation. She also urged deeper probes into potential terrorism links and described any lapse in surveillance as “a failure of the FBI and courts.”
Even so, the personal and political connections around her are drawing new attention. Court records, campaign filings, and public photos show that Omar has had social and professional ties with several people now accused or convicted in related cases. In November 2018, she held her historic congressional victory party at Safari Restaurant on Lake Street, a well-known Somali restaurant partly owned by Salim Ahmed Said.
Said, 33, was convicted in March on 21 counts of wire fraud, bribery, and money laundering after prosecutors said he stole $5 million in child nutrition money. Safari claimed reimbursements for serving 5,000 meals a day to children.
Investigators say the records were fake and that the money helped pay for a Tesla, Rolex watches, and wire transfers to Somalia. Omar, a frequent customer at Safari, paid more than $10,000 to the restaurant for campaign events during her time as a state lawmaker and later as a congressional candidate, according to Federal Election Commission reports.
Links to Ilhan Omar
Another link runs through Guhaad Hashi Said, a Democratic political organizer who worked as Omar’s main “get-out-the-vote” force in the Somali community in the 2018 and 2020 election cycles. Hashi pleaded guilty in August to stealing $1.5 million from a youth athletic program that existed mostly on paper. Photos show Omar and Hashi together at marches and campaign events, sometimes with arms linked.
House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer, R-Ky., has subpoenaed documents related to Hashi’s work and claims he functioned less as a volunteer and more as a political enforcer. “Omar’s inner circle profited while kids went hungry,” Comer said in a statement. “This isn’t coincidence; it’s corruption.”
The financial and social network stretches beyond her campaign staff. Federal campaign records show donors with ties to the Feeding Our Future scandal, including relatives of some defendants, gave about $7,400 to Omar’s political committees. Prosecutors now say part of that money can be traced back to the fraudulent nutrition payments.
A former staff member, Abdikerm Abdelahi Eidleh, has been charged in a separate Medicaid fraud case that investigators say touches some of the same circles. Immigration and Customs Enforcement also released photos of Omar standing with Abdul Dahir Ibrahim, a Somali man living in the U.S. illegally who has a 2004 deportation order and a conviction for identity fraud.
Federal records connect Ibrahim to the Feeding Our Future case. He was arrested last week as part of a high-profile immigration sweep ordered by the Trump administration. In other photos, Ibrahim appears smiling beside Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, D, at community gatherings, next to letters of support from allies such as state Sen. Omar Fateh.
Tim Walz Plays the Fool
Gov. Walz, Omar’s longtime political partner and now the 2024 Democratic vice presidential nominee, faces his own set of allegations tied to the scandal. Former Minnesota Department of Human Services employees say senior officials in his administration suppressed fraud reports in the name of “equity” in districts with large immigrant populations.
They claim data was deleted and investigators were punished or sidelined when they pushed concerns. “Under Walz, we were told to look the other way,” one DHS worker told Fox News anonymously. Walz’s office denies those charges and insists that any oversight gaps came from federal speed and confusion during the pandemic response.
Comer has expanded his inquiry to include Walz, issuing subpoenas for emails between his office and Omar’s office. Those records cover joint appearances at Somali cultural events where some of the accused fraudsters were present.
Omar and Walz share long-standing political ties inside Minnesota’s Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party. Walz has appointed several of Omar’s allies to state commissions and boards, and she campaigned for his 2022 reelection.
Their shared photos with Ibrahim, posted by DHS, have stirred anger among critics who see a pattern of favoritism. “It’s not just photos; it’s a pattern of ignoring risks in the name of representation,” said Bill Glahn, a fellow at the Center of the American Experiment, a conservative policy group.
In a written statement, Walz said the recent arrests show that “justice is blind,” while also defending Minnesota’s Somali community as “essential to our economy.”
Omar’s Wealth Questioned
At the same time, questions about Omar’s personal finances have resurfaced and are feeding public unease. Her 2024 financial disclosure, filed in May 2025, lists her household net worth in a range between $6 million and $30 million, a dramatic jump from her 2019 filing, which reported a negative $45,000. Most of the increase stems from her husband Tim Mynett’s business interests.
He owns Rose Lake Capital, a Washington, D.C., investment firm valued at between $5 million and $25 million, which claims to oversee about $60 billion in assets. He also has a stake in eStCru Wines, a California wine company valued at between $1 million and $5 million.
Omar reported no personal income from these companies, though conservative outlets like the Washington Free Beacon have questioned the timing and highlighted that Mynett’s firm advertises experience in “structuring legislation,” a phrase that echoes her MEALS Act effort.
Omar has waved off these reports as partisan attacks. In February, she called them “right-wing disinformation” and said she is “barely worth thousands,” pointing to student loan debt and a lack of real estate or stock holdings.
Fact-checking site Snopes has explained that the upper estimate in her disclosure reflects the full range of her spouse’s assets, not her individual wealth. Based on those filings, her personal net worth likely sits somewhere between $65,000 and $115,000.
Even so, in a district wrestling with the fallout from a major fraud scandal, many residents say the optics are hard to ignore. “She’s one of us, but how does her family thrive while we scrape by?” asked Amina Hassan, a Somali mother of three, during a recent community forum in Minneapolis.
As Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent promises to follow the stolen money “to the Middle East and Somalia,” the case has grown into more than a discussion about missing dollars. It has exposed deep tensions in Minnesota’s progressive project and raised sharp questions about how to support new Americans without opening the door to abuse.
Omar, who remains defiant on X, urged residents to stay focused on fair treatment. “This isn’t about race; it’s about accountability,” she wrote. With criminal trials approaching and the 2026 midterm elections moving closer, her once-rising profile in national politics now faces steady scrutiny.
For families like the Hassans, the sense of betrayal cuts straight to daily life. “We trusted the system to feed our kids,” Amina said, staring at the boarded-up doors of a meal site that once handed out free food boxes.
“Now it’s feeding doubt.” As federal agents and auditors sort through records and bank transfers, Minnesota waits, not only for convictions and sentences, but for some path toward healing in a community that feels both targeted and abandoned.
Related News:
Minnesota Terror Claims and Voter Fraud Shake Walz’s 2026 Re-election Hopes
-
News2 months agoPeace Prize Awared to Venezuela’s María Corina Machado
-
Politics2 months agoFar Left Socialist Democrats Have Taken Control of the Entire Party
-
Politics2 months agoHistorian Victor Davis Hanson Talks on Trump’s Vision for a Safer America
-
News2 months agoSouth Africa’s Audacious Bid to Teach America a Lesson
-
Politics2 months agoThe Democratic Party’s Leadership Vacuum Fuels Chaos and Exodus
-
Politics2 months agoDemocrats Fascist and Nazi Rhetoric Just Isn’t Resognating With Voters
-
Politics2 months agoChicago’s Mayor Puts Partisan Poison Over People’s Safety as Trump Troops Roll In
-
News2 months agoThe Radical Left’s Courtship of Islam is a Road to Self-Defeat




