News

“No Kings” Protests Funded By American Communist in China

Published

2 weeks ago

March 31, 2026

VORNews

No Kings Protests Funded By American Communist in China

On March 28, 2026, millions of people joined more than 3,300 “No Kings” protest events across all 50 states. Organizers said the rallies pushed back on President Donald Trump’s agenda, including the war with Iran, immigration enforcement, and rising economic stress.

But behind the crowds sat a much larger support system. Reports point to a network of roughly 500 activist groups, with a combined $3 billion in annual revenue, helping drive turnout on a national scale.

Many people who showed up came to protest peacefully. Still, investigators say some socialist and communist groups played a deeper role and used the moment to push calls for “revolution.” Two names appear again and again: the Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL) and The People’s Forum. Both groups have also been linked to organizing and mobilizing at earlier protest actions.

What Started the “No Kings” Protests?

The “No Kings” movement began in 2025 as opposition to Trump’s second term. The first major event, held in June 2025, reportedly drew about 5 million people. Then the second round in October 2025 reached around 7 million. By March 2026, estimates put turnout at 8 to 9 million nationwide, making it one of the largest one-day protest efforts in modern U.S. history.

Protesters rallied around several main concerns:

U.S. involvement in the Iran conflict, along with higher gas prices
Immigration raids and enforcement by ICE
Broader accusations that the administration showed authoritarian tendencies

Groups such as Indivisible described the protests as grassroots and locally run, with volunteers handling most of the planning. Even so, critics say a movement this large doesn’t happen without serious national backing, coordination, and money.

The $3 Billion Network Behind the Turnout

A Fox News Digital report said about 500 organizations, with roughly $3 billion in yearly revenue, supported the “No Kings” protests. That network included both mainstream left-leaning advocacy groups and groups that openly identify as socialist or communist.

Indivisible, which has ties to major Democratic donors, stood out as one of the more visible leaders. At the same time, more radical groups also urged supporters to take part. Some socialist organizations framed the protests as a chance to move people toward broader revolutionary goals. In some cases, activists also pushed for a nationwide economic strike on May Day, a date long tied to communist movements.

That funding structure has raised doubts about whether the protests were fully “people-powered.” Large budgets can cover permits, transportation, training, event guides, and organizing tools. As a result, national groups can turn local anger into large public demonstrations.

The Role of PSL and The People’s Forum

Two organizations keep showing up in discussions about protest coordination: the Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL) and The People’s Forum.

The Party for Socialism and Liberation is a Marxist-Leninist group that supports revolutionary political change. It has organized or backed actions linked to “No Kings” and similar protest efforts. It also works with allied coalitions on broader mobilization campaigns.
The People’s Forum is a New York-based nonprofit that presents itself as a hub for movement building. It has hosted events, offered meeting space, and worked with PSL and groups such as the ANSWER Coalition. The organization has also taken part in anti-war, pro-Palestine, and anti-ICE activism.

Along with partners like Code Pink and the Freedom Road Socialist Organization, these groups have pushed more radical messages inside the wider “No Kings” coalition. Reports say they also helped support and energize agitators during earlier periods of unrest.

Neville Roy Singham and the Money Behind the Far Left

A major figure in this funding network is Neville Roy Singham, a former U.S. tech executive who now lives in Shanghai, China.

Singham founded Thoughtworks, a global IT consulting company. Around 2017, he sold his stake for an estimated $785 million to $1 billion. After that, he directed much of his wealth toward left-wing causes in the United States and abroad.

Several details about Singham stand out:

He has described himself as a Marxist and a supporter of socialist causes.
He moved to Shanghai, where he still has business interests and shares office space with groups that promote Chinese achievements.
His wife, Jodie Evans, co-founded Code Pink, an activist group often connected to similar protest efforts.

Reports from The New York Times and congressional investigators say Singham has moved money through U.S. nonprofits and donor-advised funds. According to those reports, that money has helped support a wider network of media outlets, think tanks, and activist groups that often repeat Chinese government talking points.

Singham has denied taking orders from any government. Even so, his funding network has drawn heavy attention because of its support for pro-CCP narratives on both global affairs and U.S. politics.

Singham’s Links to the Chinese Communist Party

Singham’s ties to China appear to go beyond where he lives. Investigations have pointed to several connections.

He has worked with people and organizations tied to Chinese state media and propaganda efforts.
He has attended or supported events that line up with CCP priorities.
His funding has reached groups that defend China’s position abroad while attacking U.S. policy at home.

Congressional committees, including the House Ways and Means Committee under Chairman Jason Smith, have looked into those connections. Lawmakers sent letters seeking records from The People’s Forum, citing more than $20 million that allegedly came from Singham-linked sources between 2017 and 2022.

Some lawmakers argue that tax-exempt nonprofits may be shielding foreign-linked political influence. Because Singham lives outside the United States, subpoenas and other legal tools can be harder to use. Some reports say federal authorities are reviewing his activities, although public details remain limited.

Critics say this kind of backing creates a “smokeless war,” shaping public opinion and activism without open foreign control. Supporters of the groups reject that claim and say the money goes toward lawful social justice work.

Congress Pushes for More Transparency

Several House and Senate panels have reviewed parts of Singham’s network.

The Ways and Means Committee has focused on nonprofit funding and possible foreign agent concerns.
The Oversight Committee has sought briefings about possible Foreign Agents Registration Act, or FARA, violations.
Other inquiries have examined dark money moving through shell groups and mailbox nonprofits.

These investigations center on a basic concern, whether U.S. nonprofits are being used as channels for foreign influence. Reports say Singham’s network has supported campus protests, anti-ICE campaigns, and now activity tied to the “No Kings” movement.

People defending the protests say most participants have no ties to radical groups. They also stress that the events were nonviolent and reflected broad opposition to Trump policies. Organizers continue to say the movement is decentralized, and that shared resources were limited to training and basic support.

What the “No Kings” Protests Show About American Activism

The “No Kings” protests highlight a long-running tension in American political activism. Large crowds can reflect real public anger and real community concerns. At the same time, well-funded ideological groups can shape messaging, boost turnout, and guide the broader story people hear.

Several issues remain at the center of the debate:

How much influence do radical groups have over the tone of the movement?
Should funding tied to foreign-linked donors face tougher review?
Can mass protests stay peaceful when more extreme rhetoric enters the mix?

Americans have every right to protest. Still, public trust depends on knowing who is organizing events, where the money comes from, and what goals sit behind the slogans.

As “No Kings” continues, more attention is likely to fall on the $3 billion support network, the role of PSL and The People’s Forum, and Neville Roy Singham’s far-reaching funding ties. Congress and outside watchdogs say they plan to keep pressing for answers.

What may look like a spontaneous wave of public outrage can also reflect years of planning, nonprofit coordination, ideological organizing, and, in some cases, international connections.

Up Next

Is Ilhan Omar at Risk of Deportation? The Facts and U.S. Immigration Law

Don't Miss

Tulsi Gabbard Opens Investigation into USAID 2024 Election Plot

News

Trump Warns China as Vance Leads Peace Talks with Iran

Published

12 hours ago

April 12, 2026

VORNews

WASHINGTON, D.C. – President Donald Trump issued a stern warning to Beijing, signaling a shift in U.S. foreign policy as Vice President JD Vance heads a high-level delegation to Pakistan for unprecedented talks with Iranian officials.

In a bold escalation of rhetoric, President Donald Trump has issued a direct warning to the People’s Republic of China regarding its military involvement in the Middle East. Speaking from the Oval Office, the President made it clear that any attempt by Beijing to supply weaponry to Iran would be met with severe consequences.

“China is going to have big problems—very big problems—if they decide to ship weapons to Iran,” Trump stated. “We are looking for peace, but we are also looking at the facts. You cannot play both sides of the fence when the stability of the world is at stake.”

The warning comes as intelligence reports suggest increased logistics cooperation between Beijing and Tehran. For the Trump administration, the message is twofold: a demand for Chinese neutrality and a demonstration of American leverage over global trade routes and sanctions.

Potential Consequences for China

The administration has hinted at several “levers” it could pull should Beijing ignore this warning:

Secondary Sanctions: Targeting Chinese banks and firms that facilitate arms transfers.
Trade Restrictions: Implementing further tariffs or export controls on sensitive technology.
Diplomatic Isolation: Working with allies to limit Chinese influence in Middle Eastern security frameworks.

The Islamabad Summit: A High-Stakes Peace Mission

While the President maintains a hardline stance toward external interference, a different scene is unfolding in Pakistan. Vice President JD Vance is currently leading a specialized U.S. delegation to Islamabad for a Saturday meeting with high-ranking Iranian officials.

This mission represents one of the most significant diplomatic gambles of the Trump presidency. The goal is clear: to establish a “path to peace” and de-escalate years of mounting tension that have brought the region to the brink of open conflict.

The Delegation Members

The composition of the U.S. team suggests a blend of traditional diplomacy and transactional deal-making:

Vice President JD Vance: Representing the administration’s “America First” foreign policy, focused on ending “endless wars” while maintaining U.S. strength.
Steve Witkoff: A trusted confidant of the President and special envoy known for his pragmatic approach to complex negotiations.
Jared Kushner: The architect of the Abraham Accords, returning to the diplomatic fold to leverage his existing relationships in the region.

Why Pakistan?

The choice of Pakistan as a venue is no accident. Islamabad has long maintained a delicate balancing act between its relationship with the United States and its neighbor, Iran. By choosing this neutral ground, both Washington and Tehran are signaling a willingness to step outside the usual frameworks of Western-led summits.

Sources close to the delegation suggest that Pakistan’s leadership has been instrumental in facilitating the logistics for this meeting, acting as a “quiet bridge” between the two adversaries.

The Iranian Perspective

Tehran’s decision to meet with the Vance-led delegation follows months of economic pressure and internal debate. While the Iranian leadership remains publicly cautious, the presence of figures like Kushner—who has a track record of facilitating regional agreements—indicates that the talks may move beyond rhetoric into the realm of tangible concessions.

Key discussion points are expected to include:

Sanctions Relief: Iran is seeking a pathway to re-enter global energy markets.
Regional Security: A cessation of hostilities involving proxy groups.
Nuclear Limitations: Reviving a framework for monitoring Iranian nuclear capabilities that satisfies U.S. security requirements.

Global Reactions and AI Search Trends

The news has sent ripples through global markets and digital spaces. International observers are questioning whether this “Carrot and Stick” approach—threatening China while talking to Iran—can produce a lasting equilibrium.

Market Impact:

Oil Prices: Crude futures showed volatility following the announcement, as traders weighed the possibility of a “peace dividend” against the threat of new sanctions on China.
Defense Stocks: Renewed interest in maritime security and surveillance technology as the U.S. monitors Chinese shipping lanes.

Challenges to the Peace Path

Despite the optimistic headlines, significant hurdles remain. Hardliners in both Washington and Tehran are skeptical of a “quick fix.” Furthermore, China’s reaction to Trump’s warning could redefine the success of the Pakistan summit. If Beijing feels backed into a corner, it may increase its support for Iran simply to counter American influence.

Conclusion: A New Era of Diplomacy?

The events of this Saturday could define the foreign policy legacy of the current administration. By combining aggressive economic threats against spoilers like China with direct, high-level engagement with adversaries like Iran, President Trump is attempting to rewrite the diplomatic playbook.

Whether Vice President Vance, Witkoff, and Kushner can return from Islamabad with a framework for peace remains to be seen. However, the world is now on notice: the United States is willing to talk, but it is equally prepared to act.

News

Eric Swalwell Faces Explosive Rape Accusation From Former Staffer

Published

13 hours ago

April 12, 2026

VORNews

SACRAMENTO, CA — U.S. Representative Eric Swalwell, a prominent Democrat and a front-runner in the 2026 California gubernatorial race, is facing a political and legal firestorm following a series of explosive sexual misconduct allegations.

On Friday, the San Francisco Chronicle and CNN reported that a former congressional staffer has accused Swalwell of raping her, while three other women have come forward with claims of sexual harassment and inappropriate behavior.

The allegations have sent shockwaves through the Democratic Party, leading to a mass exodus of campaign staff and a chorus of calls for Swalwell’s resignation from high-ranking officials, including former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries.

The most serious charge comes from an unnamed woman who previously worked in Swalwell’s district office. In interviews, the woman detailed two non-consensual encounters:

2019 Incident: The staffer claims she was sexually assaulted by Swalwell in California while she was an employee in his office. She stated she was “heavily intoxicated” and unable to provide consent.
2024 Incident: A second alleged assault occurred in a New York hotel room after she had left his staff. The woman told CNN she was “pushing him off” and saying no, but he did not stop.
Physical Evidence: The accuser described being left “bruised and bleeding” following the 2024 encounter. Reports indicate that friends and family members have corroborated that she spoke to them about the trauma shortly after it occurred.

The Manhattan District Attorney’s Office confirmed on Saturday that it has opened an investigation into the New York allegations, urging any potential witnesses to contact their Special Victims Division.

A Pattern of Misconduct: Three Other Accusers

Beyond the former staffer’s harrowing account, three additional women have come forward to detail a pattern of alleged sexual harassment by the Congressman. These claims include:

Unsolicited Explicit Material: Two women allege receiving unwanted sexual messages and explicit images from Swalwell.
Unwelcome Advances: Accusers described a history of “unwelcome advances” and “inappropriate touching” that occurred over several years.
Retaliation Claims: Some women reported receiving “cease-and-desist” letters from Swalwell’s legal team shortly before the stories went public, which critics describe as an attempt to silence victims.

Rep. Swalwell has vehemently denied the allegations of sexual assault, calling them “politically motivated lies” timed to sabotage his bid for Governor. In a video statement released Friday night, a defiant Swalwell addressed the public.

“These allegations of sexual assault are flat false. They did not happen,” Swalwell said. While he admitted to “mistakes in judgment” regarding his marriage—issuing a public apology to his wife, Brittany Ann Watts—he maintained that no criminal or non-consensual acts ever took place. His legal team argues that the former staffer maintained a “voluntary and cooperative relationship” with him for years, even seeking job references after the alleged incidents.

Political Fallout and Resignations

The impact on Swalwell’s campaign has been immediate and devastating. His bid to succeed Governor Gavin Newsom appears to be in a state of collapse as key supporters withdraw their endorsements.

Major Developments in the Scandal:

Staff Resignations: Senior campaign advisers, including Courtni Pugh, and several congressional staffers have resigned, stating they are “horrified” by the reports.
Loss of Endorsements: High-profile Democrats, including California Senators Adam Schiff and Alex Padilla, have called for him to drop out of the race.
Democratic Leadership Response: Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries called the allegations “deeply disturbing” and urged a swift, transparent investigation.
Suspended Funding: “Californians for a Fighter,” a major super PAC supporting Swalwell, has suspended its operations.

As the Manhattan DA begins its probe, the House Ethics Committee is also expected to face pressure to open a formal inquiry. While Swalwell has vowed to “fight with everything I have,” the severity of the “bruised and bleeding” testimony, combined with the testimony of three other women, has created a hurdle that many political analysts believe is insurmountable.

The June non-partisan primary is just weeks away. For now, the Congressman remains in his seat, though his future in both the Capitol and the Governor’s mansion hangs by a thread.

Trending News:

Eric Swalwell’s Governor Campaign in Crisis After Multiple Assault Allegations Surface

News

Moon Mission Success: Artemis II Crew Splashes Down Safely in the Pacific

Published

14 hours ago

April 12, 2026

VORNews

Moon Mission Success: Artemis II Crew Splashes Down Safely in the Pacific

SAN DIEGO – The roar of the engines has been replaced by the gentle lapping of Pacific waves. Today, humanity took its biggest leap toward the lunar surface in over fifty years as the Artemis II mission concluded with a perfect splashdown off the coast of California.

The Orion spacecraft, scorched from its fiery re-entry through Earth’s atmosphere, bobbed in the water as Navy recovery teams moved in. Onboard were four pioneers who now hold a place in the history books, having completed a ten-day journey that took them further into deep space than any human has ever traveled.

The recovery operation was a precision dance between NASA and the U.S. Navy. The USS San Diego stood by as helicopters and inflatable boats surrounded the capsule.

The crew—Commander Reid Wiseman, Pilot Victor Glover, and Mission Specialists Christina Koch and Jeremy Hansen—emerged from the hatch to the cheers of recovery teams. Despite the physical toll of returning from microgravity, the astronauts appeared in high spirits, waving to the cameras that captured the moment for millions watching around the globe.

Key Milestones of the Artemis II Mission

This wasn’t just a flight; it was a stress test for the future of human exploration. During their 10.3-day mission, the crew achieved several historic firsts:

Deep Space Record: The crew traveled thousands of miles beyond the far side of the moon, setting a record for the furthest distance from Earth reached by a crewed spacecraft.
Life Support Validation: This was the first time the Orion’s life support systems were tested with humans on board in the harsh environment of deep space.
Diverse Representation: The mission included the first woman, the first person of color, and the first non-American (Canadian) to fly to the vicinity of the moon.

The Fiery Path Home

The return to Earth is often the most dangerous part of any lunar mission. Orion hit the top of the atmosphere traveling at nearly 25,000 miles per hour.

As the spacecraft pushed against the air, the heat shield endured temperatures of about 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit—half as hot as the surface of the sun. For several minutes, the friction of re-entry caused a total communications blackout, a tense period of silence that ended only when the first drogue parachutes blossomed against the blue California sky.

“Everything worked exactly as the simulations predicted,” said a NASA flight director during a press briefing shortly after the landing. “The heat shield performed flawlessly, and the skip-entry maneuver allowed us to pinpoint the landing site with incredible accuracy.”

Why Artemis II Matters

While Artemis II did not land on the moon, it paved the way for those who will. By proving that the Space Launch System (SLS) rocket and the Orion capsule can safely transport humans to lunar orbit and back, NASA has cleared the final major hurdle before Artemis III.

Artemis III, currently scheduled for late 2026 or 2027, aims to put boots back on the lunar South Pole. This mission will include the first woman and person of color to actually walk on the moon’s surface.

What Happens Next?

Now that the crew is back on solid ground, the work for NASA scientists is just beginning.

Medical Evaluations: The astronauts will undergo weeks of testing to see how deep-space radiation and weightlessness affect their bodies.
Data Analysis: Engineers will strip down the Orion capsule to study how the hardware held up.
Future Training: The lessons learned from this flight will be integrated into the training for the Artemis III crew.

A New Era of Discovery

The success of Artemis II signals a shift in how we view space. We are no longer just visiting; we are preparing to stay. With the planned Lunar Gateway station and future base camps on the surface, the moon is becoming a stepping stone for the eventual journey to Mars.

As the sun sets over the Pacific today, the world looks up at the moon with a little more familiarity. We’ve been back, we’ve seen the far side with our own eyes, and soon, we will be walking among the craters once again.