WASHINGTON, D.C. – As anger rises over one of the biggest welfare fraud cases in U.S. history, shaking Minnesota, Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar is drawing renewed attention. Her household net worth has been reported as high as $30 million, driven mainly by her husband Tim Mynett’s business interests.

Those include a venture capital firm that recently removed key leadership details from its website as questions increased. Ilhan Omar’s congressional financial disclosures show a major change over time. When she entered Congress in 2019, her filings showed negative net worth. Her debts, including student loans, were larger than her listed assets.

By her 2024 disclosure, filed in May 2025, the picture looked very different. The couple’s combined assets were reported in broad ranges that add up to between $6 million and $30 million. That total has been described as a possible 3,500% jump from the prior year.

Most of the value appears tied to Mynett’s stakes in two companies:

• Rose Lake Capital LLC, a Washington, D.C.-based venture capital firm valued at $5 million to $25 million
• eStCru LLC (eStCru Wines), a California winery valued at $1 million to $5 million

Earlier filings were far lower. In 2023, Rose Lake Capital was listed at $1 to $1,000, and the winery at $15,001 to $50,000. The sudden change has drawn attention, especially after earlier reporting on lawsuits involving Mynett’s businesses that alleged investor fraud. Those claims were reported as settled.

Ilhan Omar has pushed back on claims that she is personally wealthy. In statements and social posts, she has said she is “barely worth thousands, let alone millions” and still has student loan and credit card debt. Critics point out that congressional disclosures report household assets, including spousal business interests, and they use wide value ranges instead of exact numbers.

Rose Lake Capital Removes Officer and Advisor Details From Its Website

Rose Lake Capital, co-founded by Mynett in 2022, also drew attention for changes to its website. Archived versions reviewed by multiple outlets show the firm removed names and biographies of nine officers and advisors between September and October 2025.

The removed names included figures with Democratic ties, such as:

• Former U.S. Ambassador to China Max Baucus
• Former Ambassador to Bahrain Adam Ereli
• Former Amalgamated Bank CEO Keith Mestrich, who previously called the bank the “institutional bank of the Democratic Party.”
• Other financiers linked to the DN.C

The edits came as federal fraud cases in Minnesota continued to expand. The firm has not offered a public explanation for the changes. Outreach to Mynett or the firm has reportedly not received a response. The company address is still listed as a shared WeWork location, even as the firm has described managing billions in prior assets through global networks.

Paul Kamenar, counsel for the conservative National Legal and Policy Center (NLPC), told reporters there are “a lot of strange things going on,” and urged Omar to “come clean” about the assets. The NLPC has also indicated it may look at possible ethics issues.

Connection to Minnesota’s Nearly $1 Billion Fraud Crisis

The questions around wealth come at a tense moment in Minnesota. The state has faced fraud schemes that total close to $1 billion across programs tied to child nutrition, autism services, and housing stabilization. Many cases have involved members of Minnesota’s Somali community, which Omar represents.

The best-known case centers on Feeding Our Future, a nonprofit accused of taking $250 million to $300 million in federal child nutrition funds intended to feed children during the COVID-19 pandemic. More than 80 people have been charged, with dozens convicted. Many of those charged are of Somali descent. Federal investigators have also looked at possible money laundering ties abroad.

Ilhan Omar has taken criticism for sponsoring the 2020 MEALS Act, which loosened oversight on federal reimbursements to speed aid delivery. Critics say those changes were later used in fraud schemes. Omar has defended the law, saying it “did help feed kids” and that she has no regrets.

Her campaign reportedly accepted donations from people later convicted of the fraud and later returned the money. Omar and Mynett have not been charged, and Omar has denied any wrongdoing.

The Treasury Department and Justice Department are investigating potential broader money laundering links. Republican figures, including President Trump, have amplified the story and aimed criticism at Omar and Gov. Tim Walz.

Ilhan Omar’s Response and the Political Fallout

Ilhan Omar’s office has described the wealth claims as part of a “coordinated right-wing disinformation campaign.” In a TikTok post, she joked about wishing the rumored millions into existence to pay off her student loans.

Fact-checkers, including Snopes, have added context to the disclosure reports. They note the reported wealth comes mostly from spousal business valuations listed in wide congressional ranges, not direct cash income, and that Omar has said she still carries debt.

Even with that context, the optics remain tough. Omar is a progressive member of the “Squad” who has backed Medicare for All and student debt relief, while her household asset values have surged on paper. Critics say the rapid change calls for clearer answers, especially as her state deals with major fraud cases.

As federal investigations continue and watchdog groups apply pressure, Ilhan Omar’s situation highlights an ongoing debate about ethics rules, spousal assets, and public trust. No formal investigation has been announced against her, but scrutiny remains focused on how a firm once valued near zero rose so quickly in reported worth, and what that means for confidence in Minnesota’s leadership.

This story continues to develop at the point where personal finances, political influence, and public scandal meet under intense public attention.

Related News:

Pressure Builds for Tim Walz to Resign After Viral Video of Somali Daycare Fraud

YouTuber Nick Shirley Exposes BILLIONS of Somali Fraud, Video Goes VIRAL

MINNESOTA – Governor Tim Walz is at the center of a fast-growing controversy that has drawn national attention. A viral video from independent YouTuber Nick Shirley put a spotlight on alleged fraud inside the state’s publicly funded child care system.

The claims, which include “ghost” daycare centers collecting large subsidies, triggered sharp public backlash and renewed calls for accountability from state leaders. The uproar has also added fuel to demands for Governor Tim Walz to resign.

At the same time, questions have surfaced about a major jump in the reported value of companies tied to Rep. Ilhan Omar’s husband, Tim Mynett, as investigators look at wider corruption concerns. With federal agents moving into Minneapolis, many Minnesotans say they want clear answers and real consequences.

Viral Video Puts Daycare Subsidies Under the Microscope

The controversy took off after a 42-minute YouTube video titled “I Investigated Minnesota’s Billion Dollar Fraud Scandal.” The video was posted days before Christmas by Nick Shirley, a 23-year-old conservative influencer.

With a small crew and a camera, Shirley went to close to a dozen daycare sites in Minneapolis. Many were reportedly owned by Somali immigrants and received public support through programs such as the Child Care Assistance Program (CCAP).

In the footage, Shirley shows empty buildings, locked doors, and no visible staff or children. Viewers also saw signage with errors, including one sign reading “Quality Learing Center.” Shirley said one location that looked unused had still received more than $4 million in public money.

The video spread quickly, reaching millions of views and sparking loud debates online. Shirley claimed he identified more than $110 million in possible fraud in one day. He also pointed to earlier cases, including the Feeding Our Future scandal, where $250 million meant for child meals during the COVID-19 pandemic was allegedly stolen.

Some critics, including media outlets, accused Shirley of chasing shock value and targeting Somali-owned businesses. They also argued he showed up outside regular hours. Supporters pushed back and said he did the work others would not, calling him a citizen journalist who exposed abuse of taxpayer dollars.

Soon after, Homeland Security agents arrived in Minneapolis. DHS Secretary Kristi Noem described it as a “massive investigation on childcare and other rampant fraud.” The FBI and other federal agencies also increased activity, with officials calling the allegations a “tip of a very large iceberg.” Shirley later posted follow-up videos showing tense encounters with officials and said he faced threats, which highlighted how heated the situation had become.

Allegations Focus on Empty Centers

The main allegation centers on daycare providers that appear to exist on paper but not in practice. Shirley’s team tried to enroll a made-up child at several sites. In the video, many locations appeared closed, with no one answering the door and no children present.

One site tied to millions in funding became a flashpoint because the building looked inactive and the sign had a visible typo, raising concerns about oversight and licensing controls.

The claims land in a state already dealing with past fraud cases. Under Governor Walz’s administration, Minnesota has faced repeated accusations of weak monitoring across programs tied to Medicaid, child nutrition, and other public benefits.

Estimates shared by critics have reached into the billions. In the Feeding Our Future case, prosecutors charged dozens of people in a scheme that allegedly took $250 million meant to feed kids during the pandemic.

Authorities said some of the money went to luxury purchases, real estate, and overseas transfers, including claims tied to groups such as Al-Shabaab. Whistleblowers, including disability advocate Nathaniel Olson, have said warnings were raised for years without strong action.

Supporters of the child care system say the picture is more complicated. They note that many small providers run home-based programs, which are common in immigrant communities. They also say a quick visit, especially outside business hours, can give a misleading impression.

Tim Walz and other state leaders say they have worked to stop fraud and have asked lawmakers for more tools. Still, the Trump administration’s move to freeze federal child care payments to Minnesota until audits are finished has reinforced the belief, for many critics, that the problem is serious.

Public Anger Spreads Online

The timing has hit Minnesota Democrats hard, adding to existing frustration about costs, taxes, and government waste. Social media is filled with posts under hashtags such as #MinnesotaFraud and #WalzResign. Many commenters compared reports of alleged fraud with the daily struggles of families trying to afford child care and housing.

The outrage grew after high-profile voices amplified the story, including posts shared by Elon Musk and Donald Trump Jr. One online post even offered $100,000 to anyone who could disprove Shirley’s claims.

Locally, residents raised concerns at public meetings and in online petitions. A Change.org petition calling for Tim Walz to resign drew thousands of signatures. Minnesota GOP Chair David Hann echoed the mood, saying taxpayers feel taken advantage of. Some Democrats have also voiced concern, while others say the backlash is being used to target Somali communities and stir division.

National politicians also joined the conversation. Sen. JD Vance called for FBI involvement and described it as a “Somali fraud probe,” a label that drew strong reactions. Protests outside the state capitol brought crowds calling for transparency. Shirley’s team also reported confrontations while filming, including being shoved out of a Somali-owned business.

Pressure Mounts on Governor Tim Walz

Minnesota Republicans moved quickly after the video went viral. Several GOP lawmakers called on Walz to resign, arguing that repeated fraud cases show a breakdown in oversight and leadership.

They pointed to the state Constitution and accused the governor of failing to protect public funds. House Majority Whip Tom Emmer cited the daycare site with the misspelled sign while pressing Tim Walz on how licensing and payment systems could miss problems that appear obvious on camera.

Walz has defended his administration’s record and said state agencies have pursued fraud cases, including actions tied to Feeding Our Future. Critics say the state ignored early warnings and allowed the problem to grow. State Sen. Karin Housley called for Walz to step down as federal raids expanded, saying Minnesota has become a place where fraud is too easy.

The situation escalated after the Trump administration stepped in more forcefully. Attorney General Pam Bondi announced 98 charges connected to the broader set of scandals. Polling has shown Tim Walz’s approval rating slipping as voters express frustration and doubt about state oversight.

Ilhan Omar’s Husband Faces New Attention

The wider controversy has also pulled Rep. Ilhan Omar into the headlines. Financial disclosures showed a sharp rise in the reported value of companies tied to her husband, Tim Mynett. The filings list values moving from modest amounts to figures as high as $30 million. Mynett’s firm, Rose Lake Capital, started in 2022. The company also removed names from its website during the scrutiny, which raised more questions online.

A conservative watchdog group said it is reviewing the disclosures and looking for possible connections to Minnesota programs now under investigation. Omar has rejected the accusations, said she is not a millionaire, and called the criticism partisan. Republicans argue the overlap between her district and areas linked to alleged fraud makes transparency even more important. Calls for federal review and conflict-of-interest checks have continued as agencies investigate.

Federal agencies have taken a bigger role, including freezing funds and sending agents to investigate. Supporters of the move say Minnesota needed outside pressure to force audits and tighter controls. DHS has also reviewed immigration-related fraud claims, including marriage fraud, while the FBI has focused on networks described as Somali-linked.

Some critics have also attacked major media outlets. They say coverage has focused too much on trying to discredit Shirley, instead of fully examining the fraud claims and oversight failures.

As 2025 ends, the Minnesota child care fraud allegations have become a warning about what can happen when public programs grow faster than enforcement. With billions of dollars and public trust on the line, Minnesotans want results, not talking points. Whether the pressure leads to a resignation, new charges, or deeper reforms is still unknown. The anger and scrutiny are not fading.

WASHINGTON D.C. –  After reports of conservative activist Charlie Kirk’s assassination in September 2025, public debate on the right turned into an open fight. Big conservative voices began trading accusations over what some describe as a “Zionist attempt” to gain influence inside Turning Point USA (TPUSA), the youth group Kirk founded.

The claims have focused on Ben Shapiro, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), and radio host Mark Levin. Critics say a behind-the-scenes push is underway, tied to long-running arguments about Israel and “America First” priorities. The feud has pulled in well-known names like Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannon, Megyn Kelly, Candace Owens, and Nick Fuentes, showing divisions that could reshape conservative politics.

According to early reporting and online discussion, Kirk was shot on September 10, 2025, during a speech at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah. Authorities reportedly arrested 22-year-old Tyler Robinson, pointing to recent radicalization as part of the motive. Since then, rumors and conspiracy claims have spread fast, and some conservatives have questioned official accounts while blaming outside forces.

The Assassination and Its Aftermath

Kirk’s reported death triggered a wave of reactions across conservative media, along with public statements from elected officials, including talk of a Senate resolution honoring him. The mourning period did not last long online. Posts on X (formerly Twitter) quickly shifted to suspicion.

Some accounts blamed Israeli interests, pointing to claims that Kirk had refused funding connected to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Others said Kirk had been placing more focus on “America First” policies instead of automatic support for Israel.

In that climate, critics argue that pro-Israel voices moved quickly to gain ground inside TPUSA. Ben Shapiro, the Daily Wire co-founder and a strong supporter of Israel, gave $1 million to TPUSA soon after the reported assassination and later guest-hosted Kirk’s podcast.

Opponents framed those moves as a “hostile takeover.” On X, users claimed Shapiro, along with the ADL and Levin, was working to steer TPUSA toward a more Israel-focused direction.

The ADL, a Jewish group known for tracking antisemitism, has also taken heat from critics who say it labels too many voices as bigoted. Mark Levin has publicly defended Shapiro as the backlash grew, which added fuel to the argument.

Shapiro’s AmericaFest Speech Sets Off a Firestorm

The conflict hit a new peak at TPUSA’s AmericaFest conference in December 2025, described as the first major TPUSA event after Kirk’s death. Shapiro, who was not listed on an earlier speaker lineup Kirk had announced in August, took the stage and criticized conservatives he said were refusing to call out antisemitism. He singled out Candace Owens and others, and he argued that parts of the movement were giving space to ugly ideas.

Shapiro also criticized Tucker Carlson for interviewing Nick Fuentes, a self-described white nationalist, and said the platforming of Fuentes helped normalize extremist views.

The response was immediate. Steve Bannon, the former Trump strategist and host of War Room, hit back in his own remarks, calling Shapiro a “cancer” and accusing him of putting Israel ahead of the United States.

Bannon said Shapiro’s influence reflected a return to neoconservative foreign policy, which he argued the MAGA base has rejected. He also claimed Shapiro and allies were trying to pull TPUSA toward “greater Israel” priorities. Bannon suggested the fight could shape the road to 2028, calling it “a proxy on ’28.”

Influencers Go All In

Candace Owens, who previously worked with The Daily Wire and later split with Shapiro amid accusations of antisemitism, has stayed near the center of the storm. On her show, Owens accused Shapiro of misrepresenting her comments about Kirk’s widow, Erika Kirk.

She also suggested Shapiro’s actions showed he had insight into TPUSA’s internal plans. Owens praised Megyn Kelly for pushing back on what she called Shapiro’s misleading claims. She has described the broader fight as resistance to “moral blackmail” aimed at forcing strict pro-Israel messaging.

Megyn Kelly has echoed that theme, blasting what she calls “Israel purity tests” tied to figures like Shapiro and the ADL. In recent comments, Kelly described Shapiro’s behavior as a “betrayal” and said AmericaFest highlighted deep cracks in the MAGA coalition. She wrote on X that, instead of staying focused on the country’s problems, people were turning on each other.

Tucker Carlson, after leaving Fox News and building an independent platform, has become a main target in the dispute. Shapiro’s criticism of Carlson for interviewing Fuentes and Holocaust revisionists has sharpened the divide.

Carlson has defended the interviews as free speech and open debate, and his supporters say Shapiro’s approach looks like cancel culture.

Nick Fuentes has used the chaos to build attention. He has mocked Shapiro, claimed his career is “finished,” and urged supporters to oppose what he calls “ZioConservatism.” Fuentes also went live on Rumble to respond, rejecting Shapiro’s “no to the groypers” stance and pushing a hardline “America First” message.

What It Could Mean for TSUSA and the GOP

The fight reflects a wider split in the Republican Party. Traditional pro-Israel hawks are clashing with a louder “America First” wing that wants less foreign involvement. The ADL has pointed to rising antisemitic incidents in the United States, which has increased tension around these debates. Critics of the ADL argue that the group uses that data to shut down legitimate criticism of foreign policy.

Some conservative institutions have taken sides. Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts defended Carlson during the controversy, which added another layer to the divide.

Erika Kirk, described by supporters as stepping into a leadership role at TPUSA after her husband’s reported death, has faced online pressure as well. Viral posts have demanded transparency, tied to the takeover claims.

Allies like Joel Berry praised Shapiro’s AmericaFest speech as “moral courage.” Detractors saw the moment as opportunistic, and one popular line on X summed up the mood: “TPUSA as we knew it died with Charlie.”

With Trump back in the White House, this kind of infighting could shape debates on Israel, foreign aid, and domestic priorities. For now, the scorched-earth tone has not cooled. Influencers are fighting for control of the message, and the unity Kirk once promoted looks harder to maintain.

Related News:

Tucker Carlson Presses Qatari PM on the Shifting Power and Gaza