ATLANTA. Ga – CNN chief data analyst Harry Enten delivered a headline-making moment this week. During an on-air breakdown, he pointed to a new poll showing President Donald Trump with a full 100 percent approval rating among voters who call themselves MAGA. Not one person in that group said they disapproved.

That goes beyond strong support. It’s total support. And it comes while critics have argued that Trump’s coalition is starting to crack over the war in Iran.

Enten, known for his blunt and data-driven style, said the numbers were the kind that “jump off the screen.” Since then, the clip has spread widely online. Supporters praised it, while critics argued over how much the result really tells us.

Harry Enten’s CNN Breakdown: “You Can’t Go Higher Than 100%”

On Wednesday’s episode of CNN News Central, Enten joined the show to discuss Trump’s current standing. The segment centered on whether there was any real split inside MAGA. Some critics had pointed to people like Tucker Carlson, who has attacked Trump’s military moves in Iran.

Enten pushed back quickly, using fresh numbers from an NBC News poll.

“Sometimes you look at the polling data and there are numbers that just jump off the screen at you, and this is one of those,” Enten said.

He then showed the chart on air. The numbers were simple: among MAGA Republicans, Trump’s approval stood at 100 percent, while disapproval stood at 0 percent.

“You don’t have to be a mathematical genius to know you can’t go higher than 100%,” Enten said with a smile. “He is the 1972 Miami Dolphins.”

That comparison landed hard. The 1972 Miami Dolphins are still the only undefeated team in NFL history, finishing 17-0 and winning the Super Bowl. Enten used that image to make one point clear, Trump’s bond with his core supporters remains as strong as ever.

CNN anchor Sara Sidner summed it up in one line: “MAGA has the floor.” Enten answered right away, “MAGA has the floor, 100%.”

What the NBC News Poll Found

The poll came from Hart Research and Public Opinion Strategies and surveyed about 1,000 registered voters. The overall margin of error is plus or minus 3.1 points. Even so, the MAGA subgroup drew the most attention because of how one-sided the result was.

Here are the key findings:

• 100% of self-identified MAGA voters approve of President Trump
• 0% disapprove of President Trump among MAGA supporters
• 90% of MAGA voters approve of U.S. strikes on Iran
• Only 5% disapprove of the Iran action within the MAGA group
• 30% of Americans now identify as MAGA, up from 28% right after the 2024 election

Enten stressed a key point during the segment. Some Republicans may disapprove of Trump, but he said those voters are not part of the MAGA movement. His takeaway was direct: if someone identifies as MAGA, that person approves of Trump.

The MAGA Base Is Growing, Not Fading

A lot of political observers expected MAGA support to cool off after the election. Enten argued the data shows the opposite.

The share of Americans who say they are MAGA has inched up to 30 percent. That’s a modest gain from 28 percent in November 2024. So, according to Enten, Trump’s 100 percent approval with MAGA is not happening because the group got smaller or more isolated.

“That 100% that Donald Trump has among MAGA GOP, that is not an artifact of MAGA shrinking,” he said. “It’s just an indication of how strong Donald Trump’s grip is on that MAGA base.”

In other words, the group is still large and has even grown a bit. That cuts against recent claims that internal fights over Iran, immigration, and other issues are pulling the movement apart.

No Sign of a MAGA Break Over Iran

The timing makes the poll stand out even more. The U.S. military operation in Iran is now in its third week, and concerns over oil prices and a wider conflict have spread.

At the same time, some high-profile figures on the right have spoken out. Tucker Carlson called the campaign “absolutely disgusting and evil.” Other conservative voices have raised doubts as well. Because of that, many expected Trump’s support among his own voters to soften.

Enten rejected that idea. The segment itself carried the line, “Tucker Carlson be darned.”

He also pointed out that Trump had dismissed Carlson by saying he “is not MAGA.” The poll numbers appear to support that argument. Even under pressure, the self-identified MAGA base remains firmly behind Trump.

Outside that group, the picture looks very different. A Quinnipiac poll from March 9 found that 57 percent of Americans disapproved of Trump’s handling of Iran. Still, among MAGA voters, support remains nearly complete.

What 100% Approval Means for Trump’s Second Term

That kind of loyalty could matter a lot as Trump heads deeper into his second term and Republicans prepare for the 2026 midterms.

A united base can help in a few major ways:

• It can boost turnout in key races
• It can reduce the risk of right-wing primary challenges
• It can give Trump more freedom to push major policies

The 90 percent support for strikes on Iran inside MAGA also suggests Trump has room to act on foreign policy without losing his core supporters. Enten highlighted that number as another sign that the base is staying with him.

Still, Trump’s broader national numbers are weaker. The same NBC poll, along with others, shows trouble on issues like gas prices and the cost of living. Enten has described some of those broader figures as “nightmare stats” for Republicans heading into future elections.

Even so, the MAGA numbers stand apart. They show that the center of Trump’s movement is still fully committed.

Critics Say the Result May Be Obvious

Not everyone treated the 100 percent figure as a shock. Some analysts argued that the finding is almost built into the label itself.

After all, MAGA means “Make America Great Again,” and the slogan has been tied to Trump for years. So, asking self-described MAGA voters whether they approve of Trump may seem a lot like asking loyal fans whether they support their favorite team.

Mediaite and other outlets also noted that the MAGA subgroup is relatively small, around 200 people, which means the margin of error is wider for that slice of the poll. They also pointed out that MAGA identification had reached 36 percent earlier in 2025 before settling back to 30 percent.

Even so, Enten’s point was not that Trump is popular with random voters. His point was narrower. He used the data to challenge the claim that MAGA is breaking apart over Iran.

Trump’s Long Hold on MAGA Supporters

Trump introduced the MAGA slogan in 2015. It quickly became the center of his 2016 campaign and remained a powerful symbol through 2020. Even after leaving office in 2021, the movement stayed active through rallies, online communities, and a deeply loyal following.

His return in 2024 pushed MAGA back into the center of national politics. Now, in his second term, this new poll suggests that the connection between Trump and his core supporters has not weakened.

Enten, who also hosts CNN’s Margins of Error podcast, has followed these trends for years. He often delivers data points that cut across easy political storylines, and this week was another example.

Political Reactions Came Fast

Trump allies and conservative commentators quickly celebrated the clip. Eric Trump shared it online and called it the “nightmare stat” for Trump’s critics. Social media users posted jokes and graphics comparing Trump to the undefeated 1972 Dolphins.

On the left, reactions were mixed. Some dismissed the result as predictable. Others said it showed MAGA is still a serious political force that Democrats cannot afford to ignore.

The story also spread outside the U.S. press. Sky News Australia and other outlets picked it up quickly, pointing out that a CNN analyst had delivered a data point that strongly favored Trump.

No poll result stays fixed forever. The economy, global events, and the outcome of the Iran conflict could still test Trump’s support over time. For now, though, Enten’s message was simple. Among voters who proudly identify as MAGA, Trump has total approval. The number is hard to miss, and on CNN this week, it grabbed everyone’s attention.

Related News:

CNN Data Analyst Harry Enten Flags a Red State Boom and aBlue State Slump 

ATLANTA, Ga – A new twist has hit the early 2028 presidential race, and it could reshape the Republican field. CNN chief data analyst Harry Enten says fresh polling and prediction market numbers now show Secretary of State Marco Rubio rising into possible front-runner status. Rubio, once viewed as a long shot, is suddenly drawing serious attention as his odds climb fast, while Vice President JD Vance faces a tougher fight to stay on top.

In a recent CNN News Central segment, Enten highlighted Rubio’s sharp rise and tied it to strong Republican support for his foreign policy record. At the same time, Vance remains a major player, and conservative group Turning Point USA has already promised to help elect him in 2028.

This early shift comes as Republicans look ahead to a post-Trump race. With no sitting president in the mix, the field is open. Right now, new numbers suggest Rubio may be moving faster than many expected.

Harry Enten Lays Out Rubio’s Rapid Rise

Harry Enten, known on CNN for breaking down polls and betting data in plain terms, gave Rubio a glowing review in a recent appearance. After looking at updated prediction market numbers, he described Rubio as “hot, hot, hot, like a summer heat wave.”

Enten pointed to Kalshi’s market for the 2028 Republican nomination, where Rubio’s odds climbed to 27 percent. Just six months earlier, he sat at 7 percent.

Even Enten sounded surprised by the jump. “He was just at 7% six months ago. Hello, up like a rocket. 27% chance now,” he said. “That’s quadrupling his chances in four months’ time.”

Rubio is also gaining in broader White House markets:

• On Kalshi’s general election market, Rubio reached 20 percent, just ahead of JD Vance and Democratic favorite Gavin Newsom, who both stood at 18 percent.
• On Polymarket, Rubio posted 18.8 percent for the presidency, narrowly topping Newsom at 18.5 percent and Vance at 17.3 percent.

Those numbers mark a big change from earlier this year. At that point, Vance led GOP betting markets with roughly 48 percent for the nomination. He also posted strong primary numbers in New Hampshire, where he drew 51 percent support, a lead Enten had earlier called “unprecedented.”

Now, Rubio’s upward trend suggests he could move past Vance and take the top spot. Political analysts often say betting markets can reflect changing voter mood long before the first primary ballot is cast.

Why Rubio Is Climbing, Approval Ratings, and Trump Ties

Rubio’s rise appears closely tied to his role as Secretary of State. Recent U.S. action involving Iran won broad support from Republican voters. Among GOP voters, 89 percent approved, and support was nearly unanimous among MAGA Republicans.

Enten also said Rubio’s personal approval rating among Republicans has reached 81 percent. That puts him ahead of recent Secretaries of State, including Antony Blinken during the Biden years. History also helps Rubio’s case, since six former secretaries of state have later won the presidency.

Enten added that Rubio’s close connection to Trump matters, too. He pointed to their public chemistry and said Rubio seems to be benefiting from the administration’s good standing without losing support from the party base.

Rubio has also stayed active on issues Republicans care about most, including immigration and the economy. Those issues played a major role in Trump’s wins. His background in Florida and his years in the Senate also give him appeal in key battleground states.

JD Vance Remains a Strong Rival Despite Rubio’s Momentum

Even with Rubio getting fresh buzz, JD Vance is still firmly in the race. Early polling shows he keeps strong backing among working-class voters, and he still benefits from the name recognition that came with the 2024 ticket.

Earlier, Enten praised Vance’s lead in colorful terms. He compared Vance to Mario Andretti and said the rest of the field looked like “go-karts.” For months, Vance controlled New Hampshire polls and led prediction markets.

Today, he still holds a strong place near the top. His America First message and appeal to younger conservatives keep him in the fight. In addition, his role as vice president gives him direct access to donors, party activists, and voters across the country.

The battle between Rubio and Vance could shape where the Republican Party heads next. Rubio brings a foreign policy record. Vance speaks more directly to domestic populism. Both fit into the broader Trump movement, but they carry it in different ways.

Turning Point USA Backs JD Vance for 2028

Turning Point USA has already made its position clear. Erika Kirk, the group’s new CEO and the widow of founder Charlie Kirk, said the organization plans to throw its support behind Vance.

Speaking at a recent Turning Point event, she told the crowd, “We are going to get my husband’s friend JD Vance elected for ’28 in the most resounding way possible.”

Kirk also said one of Charlie Kirk’s final conversations centered on support for Vance. She later told reporters that efforts to back a possible JD Vance presidential run are already underway.

Turning Point USA plans to organize young conservative voters, run turnout efforts, and spread Vance’s message online and on college campuses. Because the group has strong reach with Republicans under 30, its support could matter in early primary states.

That endorsement reinforces Vance’s standing inside the MAGA movement. At the same time, it shows how unsettled the race still is, with major allies lining up behind different contenders.

What Rubio’s Surge Means for the 2028 Race

Rubio’s rise comes at an important moment. President Trump has not named a preferred successor, and reports say he has weighed both Rubio and Vance in discussions with donors.

Polls and prediction markets can swing quickly. Still, Enten’s read on the data points to real momentum behind Rubio. If his approval numbers stay high and his foreign policy record continues to help him, he could strengthen his grip on the Republican nomination fight.

Vance, on the other hand, still has a clear path. He can lean on grassroots support, his vice presidential profile, and Turning Point’s organizing power. His team is also likely to focus on domestic wins tied to the current administration.

Other possible Republican names, including Nikki Haley and Tulsi Gabbard, remain far behind in current markets, both below 10 percent. On the Democratic side, Gavin Newsom has started to emerge as an early favorite in some betting models.

Voters continue to rank the economy and border security as top concerns. Recent Harvard CAPS/Harris polling shows both Rubio and Vance perform well on those issues.

No one has officially launched a 2028 campaign yet, but the race is already gaining heat. Early fundraising, endorsements, and public visibility will shape who breaks through first.

Rubio vs. Vance, Key Strengths at a Glance

• Marco Rubio: Strong foreign policy profile, 81 percent GOP approval, rising odds that reached 27 percent for the nomination, plus a historical boost from the secretary of state’s track record.
• JD Vance: Early primary strength, including 51 percent in New Hampshire, support from Turning Point USA, a loyal MAGA base, and the visibility that comes with serving as vice president.
• Shared advantage: Both closely align with Trump’s agenda on immigration and the economy.

Analysts still warn against reading too much into early data. Prediction markets show a moment in time, not an outcome. Even so, Rubio’s rise has been fast enough to grab attention across the political world.

Enten’s latest breakdown makes one thing clear: Rubio is gaining ground quickly and now looks capable of challenging, and maybe passing, the rest of the field.

As 2028 moves closer, more polls, more endorsements, and more surprises are sure to follow. For now, Rubio’s jump in the numbers has put him in a strong spot at the front of the Republican race.

The next several months will show whether Rubio can keep that momentum going, or whether Vance’s organized support helps him reclaim the lead. One thing is clear: the 2028 race is underway, and the drama has already started.

Trending News:

Trump Eyes Historic NATO Exit as Allies Prove Their Disloyalty

WASHINGTON, D.C. – In a major military move that shook energy markets, President Donald Trump ordered U.S. forces to hit key military targets on Iran’s Kharg Island. Supporters of the operation say the strike stripped away what they call Iran’s long-running “oil terror premium.”

U.S. forces targeted naval mine depots, missile bunkers, and other military sites, while leaving the island’s oil export facilities untouched. Instead of triggering an oil supply disaster, backers say the attack exposed years of fear-driven pricing tied to petrodollar trading and repeated threats from Tehran.

Warnings about soaring oil prices and global shortages quickly lost steam. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent moved to calm investors and shippers, saying the Strait of Hormuz remains open and free of mines. He said the recent jump in prices came from speculation, not from any real break in supply. At the same time, Lloyd’s of London began working through new terms, while the U.S. introduced its own vessel insurance backstop to keep tankers moving.

Supporters say this is not just another flashpoint in the Middle East. In their view, it marks the start of the end for a system built on fear, market panic, and pressure tied to oil transit.

The Kharg Island Strike: A Focused Hit, Not a Broad Attack

Kharg Island is central to Iran’s oil trade. The small island in the Persian Gulf handles as much as 90 percent of Iran’s crude exports. For years, it stood as a symbol of Tehran’s ability to threaten global energy flows.

On March 14, President Trump said the U.S. had “totally obliterated” military assets on the island. Footage released by the White House showed precise strikes hitting missile bunkers and mine storage areas. Oil terminals were left alone.

“We hit only military targets,” Trump said. “The oil stays for now, out of decency. But if they close the Strait, everything changes.”

U.S. Central Command said the mission destroyed more than 90 targets and did not damage civilian sites or oil infrastructure. Iranian officials confirmed the strikes but tried to minimize them. Still, the signal was hard to miss: the U.S. could remove military threats without sending the global economy into shock.

The operation came after weeks of rising tension. Iran had warned it could shut the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow waterway that carries about one-fifth of the world’s oil. Yet Bessent later said no mines had been placed there. Shipping traffic continues.

Scott Bessent Pushes Back on Oil Crisis Claims: “Not Mined, Not a Crisis”

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent went on CNBC and addressed the growing panic head-on. “The Strait of Hormuz has not been mined,” he said. “We’ve seen more and more tankers moving through. Iranian ships are getting out. We’re fine with that, we want the world well-supplied.”

He also said some media outlets were trying to turn the moment into a crisis when the facts did not support that view. Oil prices rose for a short time because traders reacted to uncertainty, but the basic supply picture stayed strong.

According to Bessent and other officials, the bigger problem came from London’s insurance market. War-risk premiums for tankers in the Gulf jumped two to five times almost overnight. Spot traders added to the pressure. As a result, some ships paused not because Iran had blocked traffic, but because insurance costs had shot up.

The U.S. response came quickly. The Development Finance Corporation launched a $20 billion government-backed reinsurance program. Bessent and DFC officials rolled it out under Trump’s direction. The plan offers political-risk coverage for both hull and cargo at lower rates.

Meanwhile, Lloyd’s of London, the biggest name in maritime insurance, entered talks with U.S. officials. Market sources say the discussions focus on how the two systems can work together. The U.S. program is meant to fill the gap where London pricing became too expensive. As rates stabilize, more ships are returning to normal routes, and oil shipments are moving again.

Backers of the policy say that the response shows the real issue was financial, not physical. In their view, the disruption came from pricing pressure in insurance markets, not from any actual shutdown at sea.

The Iran Terror Premium: A Hidden Cost on Every Barrel

Behind the military headlines is a broader claim about oil prices. For years, analysts close to the Trump camp have argued that Iran’s threats added a hidden premium to crude.

Peter Navarro, Trump’s senior trade and manufacturing adviser, laid out that case in a recent report. He said tension around the Strait of Hormuz added between $5 and $15 per barrel to oil prices. In his view, that put crude 7 to 21 percent above levels justified by normal supply and demand.

Over the last 25 years, Navarro argued, that extra cost drained about $10 trillion from global GDP. He said families, companies, and governments all paid the price, while speculators and petrodollar systems benefited, especially in London and other finance centers.

Navarro called the premium a “parasite” on the world economy. Because Iran sits next to one of the most important oil routes on earth, every missile test, proxy strike, or threat against shipping could push up futures prices and insurance costs.

Supporters of the Kharg Island operation argue that Trump’s strike changed that pattern in a lasting way.

Barbara Boyd: A Blow Against a 50-Year Financial System

Barbara Boyd, speaking for Promethean Action, says the Kharg Island strike was much more than a military operation. In her piece, “Trump’s Kharg Island Strike Ends Iran’s Oil Terror Premium,” she describes it as a controlled takedown of a 50-year-old financial system.

Boyd argues that the operation was aimed at more than Iran’s weapons sites. In her view, it also challenged what she calls London’s Iran oil scam. She ties together the petrodollar structure, oil speculation, and the terror premium, saying they formed a network that enriched financiers while putting the burden on ordinary people.

She points to several parts of the response. Trump chose not to hit the oil terminals. The U.S. rolled out an insurance backstop almost at once. Bessent publicly pushed back against panic as events unfolded.

Boyd says the strike was not a spur-of-the-moment move. She describes it as part of a larger strategy, one meant to replace an old system of fear-based oil pricing with a different model.

In her telling, Trump recognized the problem years ago. The premium, she argues, came not only from Iranian threats but also from a market structure that rewarded panic and speculation.

America’s Preparations: Energy Output, Alliances, and Long-Term Planning

Boyd also says the strike did not happen in isolation. She points to four major conditions that, in her view, made the operation workable and reduced the risk of a wider oil shock.

• U.S. energy independence: The United States now produces oil at very high levels. Expanded shale output and new drilling, she argues, reduced America’s exposure to foreign pressure. That domestic supply gives the market a buffer during short-term disruptions.
• Russian oil positioning: She says strategic purchases and deals involving Russia helped support alternative supply lines. In her view, that kept global markets steadier as Gulf tensions rose.
• The Abraham Accords: Normalized ties between Israel and several Arab states created a stronger regional front against Iran. Those agreements, she argues, turned former rivals into security and energy partners.
• U.S.-Saudi civil nuclear cooperation agreement: Boyd says this agreement, signed under Trump, points the Gulf toward a future that relies less on oil alone. Saudi Arabia would gain civilian nuclear technology for power generation and desalination, opening a path beyond the old oil-only model.

Taken together, she presents these moves as part of a larger plan for a nuclear-focused development path in the Middle East.

Boyd calls that vision “Trump’s Mideast Nuclear Century.” In her view, Gulf states would expand nuclear power for electricity and water, while oil would remain a stable export rather than a political weapon. Under that model, Iran’s threat to world energy markets would lose much of its force.

What May Come Next: Lower Oil Prices and a Different Energy Market

Markets have already started to respond. Oil futures eased after Bessent’s public remarks. Some analysts now say the so-called terror premium could disappear over time, which would lower prices by $5 to $15 per barrel in the long run.

If that happens, the effects would be broad. Drivers would pay less for fuel. Companies would face lower shipping and input costs. Governments could gain breathing room in their budgets.

Trump also warned Iran that more strikes could follow if needed, even saying they could come “just for fun.” Even so, the current focus appears to be on preserving oil infrastructure for what supporters describe as a post-terror phase in the region.

Analysts such as Boyd see the Kharg Island operation as the start of a much larger shift. In their view, the old petrodollar order is weakening, while a new system built around U.S. energy strength, regional alliances, and nuclear development begins to take shape.

Their message is simple: no more fear premium, no more market panic driven by threats, and a more secure energy supply for the global economy.

From that perspective, the Kharg Island strike did not start an oil war. It brought one long-running chapter closer to an end, one that supporters say had quietly drained the world economy for decades.

Related News:

Allies Abandoning US Over Iran Sparks Fears of Trump Dumping NATO