Entertainment
Macrons Sue Candace Owens Over Her Claims Brigitte Has a Penis
DELEWARE – French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife, Brigitte Macron, have filed a major defamation lawsuit against US commentator Candace Owens over her exposé becoming Brigitte in Delaware.
The 218-page filing accuses Owens of running a “campaign of global humiliation,” targeting Brigitte Macron with false claims that she was born male. The suit includes 22 counts covering defamation, false light, and defamation.
The Lawsuit alleges Owens spread these stories to promote her podcast Becoming Brigitte and profit from her large online following: nearly 7 million on X and 4.5 million on YouTube.
Filed on July 23, 2025, the case marks a dramatic moment in a dispute that began on minor internet forums but has grown into a high-profile international legal fight.
The Macrons are now at odds with an outspoken US influencer, forcing a conversation about the limits of free speech, defamation across borders, and the responsibilities of public figures.
While Owens’ lawyers argue the suit is a foreign attempt to silence an American journalist, the Macrons’ aggressive stance and refusal to release certain evidence leave lingering questions and fuel online conspiracies.
Macrons Defamation Claims
According to the lawsuit, Owens began publicly asserting in March 2024 that Brigitte Macron, 72, was born male under the name Jean-Michel Trogneux, who is her brother. These allegations featured prominently in Owens’ eight-part YouTube series Becoming Brigitte, which drew over 2.3 million views.
The series also accused the Macrons of being blood relatives, identity theft, and suggested Emmanuel Macron’s rise to power was the result of a US mind-control plot.
The Macrons claim Owens made these statements knowing they were false, meeting the strict “actual malice” standard in US law, which requires proof that Owens either lied knowingly or acted with reckless disregard for the truth.
The suit describes the harm the couple has faced, including constant public insults and an intrusion into their lives. “Every time the Macrons leave their home, they do so knowing that countless people have heard, and many believe, these vile fabrications,” the complaint says.
Their attorney, Tom Clare of Clare Locke LLP, who previously worked on the Dominion Voting Systems case, calls this suit “a clear-cut case of defamation.” Clare says Owens dismissed solid evidence disproving her story and continued to produce content and merchandise that kept the rumours alive.
Owens’ Response and First Amendment Arguments
Candace Owens has responded with characteristic boldness, dismissing the lawsuit as “goofy” and a shallow publicity move. During a livestream on July 23, she doubled down on her attacks, calling Brigitte Macron the “First Lady man of France.”
Owens’ spokesperson asserts that this is an illegal effort by a foreign government to threaten the First Amendment rights of a US journalist.
“Candace repeatedly requested an interview with Brigitte Macron. Instead of talking, Brigitte tries to bully a reporter into silence. In France, politicians bully the press, but this is America.”
Owens and her legal team look forward to discovery, aiming to question Brigitte Macron under oath and, according to them, get to the truth in court. Owens promises her supporters that she will see the Macrons in court and that the process may reveal even more about the couple.
Owen’s defence is based strongly on her freedom of speech as protected in the US. Public figures like the Macrons have a tough standard to meet. Legal analysts note that because Owens is more of a commentator than a traditional reporter, her work blends opinion and fact, which could work in her favour.
Her team insists that even harsh opinions and speculation are protected by law, given the Macrons’ high profile. Since Owens’ businesses are registered in Delaware, that state’s courts—known for protecting speech—will hear the case.
Experts Weigh in on the Suit and Possible Motives
This lawsuit has divided legal experts. Some believe it’s a weak or even “frivolous” effort designed more to protect the Macrons’ reputation than to win in court. Three top US defamation lawyers, speaking off the record, expressed doubts about whether the Macrons could prove actual malice.
One noted, “Owens can say she relied on French sources, even bad ones, and that could protect her.” Another called the case a “face-saving effort” and argued that the Macrons’ refusal to answer Owens’ requests for comment may hurt their position.
A third expert labelled the case “partially frivolous,” highlighting that the high number of accusations and the demand for damages may be more about intimidation and publicity than about justice.
“Filing in Delaware looks like a stunt,” said the expert, “and could end up helping Owens by giving her a platform during discovery.”
Other lawyers point out that the Macrons have carefully documented their attempts to get retractions from Owens and could prevail if they prove she ignored solid evidence. Since Owens has millions of followers, the couple argues, the personal impact is enormous.
French Lawsuits and Accusations of Overreach
This is not the Macrons’ first attempt to tackle these claims. In France, Brigitte Macron has filed lawsuits against two women, Amandine Roy and Natacha Rey, for spreading similar stories online. In late 2021, the two posted a viral video claiming Brigitte was born male.
A French court convicted them of libel in September 2024, ordering damages, but in July 2025, an appeals court overturned the decision, saying that the pair acted in “good faith.” Brigitte Macron is now appealing that decision to a higher court.
The treatment of Roy and Rey has raised concerns. Natacha Rey, who is reportedly battling cancer, has faced intense legal and police pressure that many see as excessive.
French journalists and activists argue that the Macrons’ focus on these individuals, who have limited resources, threatens press freedom and could discourage open discussion. As one Paris-based journalist put it, “It looks like the Macrons are trying to silence critics rather than address the claims.
Targeting a cancer patient doesn’t help their case, especially when a court already said the allegations were made in good faith.”
Owens has pointed to the appeals court’s ruling as evidence supporting her case, saying the Macrons have switched tactics after failing to win in France. But that leaves out the fact that the ruling focused on good faith, not the truth of the claims.
A Persistent Question: The Missing Proof
A key point in this story is Brigitte Macron’s refusal to release photos, medical documents, or other evidence that could end the rumours for good. The Macrons say they provided Owens with credible information, but have not made it public.
Critics argue that a simple birth certificate or old photos could clear things up quickly. Owens raised this issue again during her recent live stream, and many of her supporters on X agree.
Macron’s lawyers argue public figures should not have to reveal private records just to refute baseless attacks. The lawsuit notes that Brigitte had three children in her first marriage as further proof of her biological sex.
Still, the lack of clear evidence has allowed conspiracy theories to grow even as the couple fights to clear their name in court. The Macrons’ lawsuit situates Owens’ claims within this toxic pattern, accusing her of using gender stereotypes and bigotry for profit and attention.
Owens and her supporters push back, saying she is simply conducting real journalism by investigating these allegations. They point to her use of sources from France, like Natacha Rey, whose claims have not been fully disproven in public.
The recent appeals court ruling in France, they argue, supports their right to discuss unproven stories as long as they act in good faith, which blurs the Macrons’ position as clear-cut victims.
What’s Next: A Case with International Impact
The Delaware case guarantees further debate about the role of social media, the boundaries of speech, and how reputations are protected or damaged worldwide.
If the Macrons win, it could set an example for public figures seeking recourse against false claims made by global influencers. If Owens wins, it would reaffirm broad speech protections for American commentators and raise questions about how far defamation law should go in an era of viral rumours.
Macron’s decision to avoid interviews with Owens or release decisive evidence may be strategic, but it has fed doubts online. At the same time, French authorities’ tough handling of smaller players like Natacha Rey and Amandine Roy has alarmed many about the state of press freedom in France.
As the court proceedings continue, the conflict will highlight the tension between privacy, reputation, and free speech in the age of internet-driven conspiracy theories. The outcome will shape the future of defamation law—on both sides of the Atlantic.
Related News:
Google and Facebook Under Huge Pressure Over User Privacy
Entertainment
Britney Spears Taken Into Custody on Suspicion of DUI
CALIFORNIA – Pop star Britney Spears was arrested late Wednesday on suspicion of driving under the influence in Ventura County. The arrest adds to a difficult period for the 44-year-old performer, who has lived under heavy public attention for years.
California Highway Patrol officers reportedly spotted Britney Spears driving a BMW sedan in a way they described as erratic and fast. The stop happened around 9:30 p.m. on March 4 in the Moorpark area near Westlake Village, about 50 miles northwest of Los Angeles.
After the traffic stop, officers arrested her on suspicion of violating California Vehicle Code section 23152(g), which covers driving under the combined influence of alcohol and drugs.
CHP booked Britney Spears into the Ventura County Jail at about 3 a.m. Thursday. Authorities impounded her car, and reports say investigators are testing substances taken from the vehicle. She was released shortly after 6 a.m., according to Ventura County Sheriff’s Office records and law enforcement confirmations.
What We Know About the Arrest So Far
- Time and area: Around 9:30 p.m. Wednesday, in the Moorpark and Westlake Village area of Ventura County
- Agency involved: California Highway Patrol (CHP)
- Allegation: DUI on suspicion of combined alcohol and drug impairment (misdemeanor)
- Jail timeline: Booked around 3 a.m., released after 6 a.m. Thursday
- Vehicle: BMW sedan impounded
- Next court date: May 4, 2026
So far, officials haven’t released any blood alcohol content (BAC) results or named any drugs connected to the case. Authorities also haven’t confirmed whether officers gave field sobriety tests or chemical tests at the scene. The investigation remains ongoing.
Statement From Britney Spears’ Representative
On Thursday, a spokesperson for Britney Spears addressed the situation and focused on both accountability and support.
“This was an unfortunate incident that is completely inexcusable,” the representative said. “Britney will comply with the law and is seeking the help and support she needs during this difficult time. Loved ones are making a plan for her well-being.”
After the arrest, Britney Spears deactivated her Instagram account, where she often posted personal updates for her millions of followers.
Reports also say her two adult sons, Sean Preston Federline, 20, and Jayden Federline, 19, are spending time with her. Spears shares them with her ex-husband, Kevin Federline.
Background: Past Issues and Recent Concerns
This appears to be Britney Spears ‘ first known arrest tied to a DUI allegation. Still, she has dealt with driving-related legal trouble before. In 2007, during a widely covered period in her personal life, she faced misdemeanor charges for a hit-and-run that caused property damage and for driving without a valid license. Those allegations were not connected to intoxication.
The latest arrest also comes as the public continues to talk about her life after her conservatorship ended. The arrangement lasted 13 years and ended in November 2021. During that time, her father, Jamie Spears, controlled major parts of her personal and financial decisions. Since it ended, Spears has spoken openly about her experience through interviews, social media, and published work.
In recent months, some reports have pointed to unusual social media posts and personal disclosures that raised concern among fans. While some outlets have linked those reports to the arrest, no direct connection has been confirmed.
Even with personal struggles, Britney Spears remains one of pop music’s biggest names. Songs like “…Baby One More Time,” “Toxic,” and “Oops!… I Did It Again” helped define late-1990s and early-2000s pop. In 2023, her memoir The Woman in Me described her conservatorship fight and her life during that time.
Possible Legal Stakes and What Happens Next
In California, a first-time DUI conviction tied to combined alcohol and drug impairment can bring several penalties, including:
- Fines that can reach $1,000 to $2,000 (and sometimes more with added fees or enhancements)
- A driver’s license suspension, often for about six months
- Required DUI classes
- Probation
- Up to six months in jail (although first offenses often result in probation instead)
Because this case involves suspected combined substance use, the outcome may depend on toxicology findings. Spears’ May 4 court date will be the first key step, since prosecutors can file charges and both sides can begin early negotiations.
For now, law enforcement sources say the case is still active, with test results pending.
The arrest has also sparked renewed talk about celebrity responsibility, mental health support in entertainment, and the pressure long-time public figures face. Meanwhile, Spears’ team says she plans to cooperate as the process moves forward, and more details may come out in the weeks ahead.
Related News:
CNN Admits Melania Documentary is HUGE Box Office Success
Entertainment
Eric Dane, Beloved Grey’s Anatomy and Euphoria Actor, Dies at 53 After ALS Battle
LOS ANGELES – Eric Dane, the magnetic actor best known for playing Dr. Mark “McSteamy” Sloan on Grey’s Anatomy and Cal Jacobs on HBO’s Euphoria, has died at 53. Dane died Thursday, February 19, 2026, in Los Angeles due to complications from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), often called Lou Gehrig’s disease. His death comes less than a year after he shared his diagnosis publicly in April 2025.
In a statement shared through his representatives, Dane’s family said, “With heavy hearts, we share that Eric Dane died Thursday afternoon after a courageous fight with ALS. During his final days, he was surrounded by close friends, his devoted wife, and his two beautiful daughters, Billie and Georgia, who meant everything to him.”
The statement added, “As he lived with ALS, Eric became deeply committed to supporting awareness and research, because he wanted to help others facing the same disease. We’ll miss him terribly and carry his memory with love. Eric cherished his fans and always felt grateful for the kindness and support he received.”
Eric Dane is survived by his wife, actress Rebecca Gayheart, whom he married in 2004, and their two daughters.
Tributes from Co-Stars, Friends, and the Wider Entertainment Community
After news of Eric Dane’s death broke, messages poured in from co-workers, friends, and fans around the world. Many remembered his humor, generosity, and steady presence on set, even as his health declined.
- Ellen Pompeo, Dane’s longtime Grey’s Anatomy co-star, called him “a true friend and an incredible talent,” adding that he brought warmth everywhere he worked.
- Zendaya, who starred with him on Euphoria, described him as “a gentle soul” and praised the way he spoke about ALS with honesty and grace.
- The ALS Association also released a statement: “We’re heartbroken by the loss of our friend Eric Dane, a fierce advocate with an open heart who stood up for families affected by ALS. He reminded people that ALS isn’t only a diagnosis, it’s a call for answers and change.”
Meanwhile, fans across social media shared favorite scenes, cast photos, and personal stories about what his work meant to them.
Eric Dane’s Career Built on Memorable Roles
Eric Dane was born on November 9, 1972, in San Francisco, California. He found acting somewhat unexpectedly during a high school production of All My Sons. After that, he pursued the work seriously and began landing TV and film roles.
Eric Dane’s big break arrived in 2006, when he joined Grey’s Anatomy in season 3. As Dr. Mark Sloan, the confident plastic surgeon fans nicknamed “McSteamy,” he quickly became a standout. His character drove major storylines tied to Meredith Grey, Derek Shepherd, and Addison Montgomery, which helped shape the show’s peak years. Dane stayed a series regular until 2012, and he later returned for guest appearances, including an emotional moment in season 17.
After Grey’s Anatomy, he shifted into a wider range of parts. He earned fresh praise as Cal Jacobs on Euphoria (2019 to 2022), playing a troubled father wrestling with secrets, anger, and family strain. That performance showed a darker side of his talent, far from the charming image many first knew.
His other credits included films like X-Men: The Last Stand (2006) and Burlesque (2010), plus TV roles on Charmed and The Last Ship, where he led as Captain Tom Chandler.
Across more than 30 years on screen, from his early work in 1991 through his final projects, Dane built a reputation as a reliable actor who could carry both drama and lighter moments.
From Symptoms to Speaking Out: His ALS Advocacy
Eric Dane began noticing symptoms in late 2023 or early 2024. He felt weakness in his right hand at first, and he initially blamed it on something simple like heavy texting. Still, as the problem continued, he sought medical help and went through months of appointments. Doctors diagnosed him with ALS in 2024.
He shared the news publicly in an exclusive April 2025 interview with People magazine, saying, “I have been diagnosed with ALS. I am grateful to have my loving family by my side as we go through this next chapter.”
Then, in a June 2025 interview with ABC News’ Diane Sawyer, Dane spoke candidly about how quickly the disease had affected him. By that point, he had lost function in his dominant right arm. Even so, he said he wanted to keep working and keep talking about ALS, so more people would understand it and support research.
ALS is a progressive disease that attacks nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord. Over time, it causes people to lose muscle control. There’s no cure, and many patients live two to five years after diagnosis, although timelines vary.
Because of his visibility, Eric Dane used his platform to raise money and amplify groups working on ALS research and support, including partnerships with organizations such as the ALS Association. His openness helped reduce stigma and brought more attention to the daily reality families face, a story many connect with the legacy of Lou Gehrig.
Remembering Eric Dane: Talent, Family, and Hope
Eric Dane’s death at 53 is another reminder of how devastating ALS can be. At the same time, his public push for awareness helped shine a brighter light on the disease and the need for better treatments.
As tributes continue, Dane’s family has asked for privacy. Plans for a celebration of life are expected in the coming weeks.
His work on television and the way he faced ALS in public will stay with fans for a long time.
Trending News:
Catherine O’Hara Dead at 71: What We Know and Why Her Work Lasts
Entertainment
CNN Admits Melania Documentary is HUGE Box Office Success
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Melania Trump’s new documentary, Melania, is turning into a real box office story. The Amazon-backed film follows the former First Lady’s life and point of view during the run-up to President Donald Trump’s second inauguration.
With director Brett Ratner at the helm and Melania Trump closely involved as a producer, the movie pulled in an estimated $7 million in domestic ticket sales in its first weekend. That’s well above early forecasts and marks the biggest opening for a non-concert documentary in 14 years.
Amazon MGM Studios shared the $7 million estimate, and it landed Melania in third place across North America. It trailed horror titles like Send Help and Iron Lung. Analysts had expected a softer start, closer to $3 million to $5 million, so the debut is being framed as a clear overperformance for a wide-release documentary.
Melania Posts Strong Results in Conservative Markets
Melania opened on more than 1,500 screens, which is a big footprint for a non-fiction film. The turnout was especially strong in conservative-leaning areas. Markets including Dallas-Fort Worth, Tampa, Orlando, Phoenix, Houston, and Atlanta delivered results that beat expectations by a wide margin.
That regional strength helped power a per-theater average of about $3,960. The audience mix leaned older, with Trump supporters driving much of the early momentum.
The documentary offers an access-heavy look at Melania Trump’s schedule and behind-the-scenes moments during the 20 days leading up to the 2025 inauguration. Supporters have promoted it as a stylish, inside look at her public role.
President Trump called the film “glamorous” in public remarks, pointing to its look and personal feel. Audience response has also been strong on exit polling, with an ‘A’ CinemaScore reported. Trade coverage said word-of-mouth played well in red-zone counties, helping the film hold steady across key locations.
Even Skeptical Media Outlets Had to Cover the Numbers
The box office results also pushed the film into broader news coverage, including outlets that often take a critical stance toward the Trump family. CNN discussed the opening, and host Brian Stelter acknowledged the scale of the performance.
“This documentary is a big success,” Stelter said on air. He added that early industry projections had it as the top documentary at the box office in about a decade, based on ticket sales. That kind of result made it harder for commentators to shrug off, even when the tone stayed skeptical.
When you set concert films aside, Melania is now ahead of recent documentary openings like After Death ($5 million in 2023). It’s also being described as the strongest non-fiction theatrical debut since releases like Chimpanzee in 2012 (in raw terms for the category).
Deadline reported that the film “overperformed in red zone cinemas.” The outlet also said 53% of admissions came from conservative areas, even though more seats were first placed in blue zones. Florida and Texas stood out, with Ft. Myers and Naples showing up among the top-10 markets.
Amazon MGM’s Big Bet, and the Long Road to Profit
Amazon MGM Studios put serious money behind the project. Reports say the company paid $40 million for the rights, beating other bids, then spent another $35 million on marketing. That puts the total spend at around $75 million.
The marketing push included TV ads during NFL playoff games and a premiere simulcast in 25 US theaters. After that, the release expanded globally to more than 3,300 locations. Trade outlets like Variety and The Hollywood Reporter called the opening a “huge start,” with the sense that few people expected this level of turnout.
Still, profitability is a separate story. With costs this high, analysts say the movie would likely need global earnings north of $100 million to make the numbers work in a theaters-plus-streaming setup.
Reviews have been rough. The film is sitting in the single digits on Rotten Tomatoes, and some critics have dismissed it as a “carefully choreographed puff piece.” A few industry voices have also raised concerns that success like this could push streamers toward big-budget, celebrity-first documentaries, leaving less space for smaller non-fiction films.
Online, there’s also been chatter about bulk buys or organized group ticket sales. No solid evidence has been presented to support claims of inflated numbers, but the discussion keeps popping up as the film stays in the spotlight.
A Politically Charged Documentary That Drew a Crowd
For now, Melania is a rare case of a political documentary performing like an event release. It shows how a focused audience can still deliver a big weekend, even when media attention is split across countless platforms.
Next comes the international rollout and the move to streaming on Amazon Prime Video. That’s when the full money story will become clearer. At this stage, the opening weekend has already reset expectations for what a documentary can do at a multiplex, and it has Hollywood paying attention.
The buzz around Melania also underlines the bigger divide in pop culture right now. For some moviegoers, buying a ticket is as much about political identity as it is about the film itself.
Whether the movie holds its pace or drops fast will play out in the weeks ahead. Either way, its first weekend is already one of the most talked-about documentary openings in years.
Related News:
CNN News Viewership Tanks Amid Sale Rumors and Ideological Backlash
-
Crime3 months agoYouTuber Nick Shirley Exposes BILLIONS of Somali Fraud, Video Goes VIRAL
-
China2 months agoChina-Based Billionaire Singham Allegedly Funding America’s Radical Left
-
Politics3 months agoIlhan Omar Faces Renewed Firestorm Over Resurfaced Video
-
Politics1 month agoCNN Delivers Stark Reality Check to Democrats Over Voter ID
-
Business3 months agoTech Giant Oracle Abandons California After 43 Years
-
Midterm Elections2 months ago2026 Midterms Guide: Candidates, Key Issues, and Battleground States
-
Crime3 months agoMinnesota Fraud Scandal EXPANDS, $10 Billion in Fraudulent Payments
-
Politics3 months agoAccusations Fly Over Alleged Zionist Takeover of (TPUSA) Turning Point USA



