WASHINGTON, D.C. – FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino has announced that he will leave his role in January, closing a powerful chapter of public service rooted in his love for country.

Speaking with reporters at Joint Base Andrews, President Donald Trump praised Bongino, saying, “Dan did a great job.” With a slight grin, the president added, “I think he wants to go back to his show,” a nod to Bongino’s popular media presence that millions have followed for years.

In a heartfelt message on X, Bongino shared his gratitude: “I will be leaving my position with the FBI in January. I want to thank President Trump, AG Bondi, and Director Patel for the opportunity to serve with purpose. Most importantly, I want to thank you, my fellow Americans, for the privilege to serve you. God bless America, and all those who defend Her.”

A Life of Service, Sacrifice, and Strong Conviction

Dan Bongino’s path to the top ranks of the FBI reflects a classic American story built on grit, duty, and courage. He began his career as a New York City police officer, then became a U.S. Secret Service agent, spending years in high-risk roles protecting presidents and key officials.

During his time in the Secret Service, Bongino served in the elite Presidential Protection Division under Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama. His work there highlighted his steady character and refusal to back away from responsibility.

After leaving government work, Bongino moved into media and quickly rose as a trusted conservative voice. “The Dan Bongino Show,” his podcast and radio program, climbed into the top ranks nationwide. Listeners tuned in for his blunt commentary, direct style, and tough stance on government abuse and threats to personal freedom.

In February 2025, President Trump asked Dan Bongino to return to government as Deputy Director of the FBI under Director Kash Patel. The choice sent a clear message about a push for change inside the bureau. Bongino placed his booming media career on pause, choosing once again to answer a higher call to serve.

Honor in Office: A Tenure Marked by Reform and Results

During his time as Deputy Director, Bongino built a record that his supporters describe as heroic. Working with Director Kash Patel and Attorney General Pam Bondi, he focused on cleaning up internal problems, redirecting resources to real threats, and pressing for accountability.

One of the strongest examples of his approach came in long-stalled cases. Under his watch, the FBI arrested a suspect in the January 6, 2021, pipe bomb investigation, a case that had frustrated investigators and the public for years. He also pushed forward on key inquiries, including the 2023 White House cocaine incident and the 2022 Supreme Court Dobbs draft leak, signaling his drive for clear answers and public trust.

Bongino also supported major operations against child predators. During his tenure, the FBI arrested hundreds of suspected offenders and helped rescue more than 200 at-risk children in joint actions with other agencies. These efforts highlighted his focus on protecting the most vulnerable and targeting those who cause serious harm.

FBI Director Kash Patel credited Bongino with playing a central role in the bureau’s turnaround, calling him “the best partner I could’ve asked for in helping restore this FBI.” Patel added, “He not only completed his mission, he far exceeded it. Our country is better and safer for it.”

President Trump has echoed that praise. In speeches and interviews, he has pointed to Bongino’s choice to walk away from a lucrative career in media in order to return to public service. During an emotional Fox News segment earlier this year, Bongino spoke about long periods away from his family and the weight of his duties, but said he had no regrets because he did it for the country he loves.

For years, Bongino was known as a fierce critic of government excess and corruption. His move inside the FBI did not soften his beliefs. Instead, it gave him a direct role in applying those principles from within, pushing for change that matched what he had urged from the outside.

Trump’s Public Support: “Dan Did a Great Job”

President Trump’s comments on Bongino’s resignation made the depth of their working relationship clear. Repeating his praise, Trump said, “Dan did a great job,” underscoring Bongino’s impact on law enforcement and national security.

Coming from a former president known for high expectations, that statement carried weight. Trump’s decision to bring Bongino into the FBI leadership was a strong signal at the time, pairing a high-profile conservative voice with a major federal law enforcement role.

Far from being viewed as a loss, Bongino’s exit is being framed by supporters as the closing of a mission that he carried out with success and integrity.

What Comes Next for Dan Bongino?

As January approaches, attention is now turning to what Bongino will do next, and many Americans are watching closely.

President Trump has already hinted at Bongino’s next move: a return to “The Dan Bongino Show.” The audience that followed him before his government service has remained loyal, eager to hear his take on current events, federal power, and personal liberty once again.

People close to Bongino say he feels energized about returning to the microphone. With his inside experience at the FBI, his commentary is expected to be sharper, with deeper insight into how the system works and where it fails.

Bongino has reminded his followers that he once “got paid for opinions” and that “one day I will be back in that space.” That day appears to be close. His podcast was already a major force in conservative media, and many expect it to grow even more with fresh behind-the-scenes knowledge. New projects could include books, expanded shows, or a larger media platform.

Whatever form it takes, his next step will keep him in the public square, speaking to millions who share his values and concerns.

A Patriot’s Legacy and a New Chapter on the Air

Dan Bongino’s story spans city streets, the Secret Service, talk radio, and the FBI’s top floor. He has worn many hats, but each role reflected the same core traits: loyalty, courage, and a clear sense of right and wrong.

His time as FBI Deputy Director left a mark on the bureau and on those who backed his push for reform. From moving stalled investigations forward, to going after child predators, to standing beside senior leaders in tough moments, his work showed both toughness and heart.

As he leaves federal service and heads back to broadcasting, his mission to defend the Constitution and stand up for everyday Americans does not end. It simply returns to a different stage.

For many, Dan Bongino represents the rare public figure who talks about sacrifice, then lives it. Former cop, protector of presidents, reformer inside the justice system, and voice for millions, he closes this chapter with his head held high.

The country owes him thanks for his service at the FBI. Now, as he returns to the airwaves, his supporters are ready to tune in.

Related News:

President Trump Delivers Upbeat National Address, Pledges Stronger Future

WASHINGTON, D.C. Across the shaded corridors of the Rayburn House Office Building and among the quiet tables at the Monocle, conversations among political operatives are shifting. They no longer discuss how the Democratic Party will win; instead, they question whether the party, in its current form, can continue to exist.

By the end of 2025, the Democratic Party will be struggling significantly. They are losing influence and appear to be collapsing internally. A sequence of stinging electoral losses has left the organization unstable.

The resultant internal review has turned into a brutal cycle of internal blame. With approval numbers extremely low and registered members considering leaving the platform, the party once led by FDR and JFK now faces a crisis threatening its very foundation.

The Problem at the Top: A Ship Adrift

The clearest sign of Democratic troubles is the severe lack of central authority. For the first time in recent memory, the party essentially has no leader. After the Biden-Harris administration departed, there is no obvious successor, no person uniting different factions, and no cohesive plan.

A Politico poll released in November 2025 highlighted an alarming situation. When Democratic voters were asked who currently leads the party, the most frequent answer was “I don’t know,” followed closely by “Nobody.” Only sixteen percent of those who voted for the Democratic slate in 2024 could name a current official leader.

“I couldn’t tell you who the leader of the Democratic Party is, and I work in Democratic politics,” one seasoned strategist confessed plainly. The retirement of powerful figures like Nancy Pelosi eliminated the last points of stability. This has left the party fragmented, acting as 535 separate brands with no common strategy.

The Ideological Shift: Internal Conflict for the Party’s Identity

While leadership remains missing, the party’s ideological core has severely fractured. The most structured, outspoken, and aggressive element within the organization is no longer moderate members; it is the Democratic Socialists.

Once a weak movement, the socialist wing has expertly pushed its members past incumbents in primary races, gaining control over the party’s machinery. Figures such as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and the newly elected New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani represent a liberal contingent that many moderates consider too extreme for general elections. This specific takeover has created a challenging atmosphere for centrist Democrats. They are now pressured between a rising Republican influence and an internal ideological cleanup.

The “Squad” and their partners promote controversial policies (the Green New Deal, Medicare for All, and intense anti-corporate language) that moderates believe are electorally harmful in the battleground states needed to secure a majority. “We are surrendering the middle ground because we are afraid of our own left wing,” stated one former Democratic congressman who lost his seat in 2024. “A group that prefers ideological purity in the minority has co-opted the party rather than working for pragmatic effectiveness in the majority.”

A Divided Institution: The Sharp Internal Fighting

The tension between these groups is now beyond polite disagreement; it is an open war. Significant infighting has undermined the party’s ability to act as a united opposition.

Recent policy disputes, such as the fight over the “Obamacare cliff” extension and yearly government spending bills, show Democrats arguing among themselves more than they confront their Republican peers. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer faced immediate, harsh criticism from the progressive wing when he supported certain bipartisan spending measures. They accused him of “capitulating” to the Trump administration.

This internal disharmony covers more than just policy; it involves core identity. Moderates want to focus on everyday issues, such as rising costs and community safety. Meanwhile, the progressive wing emphasizes social justice and identity politics. Recent data suggests these themes are alienating the very working-class and minority voters the party historically depended upon.

Approval Ratings Reach a New Low

The public’s response to this turmoil has been immediate and harsh. The Democratic Party’s popularity has reached a historical low point. A December 2025 Quinnipiac University poll discovered that only thirty percent of voters have a favorable view of the party. This is the lowest rating since the poll began tracking this data in 2008.

More troubling for the Democratic National Committee is the feeling among its own members. Nearly fifty percent of young Democrats describe their own party as “weak” or “ineffective.” Voters across the political spectrum frequently complain that the Democratic Party has become an organization of elites, no longer able to speak to the concerns of average Americans.

The Great Migration: Voters Leaving the Lineup

Perhaps the most significant threat is the large-scale departure of essential voting groups. For decades, Democrats relied on a combination of young people, minorities, and blue-collar workers. That partnership is now dissolving.

• Gen Z Abandonment: Young voters, once viewed as the party’s future, are moving toward the right rapidly. In 2024, Gen Z voters showed double-digit preference for Republicans in certain areas. This shift is driven by economic dissatisfaction and a feeling that the Democratic Party seems “stale” and disconnected.
• Minority Group Changes: The political realignment that started in 2020 has accelerated. Hispanic and Asian American voters, especially men, are increasingly aligning with Republican populist messages regarding trade, security, and traditional ideas.
• The Working Class: The party’s failure to engage with non-college-educated workers has turned former Democratic strongholds into reliably Republican territories.

Can This Breakdown Be Halted?

The Democratic Party in late 2025 illustrates institutional decline. This is a party where central voices are silenced, the socialist faction dominates but lacks electoral success, and central leadership is absent.

Without drastically changing its approach, which likely requires abandoning the current ideological platform, the party risks becoming a lasting minority, a leftover from a former political time that the rest of the nation has surpassed.

As one strategist noted, “You cannot govern by hating the opposition, and you cannot succeed when you are fighting yourself. Right now, we are doing both.”

Related News:

Trump Targets Fentanyl While Democrats Shield Illegal Drug Dealers

WASHINGTON, D.C. – President Donald Trump significantly stepped up his administration’s fight against Nicolás Maduro’s government yesterday. He announced a “total and complete blockade” targeting all sanctioned oil tankers moving into or out of Venezuela.

This action, combined with naming the Venezuelan government a foreign terrorist organization, shows a stronger approach against Caracas. This strategy uses two main tactics: a renewed effort against drug trafficking and cutting off essential oil exports.

Sources close to the White House say this is the most aggressive use yet of what the administration calls the “Trump Corollary” to the historic Monroe Doctrine. This new policy marks a key change, focusing U.S. national security efforts back toward the Western Hemisphere.

Attacking Two Fronts: Drugs and Oil

The president’s announcement follows a recent increase in military activity in the Caribbean. Since September, U.S. forces have hit more than 25 ships accused of smuggling drugs, leading to at least 95 deaths. Trump has described these military actions as necessary to stop “narco-terrorism.” He accused Maduro of running the “Cartel de los Soles,” a group allegedly involving Venezuelan military officers in cocaine shipments.

The campaign is not limited to stopping vessels at sea. On Tuesday, Trump directly linked Venezuela’s oil income to funding drug operations, human trafficking, and other illegal activities. “They are using oil from stolen oil fields to finance themselves,” he posted on Truth Social. The president promised not to let a “hostile regime” keep control of assets he believes belong to the United States.

Just this week, authorities seized a large oil tanker off Venezuela’s coast. They also imposed new sanctions on Maduro’s relatives, including three nephews of his wife, and six shipping companies involved in moving oil. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent claims these steps undo “failed” Biden-era policies that supposedly helped Maduro maintain power.

The blockade only targets sanctioned vessels. Officials expect it will reduce Venezuela’s exports, currently around 900,000 barrels per day, by about 300,000 barrels daily. Even so, this is the first time the U.S. Navy has enforced sanctions on this scale. The region now hosts a major U.S. naval presence, including aircraft carriers and many warships.

Reorienting Focus: From Europe to the Americas

This tough stance toward Venezuela is part of a bigger change in direction. The administration’s recent National Security Strategy details this strategic shift. The document clearly ranks the Western Hemisphere as a top priority. It seeks a region “free from hostile foreign incursions or ownership of key assets.” It emphasizes U.S. control over “critical supply chains” and “continued access to key strategic locations.”

European critics have responded with concern. They note the Strategy’s strong language toward traditional allies. It suggests Europe faces “civilizational erasure” because of migration and cultural shifts. It also promises to “cultivate resistance” by supporting “patriotic” political groups. The NSS indicates a reduced commitment to European defense, urging the continent to take responsibility for its safety, especially with ongoing conflicts like Ukraine.

Administration staff defend the adjustment as practical. With the U.S. producing more of its own energy, it needs less Middle Eastern oil. Public worries about illegal migration and drug abuse also lead politicians to redirect resources closer to home. “The days of stabilizing the entire world order are over,” a senior aide told journalists privately.

Reworking the Monroe Doctrine

The foundation of this change is the “Trump Corollary” to the Monroe Doctrine. The president proclaimed this addition on the doctrine’s anniversary earlier this month. The original policy, created in 1823, warned European nations against new colonization efforts in the Americas. Since then, American presidents, starting with Theodore Roosevelt, have used and broadened the doctrine to justify U.S. intervention.

Trump’s version updates the doctrine for today. “The American people, not foreign nations nor globalist institutions, will always control their own destiny in our hemisphere,” the document asserts. It aims to exclude “non-hemispheric competitors” (widely understood as China and Russia) from acquiring important assets in Latin America, such as ports or mines.

In the case of Venezuela, the corollary supports anti-drug operations and the economic pressure being applied. The pressure intends to secure U.S. access to the world’s largest proven oil reserves. Trump has frequently suggested that regime change could allow American companies to return to prominence in Venezuelan oil fields. This idea recalls the period before Venezuela nationalized its oil industry in the 1970s, when U.S. corporations dominated that area.

International Fallout: Impact on European Bankers

The aggressive crackdown could have effects far beyond the Americas, particularly for European finance. Banks in London, Switzerland, and Portugal have long been accused of helping to handle billions linked to Venezuela’s state oil company (PDVSA) and corrupt officials.

Investigations, such as the FinCEN Files, revealed how major international banks processed questionable transactions tied to Maduro’s allies, often through shell corporations in London.

Now that Venezuela is named a terrorist entity and its oil trade faces more sanctions, European financial workers face intense review. Secondary sanctions, which penalize third parties working with sanctioned entities, could freeze assets or bar firms from U.S. markets. Past investigations, like those concerning Banco Espirito Santo for Venezuelan-linked money laundering, serve as a clear warning.

Sources in the City of London, speaking anonymously, worry that Trump’s strong enforcement will break up long-established financial networks. “These institutions have profited from unclear Venezuelan dealings for years,” an analyst noted. “A complete U.S. blockade might force disclosures and prosecutions that uncover decades of involvement.”

The global banking system, often criticized in Trump circles for enabling corruption, might become collateral damage. As U.S. authorities target shadow shipping fleets and middlemen moving Venezuelan oil, many of whom run operations through European hubs, the consequences could redefine global finance.

The Global Order Under Review

Trump’s National Security Strategy signals massive upcoming changes. By prioritizing control over its own hemisphere, the policy challenges the global order created after World War II, when U.S. leadership extended worldwide through groups like NATO. For Europe and the UK, this means less American military support during a time of Russian aggression and internal divisions.

In the Americas, the strategy promises to work with “like-minded” governments on migration and crime. However, it also suggests forceful action against those who do not comply. Venezuela is the first test case. Will the blockade and military strikes remove Maduro, or will they cause a larger conflict?

As the U.S. naval forces gather around Venezuela, questions about the outcome remain. Trump has hinted at land strikes taking place “very soon” and demanded the return of “stolen” assets. Experts warn that using military force risks increasing drug violence and angering regional partners.

From the Pentagon to diplomatic offices in Brussels, one fact is undeniable: The United States has shifted its attention to its own region. The Trump Corollary is not just political talk; it is policy in action, with Venezuela front and center.

Related News:

Trump Targets Fentanyl While Democrats Shield Illegal Drug Dealers