News

The Democrats’ Great Betrayal, Champions of the Working Man to Handmaids of the Elite

Published

3 months ago

October 27, 2025

The Democrats' Great Betrayal of The Working Class Voter

WASHINGTON, DC – Once the champion of the American worker, Democrats now look like a fortress for the wealthy and the well-connected. The party that built its brand on lunch‑pail voters has turned its back on them, trading grit for glam.

After the 2024 shakeup, with President Donald J. Trump returning to the White House on a surge of working‑class anger, fresh polling shows a brutal slide. CNN surveys track a steady flight of voters that threatens to sideline the party for years.

While blue strongholds struggle with crime and drug crises, Democratic leaders seem more focused on partisan theatre and permissive border policies than public safety and prosperity. This is not a minor course correction; it is a clear break with the heartland that handed the GOP a growing, multiracial working‑class coalition.

The data is stark. A March 2025 CNN poll by SSRS put Democratic favorability at 29 percent, the lowest in the network’s tracking since 1992. That marks a 20‑point drop from January 2021, when Joe Biden took office amid the Jan. 6 fallout. Among Democrats, frustration is intense, with 57 percent wanting party leaders to block the Republican agenda at any cost rather than reach any compromise.

By July 2025, CNN found favorability slipping to 28 percent, and base enthusiasm thinning out. NBC News reported Democratic approval at 27 percent in the same window, the lowest since 1990, driven by voters who now view the party as out of touch and fixated on culture wars.

Together, these polls show a major shift. The working class, once core to the Democratic coalition, is moving to the GOP. Exit polls from 2024 show Trump winning 56 percent of non‑college voters, a group that makes up about 60 percent of the electorate, up from 50 percent in 2020. Support among white working‑class voters reached 66 percent, but the bigger story is the spread.

Trump won 45 percent of Latino working‑class voters and 20 percent of Black workers, breaking a long pattern of Democratic strength. Ruy Teixeira, a veteran Democratic analyst, wrote at Brookings that this stems from the party’s failure to offer an economic message that blue‑collar voters trust.

By July 2025, a Unite the Country super PAC survey found white men, Hispanic men, and working‑class voters calling Democrats woke, weak, and out of touch, with approval under 35 percent across groups.

The Billionaire Pivot: Donors Over Doers

At the root of this shift is a strategic tradeoff. Democrats have swapped the loyalties of factory floors for the donations of Silicon Valley and Wall Street. The party of Franklin D. Roosevelt once called out “economic royalists.” Today, as Newsweek reported in 2023, Democrats look like the party of the rich. Biden’s 2020 campaign raised nearly $200 million from six‑figure donors in tech and finance, far outpacing contributions from everyday workers.

The transformation is visible in the map. A 2025 New York Times op‑ed by reporter Aidan Mullins noted that Democratic districts went from among the poorest in 2009 to the richest by 2023, as well‑heeled suburbs turned blue.

Kamala Harris’s 2024 run highlighted the trend, with endorsements from crypto executives and Hollywood figures while signalling an open door to an industry Biden had targeted. LinkedIn co‑founder Reid Hoffman, a major donor, even mused after the election about hedging his bets against a Harris loss.

This deference to donors has drained the party’s core identity. A former fundraiser told Newsweek that candidates spend most of their time talking to the rich, chasing niche issues like open‑ended Ukraine aid, now at $175 billion and climbing, while working‑class communities absorb the blows of decades of trade policy.

The policy tilt is clear. Biden’s Build Back Better plan included a costly tax provision that helped high earners. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer’s 2016 strategy, lose one blue‑collar Democrat in Pennsylvania, win two suburban Republicans, proved accurate but damaging.

By 2024, non‑college white voters backed Trump 56 to 42, and Democrats now win majorities only among college‑educated white voters, a slice that is about 15 percent of the electorate.

Writers like Thomas Frank warned years ago that chasing professional‑class voters, tech workers, and consultants would alienate the industrial core. The party pressed on. Harris campaigned with Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban, who pushed to remove antitrust chief Lina Khan.

No surprise that a 2025 Axios analysis by Democratic pollster David Shor reported fading margins among nonwhite voters, with young men of all backgrounds moving right by double digits.

Blue‑Collar Revolt: The Working Class Goes Red

The party’s snub of working people fueled a populist backlash. Trump won a large share of voters earning under $50,000 in 2024, a group Barack Obama carried by 28 points in 2008, but Harris lost outright.

NPR’s review quoted Penn Statelabour professor Paul Clark, who said the long decline in working‑class support reached a breaking point, with non‑college voters backing Trump by a two‑to‑one margin. Union households, once a reliable firewall, dropped from 60 percent for Biden in 2020 to a slim Harris edge in 2024, according to NBC’s exit polls.

This shift crosses racial lines. Brookings estimates show Trump’s share of Latino working‑class voters up from 25 percent in 2020 to 33 percent in 2024, and Black working‑class support up to 13 percent. In Philadelphia’s working‑class wards, Trump gained about 10 points and helped flip Bucks County. A Deseret News/HarrisX survey found 40 percent of working‑class voters aligning with Republicans, compared with 36 percent with Democrats, a reversal from the Obama years.

The reasons are not hard to see. Many voters recoil at the party’s culture agenda, from DEI mandates to new language rules and debates on gender identity. Manuel Pastor at USC’s Equity Research Institute noted that Trump’s supposed existential threat to minority communities failed to hold in 2024. Voters wanted jobs and lower costs. NBC reported on Democrats’ efforts to rebuild ties with workers, but insiders said the shift came late, after years of ignoring warning signs.

In swing states, the damage is severe. Pennsylvania’s Democratic registration edge narrowed from 517,000 in 2020 to 53,000 by mid‑2025. About 314,000 registered Democrats switched to the GOP, compared to 161,000 in the other direction. Nevada lost its blue lean. A New York Times review of L2 data across 30 states found 160,000 fewer Democrats and 200,000 more Republicans since Election Day 2024. There is no visible backlash to Trump.

Blue Cities in Crisis: Crime, Drugs, and a Shrug

The failure is most visible in blue‑run cities, once vibrant, now scarred by fentanyl, theft, and disorder. San Francisco became a symbol of street chaos during Mayor London Breed’s tenure. Overdose deaths spiked roughly 40 percent during the pandemic. In Philadelphia, the Kensington area became ground zero for the opioid disaster, with more than 1,000 overdose deaths in 2024. Progressive prosecutors like Larry Krasner pulled back on retail theft and drug cases, and corner stores paid the price.

National data tracks a mixed picture. Overall, all violent crime fell in 2024, according to FBI figures, but many large cities did not share in the gains. The Council on Criminal Justice reported in mid‑2025 that droffencesses held steady or increased in 21 major metros. Larceny was down only 6 percent from pandemic highs, and shoplifting rose 10 percent compared to 2019.

Baltimore improved its homicide clearance rate to 68 percent in 2024, up from a low point near the Freddie Gray era, yet the city still struggles with entrenched violence. Detroit battles deadly drug markets, and Portland’s homeless encampments, aided by drug decriminalization, often turn dangerous.

Voters pushed back. In March 2024, San Francisco passed measures requiring drug screening for certain welfare recipients and easing police pursuit rules, both by wide margins. Washington, D.C.’s council voted to increase pretrial detention that same month. California’s Prop 36, toughening fentanyl penalties, passed in November 2024 despite party leaders’ resistance.

These outcomes did not happen by chance. Policies that cut police ranks and discourage enforcement invited chaos. A Daily Signal report counted a surge in New York City offences under Mayor Eric Adams, up from about 454,000 in 2021 to 580,000 in 2024. In Boston, Beacon Hill saw open drug use after Mayor Michelle Wu expanded harm reduction. “It used to be beautiful, now it is a violent, drug‑infested mess,” one resident said.

Partisan Theatre Over People

While neighbourhoods battled rising violence, many Democrats chose rhetoric over results. In Chicago, homicides rose 10 percent early in 2025, according to local police. Yet leaders like Gavin Newsom kept a busy donor schedule. D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser attended a dinner maskless hours before ordering citywide mandates. In Congress, Democrats under Chuck Schumer voted with Republicans to avoid a shutdown, infuriating activists who demanded hard‑line obstruction.

The split widened over sanctuary policies. Illinois, Minnesota, and New York officials defended local laws in House hearings, arguing they protect immigrants and public safety. House Oversight Chair James Comer called these policies reckless, saying they shelter criminal noncitizens and endanger residents. The killing of Laken Riley became a flashpoint, with critics blasting public spending on migrants while veterans struggle.

Border Priorities: Immigrants First, Citizens Last

The border fight sealed the break. Biden’s parole programs brought a flood of crossings before the end of Title 42, with reports of 11,000 encounters on a single day. Sanctuary cities reached capacity and began busing migrants elsewhere. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt called it mind‑boggling, saying Democrats defend criminal gang members over law‑abiding citizens.

Policy choices sent a clear message. Ways and Means Chair Jason Smith said Democrats pushed to restore funding that would have extended Obamacare‑style benefits to noncitizens at a cost near $200 billion. Sen. Marsha Blackburn accused Democrats of putting migrants ahead of veterans and schoolchildren. Research by the Center for Immigration Studies traced the party’s shift, from seeing high immigration as a problem in the 1990s to backing broad legal status by the end of Biden’s term, with 85 percent supporting a path to citizenship for long‑term unlawful residents.

Pew data highlights the divide. About 91 percent of Republicans prioritize border security. Only 59 percent of Democrats say the same. A majority of moderate Democrats favour cuts to illegal crossings, while just a quarter of liberals do. Trump’s mass deportation plans poll near 60 percent approval. Harris’s pathway pitch fell flat. As one lifelong Democrat told the New York Times, “We are being flooded with immigrants who are prioritized over the needs of citizens.”

A Party Adrift: Can Democrats Find Their Way Back?

By August 2025, the New York Times counted Democrats down 430,000 registrants outside Pennsylvania and Nevada. Latino voters now choose parties at roughly a 33 percent Democratic clip. A Harvard CAPS/Harris survey found 71 percent of voters want new moderate leaders, while Democratic approval sits at 37 percent, underwater since 2018. The Wall Street Journal reported 63 percent unfavourable views in July, a 35‑year low.

Anat Shenker‑Osorio’s focus groups paint a picture of a party seen as timid and elitist, prey for GOP attack dogs. History offers examples of reinvention, with Democrats rebounding after 1968 and after Watergate. Today’s challenge is tougher. The Senate map leans red, and the Electoral College edge is slipping in once solid blue states.

For now, working‑class voters keep moving right. Trump’s coalition of white ethnics, Latin labourers, and Black tradespeople gives Republicans a strong base. Democrats, tied to big donors and soft border stances, face a crisis of purpose. Without a return to the diner counter and the factory floor, the party that once spoke for everyday people will keep serving the priorities of the powerful.

News

New Detail Emerge on Alex Pretti Minneapolis Shooting

Published

12 hours ago

January 28, 2026

VORNews

MINNESOTA – A major investigative report has surfaced new information about Alex Pretti’s final days. Sources cited in a CNN exclusive say Pretti had a previously unreported run-in with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents just a week before he was killed.

In that earlier incident, he reportedly left with a broken rib after a physical struggle with federal officers during protest activity in Minneapolis. The disclosure adds a new layer to what happened on Saturday, January 24, 2026, when Pretti, a 37-year-old intensive care nurse, was shot and killed by Border Patrol agents.

The shooting happened during the Trump administration’s broad immigration enforcement push, described by federal officials as the largest operation in U.S. history. The crackdown has led to thousands of arrests and sharp backlash, especially in sanctuary-leaning cities such as Minneapolis.

Alex Pretti’s death was the third shooting involving federal immigration agents in the city in under three weeks, following the January 7 death of Renee Nicole Good.

Alex Pretti’s Prior Encounter

People familiar with federal records and witness statements say the earlier clash took place during a protest tied to immigration raids. Witnesses and Alex Pretti reportedly described a scene in which five agents tackled him while he watched officers chase a family on foot.

During the restraint, one agent allegedly put a heavy weight on Alex Pretti’s back, which led to a fractured rib. He was released at the scene and was not charged, but he later told people close to him that he thought he might die during the encounter.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has tracked contacts with protesters through internal paperwork described as “intel collection non-arrests.” Pretti’s name appeared in those records, according to the report, which suggests agents could have recognized him when they crossed paths again on January 24. That matters because it means Pretti may not have been viewed as a stranger at the scene, but as someone already known to immigration enforcement.

The new reporting also pushes back on early descriptions of Alex Pretti as a random troublemaker or only a “First Amendment witness,” a phrase used by Minnesota Governor Tim Walz. Instead, it paints a picture of repeated friction between Pretti and federal agents, with tensions that may have carried into the final encounter.

Shooting Video and Official Claims Collide

On the morning of January 24, near 26th Street and Nicollet Avenue in Minneapolis’s Whittier neighborhood, Alex Pretti was filming federal agents on his cellphone as they tried to enter a local business (reported as a donut shop) during protests.

Bystander video reviewed and verified by outlets including The New York Times and BBC Verify shows Pretti holding his phone in one hand while lifting his other, empty hand. The footage also appears to show him trying to protect a woman after agents pushed her down and used pepper spray.

Videos from multiple angles show agents taking Alex Pretti to the ground before shots were fired. Pretti, who held a legal firearm permit, had a gun on him, and agents tried to remove it during the struggle. Witnesses who later submitted affidavits with the ACLU said they did not see Pretti point or display the weapon.

A preliminary internal Customs and Border Protection review, leaked to congressional sources and reported by NPR, says Pretti resisted arrest, but it does not describe him attacking agents or making a lethal threat. That stands in contrast to early statements from the Trump administration that labeled him a “would-be assassin” planning to kill agents.

Alex Pretti’s family has strongly rejected those claims. In a statement, they called the government’s version “sickening lies” and pointed to a video that appears to show him unarmed in the moments before agents tackled him.

Megyn Kelly Truthful on Pretti

The new details have intensified debate across political media. Conservative commentator Megyn Kelly, host of The Megyn Kelly Show, drew widespread criticism after discussing the case on Monday. “I know I’m supposed to feel sorry for Alex Pretti, but I don’t,” Kelly said.

She argued that Pretti chose to “inject himself” into law enforcement activity, and she framed the outcome as “FAFO” (f*** around and find out). Kelly also called him an “agitator” and “subversive,” suggesting that staying away from federal operations could have prevented the death.

The remarks triggered accusations of cruelty, especially because Alex Pretti worked as an ICU nurse at a VA hospital caring for veterans.

Her response reflects the deep split over immigration enforcement. Supporters of tougher tactics see the earlier confrontation as proof that Pretti repeatedly interfered. Critics view the broken-rib incident as another example of excessive force by masked federal agents operating in city neighborhoods.

With the earlier ICE clash now public, the case looks less like a single confrontation and more like a series of escalating encounters between a committed protest observer and heavily armed federal agents.

The new context raises fresh concerns about training, de-escalation, and whether prior knowledge about Pretti affected how agents handled the January 24 scene.

Calls for an independent investigation have grown, including from some Republican lawmakers on Capitol Hill. Minnesota leaders continue pressing for federal agents to leave, while protests continue and memorials expand at the site of the shooting.

As the country argues over the costs of aggressive immigration enforcement on city streets, the report about Pretti’s earlier injury adds a troubling detail. It also may reshape how many Americans think about accountability during a period of mass arrests and deportation efforts.

Related News:

President Trump Addresses ICE Actions Amid Minnesota Unrest

News

Iran’s Supreme Leader Cowers in a Bunker, While his Security Forces Murder Thousands

Iranian Senior Health Ministry Sources Describe Enormous Casualty Count
Report Says Khamenei Ordered “No Mercy” Measures While Sheltered in a bunker Amid U.S. Strike Fears

Published

2 days ago

January 27, 2026

Jeffrey Thomas

TERRAN – A report coming from Iran describes what could be one of the worst cases of state violence against civilians in recent history. As many as 30,000 people may have been killed across Iran on January 8 and 9, based on claims shared with TIME by two senior officials in Iran’s Ministry of Health.

The reported figure comes from hospital logs and tallies kept by doctors and first responders. It suggests extreme force during a nationwide uprising that began in late December 2025. The unrest started with anger over economic collapse, then spread into calls to end the Islamic Republic’s rule. Hospitals in major cities, including Tehran and Shiraz, reportedly struggled to cope.

Morgues filled up, and authorities allegedly used trucks to move bodies after facilities reached capacity.

A confidential count inside the Ministry of Health listed 30,304 deaths recorded in civilian hospitals by late last week, according to Dr. Amir Parasta, a German-Iranian eye surgeon who reviewed the data.

The count reportedly does not include people taken straight to military morgues, those killed in rural areas, or bodies never entered into official systems. For that reason, the real number could be higher. Activists and human rights groups have reported lower totals, but still in the thousands, since protests began. Verification has been difficult because authorities imposed a near-total internet shutdown.

Accounts say the worst violence happened on January 8 and 9. Security forces, reportedly acting under direct orders, used live ammunition against crowds. Witnesses described streets filled with protesters chanting “Death to the Dictator” and “Death to Khamenei,” followed by heavy gunfire.

Cartridge cases reportedly covered the ground, then were cleared overnight by municipal crews. Demonstrations were reported in all 31 provinces, with claims that millions joined nationwide.

Large-scale killings in Iran

Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is described as central to the crackdown. Sources familiar with internal orders said that on January 9, he instructed the Supreme National Security Council to end the protests “by any means necessary.”

Security units reportedly received clear direction to shoot to kill and show no mercy. What began as protests over prices and jobs then shifted into a large-scale killing spree, according to the report’s sources.

As pressure rose at home and abroad, Khamenei reportedly moved into a fortified underground bunker in Tehran. Opposition-linked outlets and people close to the government said the relocation was driven by fears of a U.S. missile strike.

Those fears were tied to President Donald Trump’s warnings and U.S. military moves in the region, including the deployment of the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln.

Trump’s public messages urging protesters to keep going, along with statements suggesting U.S. action if killings continued, reportedly increased anxiety inside Iran’s leadership. Khamenei’s third son, Masoud, was said to be running daily operations of the Supreme Leader’s office, passing messages to government branches while Khamenei remained largely isolated.

Iran’s public messaging tells a different story. Hardliners tied to Khamenei announced 3,117 deaths on January 21. They described the dead as a mix of protesters, security forces, and people labeled as foreign-backed “rioters” or “terrorists,” with claims of links to the United States and Israel.

Crimes against humanity

Khamenei has also referred to “thousands” killed in speeches, while blaming outside powers and promising no retreat against what he called “saboteurs.” The internal Ministry of Health figures, as described in the report, point to a far larger toll and suggest an effort to hide the true scale.

The protests began in late December 2025 after the rial fell to new lows. Inflation rose, energy shortages worsened, and long-running mismanagement fueled public rage. Early action included bazaar merchants in Tehran closing shops.

It quickly expanded, with university students and everyday citizens joining rallies and chanting against the Supreme Leader. Some crowds also voiced support for exiled figures, including Reza Pahlavi, son of the late shah.

As unrest grew, the state response reportedly expanded, too. Reports described mass arrests, raids on hospitals treating injured protesters, and pressure on doctors and volunteers who helped the wounded.

Human rights groups, including Amnesty International and Iran Human Rights, condemned the crackdown as crimes against humanity. They pointed to what they described as systematic repression and planned killings.

Observers also drew stark historical comparisons. Analysts said a death toll of this size in 48 hours would rival major atrocities, including the Nazi massacre at Babyn Yar in 1941, where more than 33,000 people were executed over two days.

Anger and Outrage

In Iran, the killings described in the report were said to have taken place across many cities at once, not in a single location, which overwhelmed even parts of the state’s own system.

International reaction has been strong, though limited by the communications blackout. The United Nations and Western governments voiced alarm and called for independent investigations.

Trump increased his rhetoric, calling Khamenei a “sick criminal” and hinting at more steps, while the U.S. imposed sanctions on officials linked to the crackdown.

Inside Iran, the government appeared to have restored some control through force, but reports suggested the anger runs deep across regions and age groups. Families of victims said authorities forced them to pay for the bullets used to kill their relatives, a practice described as both cruel and extortionate.

As more details surface, the events of January 8 and 9 are being described as proof of how far the state will go to keep power. Whether the killings mark a turning point for the Islamic Republic or another brutal chapter remains unclear, but the growing list of names and numbers is unlikely to fade from public memory.

Related News:

Trump Positions U.S. Military Assets Closer to Iran Amid Deadly Crackdown

News

Tragic Private Plane Crash at Bangor International Airport Kills Six

Deadly incident ranks among Maine’s worst aviation disasters; NTSB investigation underway into possible icing, weather factors

Published

2 days ago

January 27, 2026

VORNews

BANGOR, Maine – A private business plane crashed during takeoff at Bangor International Airport on Sunday evening, killing all six people onboard. Officials say it is among the most deadly aviation accidents in Maine in recent years.

The aircraft, a Bombardier Challenger 600, flipped upside down and caught fire soon after leaving the runway around 7:45 p.m. The crash happened as a nor’easter began pushing snow across parts of the state.

The incident rattled the Bangor area, where the airport handles both commercial flights and private aircraft. Police, airport staff, and emergency teams secured the scene as investigators began gathering early information.

Bangor Fire Department crews, the Maine National Guard, and responders from nearby towns arrived within minutes. They fought the fire while snow and wind picked up. Witnesses described a dull orange flash, followed by a loud boom in the stormy night.

Local officials confirm six onboard plane

Bangor police and airport director Jose Saavedra said the flight manifest showed six people were on the twin-engine jet. No one was taken to the hospital, and all six are believed to have died at the scene.

Early FAA information confused stating there were eight people onboard, with seven deaths and one serious injury. Bangor officials pushed back Monday, saying the manifest listed six total passengers and crew, all fatally injured. The FAA noted that early details can change as investigators confirm facts.

Officials said the plane was a 2020 Bombardier Challenger 600 registered to KTKJ Challenger LLC in Houston, Texas. It reportedly arrived earlier from Houston. Sources familiar with the situation connected the jet to Arnold & Itkin, a Houston-based personal injury law firm.

Authorities have not released the victims’ names as they wait for identification and family notifications. One report named Tara Arnold as a victim, with a county official calling her “a phenomenal person, a bold leader.”

Winter weather and visibility issues at the time of the plane crash

The crash took place as heavy winter weather spread across the Northeast. National Weather Service data showed light but steady snow at the airport around the time of the incident. Temperatures were near 2 degrees Fahrenheit, with wind chills around minus 13.

Visibility dropped to about three-quarters of a mile in freezing fog. Bangor was under a winter storm warning. Snow buildup at the airport was still developing, but totals reached close to 10 inches by the next day.

Flights continued around the time of the crash, with de-icing operations underway. Other aircraft landed and took off safely before and after the incident. Saavedra said crews were already on site responding to the storm, and runways stayed open during active snow response.

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) are investigating. The NTSB is expected to review weather conditions, aircraft performance, pilot actions, maintenance records, and the possibility of icing.

Aviation safety experts have pointed to the Challenger 600’s history of wing icing concerns during takeoff. Former NTSB investigator Jeff Guzzetti told media outlets that even small ice buildup can reduce lift and increase risk. Bombardier and regulators have issued guidance on de-icing practices, though it is not yet clear what steps were taken before this flight.

Air traffic control recordings captured the alarm in the moments after the plane went down, including a call reporting the aircraft was upside down. Responders reached the site in under a minute, but the fire made rescue and recovery difficult.

One of Maine’s deadliest aviation accidents in decades

The crash now joins a short list of Maine’s most tragic aviation events. Historic examples include two fatal accidents on July 11, 1944, one involving a B-17 bomber near Rangeley that killed 10 people, along with another deadly crash elsewhere in the state the same day.

More recent incidents have involved fewer victims, though Bangor International Airport saw another fatal crash just months earlier that killed one person.

Bangor International Airport remained closed through at least midday Wednesday as NTSB teams worked the scene and cleanup continued. The agency cited weather-related travel delays for investigators, but said the review will be thorough.

A preliminary NTSB update could come in the next few weeks. A final report often takes months.

The losses have hit hard in Bangor and beyond. Local leaders praised the fast work of first responders and asked the public to keep the victims’ families in mind as the investigation moves forward.